Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition on regional and global scales : a multi-model evaluation

We use 23 atmospheric chemistry transport models to calculate current and future (2030) deposition of reactive nitrogen (NOy, NHx) and sulfate (SOx) to land and ocean surfaces. The models are driven by three emission scenarios: (1) current air quality legislation (CLE); (2) an optimistic case of the...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Global biogeochemical cycles 2006, Vol.20
Hauptverfasser: Dentener, F., Drevet, J., Lamarque, J.F., Bey, I., Eickhou, B., Fiore, A., Hauglustaine, D., Horowitz, Larry W., Krol, M., Kulshrestha, U.C., Lawrence, M., Galy-Lacaux, Corinne, Rast, S., Shindell, D., Stevenson, D., van Noije, T., Atherton, C., Bell, N., Bergmann, D., Butler, T., Cofala, J., Collins, B., Doherty, R., Ellingsen, K., Galloway, J., Gauss, M., Montanaro, V., Muller, J.F., Pitari, G., Rodriguez, J., Sanderson, M., Solmon, F., Strahan, S., Sudo, K., Laval-Szopa, Sophie, Wild, O.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Global biogeochemical cycles
container_volume 20
creator Dentener, F.
Drevet, J.
Lamarque, J.F.
Bey, I.
Eickhou, B.
Fiore, A.
Hauglustaine, D.
Horowitz, Larry W.
Krol, M.
Kulshrestha, U.C.
Lawrence, M.
Galy-Lacaux, Corinne
Rast, S.
Shindell, D.
Stevenson, D.
van Noije, T.
Atherton, C.
Bell, N.
Bergmann, D.
Butler, T.
Cofala, J.
Collins, B.
Doherty, R.
Ellingsen, K.
Galloway, J.
Gauss, M.
Montanaro, V.
Muller, J.F.
Pitari, G.
Rodriguez, J.
Sanderson, M.
Solmon, F.
Strahan, S.
Sudo, K.
Laval-Szopa, Sophie
Wild, O.
description We use 23 atmospheric chemistry transport models to calculate current and future (2030) deposition of reactive nitrogen (NOy, NHx) and sulfate (SOx) to land and ocean surfaces. The models are driven by three emission scenarios: (1) current air quality legislation (CLE); (2) an optimistic case of the maximum emissions reductions currently technologically feasible (MFR); and (3) the contrasting pessimistic IPCC SRES A2 scenario. An extensive evaluation of the present-day deposition using nearly all information on wet deposition available worldwide shows a good agreement with observations in Europe and North America, where 60–70% of the model-calculated wet deposition rates agree to within ±50% with quality-controlled measurements. Models systematically overestimate NHx deposition in South Asia, and underestimate NOy deposition in East Asia. We show that there are substantial differences among models for the removal mechanisms of NOy, NHx, and SOx, leading to ±1 σ variance in total deposition fluxes of about 30% in the anthropogenic emissions regions, and up to a factor of 2 outside. In all cases the mean model constructed from the ensemble calculations is among the best when comparing to measurements. Currently, 36–51% of all NOy, NHx, and SOx is deposited over the ocean, and 50–80% of the fraction of deposition on land falls on natural (nonagricultural) vegetation. Currently, 11% of the world's natural vegetation receives nitrogen deposition in excess of the “critical load” threshold of 1000 mg(N) m−2 yr−1. The regions most affected are the United States (20% of vegetation), western Europe (30%), eastern Europe (80%), South Asia (60%), East Asia (40%), southeast Asia (30%), and Japan (50%). Future deposition fluxes are mainly driven by changes in emissions, and less importantly by changes in atmospheric chemistry and climate. The global fraction of vegetation exposed to nitrogen loads in excess of 1000 mg(N) m−2 yr−1 increases globally to 17% for CLE and 25% for A2. In MFR, the reductions in NOy are offset by further increases for NHx deposition. The regions most affected by exceedingly high nitrogen loads for CLE and A2 are Europe and Asia, but also parts of Africa.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2005GB002672
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>hal</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00342326v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_hal_00342326v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00342326v13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVi8FKw0AURYei0Gi78wNm20Xsm5fJmLir2tqFuLHgMrzaaRx5yZSZpNC_byr-gHDhHi7nCnGn4F4BlnMEyF-fANA84EgkqtQ6LRD1lUigKExqMDNjcRPjD4DSeV4m4vPddcHXtpXU7uRHz_s-yBd78NF1zrdySLD1QMS_Rs1-O2D8IrZRPkqSTc-dSxu_syztkbiny3EirvfE0U7_-lbMVsvN8zr9Jq4OwTUUTpUnV60Xb9VlA8g0ZmiOKvuPewZoPUp_</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition on regional and global scales : a multi-model evaluation</title><source>Wiley Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Wiley Free Content</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><creator>Dentener, F. ; Drevet, J. ; Lamarque, J.F. ; Bey, I. ; Eickhou, B. ; Fiore, A. ; Hauglustaine, D. ; Horowitz, Larry W. ; Krol, M. ; Kulshrestha, U.C. ; Lawrence, M. ; Galy-Lacaux, Corinne ; Rast, S. ; Shindell, D. ; Stevenson, D. ; van Noije, T. ; Atherton, C. ; Bell, N. ; Bergmann, D. ; Butler, T. ; Cofala, J. ; Collins, B. ; Doherty, R. ; Ellingsen, K. ; Galloway, J. ; Gauss, M. ; Montanaro, V. ; Muller, J.F. ; Pitari, G. ; Rodriguez, J. ; Sanderson, M. ; Solmon, F. ; Strahan, S. ; Sudo, K. ; Laval-Szopa, Sophie ; Wild, O.</creator><creatorcontrib>Dentener, F. ; Drevet, J. ; Lamarque, J.F. ; Bey, I. ; Eickhou, B. ; Fiore, A. ; Hauglustaine, D. ; Horowitz, Larry W. ; Krol, M. ; Kulshrestha, U.C. ; Lawrence, M. ; Galy-Lacaux, Corinne ; Rast, S. ; Shindell, D. ; Stevenson, D. ; van Noije, T. ; Atherton, C. ; Bell, N. ; Bergmann, D. ; Butler, T. ; Cofala, J. ; Collins, B. ; Doherty, R. ; Ellingsen, K. ; Galloway, J. ; Gauss, M. ; Montanaro, V. ; Muller, J.F. ; Pitari, G. ; Rodriguez, J. ; Sanderson, M. ; Solmon, F. ; Strahan, S. ; Sudo, K. ; Laval-Szopa, Sophie ; Wild, O.</creatorcontrib><description>We use 23 atmospheric chemistry transport models to calculate current and future (2030) deposition of reactive nitrogen (NOy, NHx) and sulfate (SOx) to land and ocean surfaces. The models are driven by three emission scenarios: (1) current air quality legislation (CLE); (2) an optimistic case of the maximum emissions reductions currently technologically feasible (MFR); and (3) the contrasting pessimistic IPCC SRES A2 scenario. An extensive evaluation of the present-day deposition using nearly all information on wet deposition available worldwide shows a good agreement with observations in Europe and North America, where 60–70% of the model-calculated wet deposition rates agree to within ±50% with quality-controlled measurements. Models systematically overestimate NHx deposition in South Asia, and underestimate NOy deposition in East Asia. We show that there are substantial differences among models for the removal mechanisms of NOy, NHx, and SOx, leading to ±1 σ variance in total deposition fluxes of about 30% in the anthropogenic emissions regions, and up to a factor of 2 outside. In all cases the mean model constructed from the ensemble calculations is among the best when comparing to measurements. Currently, 36–51% of all NOy, NHx, and SOx is deposited over the ocean, and 50–80% of the fraction of deposition on land falls on natural (nonagricultural) vegetation. Currently, 11% of the world's natural vegetation receives nitrogen deposition in excess of the “critical load” threshold of 1000 mg(N) m−2 yr−1. The regions most affected are the United States (20% of vegetation), western Europe (30%), eastern Europe (80%), South Asia (60%), East Asia (40%), southeast Asia (30%), and Japan (50%). Future deposition fluxes are mainly driven by changes in emissions, and less importantly by changes in atmospheric chemistry and climate. The global fraction of vegetation exposed to nitrogen loads in excess of 1000 mg(N) m−2 yr−1 increases globally to 17% for CLE and 25% for A2. In MFR, the reductions in NOy are offset by further increases for NHx deposition. The regions most affected by exceedingly high nitrogen loads for CLE and A2 are Europe and Asia, but also parts of Africa.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-6236</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1944-8224</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2005GB002672</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>American Geophysical Union</publisher><subject>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics ; Physics</subject><ispartof>Global biogeochemical cycles, 2006, Vol.20</ispartof><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0003-1552-4715 ; 0000-0002-0700-0519 ; 0000-0001-8812-0565 ; 0000-0001-9432-7159 ; 0000-0003-1049-3585 ; 0000-0002-8641-1737 ; 0000-0002-4826-5118 ; 0000-0003-1049-3585 ; 0000-0002-4826-5118 ; 0000-0003-1552-4715 ; 0000-0001-8812-0565 ; 0000-0002-0700-0519 ; 0000-0001-9432-7159 ; 0000-0002-8641-1737</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00342326$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dentener, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drevet, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamarque, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bey, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eickhou, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiore, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauglustaine, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Larry W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulshrestha, U.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galy-Lacaux, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rast, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shindell, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Noije, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atherton, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cofala, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellingsen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauss, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montanaro, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitari, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solmon, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strahan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudo, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laval-Szopa, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, O.</creatorcontrib><title>Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition on regional and global scales : a multi-model evaluation</title><title>Global biogeochemical cycles</title><description>We use 23 atmospheric chemistry transport models to calculate current and future (2030) deposition of reactive nitrogen (NOy, NHx) and sulfate (SOx) to land and ocean surfaces. The models are driven by three emission scenarios: (1) current air quality legislation (CLE); (2) an optimistic case of the maximum emissions reductions currently technologically feasible (MFR); and (3) the contrasting pessimistic IPCC SRES A2 scenario. An extensive evaluation of the present-day deposition using nearly all information on wet deposition available worldwide shows a good agreement with observations in Europe and North America, where 60–70% of the model-calculated wet deposition rates agree to within ±50% with quality-controlled measurements. Models systematically overestimate NHx deposition in South Asia, and underestimate NOy deposition in East Asia. We show that there are substantial differences among models for the removal mechanisms of NOy, NHx, and SOx, leading to ±1 σ variance in total deposition fluxes of about 30% in the anthropogenic emissions regions, and up to a factor of 2 outside. In all cases the mean model constructed from the ensemble calculations is among the best when comparing to measurements. Currently, 36–51% of all NOy, NHx, and SOx is deposited over the ocean, and 50–80% of the fraction of deposition on land falls on natural (nonagricultural) vegetation. Currently, 11% of the world's natural vegetation receives nitrogen deposition in excess of the “critical load” threshold of 1000 mg(N) m−2 yr−1. The regions most affected are the United States (20% of vegetation), western Europe (30%), eastern Europe (80%), South Asia (60%), East Asia (40%), southeast Asia (30%), and Japan (50%). Future deposition fluxes are mainly driven by changes in emissions, and less importantly by changes in atmospheric chemistry and climate. The global fraction of vegetation exposed to nitrogen loads in excess of 1000 mg(N) m−2 yr−1 increases globally to 17% for CLE and 25% for A2. In MFR, the reductions in NOy are offset by further increases for NHx deposition. The regions most affected by exceedingly high nitrogen loads for CLE and A2 are Europe and Asia, but also parts of Africa.</description><subject>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>0886-6236</issn><issn>1944-8224</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVi8FKw0AURYei0Gi78wNm20Xsm5fJmLir2tqFuLHgMrzaaRx5yZSZpNC_byr-gHDhHi7nCnGn4F4BlnMEyF-fANA84EgkqtQ6LRD1lUigKExqMDNjcRPjD4DSeV4m4vPddcHXtpXU7uRHz_s-yBd78NF1zrdySLD1QMS_Rs1-O2D8IrZRPkqSTc-dSxu_syztkbiny3EirvfE0U7_-lbMVsvN8zr9Jq4OwTUUTpUnV60Xb9VlA8g0ZmiOKvuPewZoPUp_</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Dentener, F.</creator><creator>Drevet, J.</creator><creator>Lamarque, J.F.</creator><creator>Bey, I.</creator><creator>Eickhou, B.</creator><creator>Fiore, A.</creator><creator>Hauglustaine, D.</creator><creator>Horowitz, Larry W.</creator><creator>Krol, M.</creator><creator>Kulshrestha, U.C.</creator><creator>Lawrence, M.</creator><creator>Galy-Lacaux, Corinne</creator><creator>Rast, S.</creator><creator>Shindell, D.</creator><creator>Stevenson, D.</creator><creator>van Noije, T.</creator><creator>Atherton, C.</creator><creator>Bell, N.</creator><creator>Bergmann, D.</creator><creator>Butler, T.</creator><creator>Cofala, J.</creator><creator>Collins, B.</creator><creator>Doherty, R.</creator><creator>Ellingsen, K.</creator><creator>Galloway, J.</creator><creator>Gauss, M.</creator><creator>Montanaro, V.</creator><creator>Muller, J.F.</creator><creator>Pitari, G.</creator><creator>Rodriguez, J.</creator><creator>Sanderson, M.</creator><creator>Solmon, F.</creator><creator>Strahan, S.</creator><creator>Sudo, K.</creator><creator>Laval-Szopa, Sophie</creator><creator>Wild, O.</creator><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1552-4715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-0519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-0565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-7159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-3585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-1737</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4826-5118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-3585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4826-5118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1552-4715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-0565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-0519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-7159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-1737</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition on regional and global scales : a multi-model evaluation</title><author>Dentener, F. ; Drevet, J. ; Lamarque, J.F. ; Bey, I. ; Eickhou, B. ; Fiore, A. ; Hauglustaine, D. ; Horowitz, Larry W. ; Krol, M. ; Kulshrestha, U.C. ; Lawrence, M. ; Galy-Lacaux, Corinne ; Rast, S. ; Shindell, D. ; Stevenson, D. ; van Noije, T. ; Atherton, C. ; Bell, N. ; Bergmann, D. ; Butler, T. ; Cofala, J. ; Collins, B. ; Doherty, R. ; Ellingsen, K. ; Galloway, J. ; Gauss, M. ; Montanaro, V. ; Muller, J.F. ; Pitari, G. ; Rodriguez, J. ; Sanderson, M. ; Solmon, F. ; Strahan, S. ; Sudo, K. ; Laval-Szopa, Sophie ; Wild, O.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00342326v13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dentener, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Drevet, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamarque, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bey, I.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eickhou, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiore, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hauglustaine, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horowitz, Larry W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krol, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kulshrestha, U.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galy-Lacaux, Corinne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rast, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shindell, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stevenson, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Noije, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Atherton, C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bell, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergmann, D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Butler, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cofala, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Collins, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doherty, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ellingsen, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galloway, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gauss, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Montanaro, V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muller, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pitari, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanderson, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Solmon, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strahan, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sudo, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Laval-Szopa, Sophie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wild, O.</creatorcontrib><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dentener, F.</au><au>Drevet, J.</au><au>Lamarque, J.F.</au><au>Bey, I.</au><au>Eickhou, B.</au><au>Fiore, A.</au><au>Hauglustaine, D.</au><au>Horowitz, Larry W.</au><au>Krol, M.</au><au>Kulshrestha, U.C.</au><au>Lawrence, M.</au><au>Galy-Lacaux, Corinne</au><au>Rast, S.</au><au>Shindell, D.</au><au>Stevenson, D.</au><au>van Noije, T.</au><au>Atherton, C.</au><au>Bell, N.</au><au>Bergmann, D.</au><au>Butler, T.</au><au>Cofala, J.</au><au>Collins, B.</au><au>Doherty, R.</au><au>Ellingsen, K.</au><au>Galloway, J.</au><au>Gauss, M.</au><au>Montanaro, V.</au><au>Muller, J.F.</au><au>Pitari, G.</au><au>Rodriguez, J.</au><au>Sanderson, M.</au><au>Solmon, F.</au><au>Strahan, S.</au><au>Sudo, K.</au><au>Laval-Szopa, Sophie</au><au>Wild, O.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition on regional and global scales : a multi-model evaluation</atitle><jtitle>Global biogeochemical cycles</jtitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>20</volume><issn>0886-6236</issn><eissn>1944-8224</eissn><abstract>We use 23 atmospheric chemistry transport models to calculate current and future (2030) deposition of reactive nitrogen (NOy, NHx) and sulfate (SOx) to land and ocean surfaces. The models are driven by three emission scenarios: (1) current air quality legislation (CLE); (2) an optimistic case of the maximum emissions reductions currently technologically feasible (MFR); and (3) the contrasting pessimistic IPCC SRES A2 scenario. An extensive evaluation of the present-day deposition using nearly all information on wet deposition available worldwide shows a good agreement with observations in Europe and North America, where 60–70% of the model-calculated wet deposition rates agree to within ±50% with quality-controlled measurements. Models systematically overestimate NHx deposition in South Asia, and underestimate NOy deposition in East Asia. We show that there are substantial differences among models for the removal mechanisms of NOy, NHx, and SOx, leading to ±1 σ variance in total deposition fluxes of about 30% in the anthropogenic emissions regions, and up to a factor of 2 outside. In all cases the mean model constructed from the ensemble calculations is among the best when comparing to measurements. Currently, 36–51% of all NOy, NHx, and SOx is deposited over the ocean, and 50–80% of the fraction of deposition on land falls on natural (nonagricultural) vegetation. Currently, 11% of the world's natural vegetation receives nitrogen deposition in excess of the “critical load” threshold of 1000 mg(N) m−2 yr−1. The regions most affected are the United States (20% of vegetation), western Europe (30%), eastern Europe (80%), South Asia (60%), East Asia (40%), southeast Asia (30%), and Japan (50%). Future deposition fluxes are mainly driven by changes in emissions, and less importantly by changes in atmospheric chemistry and climate. The global fraction of vegetation exposed to nitrogen loads in excess of 1000 mg(N) m−2 yr−1 increases globally to 17% for CLE and 25% for A2. In MFR, the reductions in NOy are offset by further increases for NHx deposition. The regions most affected by exceedingly high nitrogen loads for CLE and A2 are Europe and Asia, but also parts of Africa.</abstract><pub>American Geophysical Union</pub><doi>10.1029/2005GB002672</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1552-4715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-0519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-0565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-7159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-3585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-1737</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4826-5118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1049-3585</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4826-5118</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1552-4715</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8812-0565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0700-0519</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9432-7159</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8641-1737</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-6236
ispartof Global biogeochemical cycles, 2006, Vol.20
issn 0886-6236
1944-8224
language eng
recordid cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00342326v1
source Wiley Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Wiley Free Content; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library
subjects Atmospheric and Oceanic Physics
Physics
title Nitrogen and Sulfur Deposition on regional and global scales : a multi-model evaluation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A05%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nitrogen%20and%20Sulfur%20Deposition%20on%20regional%20and%20global%20scales%20:%20a%20multi-model%20evaluation&rft.jtitle=Global%20biogeochemical%20cycles&rft.au=Dentener,%20F.&rft.date=2006&rft.volume=20&rft.issn=0886-6236&rft.eissn=1944-8224&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2005GB002672&rft_dat=%3Chal%3Eoai_HAL_hal_00342326v1%3C/hal%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true