Comparison of protection and release behavior of different capsule polymer combinations based on L. acidophilus survivability and function and caffeine release

Oral administration of active pharmaceutical ingredients, nutraceuticals, enzymes or probiotics requires an appropriate delivery system for optimal bioactivity and absorption. The harsh conditions during the gastrointestinal transit can degrade the administered products, hampering their efficacy. En...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Marzorati, Massimo, Calatayud Arroyo, Marta, Rotsaert, Chloe, Van Mele, Michiel, Duysburgh, Cindy, Durkee, Shane, White, Tyler, Fowler, Kelli, Jannin, Vincent, Bellamine, Aouatef
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Marzorati, Massimo
Calatayud Arroyo, Marta
Rotsaert, Chloe
Van Mele, Michiel
Duysburgh, Cindy
Durkee, Shane
White, Tyler
Fowler, Kelli
Jannin, Vincent
Bellamine, Aouatef
description Oral administration of active pharmaceutical ingredients, nutraceuticals, enzymes or probiotics requires an appropriate delivery system for optimal bioactivity and absorption. The harsh conditions during the gastrointestinal transit can degrade the administered products, hampering their efficacy. Enteric or delayed-release pharmaceutical formulations may help overcome these issues. In a Simulator of Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem model (SHIME) and using caffeine as a marker for release kinetics and L. acidophilus survivability as an indicator for protection, we compared the performance of ten capsule configurations, single or DUOCAP (R) combinations. The function of L. acidophilus and its impact on the gut microbiota was further tested in three selected capsule types, combinations of DRcaps (R) capsule in DRcaps (R) capsule (DR-in-DR) and DRcaps (R) capsule in Vcaps (R) capsule (DR-in-VC) and single Vcaps (R) Plus capsule under colonic conditions. We found that under stomach and small intestine conditions, DR-in-DR and DR-in-VC led to the best performance both under fed and fasted conditions based on the slow caffeine release and the highest L. acidophilus survivability. The Vcaps (R) Plus capsule however, led to the quickest caffeine and probiotic release. When DR-in-DR, DR-in-VC and single Vcaps (R) Plus capsules were tested through the whole gastrointestinal tract, including under colonic conditions, caffeine release was found to be slower in capsules containing DRcaps (R) capsules compared to the single Vcaps (R) capsules. In addition, colonic survival of L. acidophilus was significantly increased under fasted conditions in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC formulation compared to Vcaps (R) Plus capsule. To assess the impact of these formulations on the microbial function, acetate, butyrate and propionate as well as ammonia were measured. L. acidophilus released from DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC induced a significant increase in butyrate and a decrease in ammonia, suggesting a proliferation of butyrate-producing bacteria and reduction in ammonia-producing bacteria. These data suggest that L. acidophilus included in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC reaching the colon is viable and functional, potentially contributing to changes in colonic microbiota composition and diversity.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ghent</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_8723669</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_archive_ugent_be_8723669</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_87236693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjk1OwzAQRr0AqQV6h7lAURpXSVlXIBYs2UdjZ9wMcmzLP5F6Gq6Kg0DsWY1G873vzY3YHk693Mtj323EXUofTdN07UFuxefZzwEjJ-_AGwjRZ9KZ64ZuhEiWMBEomnBhH9fIyMZQJJdBY0jFEgRvrzNF0H5W7HClE6jKjVB73h4BNY8-TGxLglTiwgsqtpyv3xJT3J9RY21nR7_qB3Fr0Cba_cx70b48v59f95epvjBYVpE05sEjDxj1xAsN5bKeFA2nvpVd9yT_BX0B211pvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of protection and release behavior of different capsule polymer combinations based on L. acidophilus survivability and function and caffeine release</title><source>Ghent University Academic Bibliography</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Marzorati, Massimo ; Calatayud Arroyo, Marta ; Rotsaert, Chloe ; Van Mele, Michiel ; Duysburgh, Cindy ; Durkee, Shane ; White, Tyler ; Fowler, Kelli ; Jannin, Vincent ; Bellamine, Aouatef</creator><creatorcontrib>Marzorati, Massimo ; Calatayud Arroyo, Marta ; Rotsaert, Chloe ; Van Mele, Michiel ; Duysburgh, Cindy ; Durkee, Shane ; White, Tyler ; Fowler, Kelli ; Jannin, Vincent ; Bellamine, Aouatef</creatorcontrib><description>Oral administration of active pharmaceutical ingredients, nutraceuticals, enzymes or probiotics requires an appropriate delivery system for optimal bioactivity and absorption. The harsh conditions during the gastrointestinal transit can degrade the administered products, hampering their efficacy. Enteric or delayed-release pharmaceutical formulations may help overcome these issues. In a Simulator of Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem model (SHIME) and using caffeine as a marker for release kinetics and L. acidophilus survivability as an indicator for protection, we compared the performance of ten capsule configurations, single or DUOCAP (R) combinations. The function of L. acidophilus and its impact on the gut microbiota was further tested in three selected capsule types, combinations of DRcaps (R) capsule in DRcaps (R) capsule (DR-in-DR) and DRcaps (R) capsule in Vcaps (R) capsule (DR-in-VC) and single Vcaps (R) Plus capsule under colonic conditions. We found that under stomach and small intestine conditions, DR-in-DR and DR-in-VC led to the best performance both under fed and fasted conditions based on the slow caffeine release and the highest L. acidophilus survivability. The Vcaps (R) Plus capsule however, led to the quickest caffeine and probiotic release. When DR-in-DR, DR-in-VC and single Vcaps (R) Plus capsules were tested through the whole gastrointestinal tract, including under colonic conditions, caffeine release was found to be slower in capsules containing DRcaps (R) capsules compared to the single Vcaps (R) capsules. In addition, colonic survival of L. acidophilus was significantly increased under fasted conditions in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC formulation compared to Vcaps (R) Plus capsule. To assess the impact of these formulations on the microbial function, acetate, butyrate and propionate as well as ammonia were measured. L. acidophilus released from DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC induced a significant increase in butyrate and a decrease in ammonia, suggesting a proliferation of butyrate-producing bacteria and reduction in ammonia-producing bacteria. These data suggest that L. acidophilus included in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC reaching the colon is viable and functional, potentially contributing to changes in colonic microbiota composition and diversity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1873-3476</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0378-5173</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Agriculture and Food Sciences ; Colonic-targeted delivery ; DISINTEGRATION ; Drug delivery ; FOOD ; FORMULATIONS ; Gastro-resistant capsules ; Gastrointestinal transit ; GUT MICROBIOME ; HYPROMELLOSE CAPSULE ; IN-VITRO ; PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION ; Probiotic ; PROBIOTICS ; STABILITY ; TARGETED DELIVERY</subject><creationdate>2021</creationdate><rights>Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,4010,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marzorati, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calatayud Arroyo, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotsaert, Chloe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Mele, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duysburgh, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkee, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Kelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jannin, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellamine, Aouatef</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of protection and release behavior of different capsule polymer combinations based on L. acidophilus survivability and function and caffeine release</title><description>Oral administration of active pharmaceutical ingredients, nutraceuticals, enzymes or probiotics requires an appropriate delivery system for optimal bioactivity and absorption. The harsh conditions during the gastrointestinal transit can degrade the administered products, hampering their efficacy. Enteric or delayed-release pharmaceutical formulations may help overcome these issues. In a Simulator of Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem model (SHIME) and using caffeine as a marker for release kinetics and L. acidophilus survivability as an indicator for protection, we compared the performance of ten capsule configurations, single or DUOCAP (R) combinations. The function of L. acidophilus and its impact on the gut microbiota was further tested in three selected capsule types, combinations of DRcaps (R) capsule in DRcaps (R) capsule (DR-in-DR) and DRcaps (R) capsule in Vcaps (R) capsule (DR-in-VC) and single Vcaps (R) Plus capsule under colonic conditions. We found that under stomach and small intestine conditions, DR-in-DR and DR-in-VC led to the best performance both under fed and fasted conditions based on the slow caffeine release and the highest L. acidophilus survivability. The Vcaps (R) Plus capsule however, led to the quickest caffeine and probiotic release. When DR-in-DR, DR-in-VC and single Vcaps (R) Plus capsules were tested through the whole gastrointestinal tract, including under colonic conditions, caffeine release was found to be slower in capsules containing DRcaps (R) capsules compared to the single Vcaps (R) capsules. In addition, colonic survival of L. acidophilus was significantly increased under fasted conditions in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC formulation compared to Vcaps (R) Plus capsule. To assess the impact of these formulations on the microbial function, acetate, butyrate and propionate as well as ammonia were measured. L. acidophilus released from DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC induced a significant increase in butyrate and a decrease in ammonia, suggesting a proliferation of butyrate-producing bacteria and reduction in ammonia-producing bacteria. These data suggest that L. acidophilus included in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC reaching the colon is viable and functional, potentially contributing to changes in colonic microbiota composition and diversity.</description><subject>Agriculture and Food Sciences</subject><subject>Colonic-targeted delivery</subject><subject>DISINTEGRATION</subject><subject>Drug delivery</subject><subject>FOOD</subject><subject>FORMULATIONS</subject><subject>Gastro-resistant capsules</subject><subject>Gastrointestinal transit</subject><subject>GUT MICROBIOME</subject><subject>HYPROMELLOSE CAPSULE</subject><subject>IN-VITRO</subject><subject>PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION</subject><subject>Probiotic</subject><subject>PROBIOTICS</subject><subject>STABILITY</subject><subject>TARGETED DELIVERY</subject><issn>1873-3476</issn><issn>0378-5173</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ADGLB</sourceid><recordid>eNqdjk1OwzAQRr0AqQV6h7lAURpXSVlXIBYs2UdjZ9wMcmzLP5F6Gq6Kg0DsWY1G873vzY3YHk693Mtj323EXUofTdN07UFuxefZzwEjJ-_AGwjRZ9KZ64ZuhEiWMBEomnBhH9fIyMZQJJdBY0jFEgRvrzNF0H5W7HClE6jKjVB73h4BNY8-TGxLglTiwgsqtpyv3xJT3J9RY21nR7_qB3Fr0Cba_cx70b48v59f95epvjBYVpE05sEjDxj1xAsN5bKeFA2nvpVd9yT_BX0B211pvw</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Marzorati, Massimo</creator><creator>Calatayud Arroyo, Marta</creator><creator>Rotsaert, Chloe</creator><creator>Van Mele, Michiel</creator><creator>Duysburgh, Cindy</creator><creator>Durkee, Shane</creator><creator>White, Tyler</creator><creator>Fowler, Kelli</creator><creator>Jannin, Vincent</creator><creator>Bellamine, Aouatef</creator><scope>ADGLB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Comparison of protection and release behavior of different capsule polymer combinations based on L. acidophilus survivability and function and caffeine release</title><author>Marzorati, Massimo ; Calatayud Arroyo, Marta ; Rotsaert, Chloe ; Van Mele, Michiel ; Duysburgh, Cindy ; Durkee, Shane ; White, Tyler ; Fowler, Kelli ; Jannin, Vincent ; Bellamine, Aouatef</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_87236693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agriculture and Food Sciences</topic><topic>Colonic-targeted delivery</topic><topic>DISINTEGRATION</topic><topic>Drug delivery</topic><topic>FOOD</topic><topic>FORMULATIONS</topic><topic>Gastro-resistant capsules</topic><topic>Gastrointestinal transit</topic><topic>GUT MICROBIOME</topic><topic>HYPROMELLOSE CAPSULE</topic><topic>IN-VITRO</topic><topic>PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION</topic><topic>Probiotic</topic><topic>PROBIOTICS</topic><topic>STABILITY</topic><topic>TARGETED DELIVERY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marzorati, Massimo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calatayud Arroyo, Marta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rotsaert, Chloe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Mele, Michiel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duysburgh, Cindy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Durkee, Shane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>White, Tyler</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Kelli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jannin, Vincent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bellamine, Aouatef</creatorcontrib><collection>Ghent University Academic Bibliography</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marzorati, Massimo</au><au>Calatayud Arroyo, Marta</au><au>Rotsaert, Chloe</au><au>Van Mele, Michiel</au><au>Duysburgh, Cindy</au><au>Durkee, Shane</au><au>White, Tyler</au><au>Fowler, Kelli</au><au>Jannin, Vincent</au><au>Bellamine, Aouatef</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of protection and release behavior of different capsule polymer combinations based on L. acidophilus survivability and function and caffeine release</atitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><issn>1873-3476</issn><issn>0378-5173</issn><abstract>Oral administration of active pharmaceutical ingredients, nutraceuticals, enzymes or probiotics requires an appropriate delivery system for optimal bioactivity and absorption. The harsh conditions during the gastrointestinal transit can degrade the administered products, hampering their efficacy. Enteric or delayed-release pharmaceutical formulations may help overcome these issues. In a Simulator of Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem model (SHIME) and using caffeine as a marker for release kinetics and L. acidophilus survivability as an indicator for protection, we compared the performance of ten capsule configurations, single or DUOCAP (R) combinations. The function of L. acidophilus and its impact on the gut microbiota was further tested in three selected capsule types, combinations of DRcaps (R) capsule in DRcaps (R) capsule (DR-in-DR) and DRcaps (R) capsule in Vcaps (R) capsule (DR-in-VC) and single Vcaps (R) Plus capsule under colonic conditions. We found that under stomach and small intestine conditions, DR-in-DR and DR-in-VC led to the best performance both under fed and fasted conditions based on the slow caffeine release and the highest L. acidophilus survivability. The Vcaps (R) Plus capsule however, led to the quickest caffeine and probiotic release. When DR-in-DR, DR-in-VC and single Vcaps (R) Plus capsules were tested through the whole gastrointestinal tract, including under colonic conditions, caffeine release was found to be slower in capsules containing DRcaps (R) capsules compared to the single Vcaps (R) capsules. In addition, colonic survival of L. acidophilus was significantly increased under fasted conditions in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC formulation compared to Vcaps (R) Plus capsule. To assess the impact of these formulations on the microbial function, acetate, butyrate and propionate as well as ammonia were measured. L. acidophilus released from DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC induced a significant increase in butyrate and a decrease in ammonia, suggesting a proliferation of butyrate-producing bacteria and reduction in ammonia-producing bacteria. These data suggest that L. acidophilus included in DR-in-DR or DR-in-VC reaching the colon is viable and functional, potentially contributing to changes in colonic microbiota composition and diversity.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1873-3476
ispartof
issn 1873-3476
0378-5173
language eng
recordid cdi_ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_8723669
source Ghent University Academic Bibliography; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects Agriculture and Food Sciences
Colonic-targeted delivery
DISINTEGRATION
Drug delivery
FOOD
FORMULATIONS
Gastro-resistant capsules
Gastrointestinal transit
GUT MICROBIOME
HYPROMELLOSE CAPSULE
IN-VITRO
PERFORMANCE QUALIFICATION
Probiotic
PROBIOTICS
STABILITY
TARGETED DELIVERY
title Comparison of protection and release behavior of different capsule polymer combinations based on L. acidophilus survivability and function and caffeine release
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A23%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ghent&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20protection%20and%20release%20behavior%20of%20different%20capsule%20polymer%20combinations%20based%20on%20L.%20acidophilus%20survivability%20and%20function%20and%20caffeine%20release&rft.au=Marzorati,%20Massimo&rft.date=2021&rft.issn=1873-3476&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cghent%3Eoai_archive_ugent_be_8723669%3C/ghent%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true