EXTRATERRITORIAL STATE CRIMINAL LAW, POST-DOBBS
Like the federal government, states can apply their laws to people beyond their borders. Statutes can reach out-of-state conduct, such as fraud, that has effects within the state, and in some circumstances, states can prosecute their own citizens for out-of-state conduct. Many applications of extrat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of criminal law & criminology 2023-09, Vol.113 (4), p.COV1 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | COV1 |
container_title | The journal of criminal law & criminology |
container_volume | 113 |
creator | Brown, Darryl K |
description | Like the federal government, states can apply their laws to people beyond their borders. Statutes can reach out-of-state conduct, such as fraud, that has effects within the state, and in some circumstances, states can prosecute their own citizens for out-of-state conduct. Many applications of extraterritorial jurisdiction are well established and uncontroversial; state common law and the Model Penal Code provide for such authority. The practice draws little attention when states' criminal laws are broadly similar and treat the same activities as crimes. In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, however, state laws now sharply conflict over conduct related to abortion services. In addition to prohibiting in-state activities that facilitate access to abortions, some state legislatures and local prosecutors seek to extend criminal liability to persons acting in states in which their conduct is legal. Louisiana, for example, made it a crime for anyone outside of Louisiana to ship "abortion-inducing drugs" to a Louisiana resident. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A811487138</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A811487138</galeid><sourcerecordid>A811487138</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g2118-3d66702ab9f146d7200e7eb83e8b42fa8d29a8d8bd44b767e290e60802187eec3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMFKxDAQhnNQcF19h4InwWiShiQ9dmtdA3UrbURvJW2npdJtYbuCj2_EPbhQxBmY4R--fxjmBC0ICSjmVARn6Hya3sl3KL5Ad_GbyUITZ5k2aabDxMuNk16U6Se9cTIJX2-85zQ3-D5drfILdNrYfoLLQ1-il4fYRI84Sdc6ChPcMkoV9mshJGG2DBrKRS0ZISChVD6okrPGqpoFrqiy5ryUQgILCAiiCKNKAlT-El397G1tD0U3NON-Z6ttN1VFqCjlSlJfOQrPUC0MsLP9OEDTufERfzvDu6xh21Wzhusjg2P28Llv7cc0FTrf_JtV6-Svww9sNfY9tFC4V0bpb_4LUx2CMg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>EXTRATERRITORIAL STATE CRIMINAL LAW, POST-DOBBS</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Political Science Complete</source><creator>Brown, Darryl K</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Darryl K</creatorcontrib><description>Like the federal government, states can apply their laws to people beyond their borders. Statutes can reach out-of-state conduct, such as fraud, that has effects within the state, and in some circumstances, states can prosecute their own citizens for out-of-state conduct. Many applications of extraterritorial jurisdiction are well established and uncontroversial; state common law and the Model Penal Code provide for such authority. The practice draws little attention when states' criminal laws are broadly similar and treat the same activities as crimes. In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, however, state laws now sharply conflict over conduct related to abortion services. In addition to prohibiting in-state activities that facilitate access to abortions, some state legislatures and local prosecutors seek to extend criminal liability to persons acting in states in which their conduct is legal. Louisiana, for example, made it a crime for anyone outside of Louisiana to ship "abortion-inducing drugs" to a Louisiana resident.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0091-4169</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Northwestern University, School of Law</publisher><subject>Abortion ; Exterritoriality ; Extradition ; Extraterritoriality ; Freedom of movement ; Government regulation ; Immunity (Law) ; Interstate commerce ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Reproductive rights ; State jurisdiction</subject><ispartof>The journal of criminal law & criminology, 2023-09, Vol.113 (4), p.COV1</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Northwestern University, School of Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Darryl K</creatorcontrib><title>EXTRATERRITORIAL STATE CRIMINAL LAW, POST-DOBBS</title><title>The journal of criminal law & criminology</title><addtitle>Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology</addtitle><description>Like the federal government, states can apply their laws to people beyond their borders. Statutes can reach out-of-state conduct, such as fraud, that has effects within the state, and in some circumstances, states can prosecute their own citizens for out-of-state conduct. Many applications of extraterritorial jurisdiction are well established and uncontroversial; state common law and the Model Penal Code provide for such authority. The practice draws little attention when states' criminal laws are broadly similar and treat the same activities as crimes. In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, however, state laws now sharply conflict over conduct related to abortion services. In addition to prohibiting in-state activities that facilitate access to abortions, some state legislatures and local prosecutors seek to extend criminal liability to persons acting in states in which their conduct is legal. Louisiana, for example, made it a crime for anyone outside of Louisiana to ship "abortion-inducing drugs" to a Louisiana resident.</description><subject>Abortion</subject><subject>Exterritoriality</subject><subject>Extradition</subject><subject>Extraterritoriality</subject><subject>Freedom of movement</subject><subject>Government regulation</subject><subject>Immunity (Law)</subject><subject>Interstate commerce</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Reproductive rights</subject><subject>State jurisdiction</subject><issn>0091-4169</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkMFKxDAQhnNQcF19h4InwWiShiQ9dmtdA3UrbURvJW2npdJtYbuCj2_EPbhQxBmY4R--fxjmBC0ICSjmVARn6Hya3sl3KL5Ad_GbyUITZ5k2aabDxMuNk16U6Se9cTIJX2-85zQ3-D5drfILdNrYfoLLQ1-il4fYRI84Sdc6ChPcMkoV9mshJGG2DBrKRS0ZISChVD6okrPGqpoFrqiy5ryUQgILCAiiCKNKAlT-El397G1tD0U3NON-Z6ttN1VFqCjlSlJfOQrPUC0MsLP9OEDTufERfzvDu6xh21Wzhusjg2P28Llv7cc0FTrf_JtV6-Svww9sNfY9tFC4V0bpb_4LUx2CMg</recordid><startdate>20230922</startdate><enddate>20230922</enddate><creator>Brown, Darryl K</creator><general>Northwestern University, School of Law</general><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230922</creationdate><title>EXTRATERRITORIAL STATE CRIMINAL LAW, POST-DOBBS</title><author>Brown, Darryl K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g2118-3d66702ab9f146d7200e7eb83e8b42fa8d29a8d8bd44b767e290e60802187eec3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Abortion</topic><topic>Exterritoriality</topic><topic>Extradition</topic><topic>Extraterritoriality</topic><topic>Freedom of movement</topic><topic>Government regulation</topic><topic>Immunity (Law)</topic><topic>Interstate commerce</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Reproductive rights</topic><topic>State jurisdiction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Darryl K</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><jtitle>The journal of criminal law & criminology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Darryl K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EXTRATERRITORIAL STATE CRIMINAL LAW, POST-DOBBS</atitle><jtitle>The journal of criminal law & criminology</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology</addtitle><date>2023-09-22</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>113</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>COV1</spage><pages>COV1-</pages><issn>0091-4169</issn><abstract>Like the federal government, states can apply their laws to people beyond their borders. Statutes can reach out-of-state conduct, such as fraud, that has effects within the state, and in some circumstances, states can prosecute their own citizens for out-of-state conduct. Many applications of extraterritorial jurisdiction are well established and uncontroversial; state common law and the Model Penal Code provide for such authority. The practice draws little attention when states' criminal laws are broadly similar and treat the same activities as crimes. In the wake of the Supreme Court's decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization, however, state laws now sharply conflict over conduct related to abortion services. In addition to prohibiting in-state activities that facilitate access to abortions, some state legislatures and local prosecutors seek to extend criminal liability to persons acting in states in which their conduct is legal. Louisiana, for example, made it a crime for anyone outside of Louisiana to ship "abortion-inducing drugs" to a Louisiana resident.</abstract><pub>Northwestern University, School of Law</pub><tpages>36</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0091-4169 |
ispartof | The journal of criminal law & criminology, 2023-09, Vol.113 (4), p.COV1 |
issn | 0091-4169 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A811487138 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Political Science Complete |
subjects | Abortion Exterritoriality Extradition Extraterritoriality Freedom of movement Government regulation Immunity (Law) Interstate commerce Laws, regulations and rules Reproductive rights State jurisdiction |
title | EXTRATERRITORIAL STATE CRIMINAL LAW, POST-DOBBS |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T04%3A06%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EXTRATERRITORIAL%20STATE%20CRIMINAL%20LAW,%20POST-DOBBS&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20criminal%20law%20&%20criminology&rft.au=Brown,%20Darryl%20K&rft.date=2023-09-22&rft.volume=113&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=COV1&rft.pages=COV1-&rft.issn=0091-4169&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA811487138%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A811487138&rfr_iscdi=true |