Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System
Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy 2024-01, Vol.31 (2), p.199 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 199 |
container_title | Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Hauber, Laurie |
description | Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures that are ineffective and inhumane. A punitive approach to addressing unsheltered homelessness creates insurmountable barriers to housing and employment, keeping people in a cycle of homelessness that becomes increasingly difficult to overcome. Using law enforcement as the primary tool to address homelessness is not just counterproductive--it is expensive. Multiple studies have demonstrated the significant cost savings by redirecting enforcement dollars toward housing and support services. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A789772337</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A789772337</galeid><sourcerecordid>A789772337</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1057-61c18404a03b051e6abcff9728134cffaecae41f32278fe6e50a8a686b42a9b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptzE1LxDAQBuAeFFxX_0PAcyVp0qT1VopfsLDiuudlmk66kTaBJhXWX2_FvQhlDjPv8MxcJCuWZyLlpRJXyXUIn5QyJbhcJe_1aAfroLffEK13xBsSj0j27uingO0DqUgNAckuTu2JbA2p-oijm_EXBhI9AfI2Ofsbye4UIg43yaWBPuDtua-T_dPjR_2SbrbPr3W1STtGc5VKplkhqADKG5ozlNBoY0qVFYyLeQLUgIIZnmWqMCgxp1CALGQjMigbxtfJ3d_fDno8WGd8HEEPNuhDpYpSqYxzNat0QXXocITeOzR2Xv_z9wt-rhYHqxcOfgCytWmM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Hauber, Laurie</creator><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Laurie</creatorcontrib><description>Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures that are ineffective and inhumane. A punitive approach to addressing unsheltered homelessness creates insurmountable barriers to housing and employment, keeping people in a cycle of homelessness that becomes increasingly difficult to overcome. Using law enforcement as the primary tool to address homelessness is not just counterproductive--it is expensive. Multiple studies have demonstrated the significant cost savings by redirecting enforcement dollars toward housing and support services.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1524-3974</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Georgetown University Law Center</publisher><subject>Alternatives to imprisonment ; Community development ; Economic aspects ; Evaluation ; Homeless persons ; Homeless shelters ; Housing policy ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Minorities ; Social aspects</subject><ispartof>Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy, 2024-01, Vol.31 (2), p.199</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 Georgetown University Law Center</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Laurie</creatorcontrib><title>Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System</title><title>Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy</title><description>Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures that are ineffective and inhumane. A punitive approach to addressing unsheltered homelessness creates insurmountable barriers to housing and employment, keeping people in a cycle of homelessness that becomes increasingly difficult to overcome. Using law enforcement as the primary tool to address homelessness is not just counterproductive--it is expensive. Multiple studies have demonstrated the significant cost savings by redirecting enforcement dollars toward housing and support services.</description><subject>Alternatives to imprisonment</subject><subject>Community development</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Homeless persons</subject><subject>Homeless shelters</subject><subject>Housing policy</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Minorities</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><issn>1524-3974</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptzE1LxDAQBuAeFFxX_0PAcyVp0qT1VopfsLDiuudlmk66kTaBJhXWX2_FvQhlDjPv8MxcJCuWZyLlpRJXyXUIn5QyJbhcJe_1aAfroLffEK13xBsSj0j27uingO0DqUgNAckuTu2JbA2p-oijm_EXBhI9AfI2Ofsbye4UIg43yaWBPuDtua-T_dPjR_2SbrbPr3W1STtGc5VKplkhqADKG5ozlNBoY0qVFYyLeQLUgIIZnmWqMCgxp1CALGQjMigbxtfJ3d_fDno8WGd8HEEPNuhDpYpSqYxzNat0QXXocITeOzR2Xv_z9wt-rhYHqxcOfgCytWmM</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Hauber, Laurie</creator><general>Georgetown University Law Center</general><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System</title><author>Hauber, Laurie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1057-61c18404a03b051e6abcff9728134cffaecae41f32278fe6e50a8a686b42a9b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Alternatives to imprisonment</topic><topic>Community development</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Homeless persons</topic><topic>Homeless shelters</topic><topic>Housing policy</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Minorities</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hauber, Laurie</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hauber, Laurie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System</atitle><jtitle>Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>199</spage><pages>199-</pages><issn>1524-3974</issn><abstract>Millions of people today experience housing insecurity and homelessness, a large percentage of whom live without access to a sanctioned shelter site. The predominant response to this housing and homelessness crisis by local governments throughout the country is the enforcement of punitive measures that are ineffective and inhumane. A punitive approach to addressing unsheltered homelessness creates insurmountable barriers to housing and employment, keeping people in a cycle of homelessness that becomes increasingly difficult to overcome. Using law enforcement as the primary tool to address homelessness is not just counterproductive--it is expensive. Multiple studies have demonstrated the significant cost savings by redirecting enforcement dollars toward housing and support services.</abstract><pub>Georgetown University Law Center</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1524-3974 |
ispartof | Georgetown journal on poverty law & policy, 2024-01, Vol.31 (2), p.199 |
issn | 1524-3974 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A789772337 |
source | HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Alternatives to imprisonment Community development Economic aspects Evaluation Homeless persons Homeless shelters Housing policy Laws, regulations and rules Minorities Social aspects |
title | Criminalization of the Unhoused: A Case Study Of Alternatives to a Punitive System |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T05%3A18%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Criminalization%20of%20the%20Unhoused:%20A%20Case%20Study%20Of%20Alternatives%20to%20a%20Punitive%20System&rft.jtitle=Georgetown%20journal%20on%20poverty%20law%20&%20policy&rft.au=Hauber,%20Laurie&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=199&rft.pages=199-&rft.issn=1524-3974&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA789772337%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A789772337&rfr_iscdi=true |