Safety Assessment and Probiotic Potential Comparison of IBifidobacterium longum/I subsp. Iinfantis/I BLI-02, ILactobacillus plantarum/I LPL28, ILactobacillus acidophilus/I TYCA06, and ILactobacillus paracasei/I ET-66

Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BLI-02, Lactobacillus paracasei ET-66, Lactobacillus plantarum LPL28, and Lactobacillus acidophilus TYCA06, isolated from healthy breast milk, miso, and the healthy human gut, were assessed for safety in this study. BLI-02, LPL28, TYCA06, and ET-66 exhibited no...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nutrients 2023-12, Vol.16 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Chen, Jui-Fen, Hsia, Ko-Chiang, Kuo, Yi-Wei, Chen, Shu-Hui, Huang, Yen-Yu, Li, Ching-Min, Hsu, Yu-Chieh, Tsai, Shin-Yu, Ho, Hsieh-Hsun
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Nutrients
container_volume 16
creator Chen, Jui-Fen
Hsia, Ko-Chiang
Kuo, Yi-Wei
Chen, Shu-Hui
Huang, Yen-Yu
Li, Ching-Min
Hsu, Yu-Chieh
Tsai, Shin-Yu
Ho, Hsieh-Hsun
description Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BLI-02, Lactobacillus paracasei ET-66, Lactobacillus plantarum LPL28, and Lactobacillus acidophilus TYCA06, isolated from healthy breast milk, miso, and the healthy human gut, were assessed for safety in this study. BLI-02, LPL28, TYCA06, and ET-66 exhibited no antibiotic resistance and mutagenic activity in the Ames test at the highest dosage (5000 μg/plate). No genotoxicity was observed in micronucleus and chromosomal aberration assays in rodent spermatogonia at the maximum dosage of 10 g/kg body weight (BW). No acute and sub-chronic toxicity occurred in mice and rats at the maximum tested dosage of 10 g/kg BW and 1.5 g/kg BW, respectively. The lyophilized powder of these strains survived a low pH and high bile salt environment, adhering strongly to Caco-2 cells. Unique antimicrobial activities were noted in these strains, with BLI-02 demonstrating the best growth inhibition against Vibrio parahaemolyticus, LPL28 exhibiting the best growth inhibition against Helicobacter pylori, and ET-66 showing the best growth inhibition against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Based on the present study, the lyophilized powder of these four strains appears to be a safe probiotic supplement at tested dosages. It should be applicable for clinical or healthcare applications.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/nu16010126
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A779346716</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A779346716</galeid><sourcerecordid>A779346716</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g676-21a90bfb9bee0021ad6aee8d6fb4796c89e2453a45fb0abbb696ca3227681e703</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj8FOwzAMhisEEtPYhSeIxHXd0rRL2mNXDahUiUn0wmly2mQEtU3VtAfelMfBGxwQYB9s__p-y_a824CuwjCh624KOA1owPiFN2NUMJ_zKLz80V97C-fe6CkEFTyceR_PoNX4TlLnlHOt6kYCXU32g5XGjqYiezuiaKAhmW17GIyzHbGa5FujTW0lVKMazNSSxnbHqV3nxE3S9SuSm04DOh1K2yL3KVuSvED85DFNMznSNwjAcHYV-4LFfwiste1fDfbIlC9ZSvnyfOHvVTBABU4ZxHYlPnvjXWlonFp817lX3u_K7NEvnh7yLC38IxfcZwEkVGqZSKUoxanmoFRccy0jkfAqThSLNiFEGy0pSCk5ihAyJngcKEHDuXf3tfYIjTrgy3bEQ1rjqkMqRBJGXAQcqdU_FGatWlPZTmmD-g_DJ2XmjvI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety Assessment and Probiotic Potential Comparison of IBifidobacterium longum/I subsp. Iinfantis/I BLI-02, ILactobacillus plantarum/I LPL28, ILactobacillus acidophilus/I TYCA06, and ILactobacillus paracasei/I ET-66</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Chen, Jui-Fen ; Hsia, Ko-Chiang ; Kuo, Yi-Wei ; Chen, Shu-Hui ; Huang, Yen-Yu ; Li, Ching-Min ; Hsu, Yu-Chieh ; Tsai, Shin-Yu ; Ho, Hsieh-Hsun</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jui-Fen ; Hsia, Ko-Chiang ; Kuo, Yi-Wei ; Chen, Shu-Hui ; Huang, Yen-Yu ; Li, Ching-Min ; Hsu, Yu-Chieh ; Tsai, Shin-Yu ; Ho, Hsieh-Hsun</creatorcontrib><description>Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BLI-02, Lactobacillus paracasei ET-66, Lactobacillus plantarum LPL28, and Lactobacillus acidophilus TYCA06, isolated from healthy breast milk, miso, and the healthy human gut, were assessed for safety in this study. BLI-02, LPL28, TYCA06, and ET-66 exhibited no antibiotic resistance and mutagenic activity in the Ames test at the highest dosage (5000 μg/plate). No genotoxicity was observed in micronucleus and chromosomal aberration assays in rodent spermatogonia at the maximum dosage of 10 g/kg body weight (BW). No acute and sub-chronic toxicity occurred in mice and rats at the maximum tested dosage of 10 g/kg BW and 1.5 g/kg BW, respectively. The lyophilized powder of these strains survived a low pH and high bile salt environment, adhering strongly to Caco-2 cells. Unique antimicrobial activities were noted in these strains, with BLI-02 demonstrating the best growth inhibition against Vibrio parahaemolyticus, LPL28 exhibiting the best growth inhibition against Helicobacter pylori, and ET-66 showing the best growth inhibition against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Based on the present study, the lyophilized powder of these four strains appears to be a safe probiotic supplement at tested dosages. It should be applicable for clinical or healthcare applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2072-6643</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/nu16010126</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Body weight ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Probiotics ; Safety and security measures ; Tetracycline ; Tetracyclines</subject><ispartof>Nutrients, 2023-12, Vol.16 (1)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jui-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsia, Ko-Chiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Yi-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yen-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ching-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Yu-Chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Shin-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Hsieh-Hsun</creatorcontrib><title>Safety Assessment and Probiotic Potential Comparison of IBifidobacterium longum/I subsp. Iinfantis/I BLI-02, ILactobacillus plantarum/I LPL28, ILactobacillus acidophilus/I TYCA06, and ILactobacillus paracasei/I ET-66</title><title>Nutrients</title><description>Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BLI-02, Lactobacillus paracasei ET-66, Lactobacillus plantarum LPL28, and Lactobacillus acidophilus TYCA06, isolated from healthy breast milk, miso, and the healthy human gut, were assessed for safety in this study. BLI-02, LPL28, TYCA06, and ET-66 exhibited no antibiotic resistance and mutagenic activity in the Ames test at the highest dosage (5000 μg/plate). No genotoxicity was observed in micronucleus and chromosomal aberration assays in rodent spermatogonia at the maximum dosage of 10 g/kg body weight (BW). No acute and sub-chronic toxicity occurred in mice and rats at the maximum tested dosage of 10 g/kg BW and 1.5 g/kg BW, respectively. The lyophilized powder of these strains survived a low pH and high bile salt environment, adhering strongly to Caco-2 cells. Unique antimicrobial activities were noted in these strains, with BLI-02 demonstrating the best growth inhibition against Vibrio parahaemolyticus, LPL28 exhibiting the best growth inhibition against Helicobacter pylori, and ET-66 showing the best growth inhibition against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Based on the present study, the lyophilized powder of these four strains appears to be a safe probiotic supplement at tested dosages. It should be applicable for clinical or healthcare applications.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Body weight</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Probiotics</subject><subject>Safety and security measures</subject><subject>Tetracycline</subject><subject>Tetracyclines</subject><issn>2072-6643</issn><issn>2072-6643</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptj8FOwzAMhisEEtPYhSeIxHXd0rRL2mNXDahUiUn0wmly2mQEtU3VtAfelMfBGxwQYB9s__p-y_a824CuwjCh624KOA1owPiFN2NUMJ_zKLz80V97C-fe6CkEFTyceR_PoNX4TlLnlHOt6kYCXU32g5XGjqYiezuiaKAhmW17GIyzHbGa5FujTW0lVKMazNSSxnbHqV3nxE3S9SuSm04DOh1K2yL3KVuSvED85DFNMznSNwjAcHYV-4LFfwiste1fDfbIlC9ZSvnyfOHvVTBABU4ZxHYlPnvjXWlonFp817lX3u_K7NEvnh7yLC38IxfcZwEkVGqZSKUoxanmoFRccy0jkfAqThSLNiFEGy0pSCk5ihAyJngcKEHDuXf3tfYIjTrgy3bEQ1rjqkMqRBJGXAQcqdU_FGatWlPZTmmD-g_DJ2XmjvI</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Chen, Jui-Fen</creator><creator>Hsia, Ko-Chiang</creator><creator>Kuo, Yi-Wei</creator><creator>Chen, Shu-Hui</creator><creator>Huang, Yen-Yu</creator><creator>Li, Ching-Min</creator><creator>Hsu, Yu-Chieh</creator><creator>Tsai, Shin-Yu</creator><creator>Ho, Hsieh-Hsun</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Safety Assessment and Probiotic Potential Comparison of IBifidobacterium longum/I subsp. Iinfantis/I BLI-02, ILactobacillus plantarum/I LPL28, ILactobacillus acidophilus/I TYCA06, and ILactobacillus paracasei/I ET-66</title><author>Chen, Jui-Fen ; Hsia, Ko-Chiang ; Kuo, Yi-Wei ; Chen, Shu-Hui ; Huang, Yen-Yu ; Li, Ching-Min ; Hsu, Yu-Chieh ; Tsai, Shin-Yu ; Ho, Hsieh-Hsun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g676-21a90bfb9bee0021ad6aee8d6fb4796c89e2453a45fb0abbb696ca3227681e703</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Body weight</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Probiotics</topic><topic>Safety and security measures</topic><topic>Tetracycline</topic><topic>Tetracyclines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Jui-Fen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsia, Ko-Chiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kuo, Yi-Wei</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shu-Hui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Yen-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Ching-Min</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hsu, Yu-Chieh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsai, Shin-Yu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Hsieh-Hsun</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Jui-Fen</au><au>Hsia, Ko-Chiang</au><au>Kuo, Yi-Wei</au><au>Chen, Shu-Hui</au><au>Huang, Yen-Yu</au><au>Li, Ching-Min</au><au>Hsu, Yu-Chieh</au><au>Tsai, Shin-Yu</au><au>Ho, Hsieh-Hsun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety Assessment and Probiotic Potential Comparison of IBifidobacterium longum/I subsp. Iinfantis/I BLI-02, ILactobacillus plantarum/I LPL28, ILactobacillus acidophilus/I TYCA06, and ILactobacillus paracasei/I ET-66</atitle><jtitle>Nutrients</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>2072-6643</issn><eissn>2072-6643</eissn><abstract>Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis BLI-02, Lactobacillus paracasei ET-66, Lactobacillus plantarum LPL28, and Lactobacillus acidophilus TYCA06, isolated from healthy breast milk, miso, and the healthy human gut, were assessed for safety in this study. BLI-02, LPL28, TYCA06, and ET-66 exhibited no antibiotic resistance and mutagenic activity in the Ames test at the highest dosage (5000 μg/plate). No genotoxicity was observed in micronucleus and chromosomal aberration assays in rodent spermatogonia at the maximum dosage of 10 g/kg body weight (BW). No acute and sub-chronic toxicity occurred in mice and rats at the maximum tested dosage of 10 g/kg BW and 1.5 g/kg BW, respectively. The lyophilized powder of these strains survived a low pH and high bile salt environment, adhering strongly to Caco-2 cells. Unique antimicrobial activities were noted in these strains, with BLI-02 demonstrating the best growth inhibition against Vibrio parahaemolyticus, LPL28 exhibiting the best growth inhibition against Helicobacter pylori, and ET-66 showing the best growth inhibition against Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans. Based on the present study, the lyophilized powder of these four strains appears to be a safe probiotic supplement at tested dosages. It should be applicable for clinical or healthcare applications.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/nu16010126</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2072-6643
ispartof Nutrients, 2023-12, Vol.16 (1)
issn 2072-6643
2072-6643
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A779346716
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Analysis
Body weight
Drug resistance in microorganisms
Probiotics
Safety and security measures
Tetracycline
Tetracyclines
title Safety Assessment and Probiotic Potential Comparison of IBifidobacterium longum/I subsp. Iinfantis/I BLI-02, ILactobacillus plantarum/I LPL28, ILactobacillus acidophilus/I TYCA06, and ILactobacillus paracasei/I ET-66
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T17%3A44%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20Assessment%20and%20Probiotic%20Potential%20Comparison%20of%20IBifidobacterium%20longum/I%20subsp.%20Iinfantis/I%20BLI-02,%20ILactobacillus%20plantarum/I%20LPL28,%20ILactobacillus%20acidophilus/I%20TYCA06,%20and%20ILactobacillus%20paracasei/I%20ET-66&rft.jtitle=Nutrients&rft.au=Chen,%20Jui-Fen&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=2072-6643&rft.eissn=2072-6643&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/nu16010126&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA779346716%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A779346716&rfr_iscdi=true