Retrospective analysis of the impact of dose delay and reduction on outcomes of colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRIâbased treatment
Objectives To determine the relationship between chemotherapy dose delay/reduction with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI based first-line chemotherapy in real-world retrospectively study. Methods We identified 144 eligible p...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) CA), 2023-09, Vol.11, p.e15995 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | e15995 |
container_title | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA) |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Zhang, Xia Zheng, Hongjuan Cai, Cheng Xu, Yinzi Xie, Mengzhen Wang, Qinghua Jin, Xiayun Fu, Jianfei |
description | Objectives To determine the relationship between chemotherapy dose delay/reduction with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI based first-line chemotherapy in real-world retrospectively study. Methods We identified 144 eligible patients with advanced CRC who received FOLFIRI as first-line based treatment. The study protocol was submitted to the institutional review board and was exempted. Dose delay was defined as an average delay of more than 3 days (>3 days vs. [less than or equal to]3 days) from the intended date. Dose reduction (actual dose/standard dose * 100%) [less than or equal to]85% was considered as chemotherapy reduction in the chemotherapy dose relative to the standard (mg/m.sup.2 ) regimen for all cycles. Relative dose intensity (RDI) [less than or equal to]80% was described as chemotherapy reduction. OS and PFS were measured using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. Results There were 114 patients with chemotherapy dose delay (dose delay >3 days). PFS of patients without dose delay had better survival than patients with dose delay (p = 0.002). There were 28.47% patients treated with dose reduction of 5-Fu. PFS and OS were better in patients without 5-Fu dose reduction than in patients with 5-Fu dose reduction with p values of 0.024 and |
doi_str_mv | 10.7717/peerj.15995 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A764839400</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A764839400</galeid><sourcerecordid>A764839400</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g980-61b66fdb227f162fca99418075e830328d3312c82808ccc449dff1a5f0b8e8d83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1KAzEQx4MoWGpPvkBA8NaaZL-SYylWC4VC6b1kk0k3ZXezbFKlb-Ez-Cq-mGn1UMGZgfn6_ecwCN1TMikKWjx1AP1-QjMhsis0YDQvxjzJxPVFfYtG3u9JNM5ywpMB-lhD6J3vQAX7Bli2sj5667EzOFSAbdNJFU6ddh6whloeI6RxD_oQJa7FpzgE5Ro4q5SrXR-vyRor2SrocSeDhTZ4HHqQATR-t6HC89Vyvlgvvj5L6ePsvGsidodujKw9jH7zEG3mz5vZ63i5elnMpsvxTnAyzmmZ50aXjBWG5swoKURKOSky4AlJGNdJQpnijBOulEpToY2hMjOk5MA1T4bo4efsTtawta1xoZeqsV5tp0We8kSkhERq8g8VXUNjlWvB2Dj_I3i8EFQg61B5Vx9On_KX4Dd6D4YR</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Retrospective analysis of the impact of dose delay and reduction on outcomes of colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRIâbased treatment</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Zhang, Xia ; Zheng, Hongjuan ; Cai, Cheng ; Xu, Yinzi ; Xie, Mengzhen ; Wang, Qinghua ; Jin, Xiayun ; Fu, Jianfei</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xia ; Zheng, Hongjuan ; Cai, Cheng ; Xu, Yinzi ; Xie, Mengzhen ; Wang, Qinghua ; Jin, Xiayun ; Fu, Jianfei</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives To determine the relationship between chemotherapy dose delay/reduction with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI based first-line chemotherapy in real-world retrospectively study. Methods We identified 144 eligible patients with advanced CRC who received FOLFIRI as first-line based treatment. The study protocol was submitted to the institutional review board and was exempted. Dose delay was defined as an average delay of more than 3 days (>3 days vs. [less than or equal to]3 days) from the intended date. Dose reduction (actual dose/standard dose * 100%) [less than or equal to]85% was considered as chemotherapy reduction in the chemotherapy dose relative to the standard (mg/m.sup.2 ) regimen for all cycles. Relative dose intensity (RDI) [less than or equal to]80% was described as chemotherapy reduction. OS and PFS were measured using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. Results There were 114 patients with chemotherapy dose delay (dose delay >3 days). PFS of patients without dose delay had better survival than patients with dose delay (p = 0.002). There were 28.47% patients treated with dose reduction of 5-Fu. PFS and OS were better in patients without 5-Fu dose reduction than in patients with 5-Fu dose reduction with p values of 0.024 and <0.001, respectively. Patients with high 5-FU RDI had better PFS than patients with low 5-FU RDI (p < 0.001). While, there was no statistical difference in OS between the two groups. Then we stratified the analysis by age. In <65 years cohort, both PFS and OS were better in patients with high 5-Fu RDI than in those with low 5-Fu RDI (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). But, in [greater than or equal to]65 years cohort, OS were better in patients with low 5-Fu RDI than in those with high 5-Fu RDI (p = 0.025). Moreover, both dose reduction and RDI of irinotecan had no statistically significant difference in both PFS and OS. Conclusion In the advanced colorectal cancer patients who received FOLFIRI based treatment as first-line regimen, chemotherapy dose delay and reduction dose of 5-Fu were associated with worse survival, especially among patients younger than 65 years.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7717/peerj.15995</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>PeerJ. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Care and treatment ; Chemotherapy ; Colorectal cancer ; Patient outcomes</subject><ispartof>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2023-09, Vol.11, p.e15995</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 PeerJ. Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Hongjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yinzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Mengzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qinghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Xiayun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jianfei</creatorcontrib><title>Retrospective analysis of the impact of dose delay and reduction on outcomes of colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRIâbased treatment</title><title>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</title><description>Objectives To determine the relationship between chemotherapy dose delay/reduction with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI based first-line chemotherapy in real-world retrospectively study. Methods We identified 144 eligible patients with advanced CRC who received FOLFIRI as first-line based treatment. The study protocol was submitted to the institutional review board and was exempted. Dose delay was defined as an average delay of more than 3 days (>3 days vs. [less than or equal to]3 days) from the intended date. Dose reduction (actual dose/standard dose * 100%) [less than or equal to]85% was considered as chemotherapy reduction in the chemotherapy dose relative to the standard (mg/m.sup.2 ) regimen for all cycles. Relative dose intensity (RDI) [less than or equal to]80% was described as chemotherapy reduction. OS and PFS were measured using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. Results There were 114 patients with chemotherapy dose delay (dose delay >3 days). PFS of patients without dose delay had better survival than patients with dose delay (p = 0.002). There were 28.47% patients treated with dose reduction of 5-Fu. PFS and OS were better in patients without 5-Fu dose reduction than in patients with 5-Fu dose reduction with p values of 0.024 and <0.001, respectively. Patients with high 5-FU RDI had better PFS than patients with low 5-FU RDI (p < 0.001). While, there was no statistical difference in OS between the two groups. Then we stratified the analysis by age. In <65 years cohort, both PFS and OS were better in patients with high 5-Fu RDI than in those with low 5-Fu RDI (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). But, in [greater than or equal to]65 years cohort, OS were better in patients with low 5-Fu RDI than in those with high 5-Fu RDI (p = 0.025). Moreover, both dose reduction and RDI of irinotecan had no statistically significant difference in both PFS and OS. Conclusion In the advanced colorectal cancer patients who received FOLFIRI based treatment as first-line regimen, chemotherapy dose delay and reduction dose of 5-Fu were associated with worse survival, especially among patients younger than 65 years.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chemotherapy</subject><subject>Colorectal cancer</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><issn>2167-8359</issn><issn>2167-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptkM1KAzEQx4MoWGpPvkBA8NaaZL-SYylWC4VC6b1kk0k3ZXezbFKlb-Ez-Cq-mGn1UMGZgfn6_ecwCN1TMikKWjx1AP1-QjMhsis0YDQvxjzJxPVFfYtG3u9JNM5ywpMB-lhD6J3vQAX7Bli2sj5667EzOFSAbdNJFU6ddh6whloeI6RxD_oQJa7FpzgE5Ro4q5SrXR-vyRor2SrocSeDhTZ4HHqQATR-t6HC89Vyvlgvvj5L6ePsvGsidodujKw9jH7zEG3mz5vZ63i5elnMpsvxTnAyzmmZ50aXjBWG5swoKURKOSky4AlJGNdJQpnijBOulEpToY2hMjOk5MA1T4bo4efsTtawta1xoZeqsV5tp0We8kSkhERq8g8VXUNjlWvB2Dj_I3i8EFQg61B5Vx9On_KX4Dd6D4YR</recordid><startdate>20230912</startdate><enddate>20230912</enddate><creator>Zhang, Xia</creator><creator>Zheng, Hongjuan</creator><creator>Cai, Cheng</creator><creator>Xu, Yinzi</creator><creator>Xie, Mengzhen</creator><creator>Wang, Qinghua</creator><creator>Jin, Xiayun</creator><creator>Fu, Jianfei</creator><general>PeerJ. Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20230912</creationdate><title>Retrospective analysis of the impact of dose delay and reduction on outcomes of colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRIâbased treatment</title><author>Zhang, Xia ; Zheng, Hongjuan ; Cai, Cheng ; Xu, Yinzi ; Xie, Mengzhen ; Wang, Qinghua ; Jin, Xiayun ; Fu, Jianfei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g980-61b66fdb227f162fca99418075e830328d3312c82808ccc449dff1a5f0b8e8d83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chemotherapy</topic><topic>Colorectal cancer</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zheng, Hongjuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Yinzi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xie, Mengzhen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Qinghua</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Xiayun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fu, Jianfei</creatorcontrib><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Xia</au><au>Zheng, Hongjuan</au><au>Cai, Cheng</au><au>Xu, Yinzi</au><au>Xie, Mengzhen</au><au>Wang, Qinghua</au><au>Jin, Xiayun</au><au>Fu, Jianfei</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Retrospective analysis of the impact of dose delay and reduction on outcomes of colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRIâbased treatment</atitle><jtitle>PeerJ (San Francisco, CA)</jtitle><date>2023-09-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><spage>e15995</spage><pages>e15995-</pages><issn>2167-8359</issn><eissn>2167-8359</eissn><abstract>Objectives To determine the relationship between chemotherapy dose delay/reduction with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRI based first-line chemotherapy in real-world retrospectively study. Methods We identified 144 eligible patients with advanced CRC who received FOLFIRI as first-line based treatment. The study protocol was submitted to the institutional review board and was exempted. Dose delay was defined as an average delay of more than 3 days (>3 days vs. [less than or equal to]3 days) from the intended date. Dose reduction (actual dose/standard dose * 100%) [less than or equal to]85% was considered as chemotherapy reduction in the chemotherapy dose relative to the standard (mg/m.sup.2 ) regimen for all cycles. Relative dose intensity (RDI) [less than or equal to]80% was described as chemotherapy reduction. OS and PFS were measured using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard models. Results There were 114 patients with chemotherapy dose delay (dose delay >3 days). PFS of patients without dose delay had better survival than patients with dose delay (p = 0.002). There were 28.47% patients treated with dose reduction of 5-Fu. PFS and OS were better in patients without 5-Fu dose reduction than in patients with 5-Fu dose reduction with p values of 0.024 and <0.001, respectively. Patients with high 5-FU RDI had better PFS than patients with low 5-FU RDI (p < 0.001). While, there was no statistical difference in OS between the two groups. Then we stratified the analysis by age. In <65 years cohort, both PFS and OS were better in patients with high 5-Fu RDI than in those with low 5-Fu RDI (p < 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). But, in [greater than or equal to]65 years cohort, OS were better in patients with low 5-Fu RDI than in those with high 5-Fu RDI (p = 0.025). Moreover, both dose reduction and RDI of irinotecan had no statistically significant difference in both PFS and OS. Conclusion In the advanced colorectal cancer patients who received FOLFIRI based treatment as first-line regimen, chemotherapy dose delay and reduction dose of 5-Fu were associated with worse survival, especially among patients younger than 65 years.</abstract><pub>PeerJ. Ltd</pub><doi>10.7717/peerj.15995</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2167-8359 |
ispartof | PeerJ (San Francisco, CA), 2023-09, Vol.11, p.e15995 |
issn | 2167-8359 2167-8359 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A764839400 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central; EZB Electronic Journals Library |
subjects | Analysis Cancer Cancer patients Care and treatment Chemotherapy Colorectal cancer Patient outcomes |
title | Retrospective analysis of the impact of dose delay and reduction on outcomes of colorectal cancer patients treated with FOLFIRIâbased treatment |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T09%3A21%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Retrospective%20analysis%20of%20the%20impact%20of%20dose%20delay%20and%20reduction%20on%20outcomes%20of%20colorectal%20cancer%20patients%20treated%20with%20FOLFIRI%C3%A2based%20treatment&rft.jtitle=PeerJ%20(San%20Francisco,%20CA)&rft.au=Zhang,%20Xia&rft.date=2023-09-12&rft.volume=11&rft.spage=e15995&rft.pages=e15995-&rft.issn=2167-8359&rft.eissn=2167-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.7717/peerj.15995&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA764839400%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A764839400&rfr_iscdi=true |