Climate change litigation in private nuisance: Can it address harms sustained by traditional owners in the Torres Strait?

Torres Strait Islanders are highly vulnerable to climate change hazards and in turn, climate-related harms. Through a detailed analysis of Australian and foreign case law and commentary, this article examines whether tort law, specifically, private nuisance, may offer Traditional Owners in the Torre...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Monash University law review 2021-12, Vol.47 (3), p.142-174
Hauptverfasser: Emmanouil, Nia, Popa, Tina, Kallies, Anne
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 174
container_issue 3
container_start_page 142
container_title Monash University law review
container_volume 47
creator Emmanouil, Nia
Popa, Tina
Kallies, Anne
description Torres Strait Islanders are highly vulnerable to climate change hazards and in turn, climate-related harms. Through a detailed analysis of Australian and foreign case law and commentary, this article examines whether tort law, specifically, private nuisance, may offer Traditional Owners in the Torres Strait an avenue for holding accountable major carbon polluters for their contribution to these climate-related harms. Barriers to success are analysed and further discussed in relation to policy questions. Ultimately, the article finds that significant barriers to success currently exist, making a climate-related harm claim in private nuisance unlikely to succeed, for now. However, advances in international and Australian jurisprudence are creating the potential for actions to be successful in the future.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_rmit_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A753218065</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A753218065</galeid><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20230509088084</informt_id><sourcerecordid>A753218065</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g304t-1b566ac97d93133cc7f87cb0a947557d22ca8a457d8397e33bde56f2ea61ec213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhntQ8PM_BDxXkqafXkSKroLgwfUcpsm0HWnTJYnK_nuz6kFhQXJImHmed4YcJMdcCpFKkfOj5MT7V86l5GVznGzbiWYIyPQIdkA2UaABAi2WkWUbR--7pn0jD1bjFWshNgIDYxx6z0Zws2f-zQcgi4Z1WxYcGNoFwMSWD4vO75LCiGy9uCix50hQuD5LDnuYPJ7_3KfJy93tur1PH59WD-3NYzpInodUdEVZgm4q00ghpdZVX1e649DkVVFUJss01JDHVy2bCqXsDBZlnyGUAnUm5Gly8Z07wISKbL_E-Xomr9VNVchM1LwsIpXuoQaM-8O0WOwplv_wl3v4eAzOpPcKzbfgZgpKL9OEevdL_hWCV4IrKUWpYCC_CSrjmeQFb3hd8zqP7uqXCxvog_IITo9fk7-qixuUWeifpE_8R6Mk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Climate change litigation in private nuisance: Can it address harms sustained by traditional owners in the Torres Strait?</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Emmanouil, Nia ; Popa, Tina ; Kallies, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Emmanouil, Nia ; Popa, Tina ; Kallies, Anne</creatorcontrib><description>Torres Strait Islanders are highly vulnerable to climate change hazards and in turn, climate-related harms. Through a detailed analysis of Australian and foreign case law and commentary, this article examines whether tort law, specifically, private nuisance, may offer Traditional Owners in the Torres Strait an avenue for holding accountable major carbon polluters for their contribution to these climate-related harms. Barriers to success are analysed and further discussed in relation to policy questions. Ultimately, the article finds that significant barriers to success currently exist, making a climate-related harm claim in private nuisance unlikely to succeed, for now. However, advances in international and Australian jurisprudence are creating the potential for actions to be successful in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0311-3140</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Monash University (Australia)</publisher><subject>Air quality management ; Climatic changes ; Energy industry ; Energy minerals ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental law ; Fossil fuels ; Government liability ; Jurisprudence ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Liability for environmental damages ; Liability for flood damages ; Locus standi ; Nuisances ; Oceanians ; Political aspects ; Remedies ; Torts</subject><ispartof>Monash University law review, 2021-12, Vol.47 (3), p.142-174</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Monash University (Australia)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Emmanouil, Nia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popa, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallies, Anne</creatorcontrib><title>Climate change litigation in private nuisance: Can it address harms sustained by traditional owners in the Torres Strait?</title><title>Monash University law review</title><description>Torres Strait Islanders are highly vulnerable to climate change hazards and in turn, climate-related harms. Through a detailed analysis of Australian and foreign case law and commentary, this article examines whether tort law, specifically, private nuisance, may offer Traditional Owners in the Torres Strait an avenue for holding accountable major carbon polluters for their contribution to these climate-related harms. Barriers to success are analysed and further discussed in relation to policy questions. Ultimately, the article finds that significant barriers to success currently exist, making a climate-related harm claim in private nuisance unlikely to succeed, for now. However, advances in international and Australian jurisprudence are creating the potential for actions to be successful in the future.</description><subject>Air quality management</subject><subject>Climatic changes</subject><subject>Energy industry</subject><subject>Energy minerals</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental law</subject><subject>Fossil fuels</subject><subject>Government liability</subject><subject>Jurisprudence</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Liability for environmental damages</subject><subject>Liability for flood damages</subject><subject>Locus standi</subject><subject>Nuisances</subject><subject>Oceanians</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Remedies</subject><subject>Torts</subject><issn>0311-3140</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LxDAQhntQ8PM_BDxXkqafXkSKroLgwfUcpsm0HWnTJYnK_nuz6kFhQXJImHmed4YcJMdcCpFKkfOj5MT7V86l5GVznGzbiWYIyPQIdkA2UaABAi2WkWUbR--7pn0jD1bjFWshNgIDYxx6z0Zws2f-zQcgi4Z1WxYcGNoFwMSWD4vO75LCiGy9uCix50hQuD5LDnuYPJ7_3KfJy93tur1PH59WD-3NYzpInodUdEVZgm4q00ghpdZVX1e649DkVVFUJss01JDHVy2bCqXsDBZlnyGUAnUm5Gly8Z07wISKbL_E-Xomr9VNVchM1LwsIpXuoQaM-8O0WOwplv_wl3v4eAzOpPcKzbfgZgpKL9OEevdL_hWCV4IrKUWpYCC_CSrjmeQFb3hd8zqP7uqXCxvog_IITo9fk7-qixuUWeifpE_8R6Mk</recordid><startdate>20211201</startdate><enddate>20211201</enddate><creator>Emmanouil, Nia</creator><creator>Popa, Tina</creator><creator>Kallies, Anne</creator><general>Monash University (Australia)</general><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211201</creationdate><title>Climate change litigation in private nuisance: Can it address harms sustained by traditional owners in the Torres Strait?</title><author>Emmanouil, Nia ; Popa, Tina ; Kallies, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g304t-1b566ac97d93133cc7f87cb0a947557d22ca8a457d8397e33bde56f2ea61ec213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Air quality management</topic><topic>Climatic changes</topic><topic>Energy industry</topic><topic>Energy minerals</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental law</topic><topic>Fossil fuels</topic><topic>Government liability</topic><topic>Jurisprudence</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Liability for environmental damages</topic><topic>Liability for flood damages</topic><topic>Locus standi</topic><topic>Nuisances</topic><topic>Oceanians</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Remedies</topic><topic>Torts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Emmanouil, Nia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Popa, Tina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kallies, Anne</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Monash University law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Emmanouil, Nia</au><au>Popa, Tina</au><au>Kallies, Anne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Climate change litigation in private nuisance: Can it address harms sustained by traditional owners in the Torres Strait?</atitle><jtitle>Monash University law review</jtitle><date>2021-12-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>142</spage><epage>174</epage><pages>142-174</pages><issn>0311-3140</issn><abstract>Torres Strait Islanders are highly vulnerable to climate change hazards and in turn, climate-related harms. Through a detailed analysis of Australian and foreign case law and commentary, this article examines whether tort law, specifically, private nuisance, may offer Traditional Owners in the Torres Strait an avenue for holding accountable major carbon polluters for their contribution to these climate-related harms. Barriers to success are analysed and further discussed in relation to policy questions. Ultimately, the article finds that significant barriers to success currently exist, making a climate-related harm claim in private nuisance unlikely to succeed, for now. However, advances in international and Australian jurisprudence are creating the potential for actions to be successful in the future.</abstract><pub>Monash University (Australia)</pub><tpages>33</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0311-3140
ispartof Monash University law review, 2021-12, Vol.47 (3), p.142-174
issn 0311-3140
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A753218065
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library
subjects Air quality management
Climatic changes
Energy industry
Energy minerals
Environmental aspects
Environmental law
Fossil fuels
Government liability
Jurisprudence
Laws, regulations and rules
Liability for environmental damages
Liability for flood damages
Locus standi
Nuisances
Oceanians
Political aspects
Remedies
Torts
title Climate change litigation in private nuisance: Can it address harms sustained by traditional owners in the Torres Strait?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T21%3A09%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_rmit_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Climate%20change%20litigation%20in%20private%20nuisance:%20Can%20it%20address%20harms%20sustained%20by%20traditional%20owners%20in%20the%20Torres%20Strait?&rft.jtitle=Monash%20University%20law%20review&rft.au=Emmanouil,%20Nia&rft.date=2021-12-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=142&rft.epage=174&rft.pages=142-174&rft.issn=0311-3140&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_rmit_%3EA753218065%3C/gale_rmit_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A753218065&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20230509088084&rfr_iscdi=true