Comparison experiments on geosynthetic-reinforced soil and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls under strip footing surcharge loads

Scaled experiments were compared on geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with a full-height facing (GRSWs) and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls (SPWs). A strip footing surcharge load was applied. PIV analyses showed that, in both test series, two slip surfaces developed under the strip footing load:...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Ahmadi, H, Wittekoek, B, van Eekelen, S .J. M, Bezuijen, Adam
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Ahmadi, H
Wittekoek, B
van Eekelen, S .J. M
Bezuijen, Adam
description Scaled experiments were compared on geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with a full-height facing (GRSWs) and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls (SPWs). A strip footing surcharge load was applied. PIV analyses showed that, in both test series, two slip surfaces developed under the strip footing load: one from the inner edge, the other one from the outer edge of the strip footing. In the GRSWs, the slip surfaces were straight, and the angle with the horizontal was approximately π/4+φ/2. For the SPWs, the slip surfaces reoriented at the intersection with the geogrids and did not always remain straight. The GRSW model behaved stiffer than the geogrid-anchored SPW model for relatively high surcharge loads. The SPW-system behaviour was also stiffer when an extra geogrid anchor was installed at a lower level. This indicates that the soil-reinforcement interface frictional behaviour determines the system behaviour more than for example the reinforcement stiffness.
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>ghent_ADGLB</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_01HBTX9885SGFX2FTBPD4M82X6</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_archive_ugent_be_01HBTX9885SGFX2FTBPD4M82X6</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_01HBTX9885SGFX2FTBPD4M82X63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqtjs1qwzAQhH3poaR5h30BQ5r-4FyTxs2lUKgPvomNtJYWFK1Zyf259dFrQx6hp2H4Zoa5rX4PchlROUsC-h5J-UKpZJitJ8k_qQQqbGslToOoJQdZOAImtwS8sqsx2SC6kEBUYORI8IUxZpiSI4VclEcYRAonD3lSG1A9QRR0-a66GTBmWl91VR3bY3c41T7MR0zks5LFYgTZ4NzkTzKTX9CZzOb-tO_6XdM8fby2_bbt9u8vj2_Ntn9--K-dP8jaZMw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Institutional Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Comparison experiments on geosynthetic-reinforced soil and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls under strip footing surcharge loads</title><source>Ghent University Academic Bibliography</source><creator>Ahmadi, H ; Wittekoek, B ; van Eekelen, S .J. M ; Bezuijen, Adam</creator><creatorcontrib>Ahmadi, H ; Wittekoek, B ; van Eekelen, S .J. M ; Bezuijen, Adam</creatorcontrib><description>Scaled experiments were compared on geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with a full-height facing (GRSWs) and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls (SPWs). A strip footing surcharge load was applied. PIV analyses showed that, in both test series, two slip surfaces developed under the strip footing load: one from the inner edge, the other one from the outer edge of the strip footing. In the GRSWs, the slip surfaces were straight, and the angle with the horizontal was approximately π/4+φ/2. For the SPWs, the slip surfaces reoriented at the intersection with the geogrids and did not always remain straight. The GRSW model behaved stiffer than the geogrid-anchored SPW model for relatively high surcharge loads. The SPW-system behaviour was also stiffer when an extra geogrid anchor was installed at a lower level. This indicates that the soil-reinforcement interface frictional behaviour determines the system behaviour more than for example the reinforcement stiffness.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>CRC Press</publisher><subject>Technology and Engineering</subject><creationdate>2024</creationdate><rights>Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International Public License (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,315,776,4035,27839</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://hdl.handle.net/1854/LU-01HBTX9885SGFX2FTBPD4M82X6$$EView_record_in_Ghent_University$$FView_record_in_$$GGhent_University$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ahmadi, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittekoek, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eekelen, S .J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezuijen, Adam</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison experiments on geosynthetic-reinforced soil and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls under strip footing surcharge loads</title><description>Scaled experiments were compared on geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with a full-height facing (GRSWs) and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls (SPWs). A strip footing surcharge load was applied. PIV analyses showed that, in both test series, two slip surfaces developed under the strip footing load: one from the inner edge, the other one from the outer edge of the strip footing. In the GRSWs, the slip surfaces were straight, and the angle with the horizontal was approximately π/4+φ/2. For the SPWs, the slip surfaces reoriented at the intersection with the geogrids and did not always remain straight. The GRSW model behaved stiffer than the geogrid-anchored SPW model for relatively high surcharge loads. The SPW-system behaviour was also stiffer when an extra geogrid anchor was installed at a lower level. This indicates that the soil-reinforcement interface frictional behaviour determines the system behaviour more than for example the reinforcement stiffness.</description><subject>Technology and Engineering</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>ADGLB</sourceid><recordid>eNqtjs1qwzAQhH3poaR5h30BQ5r-4FyTxs2lUKgPvomNtJYWFK1Zyf259dFrQx6hp2H4Zoa5rX4PchlROUsC-h5J-UKpZJitJ8k_qQQqbGslToOoJQdZOAImtwS8sqsx2SC6kEBUYORI8IUxZpiSI4VclEcYRAonD3lSG1A9QRR0-a66GTBmWl91VR3bY3c41T7MR0zks5LFYgTZ4NzkTzKTX9CZzOb-tO_6XdM8fby2_bbt9u8vj2_Ntn9--K-dP8jaZMw</recordid><startdate>2024</startdate><enddate>2024</enddate><creator>Ahmadi, H</creator><creator>Wittekoek, B</creator><creator>van Eekelen, S .J. M</creator><creator>Bezuijen, Adam</creator><general>CRC Press</general><scope>ADGLB</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2024</creationdate><title>Comparison experiments on geosynthetic-reinforced soil and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls under strip footing surcharge loads</title><author>Ahmadi, H ; Wittekoek, B ; van Eekelen, S .J. M ; Bezuijen, Adam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_01HBTX9885SGFX2FTBPD4M82X63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Technology and Engineering</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ahmadi, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittekoek, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Eekelen, S .J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bezuijen, Adam</creatorcontrib><collection>Ghent University Academic Bibliography</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ahmadi, H</au><au>Wittekoek, B</au><au>van Eekelen, S .J. M</au><au>Bezuijen, Adam</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Comparison experiments on geosynthetic-reinforced soil and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls under strip footing surcharge loads</atitle><date>2024</date><risdate>2024</risdate><abstract>Scaled experiments were compared on geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls with a full-height facing (GRSWs) and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls (SPWs). A strip footing surcharge load was applied. PIV analyses showed that, in both test series, two slip surfaces developed under the strip footing load: one from the inner edge, the other one from the outer edge of the strip footing. In the GRSWs, the slip surfaces were straight, and the angle with the horizontal was approximately π/4+φ/2. For the SPWs, the slip surfaces reoriented at the intersection with the geogrids and did not always remain straight. The GRSW model behaved stiffer than the geogrid-anchored SPW model for relatively high surcharge loads. The SPW-system behaviour was also stiffer when an extra geogrid anchor was installed at a lower level. This indicates that the soil-reinforcement interface frictional behaviour determines the system behaviour more than for example the reinforcement stiffness.</abstract><pub>CRC Press</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_ghent_librecat_oai_archive_ugent_be_01HBTX9885SGFX2FTBPD4M82X6
source Ghent University Academic Bibliography
subjects Technology and Engineering
title Comparison experiments on geosynthetic-reinforced soil and geogrid-anchored sheet pile walls under strip footing surcharge loads
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T07%3A32%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-ghent_ADGLB&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Comparison%20experiments%20on%20geosynthetic-reinforced%20soil%20and%20geogrid-anchored%20sheet%20pile%20walls%20under%20strip%20footing%20surcharge%20loads&rft.au=Ahmadi,%20H&rft.date=2024&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cghent_ADGLB%3Eoai_archive_ugent_be_01HBTX9885SGFX2FTBPD4M82X6%3C/ghent_ADGLB%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true