Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System

Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy 2024-01, Vol.31 (2), p.199
1. Verfasser: Hauber, Laurie
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 199
container_title Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy
container_volume 31
creator Hauber, Laurie
description Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures that are ineffective and inhumane. A punitive approach to addressing unsheltered homelessness creates insurmountable barriers to housing and employment, keeping people in a cycle of homelessness that becomes increasingly difficult to overcome. Using law enforcement as the primary tool to address homelessness is not just counterproductive--it is expensive. Multiple studies have demonstrated the significant cost savings by redirecting enforcement dollars toward housing and support services.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A789772337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A789772337</galeid><sourcerecordid>A789772337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1057-61c18404a03b051e6abcff9728134cffaecae41f32278fe6e50a8a686b42a9b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzE1LxDAQBuAeFFxX_0PAcyVp0qT1VopfsLDiuudlmk66kTaBJhXWX2_FvQhlDjPv8MxcJCuWZyLlpRJXyXUIn5QyJbhcJe_1aAfroLffEK13xBsSj0j27uingO0DqUgNAckuTu2JbA2p-oijm_EXBhI9AfI2Ofsbye4UIg43yaWBPuDtua-T_dPjR_2SbrbPr3W1STtGc5VKplkhqADKG5ozlNBoY0qVFYyLeQLUgIIZnmWqMCgxp1CALGQjMigbxtfJ3d_fDno8WGd8HEEPNuhDpYpSqYxzNat0QXXocITeOzR2Xv_z9wt-rhYHqxcOfgCytWmM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Hauber, Laurie</creator><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Laurie</creatorcontrib><description>Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures that are ineffective and inhumane. A punitive approach to addressing unsheltered homelessness creates insurmountable barriers to housing and employment, keeping people in a cycle of homelessness that becomes increasingly difficult to overcome. Using law enforcement as the primary tool to address homelessness is not just counterproductive--it is expensive. Multiple studies have demonstrated the significant cost savings by redirecting enforcement dollars toward housing and support services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-3974</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Georgetown University Law Center</publisher><subject>Alternatives to imprisonment ; Community development ; Economic aspects ; Evaluation ; Homeless persons ; Homeless shelters ; Housing policy ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Minorities ; Social aspects</subject><ispartof>Georgetown journal on poverty law &amp; policy, 2024-01, Vol.31 (2), p.199</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Georgetown University Law Center</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Laurie</creatorcontrib><title>Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System</title><title>Georgetown journal on poverty law &amp; policy</title><description>Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures that are ineffective and inhumane. A punitive approach to addressing unsheltered homelessness creates insurmountable barriers to housing and employment, keeping people in a cycle of homelessness that becomes increasingly difficult to overcome. Using law enforcement as the primary tool to address homelessness is not just counterproductive--it is expensive. Multiple studies have demonstrated the significant cost savings by redirecting enforcement dollars toward housing and support services.</description><subject>Alternatives to imprisonment</subject><subject>Community development</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Homeless persons</subject><subject>Homeless shelters</subject><subject>Housing policy</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Minorities</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><issn>1524-3974</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptzE1LxDAQBuAeFFxX_0PAcyVp0qT1VopfsLDiuudlmk66kTaBJhXWX2_FvQhlDjPv8MxcJCuWZyLlpRJXyXUIn5QyJbhcJe_1aAfroLffEK13xBsSj0j27uingO0DqUgNAckuTu2JbA2p-oijm_EXBhI9AfI2Ofsbye4UIg43yaWBPuDtua-T_dPjR_2SbrbPr3W1STtGc5VKplkhqADKG5ozlNBoY0qVFYyLeQLUgIIZnmWqMCgxp1CALGQjMigbxtfJ3d_fDno8WGd8HEEPNuhDpYpSqYxzNat0QXXocITeOzR2Xv_z9wt-rhYHqxcOfgCytWmM</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Hauber, Laurie</creator><general>Georgetown University Law Center</general><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System</title><author>Hauber, Laurie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1057-61c18404a03b051e6abcff9728134cffaecae41f32278fe6e50a8a686b42a9b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternatives to imprisonment</topic><topic>Community development</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Homeless persons</topic><topic>Homeless shelters</topic><topic>Housing policy</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Minorities</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Laurie</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Georgetown journal on poverty law &amp; policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauber, Laurie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System</atitle><jtitle>Georgetown journal on poverty law &amp; policy</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><pages>199-</pages><issn>1524-3974</issn><abstract>Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures that are ineffective and inhumane. A punitive approach to addressing unsheltered homelessness creates insurmountable barriers to housing and employment, keeping people in a cycle of homelessness that becomes increasingly difficult to overcome. Using law enforcement as the primary tool to address homelessness is not just counterproductive--it is expensive. Multiple studies have demonstrated the significant cost savings by redirecting enforcement dollars toward housing and support services.</abstract><pub>Georgetown University Law Center</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1524-3974
ispartof Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy, 2024-01, Vol.31 (2), p.199
issn 1524-3974
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A789772337
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Alternatives to imprisonment
Community development
Economic aspects
Evaluation
Homeless persons
Homeless shelters
Housing policy
Laws, regulations and rules
Minorities
Social aspects
title Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Criminalization%20of%20the%20Unhoused:%20A%20Case%20Study%20Of%20Alternatives%20to%20a%20Punitive%20System&rft.jtitle=Georgetown%20journal%20on%20poverty%20law%20&%20policy&rft.au=Hauber,%20Laurie&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.pages=199-&rft.issn=1524-3974&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA789772337%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A789772337&rfr_iscdi=true