Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union

Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime change...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regions & cohesion 2023-06, Vol.13 (2), p.105-118
1. Verfasser: Siman, TainÃ
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 118
container_issue 2
container_start_page 105
container_title Regions & cohesion
container_volume 13
creator Siman, TainÃ
description Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime changes occur, or governments become undemocratic. This article reflects on the development and enforcement of these tools based on two major cases for Europe and Latin America: the case of Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union. The conclusion is not supposed to plainly label processes as “succeeded” or “failed” but rather to provide observations on mutual learning through case studies to better reflect on the design of institutions, norms, adaptation, and political constraints to its enforcement.
doi_str_mv 10.3167/reco.2023.130206
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A772562432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A772562432</galeid><sourcerecordid>A772562432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c178t-873459c6dce168acb418014d0cbaf7b62426fd7324c2fe215ebd9ef1e91234ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouKx71qPguTWZpEl7XBa_YNGLgreQTidSaRtJetn_3pQVQXDmMMPw5vH4MXYleCmFNreRMJTAQZZCcuD6hK1AVFA03NSnv7t-P2eblD55rkrVooEVu3wOU9HRGDA6PFzPYaDoJqQLdubdkGjzM9fs7f7udfdY7F8ennbbfYHC1HNRG6mqBnWHJHTtsFWi5kJ1HFvnTatBgfadkaAQPOUc1HYNeUGNAKmI5JrdHH0_3EC2n3yYc5CxT2i3xkCVHSRkVfmPKndO3mOYyPf5_ueBHx8whpQiefsV-9HFgxXcLsjsgswuyOwRmfwGeTdcow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Siman, TainÃ</creator><creatorcontrib>Siman, TainÃ</creatorcontrib><description>Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime changes occur, or governments become undemocratic. This article reflects on the development and enforcement of these tools based on two major cases for Europe and Latin America: the case of Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union. The conclusion is not supposed to plainly label processes as “succeeded” or “failed” but rather to provide observations on mutual learning through case studies to better reflect on the design of institutions, norms, adaptation, and political constraints to its enforcement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2152-906X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-9078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3167/reco.2023.130206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berghahn Books, Inc</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Europe ; International aspects ; Political aspects ; South America ; Toleration</subject><ispartof>Regions &amp; cohesion, 2023-06, Vol.13 (2), p.105-118</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Berghahn Books, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-9516-7791</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siman, TainÃ</creatorcontrib><title>Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union</title><title>Regions &amp; cohesion</title><description>Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime changes occur, or governments become undemocratic. This article reflects on the development and enforcement of these tools based on two major cases for Europe and Latin America: the case of Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union. The conclusion is not supposed to plainly label processes as “succeeded” or “failed” but rather to provide observations on mutual learning through case studies to better reflect on the design of institutions, norms, adaptation, and political constraints to its enforcement.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>International aspects</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Toleration</subject><issn>2152-906X</issn><issn>2152-9078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouKx71qPguTWZpEl7XBa_YNGLgreQTidSaRtJetn_3pQVQXDmMMPw5vH4MXYleCmFNreRMJTAQZZCcuD6hK1AVFA03NSnv7t-P2eblD55rkrVooEVu3wOU9HRGDA6PFzPYaDoJqQLdubdkGjzM9fs7f7udfdY7F8ennbbfYHC1HNRG6mqBnWHJHTtsFWi5kJ1HFvnTatBgfadkaAQPOUc1HYNeUGNAKmI5JrdHH0_3EC2n3yYc5CxT2i3xkCVHSRkVfmPKndO3mOYyPf5_ueBHx8whpQiefsV-9HFgxXcLsjsgswuyOwRmfwGeTdcow</recordid><startdate>20230622</startdate><enddate>20230622</enddate><creator>Siman, TainÃ</creator><general>Berghahn Books, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9516-7791</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230622</creationdate><title>Non-democracy tolerance</title><author>Siman, TainÃ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c178t-873459c6dce168acb418014d0cbaf7b62426fd7324c2fe215ebd9ef1e91234ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>International aspects</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Toleration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siman, TainÃ</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Regions &amp; cohesion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siman, TainÃ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union</atitle><jtitle>Regions &amp; cohesion</jtitle><date>2023-06-22</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>105-118</pages><issn>2152-906X</issn><eissn>2152-9078</eissn><abstract>Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime changes occur, or governments become undemocratic. This article reflects on the development and enforcement of these tools based on two major cases for Europe and Latin America: the case of Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union. The conclusion is not supposed to plainly label processes as “succeeded” or “failed” but rather to provide observations on mutual learning through case studies to better reflect on the design of institutions, norms, adaptation, and political constraints to its enforcement.</abstract><pub>Berghahn Books, Inc</pub><doi>10.3167/reco.2023.130206</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9516-7791</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2152-906X
ispartof Regions & cohesion, 2023-06, Vol.13 (2), p.105-118
issn 2152-906X
2152-9078
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A772562432
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals
subjects Democracy
Europe
International aspects
Political aspects
South America
Toleration
title Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A21%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-democracy%20tolerance:%20Venezuela%20in%20Mercosur%20and%20Hungary%20in%20the%20European%20Union&rft.jtitle=Regions%20&%20cohesion&rft.au=Siman,%20Tain%C3%83&rft.date=2023-06-22&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=105-118&rft.issn=2152-906X&rft.eissn=2152-9078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3167/reco.2023.130206&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA772562432%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A772562432&rfr_iscdi=true