Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in chronic low back pain
The assessment of a broad range of biopsychosocial aspects is important in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) for the prediction of outcome as well as for evaluation. The objective of this study was to test the responsiveness, construct validity and predictive value of...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Hilfiker, R Knutti, IA Raval-Roland, B Rivier, G Crombez, Geert Opsommer, E |
description | The assessment of a broad range of biopsychosocial aspects is important in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) for the prediction of outcome as well as for evaluation. The objective of this study was to test the responsiveness, construct validity and predictive value of the A-rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ) compared to other instruments widely used to assess biopsychosocial aspects in patients with CLBP.
111 patients with CLBP admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation completed a set of questionnaires on biopsychosocial aspects at baseline and at discharge. Ninety-eight patients responded at three months for an assessment of the return to work status. Responsiveness of the OMPSQ, the ability to detect change in the construct of interest, was investigated by a set of hypotheses on correlations with widely used questionnaires. We tested the hypothesis that the changes in the OMPSQ would vary along with the responses in the Patient's Global Impression of Change. Prediction of disability at discharge, work status at three months and time to return to work was evaluated with linear, logistic and cox regression models.
The OMPSQ showed good predictive values for disability and return to work and construct validity of the instrument was corroborated. Seventy-nine percent of our hypotheses for responsiveness could be confirmed, with the OMPSQ showing the second highest change during the rehabilitation.
The OMPSQ can also be applied in patients with CLBP, but for the assessment of change in psychosocial variables one should add specific questionnaires. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>ghent</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_8054272</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_archive_ugent_be_8054272</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_80542723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjttNAzEQRf0BEuHRwzQQyVny2m9ERAGIX2vWmayHOOMw4w2iAUqgIRpjQdAAX1c6R0e6Z27i27mfLlez9sJdmj17P1u0fjlx70-Yecv1DVC2oGTHIsYnEjKDsoOaCDZKEhOcSI2L_NHPD6VOCxwGi0MutqdMFTMckQUsKpGw9PAykNUxE2QlGFVMWoQj5PIKHcb9T3DtzneYjW5-98o1m_vHu4dpn0hqyNwpRayhIAfUmMaHYei_VUdh7RfzZtXc_iv6AuKBYNc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in chronic low back pain</title><source>Ghent University Academic Bibliography</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Hilfiker, R ; Knutti, IA ; Raval-Roland, B ; Rivier, G ; Crombez, Geert ; Opsommer, E</creator><creatorcontrib>Hilfiker, R ; Knutti, IA ; Raval-Roland, B ; Rivier, G ; Crombez, Geert ; Opsommer, E</creatorcontrib><description>The assessment of a broad range of biopsychosocial aspects is important in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) for the prediction of outcome as well as for evaluation. The objective of this study was to test the responsiveness, construct validity and predictive value of the A-rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ) compared to other instruments widely used to assess biopsychosocial aspects in patients with CLBP.
111 patients with CLBP admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation completed a set of questionnaires on biopsychosocial aspects at baseline and at discharge. Ninety-eight patients responded at three months for an assessment of the return to work status. Responsiveness of the OMPSQ, the ability to detect change in the construct of interest, was investigated by a set of hypotheses on correlations with widely used questionnaires. We tested the hypothesis that the changes in the OMPSQ would vary along with the responses in the Patient's Global Impression of Change. Prediction of disability at discharge, work status at three months and time to return to work was evaluated with linear, logistic and cox regression models.
The OMPSQ showed good predictive values for disability and return to work and construct validity of the instrument was corroborated. Seventy-nine percent of our hypotheses for responsiveness could be confirmed, with the OMPSQ showing the second highest change during the rehabilitation.
The OMPSQ can also be applied in patients with CLBP, but for the assessment of change in psychosocial variables one should add specific questionnaires.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0940-6719</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Low back pain ; PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY ; prognosis ; Psychometrics ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation ; RISK ; Social Sciences ; VALIDATION</subject><creationdate>2016</creationdate><rights>No license (in copyright) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,4010,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hilfiker, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knutti, IA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raval-Roland, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivier, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crombez, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opsommer, E</creatorcontrib><title>Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in chronic low back pain</title><description>The assessment of a broad range of biopsychosocial aspects is important in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) for the prediction of outcome as well as for evaluation. The objective of this study was to test the responsiveness, construct validity and predictive value of the A-rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ) compared to other instruments widely used to assess biopsychosocial aspects in patients with CLBP.
111 patients with CLBP admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation completed a set of questionnaires on biopsychosocial aspects at baseline and at discharge. Ninety-eight patients responded at three months for an assessment of the return to work status. Responsiveness of the OMPSQ, the ability to detect change in the construct of interest, was investigated by a set of hypotheses on correlations with widely used questionnaires. We tested the hypothesis that the changes in the OMPSQ would vary along with the responses in the Patient's Global Impression of Change. Prediction of disability at discharge, work status at three months and time to return to work was evaluated with linear, logistic and cox regression models.
The OMPSQ showed good predictive values for disability and return to work and construct validity of the instrument was corroborated. Seventy-nine percent of our hypotheses for responsiveness could be confirmed, with the OMPSQ showing the second highest change during the rehabilitation.
The OMPSQ can also be applied in patients with CLBP, but for the assessment of change in psychosocial variables one should add specific questionnaires.</description><subject>Low back pain</subject><subject>PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY</subject><subject>prognosis</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>RISK</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>VALIDATION</subject><issn>0940-6719</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ADGLB</sourceid><recordid>eNqdjttNAzEQRf0BEuHRwzQQyVny2m9ERAGIX2vWmayHOOMw4w2iAUqgIRpjQdAAX1c6R0e6Z27i27mfLlez9sJdmj17P1u0fjlx70-Yecv1DVC2oGTHIsYnEjKDsoOaCDZKEhOcSI2L_NHPD6VOCxwGi0MutqdMFTMckQUsKpGw9PAykNUxE2QlGFVMWoQj5PIKHcb9T3DtzneYjW5-98o1m_vHu4dpn0hqyNwpRayhIAfUmMaHYei_VUdh7RfzZtXc_iv6AuKBYNc</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Hilfiker, R</creator><creator>Knutti, IA</creator><creator>Raval-Roland, B</creator><creator>Rivier, G</creator><creator>Crombez, Geert</creator><creator>Opsommer, E</creator><scope>ADGLB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in chronic low back pain</title><author>Hilfiker, R ; Knutti, IA ; Raval-Roland, B ; Rivier, G ; Crombez, Geert ; Opsommer, E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_80542723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Low back pain</topic><topic>PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY</topic><topic>prognosis</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>RISK</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>VALIDATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hilfiker, R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knutti, IA</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Raval-Roland, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rivier, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Crombez, Geert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Opsommer, E</creatorcontrib><collection>Ghent University Academic Bibliography</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hilfiker, R</au><au>Knutti, IA</au><au>Raval-Roland, B</au><au>Rivier, G</au><au>Crombez, Geert</au><au>Opsommer, E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in chronic low back pain</atitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><issn>0940-6719</issn><abstract>The assessment of a broad range of biopsychosocial aspects is important in the rehabilitation of patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP) for the prediction of outcome as well as for evaluation. The objective of this study was to test the responsiveness, construct validity and predictive value of the A-rebro Musculoskeletal Pain Screening Questionnaire (OMPSQ) compared to other instruments widely used to assess biopsychosocial aspects in patients with CLBP.
111 patients with CLBP admitted to an inpatient rehabilitation completed a set of questionnaires on biopsychosocial aspects at baseline and at discharge. Ninety-eight patients responded at three months for an assessment of the return to work status. Responsiveness of the OMPSQ, the ability to detect change in the construct of interest, was investigated by a set of hypotheses on correlations with widely used questionnaires. We tested the hypothesis that the changes in the OMPSQ would vary along with the responses in the Patient's Global Impression of Change. Prediction of disability at discharge, work status at three months and time to return to work was evaluated with linear, logistic and cox regression models.
The OMPSQ showed good predictive values for disability and return to work and construct validity of the instrument was corroborated. Seventy-nine percent of our hypotheses for responsiveness could be confirmed, with the OMPSQ showing the second highest change during the rehabilitation.
The OMPSQ can also be applied in patients with CLBP, but for the assessment of change in psychosocial variables one should add specific questionnaires.</abstract><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0940-6719 |
ispartof | |
issn | 0940-6719 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_8054272 |
source | Ghent University Academic Bibliography; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
subjects | Low back pain PREDICTIVE-VALIDITY prognosis Psychometrics Questionnaires Rehabilitation RISK Social Sciences VALIDATION |
title | Validity and responsiveness of the French version of the Örebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in chronic low back pain |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T18%3A31%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ghent&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Validity%20and%20responsiveness%20of%20the%20French%20version%20of%20the%20%C3%96rebro%20musculoskeletal%20pain%20screening%20questionnaire%20in%20chronic%20low%20back%20pain&rft.au=Hilfiker,%20R&rft.date=2016&rft.issn=0940-6719&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cghent%3Eoai_archive_ugent_be_8054272%3C/ghent%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |