Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union
Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime change...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regions & cohesion 2023-06, Vol.13 (2), p.105-118 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 118 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 105 |
container_title | Regions & cohesion |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Siman, Tainà |
description | Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime changes occur, or governments become undemocratic. This article reflects on the development and enforcement of these tools based on two major cases for Europe and Latin America: the case of Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union. The conclusion is not supposed to plainly label processes as “succeeded” or “failed” but rather to provide observations on mutual learning through case studies to better reflect on the design of institutions, norms, adaptation, and political constraints to its enforcement. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3167/reco.2023.130206 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A772562432</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A772562432</galeid><sourcerecordid>A772562432</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c178t-873459c6dce168acb418014d0cbaf7b62426fd7324c2fe215ebd9ef1e91234ee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouKx71qPguTWZpEl7XBa_YNGLgreQTidSaRtJetn_3pQVQXDmMMPw5vH4MXYleCmFNreRMJTAQZZCcuD6hK1AVFA03NSnv7t-P2eblD55rkrVooEVu3wOU9HRGDA6PFzPYaDoJqQLdubdkGjzM9fs7f7udfdY7F8ennbbfYHC1HNRG6mqBnWHJHTtsFWi5kJ1HFvnTatBgfadkaAQPOUc1HYNeUGNAKmI5JrdHH0_3EC2n3yYc5CxT2i3xkCVHSRkVfmPKndO3mOYyPf5_ueBHx8whpQiefsV-9HFgxXcLsjsgswuyOwRmfwGeTdcow</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><creator>Siman, TainÃ</creator><creatorcontrib>Siman, TainÃ</creatorcontrib><description>Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime changes occur, or governments become undemocratic. This article reflects on the development and enforcement of these tools based on two major cases for Europe and Latin America: the case of Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union. The conclusion is not supposed to plainly label processes as “succeeded” or “failed” but rather to provide observations on mutual learning through case studies to better reflect on the design of institutions, norms, adaptation, and political constraints to its enforcement.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2152-906X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2152-9078</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3167/reco.2023.130206</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berghahn Books, Inc</publisher><subject>Democracy ; Europe ; International aspects ; Political aspects ; South America ; Toleration</subject><ispartof>Regions & cohesion, 2023-06, Vol.13 (2), p.105-118</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Berghahn Books, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-9516-7791</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siman, TainÃ</creatorcontrib><title>Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union</title><title>Regions & cohesion</title><description>Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime changes occur, or governments become undemocratic. This article reflects on the development and enforcement of these tools based on two major cases for Europe and Latin America: the case of Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union. The conclusion is not supposed to plainly label processes as “succeeded” or “failed” but rather to provide observations on mutual learning through case studies to better reflect on the design of institutions, norms, adaptation, and political constraints to its enforcement.</description><subject>Democracy</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>International aspects</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>South America</subject><subject>Toleration</subject><issn>2152-906X</issn><issn>2152-9078</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1LxDAQxYMouKx71qPguTWZpEl7XBa_YNGLgreQTidSaRtJetn_3pQVQXDmMMPw5vH4MXYleCmFNreRMJTAQZZCcuD6hK1AVFA03NSnv7t-P2eblD55rkrVooEVu3wOU9HRGDA6PFzPYaDoJqQLdubdkGjzM9fs7f7udfdY7F8ennbbfYHC1HNRG6mqBnWHJHTtsFWi5kJ1HFvnTatBgfadkaAQPOUc1HYNeUGNAKmI5JrdHH0_3EC2n3yYc5CxT2i3xkCVHSRkVfmPKndO3mOYyPf5_ueBHx8whpQiefsV-9HFgxXcLsjsgswuyOwRmfwGeTdcow</recordid><startdate>20230622</startdate><enddate>20230622</enddate><creator>Siman, TainÃ</creator><general>Berghahn Books, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9516-7791</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230622</creationdate><title>Non-democracy tolerance</title><author>Siman, TainÃ</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c178t-873459c6dce168acb418014d0cbaf7b62426fd7324c2fe215ebd9ef1e91234ee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Democracy</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>International aspects</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>South America</topic><topic>Toleration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siman, TainÃ</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Regions & cohesion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siman, TainÃ</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union</atitle><jtitle>Regions & cohesion</jtitle><date>2023-06-22</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>105</spage><epage>118</epage><pages>105-118</pages><issn>2152-906X</issn><eissn>2152-9078</eissn><abstract>Regional integration organizations (RIOs) have long been an important mechanism for cooperation among States. With their ever- closer ties, concerns about the regimes of the States involved have led RIOs to adopt norms for sanctions or suspension from these organizations when irregular regime changes occur, or governments become undemocratic. This article reflects on the development and enforcement of these tools based on two major cases for Europe and Latin America: the case of Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union. The conclusion is not supposed to plainly label processes as “succeeded” or “failed” but rather to provide observations on mutual learning through case studies to better reflect on the design of institutions, norms, adaptation, and political constraints to its enforcement.</abstract><pub>Berghahn Books, Inc</pub><doi>10.3167/reco.2023.130206</doi><tpages>14</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9516-7791</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2152-906X |
ispartof | Regions & cohesion, 2023-06, Vol.13 (2), p.105-118 |
issn | 2152-906X 2152-9078 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A772562432 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals |
subjects | Democracy Europe International aspects Political aspects South America Toleration |
title | Non-democracy tolerance: Venezuela in Mercosur and Hungary in the European Union |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T18%3A21%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Non-democracy%20tolerance:%20Venezuela%20in%20Mercosur%20and%20Hungary%20in%20the%20European%20Union&rft.jtitle=Regions%20&%20cohesion&rft.au=Siman,%20Tain%C3%83&rft.date=2023-06-22&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=105&rft.epage=118&rft.pages=105-118&rft.issn=2152-906X&rft.eissn=2152-9078&rft_id=info:doi/10.3167/reco.2023.130206&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA772562432%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A772562432&rfr_iscdi=true |