Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography, ultrasound pachymetry, and orbscan

Background The thickness of the cornea is a sensitive and important indicator for the health of the cornea. It is beneficial for evaluating endothelial pump function and corneal barrier, monitoring the disorders of the cornea such as keratoconus and corneal edema, and choosing patients for refractiv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Tanta Medical Journal 2022-10, Vol.50 (4), p.306-311
Hauptverfasser: Khalil, Nahla, Nagy, Khaled, Sabry, Moataz, Nasef, Mohamed
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 311
container_issue 4
container_start_page 306
container_title Tanta Medical Journal
container_volume 50
creator Khalil, Nahla
Nagy, Khaled
Sabry, Moataz
Nasef, Mohamed
description Background The thickness of the cornea is a sensitive and important indicator for the health of the cornea. It is beneficial for evaluating endothelial pump function and corneal barrier, monitoring the disorders of the cornea such as keratoconus and corneal edema, and choosing patients for refractive surgery. Aim The aim of this work was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) using orbscan, ultrasound pachymetry (USP), and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients and methods This prospective study was carried out on 60 eyes of 30 individuals aged from 18 to 40 years old and with clinically normal cornea who attended the outpatient clinic of Tanta University Hospital and Nour El Ein Hospital from April 2018 till March 2019. Results There was no statistically significant difference in mean minimal measurement of the thickness of the central cornea as measured by the three devices. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean maximal measurement of the CCT as detected by the three devices. The average CCT was statistically significantly different across the three devices. Conclusions OCT, USP, and orbscan were reliable for CCT measurement. Orbscan and USP were more reproducible, but OCT and ultrasound were more technically dependent. The average CCT was the highest by orbscan.
doi_str_mv 10.4103/tmj.tmj_14_22
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A753415164</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A753415164</galeid><sourcerecordid>A753415164</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192s-d79f5d685f342c2c97f2553c0f9ecab2742e049a82ca47ccfc572efb6602d1ea3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkc1r3DAQxU1pIUuSY--CQk_1Rl-216cSljYtBHppz0I7Hq2VtSQjySx76r9eJZuWBsIwDBp-bxDvVdV7RteSUXGT3cO6tGJScf6mWnHBZL1puXxbrRhjtGaSNRfVdUoPlFLGRN8Ltqp-b4ObdbQpeBIMAfQ56olAiB7LzKOFg8eUyJKs3xPtM0YbIkm4d4UlYc4WngQjRvSAJAcX9lHP4-kTWaZyLYXFD2TWMJ4c5ljWurxD3CXQ_qp6Z_SU8Pp5Xla_vn75uf1W3_-4-769va-B9TzVQ9ebZmg3jRGSA4e-M7xpBFDTI-gd7yRHKnu94aBlB2Cg6TiaXdtSPjDU4rL6cL671xMq600oPwNnE6jbrhHFG9bKQq1foUoN6CwEj8aW_QvBx_8EY7EsjylMS7bBp5dgfQYhhpQiGjVH63Q8KUbVY4DqMbx_ARb-85k_hqlYng7TcsSoHA4HH46vi5Sgrfqbp_gDMeWoXg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography, ultrasound pachymetry, and orbscan</title><source>Medknow Open Access Medical Journals</source><creator>Khalil, Nahla ; Nagy, Khaled ; Sabry, Moataz ; Nasef, Mohamed</creator><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Nahla ; Nagy, Khaled ; Sabry, Moataz ; Nasef, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><description>Background The thickness of the cornea is a sensitive and important indicator for the health of the cornea. It is beneficial for evaluating endothelial pump function and corneal barrier, monitoring the disorders of the cornea such as keratoconus and corneal edema, and choosing patients for refractive surgery. Aim The aim of this work was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) using orbscan, ultrasound pachymetry (USP), and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients and methods This prospective study was carried out on 60 eyes of 30 individuals aged from 18 to 40 years old and with clinically normal cornea who attended the outpatient clinic of Tanta University Hospital and Nour El Ein Hospital from April 2018 till March 2019. Results There was no statistically significant difference in mean minimal measurement of the thickness of the central cornea as measured by the three devices. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean maximal measurement of the CCT as detected by the three devices. The average CCT was statistically significantly different across the three devices. Conclusions OCT, USP, and orbscan were reliable for CCT measurement. Orbscan and USP were more reproducible, but OCT and ultrasound were more technically dependent. The average CCT was the highest by orbscan.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1110-1415</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2314-8624</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4103/tmj.tmj_14_22</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</publisher><subject>Comparative analysis ; Eye ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Surgery ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Tanta Medical Journal, 2022-10, Vol.50 (4), p.306-311</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c192s-d79f5d685f342c2c97f2553c0f9ecab2742e049a82ca47ccfc572efb6602d1ea3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27463,27929,27930</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Nahla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagy, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabry, Moataz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasef, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography, ultrasound pachymetry, and orbscan</title><title>Tanta Medical Journal</title><description>Background The thickness of the cornea is a sensitive and important indicator for the health of the cornea. It is beneficial for evaluating endothelial pump function and corneal barrier, monitoring the disorders of the cornea such as keratoconus and corneal edema, and choosing patients for refractive surgery. Aim The aim of this work was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) using orbscan, ultrasound pachymetry (USP), and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients and methods This prospective study was carried out on 60 eyes of 30 individuals aged from 18 to 40 years old and with clinically normal cornea who attended the outpatient clinic of Tanta University Hospital and Nour El Ein Hospital from April 2018 till March 2019. Results There was no statistically significant difference in mean minimal measurement of the thickness of the central cornea as measured by the three devices. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean maximal measurement of the CCT as detected by the three devices. The average CCT was statistically significantly different across the three devices. Conclusions OCT, USP, and orbscan were reliable for CCT measurement. Orbscan and USP were more reproducible, but OCT and ultrasound were more technically dependent. The average CCT was the highest by orbscan.</description><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>1110-1415</issn><issn>2314-8624</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkc1r3DAQxU1pIUuSY--CQk_1Rl-216cSljYtBHppz0I7Hq2VtSQjySx76r9eJZuWBsIwDBp-bxDvVdV7RteSUXGT3cO6tGJScf6mWnHBZL1puXxbrRhjtGaSNRfVdUoPlFLGRN8Ltqp-b4ObdbQpeBIMAfQ56olAiB7LzKOFg8eUyJKs3xPtM0YbIkm4d4UlYc4WngQjRvSAJAcX9lHP4-kTWaZyLYXFD2TWMJ4c5ljWurxD3CXQ_qp6Z_SU8Pp5Xla_vn75uf1W3_-4-769va-B9TzVQ9ebZmg3jRGSA4e-M7xpBFDTI-gd7yRHKnu94aBlB2Cg6TiaXdtSPjDU4rL6cL671xMq600oPwNnE6jbrhHFG9bKQq1foUoN6CwEj8aW_QvBx_8EY7EsjylMS7bBp5dgfQYhhpQiGjVH63Q8KUbVY4DqMbx_ARb-85k_hqlYng7TcsSoHA4HH46vi5Sgrfqbp_gDMeWoXg</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>Khalil, Nahla</creator><creator>Nagy, Khaled</creator><creator>Sabry, Moataz</creator><creator>Nasef, Mohamed</creator><general>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</general><general>Medknow Publications and Media Pvt. Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography, ultrasound pachymetry, and orbscan</title><author>Khalil, Nahla ; Nagy, Khaled ; Sabry, Moataz ; Nasef, Mohamed</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c192s-d79f5d685f342c2c97f2553c0f9ecab2742e049a82ca47ccfc572efb6602d1ea3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Khalil, Nahla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagy, Khaled</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabry, Moataz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nasef, Mohamed</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Tanta Medical Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Khalil, Nahla</au><au>Nagy, Khaled</au><au>Sabry, Moataz</au><au>Nasef, Mohamed</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography, ultrasound pachymetry, and orbscan</atitle><jtitle>Tanta Medical Journal</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>50</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>306</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>306-311</pages><issn>1110-1415</issn><eissn>2314-8624</eissn><abstract>Background The thickness of the cornea is a sensitive and important indicator for the health of the cornea. It is beneficial for evaluating endothelial pump function and corneal barrier, monitoring the disorders of the cornea such as keratoconus and corneal edema, and choosing patients for refractive surgery. Aim The aim of this work was to compare central corneal thickness (CCT) using orbscan, ultrasound pachymetry (USP), and anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). Patients and methods This prospective study was carried out on 60 eyes of 30 individuals aged from 18 to 40 years old and with clinically normal cornea who attended the outpatient clinic of Tanta University Hospital and Nour El Ein Hospital from April 2018 till March 2019. Results There was no statistically significant difference in mean minimal measurement of the thickness of the central cornea as measured by the three devices. There was a statistically significant difference in the mean maximal measurement of the CCT as detected by the three devices. The average CCT was statistically significantly different across the three devices. Conclusions OCT, USP, and orbscan were reliable for CCT measurement. Orbscan and USP were more reproducible, but OCT and ultrasound were more technically dependent. The average CCT was the highest by orbscan.</abstract><pub>Wolters Kluwer India Pvt. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4103/tmj.tmj_14_22</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1110-1415
ispartof Tanta Medical Journal, 2022-10, Vol.50 (4), p.306-311
issn 1110-1415
2314-8624
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A753415164
source Medknow Open Access Medical Journals
subjects Comparative analysis
Eye
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Surgery
Tomography
title Comparison of central corneal thickness using anterior segment optical coherence tomography, ultrasound pachymetry, and orbscan
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T12%3A51%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20central%20corneal%20thickness%20using%20anterior%20segment%20optical%20coherence%20tomography,%20ultrasound%20pachymetry,%20and%20orbscan&rft.jtitle=Tanta%20Medical%20Journal&rft.au=Khalil,%20Nahla&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=50&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=306&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=306-311&rft.issn=1110-1415&rft.eissn=2314-8624&rft_id=info:doi/10.4103/tmj.tmj_14_22&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA753415164%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A753415164&rfr_iscdi=true