Comparative Foraging and Nutrition of Horses and Cattle in European Wetlands
1. Equids are generalist herbivores that co-exist with bovids of similar body size in many ecosystems. There are two major hypotheses to explain their co-existence, but few comparative data are available to test them. The first postulates that the very different functioning of their digestive tracts...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of applied ecology 2002-02, Vol.39 (1), p.120-133 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 133 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 120 |
container_title | The Journal of applied ecology |
container_volume | 39 |
creator | Menard, Catherine Duncan, Patrick Fleurance, Geraldine Georges, Jean-Yves Lila, Marc |
description | 1. Equids are generalist herbivores that co-exist with bovids of similar body size in many ecosystems. There are two major hypotheses to explain their co-existence, but few comparative data are available to test them. The first postulates that the very different functioning of their digestive tracts leads to fundamentally different patterns of use of grasses of different fibre contents. The second postulates resource partitioning through the use of different plant species. As domestic horses and cattle are used widely in Europe for the management of conservation areas, particularly in wetlands, a good knowledge of their foraging behaviour and comparative nutrition is necessary. 2. In this paper we describe resource-use by horses and cattle in complementary studies in two French wetlands. Horses used marshes intensively during the warmer seasons; both species used grasslands intensively throughout the year; cattle used forbs and shrubs much more than horses. Niche breadth was similar and overlap was high (Kulczinski's index 0·58-0·77). Horses spent much more time feeding on short grass than cattle. These results from the two sites indicate strong potential for competition. 3. Comparative daily food intake, measured in the field during this study for the first time, was 63% higher in horses (144 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1) than in cattle (88 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1). Digestibility of the cattle diets was a little higher, but daily intake of digestible dry matter (i.e. nutrient extraction) in all seasons was considerably higher in horses (78 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1) than in cattle (51 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1). When food is limiting, horses should outcompete cattle in habitats dominated by grasses because their functional response is steeper; under these circumstances cattle will require an ecological refuge for survival during winter, woodland or shrubland with abundant dicotyledons. 4. Horses are a good tool for plant management because they remove more vegetation per unit body weight than cattle, and use the most productive plant communities and plant species (especially graminoids) to a greater extent. They feed closer to the ground, and maintain a mosaic of patches of short and tall grass that contributes to structural diversity at this scale. Cattle use broadleaved plants to a greater extent than horses, and can reduce the rate of encroachment by certain woody species. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00693.x |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_hal_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00192108v1</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>827224</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>827224</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5683-fe35258ffac1ac74ac20bb02d530e9a108b200ad2a362ba43080308f7b4108e93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVoINukv6AXUWihB7ujD3sl6CUsm27LkuSQ0qMYe-VUxmttJTtN_n3lOGyhpx6ExLzPO5oPQiiDnIEsP7U5E2WR8bKUOQfgOUCpRf54QhZH4RVZJIVlSgM7I69jbAFAF0IsyHbl9wcMOLgHS698wHvX31Psd_R6HIIbnO-pb-jGh2jjc3yFw9BZ6nq6HoM_WOzpDzt0SYoX5LTBLto3L_c5-X61vlttsu3Nl6-ry21WF6USWWNFwQvVNFgzrJcSaw5VBXxXCLAaGagqdYI7jqLkFUoBCtJplpVMmtXinHyc8_7EzhyC22N4Mh6d2VxuzRQDYJon9oEl9sPMHoL_Ndo4mL2Lte1SwdaP0TDF9VIDJPDdP2Drx9CnPgwXQgqttEyQmqE6-BiDbY7fMzDTPkxrprGbaexm2od53od5TNb3L_kx1tg1Afvaxb9-IXVRyqmOzzP323X26b_zm2-36_RI9rezvY2DD0e74kvOpfgDE_akXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>233439894</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Foraging and Nutrition of Horses and Cattle in European Wetlands</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Menard, Catherine ; Duncan, Patrick ; Fleurance, Geraldine ; Georges, Jean-Yves ; Lila, Marc</creator><creatorcontrib>Menard, Catherine ; Duncan, Patrick ; Fleurance, Geraldine ; Georges, Jean-Yves ; Lila, Marc</creatorcontrib><description>1. Equids are generalist herbivores that co-exist with bovids of similar body size in many ecosystems. There are two major hypotheses to explain their co-existence, but few comparative data are available to test them. The first postulates that the very different functioning of their digestive tracts leads to fundamentally different patterns of use of grasses of different fibre contents. The second postulates resource partitioning through the use of different plant species. As domestic horses and cattle are used widely in Europe for the management of conservation areas, particularly in wetlands, a good knowledge of their foraging behaviour and comparative nutrition is necessary. 2. In this paper we describe resource-use by horses and cattle in complementary studies in two French wetlands. Horses used marshes intensively during the warmer seasons; both species used grasslands intensively throughout the year; cattle used forbs and shrubs much more than horses. Niche breadth was similar and overlap was high (Kulczinski's index 0·58-0·77). Horses spent much more time feeding on short grass than cattle. These results from the two sites indicate strong potential for competition. 3. Comparative daily food intake, measured in the field during this study for the first time, was 63% higher in horses (144 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1) than in cattle (88 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1). Digestibility of the cattle diets was a little higher, but daily intake of digestible dry matter (i.e. nutrient extraction) in all seasons was considerably higher in horses (78 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1) than in cattle (51 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1). When food is limiting, horses should outcompete cattle in habitats dominated by grasses because their functional response is steeper; under these circumstances cattle will require an ecological refuge for survival during winter, woodland or shrubland with abundant dicotyledons. 4. Horses are a good tool for plant management because they remove more vegetation per unit body weight than cattle, and use the most productive plant communities and plant species (especially graminoids) to a greater extent. They feed closer to the ground, and maintain a mosaic of patches of short and tall grass that contributes to structural diversity at this scale. Cattle use broadleaved plants to a greater extent than horses, and can reduce the rate of encroachment by certain woody species.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00693.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford, UK: Blackwell Science Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Animals ; Applied ecology ; Autoecology ; Biodiversity and Ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Diet ; Environment and Society ; Environmental Sciences ; food intake ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Global Changes ; Grasses ; grazing management ; habitat selection ; herbivory ; Horses ; Mammalia ; Marshes ; niche overlap ; Plants ; Summer ; Vertebrata ; Wetland ecology ; Wetlands</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2002-02, Vol.39 (1), p.120-133</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright Blackwell Science Ltd. Feb 2002</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5683-fe35258ffac1ac74ac20bb02d530e9a108b200ad2a362ba43080308f7b4108e93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5683-fe35258ffac1ac74ac20bb02d530e9a108b200ad2a362ba43080308f7b4108e93</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1161-2275 ; 0000-0003-3221-9026</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/827224$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/827224$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,805,887,1419,1435,27931,27932,45581,45582,46416,46840,58024,58257</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13495640$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-00192108$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Menard, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleurance, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georges, Jean-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lila, Marc</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Foraging and Nutrition of Horses and Cattle in European Wetlands</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Equids are generalist herbivores that co-exist with bovids of similar body size in many ecosystems. There are two major hypotheses to explain their co-existence, but few comparative data are available to test them. The first postulates that the very different functioning of their digestive tracts leads to fundamentally different patterns of use of grasses of different fibre contents. The second postulates resource partitioning through the use of different plant species. As domestic horses and cattle are used widely in Europe for the management of conservation areas, particularly in wetlands, a good knowledge of their foraging behaviour and comparative nutrition is necessary. 2. In this paper we describe resource-use by horses and cattle in complementary studies in two French wetlands. Horses used marshes intensively during the warmer seasons; both species used grasslands intensively throughout the year; cattle used forbs and shrubs much more than horses. Niche breadth was similar and overlap was high (Kulczinski's index 0·58-0·77). Horses spent much more time feeding on short grass than cattle. These results from the two sites indicate strong potential for competition. 3. Comparative daily food intake, measured in the field during this study for the first time, was 63% higher in horses (144 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1) than in cattle (88 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1). Digestibility of the cattle diets was a little higher, but daily intake of digestible dry matter (i.e. nutrient extraction) in all seasons was considerably higher in horses (78 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1) than in cattle (51 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1). When food is limiting, horses should outcompete cattle in habitats dominated by grasses because their functional response is steeper; under these circumstances cattle will require an ecological refuge for survival during winter, woodland or shrubland with abundant dicotyledons. 4. Horses are a good tool for plant management because they remove more vegetation per unit body weight than cattle, and use the most productive plant communities and plant species (especially graminoids) to a greater extent. They feed closer to the ground, and maintain a mosaic of patches of short and tall grass that contributes to structural diversity at this scale. Cattle use broadleaved plants to a greater extent than horses, and can reduce the rate of encroachment by certain woody species.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Autoecology</subject><subject>Biodiversity and Ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Diet</subject><subject>Environment and Society</subject><subject>Environmental Sciences</subject><subject>food intake</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Global Changes</subject><subject>Grasses</subject><subject>grazing management</subject><subject>habitat selection</subject><subject>herbivory</subject><subject>Horses</subject><subject>Mammalia</subject><subject>Marshes</subject><subject>niche overlap</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Summer</subject><subject>Vertebrata</subject><subject>Wetland ecology</subject><subject>Wetlands</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU1r3DAQhkVoINukv6AXUWihB7ujD3sl6CUsm27LkuSQ0qMYe-VUxmttJTtN_n3lOGyhpx6ExLzPO5oPQiiDnIEsP7U5E2WR8bKUOQfgOUCpRf54QhZH4RVZJIVlSgM7I69jbAFAF0IsyHbl9wcMOLgHS698wHvX31Psd_R6HIIbnO-pb-jGh2jjc3yFw9BZ6nq6HoM_WOzpDzt0SYoX5LTBLto3L_c5-X61vlttsu3Nl6-ry21WF6USWWNFwQvVNFgzrJcSaw5VBXxXCLAaGagqdYI7jqLkFUoBCtJplpVMmtXinHyc8_7EzhyC22N4Mh6d2VxuzRQDYJon9oEl9sPMHoL_Ndo4mL2Lte1SwdaP0TDF9VIDJPDdP2Drx9CnPgwXQgqttEyQmqE6-BiDbY7fMzDTPkxrprGbaexm2od53od5TNb3L_kx1tg1Afvaxb9-IXVRyqmOzzP323X26b_zm2-36_RI9rezvY2DD0e74kvOpfgDE_akXg</recordid><startdate>200202</startdate><enddate>200202</enddate><creator>Menard, Catherine</creator><creator>Duncan, Patrick</creator><creator>Fleurance, Geraldine</creator><creator>Georges, Jean-Yves</creator><creator>Lila, Marc</creator><general>Blackwell Science Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Science</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1161-2275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-9026</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>200202</creationdate><title>Comparative Foraging and Nutrition of Horses and Cattle in European Wetlands</title><author>Menard, Catherine ; Duncan, Patrick ; Fleurance, Geraldine ; Georges, Jean-Yves ; Lila, Marc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5683-fe35258ffac1ac74ac20bb02d530e9a108b200ad2a362ba43080308f7b4108e93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Autoecology</topic><topic>Biodiversity and Ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Diet</topic><topic>Environment and Society</topic><topic>Environmental Sciences</topic><topic>food intake</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Global Changes</topic><topic>Grasses</topic><topic>grazing management</topic><topic>habitat selection</topic><topic>herbivory</topic><topic>Horses</topic><topic>Mammalia</topic><topic>Marshes</topic><topic>niche overlap</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Summer</topic><topic>Vertebrata</topic><topic>Wetland ecology</topic><topic>Wetlands</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Menard, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duncan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleurance, Geraldine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Georges, Jean-Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lila, Marc</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Menard, Catherine</au><au>Duncan, Patrick</au><au>Fleurance, Geraldine</au><au>Georges, Jean-Yves</au><au>Lila, Marc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative Foraging and Nutrition of Horses and Cattle in European Wetlands</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2002-02</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>120</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>120-133</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Equids are generalist herbivores that co-exist with bovids of similar body size in many ecosystems. There are two major hypotheses to explain their co-existence, but few comparative data are available to test them. The first postulates that the very different functioning of their digestive tracts leads to fundamentally different patterns of use of grasses of different fibre contents. The second postulates resource partitioning through the use of different plant species. As domestic horses and cattle are used widely in Europe for the management of conservation areas, particularly in wetlands, a good knowledge of their foraging behaviour and comparative nutrition is necessary. 2. In this paper we describe resource-use by horses and cattle in complementary studies in two French wetlands. Horses used marshes intensively during the warmer seasons; both species used grasslands intensively throughout the year; cattle used forbs and shrubs much more than horses. Niche breadth was similar and overlap was high (Kulczinski's index 0·58-0·77). Horses spent much more time feeding on short grass than cattle. These results from the two sites indicate strong potential for competition. 3. Comparative daily food intake, measured in the field during this study for the first time, was 63% higher in horses (144 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1) than in cattle (88 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1). Digestibility of the cattle diets was a little higher, but daily intake of digestible dry matter (i.e. nutrient extraction) in all seasons was considerably higher in horses (78 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1) than in cattle (51 gDMkg W-0· 75day-1). When food is limiting, horses should outcompete cattle in habitats dominated by grasses because their functional response is steeper; under these circumstances cattle will require an ecological refuge for survival during winter, woodland or shrubland with abundant dicotyledons. 4. Horses are a good tool for plant management because they remove more vegetation per unit body weight than cattle, and use the most productive plant communities and plant species (especially graminoids) to a greater extent. They feed closer to the ground, and maintain a mosaic of patches of short and tall grass that contributes to structural diversity at this scale. Cattle use broadleaved plants to a greater extent than horses, and can reduce the rate of encroachment by certain woody species.</abstract><cop>Oxford, UK</cop><pub>Blackwell Science Ltd</pub><doi>10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00693.x</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1161-2275</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-9026</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8901 |
ispartof | The Journal of applied ecology, 2002-02, Vol.39 (1), p.120-133 |
issn | 0021-8901 1365-2664 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_hal_primary_oai_HAL_hal_00192108v1 |
source | Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection) |
subjects | Animal and plant ecology Animal, plant and microbial ecology Animals Applied ecology Autoecology Biodiversity and Ecology Biological and medical sciences Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Diet Environment and Society Environmental Sciences food intake Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects Global Changes Grasses grazing management habitat selection herbivory Horses Mammalia Marshes niche overlap Plants Summer Vertebrata Wetland ecology Wetlands |
title | Comparative Foraging and Nutrition of Horses and Cattle in European Wetlands |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T04%3A10%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_hal_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Foraging%20and%20Nutrition%20of%20Horses%20and%20Cattle%20in%20European%20Wetlands&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Menard,%20Catherine&rft.date=2002-02&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=120&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=120-133&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00693.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_hal_p%3E827224%3C/jstor_hal_p%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=233439894&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=827224&rfr_iscdi=true |