Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral pFC on the attentional blink depend on individual baseline performance

Selection mechanisms that dynamically gate only relevant perceptual information for further processing and sustained representation in working memory are critical for goal-directed behavior. We examined whether this gating process can be modulated by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: London, Raquel, Slagter, HA
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator London, Raquel
Slagter, HA
description Selection mechanisms that dynamically gate only relevant perceptual information for further processing and sustained representation in working memory are critical for goal-directed behavior. We examined whether this gating process can be modulated by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left dorsolateral pFC (DLPFC)a region known to play a key role in working memory and conscious access. Specifically, we examined the effects of tDCS on the magnitude of the so-called attentional blink (AB), a deficit in identifying the second of two targets presented in rapid succession. Thirty-four participants performed a standard AB task before (baseline), during, and after 20 min of 1-mA anodal and cathodal tDCS in two separate sessions. On the basis of previous reports linking individual differences in AB magnitude to individual differences in DLPFC activity and on suggestions that effects of tDCS depend on baseline brain activity levels, we hypothesized that anodal tDCS over left DLPFC would modulate the magnitude of the AB as a function of individual baseline AB magnitude. Indeed, individual differences analyses revealed that anodal tDCS decreased the AB in participants with a large baseline AB but increased the AB in participants with a small baseline AB. This effect was only observed during (but not after) stimulation, was not found for cathodal tDCS, and could not be explained by regression to the mean. Notably, the effects of tDCS were not apparent at the group level, highlighting the importance of taking individual variability in performance into account when evaluating the effectiveness of tDCS. These findings support the idea that left DLPFC plays a critical role in the AB and in conscious access more generally. They are also in line with the notion that there is an optimal level of prefrontal activity for cognitive function, with both too little and too much activity hurting performance.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ghent</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_7145542</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_archive_ugent_be_7145542</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_71455423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqdjk1OxDAMRrMAieHnDr7ASKW0MF2PZsQBWLCL3MSZGjJJ5aQ9B0fGlTgBG1v6np_13ZhdcxgO-6EdPu_MfSlfTdO0_Wu3Mz-nEMjVAjlAFUzF6WCM4Fk0B7eIUKpQKl-XiJVzgrySQKRQwWcpWVMSNebzEZTWiQBrVUlvNR4jp2_wNFPyG-fkeWW_bAgLKSWYSUKWKyZHj-Y2YCz09LcfTHs-fRzf95dJX9rIo_bCajOyRXETr2SXy4ZGsm_PXd937cu_pF_B3mRX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral pFC on the attentional blink depend on individual baseline performance</title><source>Ghent University Academic Bibliography</source><source>MIT Press Journals</source><creator>London, Raquel ; Slagter, HA</creator><creatorcontrib>London, Raquel ; Slagter, HA</creatorcontrib><description>Selection mechanisms that dynamically gate only relevant perceptual information for further processing and sustained representation in working memory are critical for goal-directed behavior. We examined whether this gating process can be modulated by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left dorsolateral pFC (DLPFC)a region known to play a key role in working memory and conscious access. Specifically, we examined the effects of tDCS on the magnitude of the so-called attentional blink (AB), a deficit in identifying the second of two targets presented in rapid succession. Thirty-four participants performed a standard AB task before (baseline), during, and after 20 min of 1-mA anodal and cathodal tDCS in two separate sessions. On the basis of previous reports linking individual differences in AB magnitude to individual differences in DLPFC activity and on suggestions that effects of tDCS depend on baseline brain activity levels, we hypothesized that anodal tDCS over left DLPFC would modulate the magnitude of the AB as a function of individual baseline AB magnitude. Indeed, individual differences analyses revealed that anodal tDCS decreased the AB in participants with a large baseline AB but increased the AB in participants with a small baseline AB. This effect was only observed during (but not after) stimulation, was not found for cathodal tDCS, and could not be explained by regression to the mean. Notably, the effects of tDCS were not apparent at the group level, highlighting the importance of taking individual variability in performance into account when evaluating the effectiveness of tDCS. These findings support the idea that left DLPFC plays a critical role in the AB and in conscious access more generally. They are also in line with the notion that there is an optimal level of prefrontal activity for cognitive function, with both too little and too much activity hurting performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0898-929X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MIT PRESS</publisher><subject>BRAIN ; COMT VAL/MET POLYMORPHISM ; CORTICAL EXCITABILITY ; HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX ; INITIAL-VALUE ; MODULATION ; PREFRONTAL CORTEX ; SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION ; Social Sciences ; TEMPORARY LOSS ; WORKING-MEMORY</subject><creationdate>2015</creationdate><rights>No license (in copyright) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,315,776,780,4010,27837</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>London, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slagter, HA</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral pFC on the attentional blink depend on individual baseline performance</title><description>Selection mechanisms that dynamically gate only relevant perceptual information for further processing and sustained representation in working memory are critical for goal-directed behavior. We examined whether this gating process can be modulated by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left dorsolateral pFC (DLPFC)a region known to play a key role in working memory and conscious access. Specifically, we examined the effects of tDCS on the magnitude of the so-called attentional blink (AB), a deficit in identifying the second of two targets presented in rapid succession. Thirty-four participants performed a standard AB task before (baseline), during, and after 20 min of 1-mA anodal and cathodal tDCS in two separate sessions. On the basis of previous reports linking individual differences in AB magnitude to individual differences in DLPFC activity and on suggestions that effects of tDCS depend on baseline brain activity levels, we hypothesized that anodal tDCS over left DLPFC would modulate the magnitude of the AB as a function of individual baseline AB magnitude. Indeed, individual differences analyses revealed that anodal tDCS decreased the AB in participants with a large baseline AB but increased the AB in participants with a small baseline AB. This effect was only observed during (but not after) stimulation, was not found for cathodal tDCS, and could not be explained by regression to the mean. Notably, the effects of tDCS were not apparent at the group level, highlighting the importance of taking individual variability in performance into account when evaluating the effectiveness of tDCS. These findings support the idea that left DLPFC plays a critical role in the AB and in conscious access more generally. They are also in line with the notion that there is an optimal level of prefrontal activity for cognitive function, with both too little and too much activity hurting performance.</description><subject>BRAIN</subject><subject>COMT VAL/MET POLYMORPHISM</subject><subject>CORTICAL EXCITABILITY</subject><subject>HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX</subject><subject>INITIAL-VALUE</subject><subject>MODULATION</subject><subject>PREFRONTAL CORTEX</subject><subject>SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>TEMPORARY LOSS</subject><subject>WORKING-MEMORY</subject><issn>0898-929X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ADGLB</sourceid><recordid>eNqdjk1OxDAMRrMAieHnDr7ASKW0MF2PZsQBWLCL3MSZGjJJ5aQ9B0fGlTgBG1v6np_13ZhdcxgO-6EdPu_MfSlfTdO0_Wu3Mz-nEMjVAjlAFUzF6WCM4Fk0B7eIUKpQKl-XiJVzgrySQKRQwWcpWVMSNebzEZTWiQBrVUlvNR4jp2_wNFPyG-fkeWW_bAgLKSWYSUKWKyZHj-Y2YCz09LcfTHs-fRzf95dJX9rIo_bCajOyRXETr2SXy4ZGsm_PXd937cu_pF_B3mRX</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>London, Raquel</creator><creator>Slagter, HA</creator><general>MIT PRESS</general><scope>ADGLB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral pFC on the attentional blink depend on individual baseline performance</title><author>London, Raquel ; Slagter, HA</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_71455423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>BRAIN</topic><topic>COMT VAL/MET POLYMORPHISM</topic><topic>CORTICAL EXCITABILITY</topic><topic>HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX</topic><topic>INITIAL-VALUE</topic><topic>MODULATION</topic><topic>PREFRONTAL CORTEX</topic><topic>SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>TEMPORARY LOSS</topic><topic>WORKING-MEMORY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>London, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slagter, HA</creatorcontrib><collection>Ghent University Academic Bibliography</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>London, Raquel</au><au>Slagter, HA</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral pFC on the attentional blink depend on individual baseline performance</atitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><issn>0898-929X</issn><abstract>Selection mechanisms that dynamically gate only relevant perceptual information for further processing and sustained representation in working memory are critical for goal-directed behavior. We examined whether this gating process can be modulated by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over left dorsolateral pFC (DLPFC)a region known to play a key role in working memory and conscious access. Specifically, we examined the effects of tDCS on the magnitude of the so-called attentional blink (AB), a deficit in identifying the second of two targets presented in rapid succession. Thirty-four participants performed a standard AB task before (baseline), during, and after 20 min of 1-mA anodal and cathodal tDCS in two separate sessions. On the basis of previous reports linking individual differences in AB magnitude to individual differences in DLPFC activity and on suggestions that effects of tDCS depend on baseline brain activity levels, we hypothesized that anodal tDCS over left DLPFC would modulate the magnitude of the AB as a function of individual baseline AB magnitude. Indeed, individual differences analyses revealed that anodal tDCS decreased the AB in participants with a large baseline AB but increased the AB in participants with a small baseline AB. This effect was only observed during (but not after) stimulation, was not found for cathodal tDCS, and could not be explained by regression to the mean. Notably, the effects of tDCS were not apparent at the group level, highlighting the importance of taking individual variability in performance into account when evaluating the effectiveness of tDCS. These findings support the idea that left DLPFC plays a critical role in the AB and in conscious access more generally. They are also in line with the notion that there is an optimal level of prefrontal activity for cognitive function, with both too little and too much activity hurting performance.</abstract><pub>MIT PRESS</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0898-929X
ispartof
issn 0898-929X
language eng
recordid cdi_ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_7145542
source Ghent University Academic Bibliography; MIT Press Journals
subjects BRAIN
COMT VAL/MET POLYMORPHISM
CORTICAL EXCITABILITY
HUMAN MOTOR CORTEX
INITIAL-VALUE
MODULATION
PREFRONTAL CORTEX
SERIAL VISUAL PRESENTATION
Social Sciences
TEMPORARY LOSS
WORKING-MEMORY
title Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over left dorsolateral pFC on the attentional blink depend on individual baseline performance
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T23%3A13%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ghent&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20transcranial%20direct%20current%20stimulation%20over%20left%20dorsolateral%20pFC%20on%20the%20attentional%20blink%20depend%20on%20individual%20baseline%20performance&rft.au=London,%20Raquel&rft.date=2015&rft.issn=0898-929X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cghent%3Eoai_archive_ugent_be_7145542%3C/ghent%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true