Liability for Telemedicine
This paper analyzes four issues about “telemedicine” in light of the systems (norms), responsibilities, and liabilities in effectively connecting health services. The structures are: First is “face to face examination” as a general principle and physician’s responsibility and liability. Second is di...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of e-health and medical communications 2012-01, Vol.3 (1), p.1-21 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 21 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | International journal of e-health and medical communications |
container_volume | 3 |
creator | Nakayasu, Kazuyuki Sato, Chiaki |
description | This paper analyzes four issues about “telemedicine” in light of the systems (norms), responsibilities, and liabilities in effectively connecting health services. The structures are: First is “face to face examination” as a general principle and physician’s responsibility and liability. Second is dividing lines between physicians and physicians in telemedicine. Third are about areas which should be regulated by medical practitioners acts in providing telemedicine. Fourth is fee arrangements and cost burden for continuing telemedicine projects. The authors argue that not telemedicine’s special features as a means, but judgments for its medical necessity should be focused. The authors also alert that a responsibility can arise to establish a business model where all of the actors are responsible for managing healthcare delivery systems will continue to involve in the delivery of telemedicine, because patients become deeply in despair when telemedicine services stop without any alternative ways to get medical cares. |
doi_str_mv | 10.4018/jehmc.2012010101 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_igi_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A760138743</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A760138743</galeid><sourcerecordid>A760138743</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-9b7615e05680a3b6c4090013e6b51bb7c0d7b55b4b43586b36a7047a91a2d3e03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kTtrwzAUhUVpoSHNXjoFunSoU8l62WMIfUGgSwrdhCTLjoIfqWQP-feVk1IngUriSsN3D0fnAnCL4IxAlDxtzLrSsxiicPp9AUYoJTzCiCWXf2_6dQ0m3m9gWJRwxvkI3C2tVLa07W6aN266MqWpTGa1rc0NuMpl6c3k9x6Dz5fn1eItWn68vi_my0gTFrdRqjhD1EDKEiixYprAFEKEDVMUKcU1zLiiVBFFME2YwkxySLhMkYwzbCAeg4eD7tY1353xrais16YsZW2azguESUrimLAkoPdn6KbpXB3ciTjFPCYwYWigClkaYeu8aZ3UvaiYcxasJZzgQD0eUarz4cs-FG-LdesL2Xl_isMDrl3jvTO52DpbSbcTCIp-CGI_BDEMIbQsDi22sIPRfdgihC2Ow_5XZIjnROWcE9ssxz8leJnD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2937240861</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Liability for Telemedicine</title><source>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</source><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Nakayasu, Kazuyuki ; Sato, Chiaki</creator><creatorcontrib>Nakayasu, Kazuyuki ; Sato, Chiaki</creatorcontrib><description>This paper analyzes four issues about “telemedicine” in light of the systems (norms), responsibilities, and liabilities in effectively connecting health services. The structures are: First is “face to face examination” as a general principle and physician’s responsibility and liability. Second is dividing lines between physicians and physicians in telemedicine. Third are about areas which should be regulated by medical practitioners acts in providing telemedicine. Fourth is fee arrangements and cost burden for continuing telemedicine projects. The authors argue that not telemedicine’s special features as a means, but judgments for its medical necessity should be focused. The authors also alert that a responsibility can arise to establish a business model where all of the actors are responsible for managing healthcare delivery systems will continue to involve in the delivery of telemedicine, because patients become deeply in despair when telemedicine services stop without any alternative ways to get medical cares.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1947-315X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1947-3168</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4018/jehmc.2012010101</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hershey: IGI Global</publisher><subject>Business ; Health care ; Health services ; Liability ; Liability (Law) ; Medical ; Medical equipment ; Medical law ; Norms ; Physicians ; Physiological apparatus ; Plugs ; System effectiveness ; Telemedicine</subject><ispartof>International journal of e-health and medical communications, 2012-01, Vol.3 (1), p.1-21</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2012 IGI Global</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-9b7615e05680a3b6c4090013e6b51bb7c0d7b55b4b43586b36a7047a91a2d3e03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2937240861?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21387,21388,27923,27924,33529,33530,33743,33744,43658,43804,64384,64386,64388,72340</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Nakayasu, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Chiaki</creatorcontrib><title>Liability for Telemedicine</title><title>International journal of e-health and medical communications</title><description>This paper analyzes four issues about “telemedicine” in light of the systems (norms), responsibilities, and liabilities in effectively connecting health services. The structures are: First is “face to face examination” as a general principle and physician’s responsibility and liability. Second is dividing lines between physicians and physicians in telemedicine. Third are about areas which should be regulated by medical practitioners acts in providing telemedicine. Fourth is fee arrangements and cost burden for continuing telemedicine projects. The authors argue that not telemedicine’s special features as a means, but judgments for its medical necessity should be focused. The authors also alert that a responsibility can arise to establish a business model where all of the actors are responsible for managing healthcare delivery systems will continue to involve in the delivery of telemedicine, because patients become deeply in despair when telemedicine services stop without any alternative ways to get medical cares.</description><subject>Business</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Health services</subject><subject>Liability</subject><subject>Liability (Law)</subject><subject>Medical</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Medical law</subject><subject>Norms</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Physiological apparatus</subject><subject>Plugs</subject><subject>System effectiveness</subject><subject>Telemedicine</subject><issn>1947-315X</issn><issn>1947-3168</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kTtrwzAUhUVpoSHNXjoFunSoU8l62WMIfUGgSwrdhCTLjoIfqWQP-feVk1IngUriSsN3D0fnAnCL4IxAlDxtzLrSsxiicPp9AUYoJTzCiCWXf2_6dQ0m3m9gWJRwxvkI3C2tVLa07W6aN266MqWpTGa1rc0NuMpl6c3k9x6Dz5fn1eItWn68vi_my0gTFrdRqjhD1EDKEiixYprAFEKEDVMUKcU1zLiiVBFFME2YwkxySLhMkYwzbCAeg4eD7tY1353xrais16YsZW2azguESUrimLAkoPdn6KbpXB3ciTjFPCYwYWigClkaYeu8aZ3UvaiYcxasJZzgQD0eUarz4cs-FG-LdesL2Xl_isMDrl3jvTO52DpbSbcTCIp-CGI_BDEMIbQsDi22sIPRfdgihC2Ow_5XZIjnROWcE9ssxz8leJnD</recordid><startdate>20120101</startdate><enddate>20120101</enddate><creator>Nakayasu, Kazuyuki</creator><creator>Sato, Chiaki</creator><general>IGI Global</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120101</creationdate><title>Liability for Telemedicine</title><author>Nakayasu, Kazuyuki ; Sato, Chiaki</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c462t-9b7615e05680a3b6c4090013e6b51bb7c0d7b55b4b43586b36a7047a91a2d3e03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Business</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Health services</topic><topic>Liability</topic><topic>Liability (Law)</topic><topic>Medical</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Medical law</topic><topic>Norms</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Physiological apparatus</topic><topic>Plugs</topic><topic>System effectiveness</topic><topic>Telemedicine</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Nakayasu, Kazuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sato, Chiaki</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>International journal of e-health and medical communications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Nakayasu, Kazuyuki</au><au>Sato, Chiaki</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Liability for Telemedicine</atitle><jtitle>International journal of e-health and medical communications</jtitle><date>2012-01-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>21</epage><pages>1-21</pages><issn>1947-315X</issn><eissn>1947-3168</eissn><abstract>This paper analyzes four issues about “telemedicine” in light of the systems (norms), responsibilities, and liabilities in effectively connecting health services. The structures are: First is “face to face examination” as a general principle and physician’s responsibility and liability. Second is dividing lines between physicians and physicians in telemedicine. Third are about areas which should be regulated by medical practitioners acts in providing telemedicine. Fourth is fee arrangements and cost burden for continuing telemedicine projects. The authors argue that not telemedicine’s special features as a means, but judgments for its medical necessity should be focused. The authors also alert that a responsibility can arise to establish a business model where all of the actors are responsible for managing healthcare delivery systems will continue to involve in the delivery of telemedicine, because patients become deeply in despair when telemedicine services stop without any alternative ways to get medical cares.</abstract><cop>Hershey</cop><pub>IGI Global</pub><doi>10.4018/jehmc.2012010101</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1947-315X |
ispartof | International journal of e-health and medical communications, 2012-01, Vol.3 (1), p.1-21 |
issn | 1947-315X 1947-3168 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A760138743 |
source | ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition); ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; Alma/SFX Local Collection; ProQuest Central |
subjects | Business Health care Health services Liability Liability (Law) Medical Medical equipment Medical law Norms Physicians Physiological apparatus Plugs System effectiveness Telemedicine |
title | Liability for Telemedicine |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T23%3A11%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_igi_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Liability%20for%20Telemedicine&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20e-health%20and%20medical%20communications&rft.au=Nakayasu,%20Kazuyuki&rft.date=2012-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=21&rft.pages=1-21&rft.issn=1947-315X&rft.eissn=1947-3168&rft_id=info:doi/10.4018/jehmc.2012010101&rft_dat=%3Cgale_igi_j%3EA760138743%3C/gale_igi_j%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2937240861&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A760138743&rfr_iscdi=true |