Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in IAcinetobacter/I spp

Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercializ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Microorganisms (Basel) 2023-07, Vol.11 (8)
Hauptverfasser: Jeannot, Katy, Gaillot, Susie, Triponney, Pauline, Portets, Sylvain, Pourchet, Valentin, Fournier, Damien, Potron, Anaïs
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Microorganisms (Basel)
container_volume 11
creator Jeannot, Katy
Gaillot, Susie
Triponney, Pauline
Portets, Sylvain
Pourchet, Valentin
Fournier, Damien
Potron, Anaïs
description Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercialized broth microdilution methods (ComASP[sup.®] , Liofilchem and UMIC[sup.®] , Bruker), MIC test strips (Liofilchem) and disc diffusion using discs of three different brands (Mast Diagnostic, Liofilchem and Oxoid—Thermo Fisher Scientific) were compared with the broth microdilution reference method. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ±30%) but both BMD methods achieved acceptable categorical agreement rates (CA = 95.9% [93/97, 95% CI 89.9–98.4] and CA = 93.8% [91/97, 95% CI 87.2–97.1] for ComASP[sup.®] and UMIC[sup.®] , respectively) and bias < 30% (−7.2% and −25.2% for ComASP[sup.®] and UMIC[sup.®] , respectively). The use of MIC gradient testing is strongly discouraged due to misclassification of 55% (n= 23/42) of resistant strains. Finally, the disc diffusion method could be used to rapidly screen for susceptible strains by setting a critical diameter of 22 mm.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/microorganisms11081971
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A762483439</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A762483439</galeid><sourcerecordid>A762483439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-c255da7e4606197a16b8cc55aa58f62f373597db48c3f8e8d1aea3dcad9941793</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUU1LAzEQXUTBUvsXJODV1s1md7N7LPWrYFFw72U2mdRINilJqvS3-edMrQcPZmASMvPem7xk2SXNZ4y1-c2ghXfOb8DqMARK84a2nJ5koyLn9bSoc37653yeTUJ4z9NqKWsqOsq-XtAr5wewAolTJL4hudVBpKTULmhnyQrjm5PXZNW9kgcPUqONpMMQAwErSffpyMINA3qhwZg9mX-ANtAbJKvDcFKbXTzwHCFJ7CiCEf2gLfzUkvIClZbonXCGvO6CwG3UvTY67om2ZDkX2mJ0PYiEu1mSsN1eZGcKTMDJ7z7Ouvu7bvE4fXp-WC7mT9NNzdupKKpKAseyzuvkDdC6b4SoKoCqUXWhGGdVy2VfNoKpBhtJAYFJAbJtS8pbNs6ujrQbMLjWVrnoQQzJpPWc10XZsJIdumb_dKWQmP7I2fS6dP8H8A0WuoyD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in IAcinetobacter/I spp</title><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Jeannot, Katy ; Gaillot, Susie ; Triponney, Pauline ; Portets, Sylvain ; Pourchet, Valentin ; Fournier, Damien ; Potron, Anaïs</creator><creatorcontrib>Jeannot, Katy ; Gaillot, Susie ; Triponney, Pauline ; Portets, Sylvain ; Pourchet, Valentin ; Fournier, Damien ; Potron, Anaïs</creatorcontrib><description>Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercialized broth microdilution methods (ComASP[sup.®] , Liofilchem and UMIC[sup.®] , Bruker), MIC test strips (Liofilchem) and disc diffusion using discs of three different brands (Mast Diagnostic, Liofilchem and Oxoid—Thermo Fisher Scientific) were compared with the broth microdilution reference method. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ±30%) but both BMD methods achieved acceptable categorical agreement rates (CA = 95.9% [93/97, 95% CI 89.9–98.4] and CA = 93.8% [91/97, 95% CI 87.2–97.1] for ComASP[sup.®] and UMIC[sup.®] , respectively) and bias &lt; 30% (−7.2% and −25.2% for ComASP[sup.®] and UMIC[sup.®] , respectively). The use of MIC gradient testing is strongly discouraged due to misclassification of 55% (n= 23/42) of resistant strains. Finally, the disc diffusion method could be used to rapidly screen for susceptible strains by setting a critical diameter of 22 mm.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2076-2607</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2076-2607</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms11081971</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Acinetobacter ; Analysis ; Drug resistance in microorganisms ; Methodology ; Physiological aspects</subject><ispartof>Microorganisms (Basel), 2023-07, Vol.11 (8)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jeannot, Katy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaillot, Susie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triponney, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portets, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourchet, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potron, Anaïs</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in IAcinetobacter/I spp</title><title>Microorganisms (Basel)</title><description>Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercialized broth microdilution methods (ComASP[sup.®] , Liofilchem and UMIC[sup.®] , Bruker), MIC test strips (Liofilchem) and disc diffusion using discs of three different brands (Mast Diagnostic, Liofilchem and Oxoid—Thermo Fisher Scientific) were compared with the broth microdilution reference method. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ±30%) but both BMD methods achieved acceptable categorical agreement rates (CA = 95.9% [93/97, 95% CI 89.9–98.4] and CA = 93.8% [91/97, 95% CI 87.2–97.1] for ComASP[sup.®] and UMIC[sup.®] , respectively) and bias &lt; 30% (−7.2% and −25.2% for ComASP[sup.®] and UMIC[sup.®] , respectively). The use of MIC gradient testing is strongly discouraged due to misclassification of 55% (n= 23/42) of resistant strains. Finally, the disc diffusion method could be used to rapidly screen for susceptible strains by setting a critical diameter of 22 mm.</description><subject>Acinetobacter</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Drug resistance in microorganisms</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><issn>2076-2607</issn><issn>2076-2607</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptUU1LAzEQXUTBUvsXJODV1s1md7N7LPWrYFFw72U2mdRINilJqvS3-edMrQcPZmASMvPem7xk2SXNZ4y1-c2ghXfOb8DqMARK84a2nJ5koyLn9bSoc37653yeTUJ4z9NqKWsqOsq-XtAr5wewAolTJL4hudVBpKTULmhnyQrjm5PXZNW9kgcPUqONpMMQAwErSffpyMINA3qhwZg9mX-ANtAbJKvDcFKbXTzwHCFJ7CiCEf2gLfzUkvIClZbonXCGvO6CwG3UvTY67om2ZDkX2mJ0PYiEu1mSsN1eZGcKTMDJ7z7Ouvu7bvE4fXp-WC7mT9NNzdupKKpKAseyzuvkDdC6b4SoKoCqUXWhGGdVy2VfNoKpBhtJAYFJAbJtS8pbNs6ujrQbMLjWVrnoQQzJpPWc10XZsJIdumb_dKWQmP7I2fS6dP8H8A0WuoyD</recordid><startdate>20230701</startdate><enddate>20230701</enddate><creator>Jeannot, Katy</creator><creator>Gaillot, Susie</creator><creator>Triponney, Pauline</creator><creator>Portets, Sylvain</creator><creator>Pourchet, Valentin</creator><creator>Fournier, Damien</creator><creator>Potron, Anaïs</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20230701</creationdate><title>Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in IAcinetobacter/I spp</title><author>Jeannot, Katy ; Gaillot, Susie ; Triponney, Pauline ; Portets, Sylvain ; Pourchet, Valentin ; Fournier, Damien ; Potron, Anaïs</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-c255da7e4606197a16b8cc55aa58f62f373597db48c3f8e8d1aea3dcad9941793</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Acinetobacter</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Drug resistance in microorganisms</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jeannot, Katy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaillot, Susie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Triponney, Pauline</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Portets, Sylvain</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pourchet, Valentin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fournier, Damien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Potron, Anaïs</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Microorganisms (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jeannot, Katy</au><au>Gaillot, Susie</au><au>Triponney, Pauline</au><au>Portets, Sylvain</au><au>Pourchet, Valentin</au><au>Fournier, Damien</au><au>Potron, Anaïs</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in IAcinetobacter/I spp</atitle><jtitle>Microorganisms (Basel)</jtitle><date>2023-07-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>8</issue><issn>2076-2607</issn><eissn>2076-2607</eissn><abstract>Cefiderocol is a siderophore-conjugated cephalosporin with potent activity against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens including Acinetobacter baumannii. The aim of this study was to evaluate cefiderocol testing methods on a relevant collection of 97 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Commercialized broth microdilution methods (ComASP[sup.®] , Liofilchem and UMIC[sup.®] , Bruker), MIC test strips (Liofilchem) and disc diffusion using discs of three different brands (Mast Diagnostic, Liofilchem and Oxoid—Thermo Fisher Scientific) were compared with the broth microdilution reference method. None of the methods tested fulfilled acceptable criteria (essential agreement [EA] ≥ 90%; bias = ±30%) but both BMD methods achieved acceptable categorical agreement rates (CA = 95.9% [93/97, 95% CI 89.9–98.4] and CA = 93.8% [91/97, 95% CI 87.2–97.1] for ComASP[sup.®] and UMIC[sup.®] , respectively) and bias &lt; 30% (−7.2% and −25.2% for ComASP[sup.®] and UMIC[sup.®] , respectively). The use of MIC gradient testing is strongly discouraged due to misclassification of 55% (n= 23/42) of resistant strains. Finally, the disc diffusion method could be used to rapidly screen for susceptible strains by setting a critical diameter of 22 mm.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/microorganisms11081971</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2076-2607
ispartof Microorganisms (Basel), 2023-07, Vol.11 (8)
issn 2076-2607
2076-2607
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A762483439
source MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Acinetobacter
Analysis
Drug resistance in microorganisms
Methodology
Physiological aspects
title Performance of the Disc Diffusion Method, MTS Gradient Tests and Two Commercially Available Microdilution Tests for the Determination of Cefiderocol Susceptibility in IAcinetobacter/I spp
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A53%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20the%20Disc%20Diffusion%20Method,%20MTS%20Gradient%20Tests%20and%20Two%20Commercially%20Available%20Microdilution%20Tests%20for%20the%20Determination%20of%20Cefiderocol%20Susceptibility%20in%20IAcinetobacter/I%20spp&rft.jtitle=Microorganisms%20(Basel)&rft.au=Jeannot,%20Katy&rft.date=2023-07-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=8&rft.issn=2076-2607&rft.eissn=2076-2607&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/microorganisms11081971&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA762483439%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A762483439&rfr_iscdi=true