Technology Assessments and Effective Risk Management: A Plea for More Reflection and Rationality
It is a common misconception in risk management, from classical purely quantitative risk assessments as being coined in banking to qualitative approaches to evaluating new technologies such as AI, and hybrids like scenario techniques in the middle, that a certain toolkit and a specific set of method...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of technoethics 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.1-10 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 10 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | International journal of technoethics |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Hoffmann, Christian Hugo |
| description | It is a common misconception in risk management, from classical purely quantitative risk assessments as being coined in banking to qualitative approaches to evaluating new technologies such as AI, and hybrids like scenario techniques in the middle, that a certain toolkit and a specific set of methods serve as a panacea for all challenges risk managers may face. Given the lurking pitfalls in this area of risk management, the call for an avoidance strategy cannot be ignored. In this article, we outline six guidelines that should be followed on the way to more decision-making competency in risk management. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.4018/IJT.306639 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A759244264</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A759244264</galeid><sourcerecordid>A759244264</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1bd0e8ad841e8f092348867390fe7960ab63ca8b32afc1ef9021a635119044f03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkctKAzEUhgdRsKgbnyDgTmjNrZmJu6HUGxalVHAX0_Skpk4nNZkKfXtTR7ygySKH5PsPh3xZdkxwj2NSnF3fTHoMC8HkTtYhkuddxsXj7lfdJ_vZUYwLnFaf50LSTvY0AfNc-8rPN6iMEWJcQt1EpOsZGloLpnFvgMYuvqCRrvUcts_nqET3FWhkfUAjHxIAttqyvv5IjvW21JVrNofZntVVhKPP8yB7uBhOBlfd27vL60F52zU0Z02XTGcYCj0rOIHCYkkZLwqRM4kt5FJgPRXM6GLKqLaGgJWYEi1YnxCJObeYHWQnbd9V8K9riI1a-HVIM0RFEyJoQZn8pua6AuVq65ugzdJFo8q8LynnVPBE9f6h0p7B0hlfg3Xp_lfgtA2Y4GMMYNUquKUOG0Ww2rpRyY1q3SS4bGE3d99Dtg7UDwcq_aQa2r8dCGPvedKU6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2904628239</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Technology Assessments and Effective Risk Management: A Plea for More Reflection and Rationality</title><source>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</source><source>ProQuest Central</source><creator>Hoffmann, Christian Hugo</creator><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Christian Hugo</creatorcontrib><description>It is a common misconception in risk management, from classical purely quantitative risk assessments as being coined in banking to qualitative approaches to evaluating new technologies such as AI, and hybrids like scenario techniques in the middle, that a certain toolkit and a specific set of methods serve as a panacea for all challenges risk managers may face. Given the lurking pitfalls in this area of risk management, the call for an avoidance strategy cannot be ignored. In this article, we outline six guidelines that should be followed on the way to more decision-making competency in risk management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1947-3451</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1947-346X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4018/IJT.306639</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hershey: IGI Global</publisher><subject>Decision-making ; New technology ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; Technology application ; Technology assessment</subject><ispartof>International journal of technoethics, 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.1-10</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 IGI Global</rights><rights>Copyright © 2022, IGI Global. Copying or distributing in print or electronic forms without written permission of IGI Global is prohibited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1bd0e8ad841e8f092348867390fe7960ab63ca8b32afc1ef9021a635119044f03</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2904628239?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,21388,27924,27925,33744,43805,64385,64389,72469</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Christian Hugo</creatorcontrib><title>Technology Assessments and Effective Risk Management: A Plea for More Reflection and Rationality</title><title>International journal of technoethics</title><description>It is a common misconception in risk management, from classical purely quantitative risk assessments as being coined in banking to qualitative approaches to evaluating new technologies such as AI, and hybrids like scenario techniques in the middle, that a certain toolkit and a specific set of methods serve as a panacea for all challenges risk managers may face. Given the lurking pitfalls in this area of risk management, the call for an avoidance strategy cannot be ignored. In this article, we outline six guidelines that should be followed on the way to more decision-making competency in risk management.</description><subject>Decision-making</subject><subject>New technology</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Technology assessment</subject><issn>1947-3451</issn><issn>1947-346X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNptkctKAzEUhgdRsKgbnyDgTmjNrZmJu6HUGxalVHAX0_Skpk4nNZkKfXtTR7ygySKH5PsPh3xZdkxwj2NSnF3fTHoMC8HkTtYhkuddxsXj7lfdJ_vZUYwLnFaf50LSTvY0AfNc-8rPN6iMEWJcQt1EpOsZGloLpnFvgMYuvqCRrvUcts_nqET3FWhkfUAjHxIAttqyvv5IjvW21JVrNofZntVVhKPP8yB7uBhOBlfd27vL60F52zU0Z02XTGcYCj0rOIHCYkkZLwqRM4kt5FJgPRXM6GLKqLaGgJWYEi1YnxCJObeYHWQnbd9V8K9riI1a-HVIM0RFEyJoQZn8pua6AuVq65ugzdJFo8q8LynnVPBE9f6h0p7B0hlfg3Xp_lfgtA2Y4GMMYNUquKUOG0Ww2rpRyY1q3SS4bGE3d99Dtg7UDwcq_aQa2r8dCGPvedKU6w</recordid><startdate>20220101</startdate><enddate>20220101</enddate><creator>Hoffmann, Christian Hugo</creator><general>IGI Global</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220101</creationdate><title>Technology Assessments and Effective Risk Management: A Plea for More Reflection and Rationality</title><author>Hoffmann, Christian Hugo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c273t-1bd0e8ad841e8f092348867390fe7960ab63ca8b32afc1ef9021a635119044f03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Decision-making</topic><topic>New technology</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Technology assessment</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hoffmann, Christian Hugo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of technoethics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hoffmann, Christian Hugo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Technology Assessments and Effective Risk Management: A Plea for More Reflection and Rationality</atitle><jtitle>International journal of technoethics</jtitle><date>2022-01-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>10</epage><pages>1-10</pages><issn>1947-3451</issn><eissn>1947-346X</eissn><abstract>It is a common misconception in risk management, from classical purely quantitative risk assessments as being coined in banking to qualitative approaches to evaluating new technologies such as AI, and hybrids like scenario techniques in the middle, that a certain toolkit and a specific set of methods serve as a panacea for all challenges risk managers may face. Given the lurking pitfalls in this area of risk management, the call for an avoidance strategy cannot be ignored. In this article, we outline six guidelines that should be followed on the way to more decision-making competency in risk management.</abstract><cop>Hershey</cop><pub>IGI Global</pub><doi>10.4018/IJT.306639</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1947-3451 |
| ispartof | International journal of technoethics, 2022-01, Vol.13 (1), p.1-10 |
| issn | 1947-3451 1947-346X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A759244264 |
| source | ProQuest Central UK/Ireland; ProQuest Central |
| subjects | Decision-making New technology Risk assessment Risk management Technology application Technology assessment |
| title | Technology Assessments and Effective Risk Management: A Plea for More Reflection and Rationality |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T01%3A10%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Technology%20Assessments%20and%20Effective%20Risk%20Management:%20A%20Plea%20for%20More%20Reflection%20and%20Rationality&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20technoethics&rft.au=Hoffmann,%20Christian%20Hugo&rft.date=2022-01-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=10&rft.pages=1-10&rft.issn=1947-3451&rft.eissn=1947-346X&rft_id=info:doi/10.4018/IJT.306639&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA759244264%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2904628239&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A759244264&rfr_iscdi=true |