Does the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery score after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma have prognostic value?

Background: The value of the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery (TOPS) score, a composite measure of surgical performance for quality assurance, was evaluated in a South African tertiary hospital cohort of pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) performed for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (AAV)....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:South African journal of surgery 2024-06, Vol.62 (2), p.136-141
Hauptverfasser: Leech, N, Krige, J.E.J, Sobnach, S, Kloppers, J.C, Bernon, M.M, Burmeister, S, Jonas, E.G
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 141
container_issue 2
container_start_page 136
container_title South African journal of surgery
container_volume 62
creator Leech, N
Krige, J.E.J
Sobnach, S
Kloppers, J.C
Bernon, M.M
Burmeister, S
Jonas, E.G
description Background: The value of the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery (TOPS) score, a composite measure of surgical performance for quality assurance, was evaluated in a South African tertiary hospital cohort of pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) performed for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (AAV). Method: A review of all patients undergoing a PD for AAV at a single centre between January 1999 and December 2023 was performed. Demographic, operative, pathological and postoperative variables were recorded. Ten clinical and histological variables were used to construct a TOPS score. These included an R0 resection, no postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), no bile leak, no post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, no delayed gastric emptying, no major postoperative complications (< Gr 3 Clavien-Dindo), no readmission to ICU, length of stay [less than or equal to] 10 days, no 30-day readmission or intervention and no 30-day mortality. A textbook outcome (TO) was defined as the fulfilment of all 10 variables. In patients in whom TO was not achieved, the reasons for failure were identified. In addition, the number of patients who had major complications and died were categorised as failure to rescue (FTR). Results: A positive TOPS score was achieved in 27 of 79 (34.2%) patients undergoing a PD. Overall five-year survival after PD was 33.9%. TOPS conferred a significant 1-year survival benefit, 88.9% vs 66.7% (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.08- 15.67, p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival between TOPS and non-TOPS patients, 40.0% vs 32.4% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.48-3.99, p = 0.54). A POPF occurred in 31.6% patients, resulting in a significantly longer hospital admission, 17 vs 10 days (95% CI 2.66-11.34, p = 0.0019). Twenty-one (26.6%) patients developed a major complication, five of whom died (FTR = 6.3%) Conclusion: This study confirmed the value of TOPS as a useful measurement to assess hospital quality metrics and short-term survival after PD for AAV. One quarter of patients developed a major complication with a 6.3% FTR. Keywords: ampullary carcinoma, pancreaticoduodenectomy, textbook outcome, morbidity, survival
doi_str_mv 10.36303/SAJS.00414
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A808253258</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A808253258</galeid><sourcerecordid>A808253258</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-fadb717dda9193cbb8a434d7cdcfa966dea7b3950db911bd4696969e5d74ce553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkU1LxEAMhgdRcF09-QcGBC_SdabT6cdJFr9F8KCeSzqT7lbbZpmZLnr1l9tVDwqSQyB53oTkZexQiplKlVCnj_O7x5kQiUy22CQWWR5pqeU2mwih8ihWqdxle96_jIjKdDphHxeEnocl8oBvoSJ65TQEQx3ypucr6I1DCI3hfnALdO_cG3LIoQ7ofrXJDmSxRxOoe-c1OQ7damhbGBUGnGl66oAvYY185WjRk9_MXEM74Nk-26mh9Xjwk6fs-ery6fwmun-4vj2f30cm1nmIarBVJjNroZCFMlWVQ6ISmxlraijS1CJklSq0sFUhZWWTtNgEapslBrVWU3b0PXcBLZZNX1NwYLrGm3KeizzWatwzUrN_qDEsduOdPdbNWP8jOP4lWCK0YempHUJDvf8LnnyDxpH3Duty5Zpu_FApRfllX7mxr_yyT30C6VCPtQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Does the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery score after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma have prognostic value?</title><source>African Journals Online (Open Access)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Leech, N ; Krige, J.E.J ; Sobnach, S ; Kloppers, J.C ; Bernon, M.M ; Burmeister, S ; Jonas, E.G</creator><creatorcontrib>Leech, N ; Krige, J.E.J ; Sobnach, S ; Kloppers, J.C ; Bernon, M.M ; Burmeister, S ; Jonas, E.G</creatorcontrib><description>Background: The value of the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery (TOPS) score, a composite measure of surgical performance for quality assurance, was evaluated in a South African tertiary hospital cohort of pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) performed for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (AAV). Method: A review of all patients undergoing a PD for AAV at a single centre between January 1999 and December 2023 was performed. Demographic, operative, pathological and postoperative variables were recorded. Ten clinical and histological variables were used to construct a TOPS score. These included an R0 resection, no postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), no bile leak, no post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, no delayed gastric emptying, no major postoperative complications (&lt; Gr 3 Clavien-Dindo), no readmission to ICU, length of stay [less than or equal to] 10 days, no 30-day readmission or intervention and no 30-day mortality. A textbook outcome (TO) was defined as the fulfilment of all 10 variables. In patients in whom TO was not achieved, the reasons for failure were identified. In addition, the number of patients who had major complications and died were categorised as failure to rescue (FTR). Results: A positive TOPS score was achieved in 27 of 79 (34.2%) patients undergoing a PD. Overall five-year survival after PD was 33.9%. TOPS conferred a significant 1-year survival benefit, 88.9% vs 66.7% (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.08- 15.67, p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival between TOPS and non-TOPS patients, 40.0% vs 32.4% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.48-3.99, p = 0.54). A POPF occurred in 31.6% patients, resulting in a significantly longer hospital admission, 17 vs 10 days (95% CI 2.66-11.34, p = 0.0019). Twenty-one (26.6%) patients developed a major complication, five of whom died (FTR = 6.3%) Conclusion: This study confirmed the value of TOPS as a useful measurement to assess hospital quality metrics and short-term survival after PD for AAV. One quarter of patients developed a major complication with a 6.3% FTR. Keywords: ampullary carcinoma, pancreaticoduodenectomy, textbook outcome, morbidity, survival</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-2361</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2078-5151</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.36303/SAJS.00414</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Medpharm Publications</publisher><subject>Cancer ; Carcinoma ; Complications and side effects ; Medical care ; Mortality ; Pancreaticoduodenectomy ; Quality management ; Textbooks ; Type 2 diabetes</subject><ispartof>South African journal of surgery, 2024-06, Vol.62 (2), p.136-141</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Medpharm Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-fadb717dda9193cbb8a434d7cdcfa966dea7b3950db911bd4696969e5d74ce553</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7057-9156 ; 0000-0003-2438-6879 ; 0000-0003-0888-7606 ; 0000-0002-7967-8548 ; 0000-0003-0123-256X ; 0009-0002-6973-8241 ; 0000-0002-4456-2115</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Leech, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krige, J.E.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobnach, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloppers, J.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernon, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burmeister, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonas, E.G</creatorcontrib><title>Does the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery score after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma have prognostic value?</title><title>South African journal of surgery</title><description>Background: The value of the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery (TOPS) score, a composite measure of surgical performance for quality assurance, was evaluated in a South African tertiary hospital cohort of pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) performed for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (AAV). Method: A review of all patients undergoing a PD for AAV at a single centre between January 1999 and December 2023 was performed. Demographic, operative, pathological and postoperative variables were recorded. Ten clinical and histological variables were used to construct a TOPS score. These included an R0 resection, no postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), no bile leak, no post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, no delayed gastric emptying, no major postoperative complications (&lt; Gr 3 Clavien-Dindo), no readmission to ICU, length of stay [less than or equal to] 10 days, no 30-day readmission or intervention and no 30-day mortality. A textbook outcome (TO) was defined as the fulfilment of all 10 variables. In patients in whom TO was not achieved, the reasons for failure were identified. In addition, the number of patients who had major complications and died were categorised as failure to rescue (FTR). Results: A positive TOPS score was achieved in 27 of 79 (34.2%) patients undergoing a PD. Overall five-year survival after PD was 33.9%. TOPS conferred a significant 1-year survival benefit, 88.9% vs 66.7% (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.08- 15.67, p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival between TOPS and non-TOPS patients, 40.0% vs 32.4% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.48-3.99, p = 0.54). A POPF occurred in 31.6% patients, resulting in a significantly longer hospital admission, 17 vs 10 days (95% CI 2.66-11.34, p = 0.0019). Twenty-one (26.6%) patients developed a major complication, five of whom died (FTR = 6.3%) Conclusion: This study confirmed the value of TOPS as a useful measurement to assess hospital quality metrics and short-term survival after PD for AAV. One quarter of patients developed a major complication with a 6.3% FTR. Keywords: ampullary carcinoma, pancreaticoduodenectomy, textbook outcome, morbidity, survival</description><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Carcinoma</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Medical care</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Pancreaticoduodenectomy</subject><subject>Quality management</subject><subject>Textbooks</subject><subject>Type 2 diabetes</subject><issn>0038-2361</issn><issn>2078-5151</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkU1LxEAMhgdRcF09-QcGBC_SdabT6cdJFr9F8KCeSzqT7lbbZpmZLnr1l9tVDwqSQyB53oTkZexQiplKlVCnj_O7x5kQiUy22CQWWR5pqeU2mwih8ihWqdxle96_jIjKdDphHxeEnocl8oBvoSJ65TQEQx3ypucr6I1DCI3hfnALdO_cG3LIoQ7ofrXJDmSxRxOoe-c1OQ7damhbGBUGnGl66oAvYY185WjRk9_MXEM74Nk-26mh9Xjwk6fs-ery6fwmun-4vj2f30cm1nmIarBVJjNroZCFMlWVQ6ISmxlraijS1CJklSq0sFUhZWWTtNgEapslBrVWU3b0PXcBLZZNX1NwYLrGm3KeizzWatwzUrN_qDEsduOdPdbNWP8jOP4lWCK0YempHUJDvf8LnnyDxpH3Duty5Zpu_FApRfllX7mxr_yyT30C6VCPtQ</recordid><startdate>20240601</startdate><enddate>20240601</enddate><creator>Leech, N</creator><creator>Krige, J.E.J</creator><creator>Sobnach, S</creator><creator>Kloppers, J.C</creator><creator>Bernon, M.M</creator><creator>Burmeister, S</creator><creator>Jonas, E.G</creator><general>Medpharm Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7057-9156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2438-6879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-7606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-8548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-256X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6973-8241</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-2115</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240601</creationdate><title>Does the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery score after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma have prognostic value?</title><author>Leech, N ; Krige, J.E.J ; Sobnach, S ; Kloppers, J.C ; Bernon, M.M ; Burmeister, S ; Jonas, E.G</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-fadb717dda9193cbb8a434d7cdcfa966dea7b3950db911bd4696969e5d74ce553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Carcinoma</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Medical care</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Pancreaticoduodenectomy</topic><topic>Quality management</topic><topic>Textbooks</topic><topic>Type 2 diabetes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Leech, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krige, J.E.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sobnach, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kloppers, J.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bernon, M.M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burmeister, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jonas, E.G</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>South African journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Leech, N</au><au>Krige, J.E.J</au><au>Sobnach, S</au><au>Kloppers, J.C</au><au>Bernon, M.M</au><au>Burmeister, S</au><au>Jonas, E.G</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Does the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery score after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma have prognostic value?</atitle><jtitle>South African journal of surgery</jtitle><date>2024-06-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>136</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>136-141</pages><issn>0038-2361</issn><eissn>2078-5151</eissn><abstract>Background: The value of the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery (TOPS) score, a composite measure of surgical performance for quality assurance, was evaluated in a South African tertiary hospital cohort of pancreaticoduodenectomies (PD) performed for adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater (AAV). Method: A review of all patients undergoing a PD for AAV at a single centre between January 1999 and December 2023 was performed. Demographic, operative, pathological and postoperative variables were recorded. Ten clinical and histological variables were used to construct a TOPS score. These included an R0 resection, no postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), no bile leak, no post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage, no delayed gastric emptying, no major postoperative complications (&lt; Gr 3 Clavien-Dindo), no readmission to ICU, length of stay [less than or equal to] 10 days, no 30-day readmission or intervention and no 30-day mortality. A textbook outcome (TO) was defined as the fulfilment of all 10 variables. In patients in whom TO was not achieved, the reasons for failure were identified. In addition, the number of patients who had major complications and died were categorised as failure to rescue (FTR). Results: A positive TOPS score was achieved in 27 of 79 (34.2%) patients undergoing a PD. Overall five-year survival after PD was 33.9%. TOPS conferred a significant 1-year survival benefit, 88.9% vs 66.7% (OR 4.12, 95% CI 1.08- 15.67, p = 0.038). There was no significant difference in 5-year survival between TOPS and non-TOPS patients, 40.0% vs 32.4% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 0.48-3.99, p = 0.54). A POPF occurred in 31.6% patients, resulting in a significantly longer hospital admission, 17 vs 10 days (95% CI 2.66-11.34, p = 0.0019). Twenty-one (26.6%) patients developed a major complication, five of whom died (FTR = 6.3%) Conclusion: This study confirmed the value of TOPS as a useful measurement to assess hospital quality metrics and short-term survival after PD for AAV. One quarter of patients developed a major complication with a 6.3% FTR. Keywords: ampullary carcinoma, pancreaticoduodenectomy, textbook outcome, morbidity, survival</abstract><pub>Medpharm Publications</pub><doi>10.36303/SAJS.00414</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7057-9156</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2438-6879</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0888-7606</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7967-8548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0123-256X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6973-8241</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4456-2115</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-2361
ispartof South African journal of surgery, 2024-06, Vol.62 (2), p.136-141
issn 0038-2361
2078-5151
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A808253258
source African Journals Online (Open Access); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Cancer
Carcinoma
Complications and side effects
Medical care
Mortality
Pancreaticoduodenectomy
Quality management
Textbooks
Type 2 diabetes
title Does the textbook outcome in pancreatic surgery score after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma have prognostic value?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T12%3A44%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Does%20the%20textbook%20outcome%20in%20pancreatic%20surgery%20score%20after%20pancreaticoduodenectomy%20for%20ampullary%20carcinoma%20have%20prognostic%20value?&rft.jtitle=South%20African%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Leech,%20N&rft.date=2024-06-01&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=136&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=136-141&rft.issn=0038-2361&rft.eissn=2078-5151&rft_id=info:doi/10.36303/SAJS.00414&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA808253258%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A808253258&rfr_iscdi=true