Evaluation of dissertation abstracts: implementation of a proposal/Avaliacao dos resumos de dissertacoes: execucao de uma proposta
The main objective of this paper is to examine the self-assessment process developed in the Postgraduate Program in Education of a private university. To this end, a partnership was established with another program, from a confessional university, to assess the adequacy of the 87 abstracts of disser...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Revista de Educacao PUC - Campinas 2024-01, Vol.29 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | por |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Revista de Educacao PUC - Campinas |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Lopes, Silvia Maria da Silva Marangoni, Ricardo Alexandre |
description | The main objective of this paper is to examine the self-assessment process developed in the Postgraduate Program in Education of a private university. To this end, a partnership was established with another program, from a confessional university, to assess the adequacy of the 87 abstracts of dissertations defended in the Master's Degree in Education, between 2017 and 2020. Based on the self-assessment descriptors, defined by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, the institutional context was evaluated. The methodological procedure was to evaluate, through an evaluative instrument, the presence or absence of quality indicators of these abstracts. After analyzing the data, it was found that there is a demand for improvement of the abstracts and a need for revision of the evaluative instrument. |
doi_str_mv | 10.24220/2318-0870v29a2024e8676 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A808396957</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A808396957</galeid><sourcerecordid>A808396957</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracmisc_A8083969573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjstqwzAURLVoIaHNN0TQtRs9_JC6CyElH5B9uJGvg0CyjK8cuu6X1-kj666GgTOHYWwtxasqlRIbpaUphGnEVVlQQpVo6qZ-YEtZSVtoa_WCrYj8WQgpdVXbcsk-91cIE2Sfep463noiHPNPhzPlEVymN-7jEDBin-8k8GFMQyIIm-2s8OAg8TYRH5GmOGeLd5tLODvwA930TSGf4t8-wzN77CAQrn7zib2874-7Q3GBgCffd-n2Inpyp60RRtvaVo3-H_UFDKJZaw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of dissertation abstracts: implementation of a proposal/Avaliacao dos resumos de dissertacoes: execucao de uma proposta</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Lopes, Silvia Maria da Silva ; Marangoni, Ricardo Alexandre</creator><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Silvia Maria da Silva ; Marangoni, Ricardo Alexandre</creatorcontrib><description>The main objective of this paper is to examine the self-assessment process developed in the Postgraduate Program in Education of a private university. To this end, a partnership was established with another program, from a confessional university, to assess the adequacy of the 87 abstracts of dissertations defended in the Master's Degree in Education, between 2017 and 2020. Based on the self-assessment descriptors, defined by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, the institutional context was evaluated. The methodological procedure was to evaluate, through an evaluative instrument, the presence or absence of quality indicators of these abstracts. After analyzing the data, it was found that there is a demand for improvement of the abstracts and a need for revision of the evaluative instrument.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1519-3993</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.24220/2318-0870v29a2024e8676</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Campinas</publisher><ispartof>Revista de Educacao PUC - Campinas, 2024-01, Vol.29</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Campinas</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Silvia Maria da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangoni, Ricardo Alexandre</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of dissertation abstracts: implementation of a proposal/Avaliacao dos resumos de dissertacoes: execucao de uma proposta</title><title>Revista de Educacao PUC - Campinas</title><description>The main objective of this paper is to examine the self-assessment process developed in the Postgraduate Program in Education of a private university. To this end, a partnership was established with another program, from a confessional university, to assess the adequacy of the 87 abstracts of dissertations defended in the Master's Degree in Education, between 2017 and 2020. Based on the self-assessment descriptors, defined by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, the institutional context was evaluated. The methodological procedure was to evaluate, through an evaluative instrument, the presence or absence of quality indicators of these abstracts. After analyzing the data, it was found that there is a demand for improvement of the abstracts and a need for revision of the evaluative instrument.</description><issn>1519-3993</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjstqwzAURLVoIaHNN0TQtRs9_JC6CyElH5B9uJGvg0CyjK8cuu6X1-kj666GgTOHYWwtxasqlRIbpaUphGnEVVlQQpVo6qZ-YEtZSVtoa_WCrYj8WQgpdVXbcsk-91cIE2Sfep463noiHPNPhzPlEVymN-7jEDBin-8k8GFMQyIIm-2s8OAg8TYRH5GmOGeLd5tLODvwA930TSGf4t8-wzN77CAQrn7zib2874-7Q3GBgCffd-n2Inpyp60RRtvaVo3-H_UFDKJZaw</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Lopes, Silvia Maria da Silva</creator><creator>Marangoni, Ricardo Alexandre</creator><general>Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Campinas</general><scope>INF</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of dissertation abstracts: implementation of a proposal/Avaliacao dos resumos de dissertacoes: execucao de uma proposta</title><author>Lopes, Silvia Maria da Silva ; Marangoni, Ricardo Alexandre</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracmisc_A8083969573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lopes, Silvia Maria da Silva</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marangoni, Ricardo Alexandre</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><jtitle>Revista de Educacao PUC - Campinas</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lopes, Silvia Maria da Silva</au><au>Marangoni, Ricardo Alexandre</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of dissertation abstracts: implementation of a proposal/Avaliacao dos resumos de dissertacoes: execucao de uma proposta</atitle><jtitle>Revista de Educacao PUC - Campinas</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>29</volume><issn>1519-3993</issn><abstract>The main objective of this paper is to examine the self-assessment process developed in the Postgraduate Program in Education of a private university. To this end, a partnership was established with another program, from a confessional university, to assess the adequacy of the 87 abstracts of dissertations defended in the Master's Degree in Education, between 2017 and 2020. Based on the self-assessment descriptors, defined by the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel, the institutional context was evaluated. The methodological procedure was to evaluate, through an evaluative instrument, the presence or absence of quality indicators of these abstracts. After analyzing the data, it was found that there is a demand for improvement of the abstracts and a need for revision of the evaluative instrument.</abstract><pub>Pontificia Universidade Catolica de Campinas</pub><doi>10.24220/2318-0870v29a2024e8676</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1519-3993 |
ispartof | Revista de Educacao PUC - Campinas, 2024-01, Vol.29 |
issn | 1519-3993 |
language | por |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A808396957 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
title | Evaluation of dissertation abstracts: implementation of a proposal/Avaliacao dos resumos de dissertacoes: execucao de uma proposta |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A18%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20dissertation%20abstracts:%20implementation%20of%20a%20proposal/Avaliacao%20dos%20resumos%20de%20dissertacoes:%20execucao%20de%20uma%20proposta&rft.jtitle=Revista%20de%20Educacao%20PUC%20-%20Campinas&rft.au=Lopes,%20Silvia%20Maria%20da%20Silva&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issn=1519-3993&rft_id=info:doi/10.24220/2318-0870v29a2024e8676&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA808396957%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A808396957&rfr_iscdi=true |