Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?

Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex ren...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urologia internationalis 2023-06, Vol.107 (6), p.550-556
Hauptverfasser: Xiao, Bo, Zeng, Xue, Zhang, Gang, Ji, Chaoyue, Jin, Song, Bai, Wenjie, Tang, Yuzhe, Wang, Bixiao, Li, Jianxing
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 556
container_issue 6
container_start_page 550
container_title Urologia internationalis
container_volume 107
creator Xiao, Bo
Zeng, Xue
Zhang, Gang
Ji, Chaoyue
Jin, Song
Bai, Wenjie
Tang, Yuzhe
Wang, Bixiao
Li, Jianxing
description Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex renal stones at our institution between August 2018 and December 2021. During this time, 188 consecutive patients underwent US-guided PCNL in the prone position (P group, n = 129) or in the flank-free modified supine position (S group, n = 59). Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Successful renal access was achieved in all patients. The baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The numbers of renal access were significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.002), and the operation time was comparable (79.1 ± 14.6 min vs. 96.2 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.06) between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the P group (6.2 ± 1.5 d vs. 10.2 ± 1.7 d, p = 0.008). The postoperative hemoglobin loss was similar between the P and S groups (1.7 ± 0.4 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.12). The stone-free rate was significantly lower in the S group (57.5% vs. 82.7%, p < 0.001). There were no embolization or septic complications. Twelve patients (20.3%) in the S group underwent simultaneous or staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to remove residual stones. Conclusion: US-guided PCNL in the modified supine position was a safe treatment for complex renal stones. However, the single-session stone clearance rate was not ideal. The supine flank-free position may be unsuitable for US-guided PCNL in patients with complex renal stones according to our preliminary findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000528677
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A753064003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A753064003</galeid><sourcerecordid>A753064003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-65fa308652a29b6b331aebb9330f81560effb08a7d506db8e76300589cfbe4283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0cFu1DAQAFALgehSOHBHyFIv5ZAyjhM7PqFqVcpKVVlR9hw5ybhrSOJgO4L9e1ylrIRU-WB5_Maa8RDylsEFY6X6CABlXgkpn5EVK3KeAVfqOVkBFHnGGK9OyKsQfgAkrORLcsKFLAso2IocNoHGPdK7ebIj0q0LNlo3prONuumRGufpro9eBzePXXY92w47ukXfzlGP6OZAb3Hae9fbuHfRDQdqR7rV0eIYA_2donTthqnHP_Qbjrqnd9GNGD69Ji-M7gO-edxPye7z1ff1l-zm6_VmfXmTtVyJmInSaA6VKHOdq0Y0nDONTaM4B1OxUgAa00ClZVeC6JoKpeDpOyrVmgaLvOKn5Hx5d_Lu14wh1oMNLfb9Un2dS1lUSkquEj1b6L3usbajcanv9oHXl7LkIAoAntTFEyqtDgfbpt6MTfH_Ej4sCa13IXg09eTtoP2hZlA_DLA-DjDZ94_Vzs2A3VH-m1gC7xbwU_t79EdwzD978nq3uV1EPXWG_wUFu6oi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774897739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Xiao, Bo ; Zeng, Xue ; Zhang, Gang ; Ji, Chaoyue ; Jin, Song ; Bai, Wenjie ; Tang, Yuzhe ; Wang, Bixiao ; Li, Jianxing</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Bo ; Zeng, Xue ; Zhang, Gang ; Ji, Chaoyue ; Jin, Song ; Bai, Wenjie ; Tang, Yuzhe ; Wang, Bixiao ; Li, Jianxing</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex renal stones at our institution between August 2018 and December 2021. During this time, 188 consecutive patients underwent US-guided PCNL in the prone position (P group, n = 129) or in the flank-free modified supine position (S group, n = 59). Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Successful renal access was achieved in all patients. The baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The numbers of renal access were significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.002), and the operation time was comparable (79.1 ± 14.6 min vs. 96.2 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.06) between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the P group (6.2 ± 1.5 d vs. 10.2 ± 1.7 d, p = 0.008). The postoperative hemoglobin loss was similar between the P and S groups (1.7 ± 0.4 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.12). The stone-free rate was significantly lower in the S group (57.5% vs. 82.7%, p &lt; 0.001). There were no embolization or septic complications. Twelve patients (20.3%) in the S group underwent simultaneous or staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to remove residual stones. Conclusion: US-guided PCNL in the modified supine position was a safe treatment for complex renal stones. However, the single-session stone clearance rate was not ideal. The supine flank-free position may be unsuitable for US-guided PCNL in patients with complex renal stones according to our preliminary findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-1138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000528677</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36754041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Care and treatment ; Complications and side effects ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - complications ; Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney Calculi - surgery ; Kidney stones ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous ; Patient outcomes ; Percutaneous nephrostomy ; Prone Position ; Research Article ; Retrospective Studies ; Supine Position ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><ispartof>Urologia internationalis, 2023-06, Vol.107 (6), p.550-556</ispartof><rights>2023 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 S. Karger AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-65fa308652a29b6b331aebb9330f81560effb08a7d506db8e76300589cfbe4283</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6961-3532</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2422,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36754041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Chaoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bixiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jianxing</creatorcontrib><title>Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?</title><title>Urologia internationalis</title><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><description>Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex renal stones at our institution between August 2018 and December 2021. During this time, 188 consecutive patients underwent US-guided PCNL in the prone position (P group, n = 129) or in the flank-free modified supine position (S group, n = 59). Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Successful renal access was achieved in all patients. The baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The numbers of renal access were significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.002), and the operation time was comparable (79.1 ± 14.6 min vs. 96.2 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.06) between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the P group (6.2 ± 1.5 d vs. 10.2 ± 1.7 d, p = 0.008). The postoperative hemoglobin loss was similar between the P and S groups (1.7 ± 0.4 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.12). The stone-free rate was significantly lower in the S group (57.5% vs. 82.7%, p &lt; 0.001). There were no embolization or septic complications. Twelve patients (20.3%) in the S group underwent simultaneous or staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to remove residual stones. Conclusion: US-guided PCNL in the modified supine position was a safe treatment for complex renal stones. However, the single-session stone clearance rate was not ideal. The supine flank-free position may be unsuitable for US-guided PCNL in patients with complex renal stones according to our preliminary findings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - complications</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney stones</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Percutaneous nephrostomy</subject><subject>Prone Position</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Supine Position</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><issn>0042-1138</issn><issn>1423-0399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0cFu1DAQAFALgehSOHBHyFIv5ZAyjhM7PqFqVcpKVVlR9hw5ybhrSOJgO4L9e1ylrIRU-WB5_Maa8RDylsEFY6X6CABlXgkpn5EVK3KeAVfqOVkBFHnGGK9OyKsQfgAkrORLcsKFLAso2IocNoHGPdK7ebIj0q0LNlo3prONuumRGufpro9eBzePXXY92w47ukXfzlGP6OZAb3Hae9fbuHfRDQdqR7rV0eIYA_2donTthqnHP_Qbjrqnd9GNGD69Ji-M7gO-edxPye7z1ff1l-zm6_VmfXmTtVyJmInSaA6VKHOdq0Y0nDONTaM4B1OxUgAa00ClZVeC6JoKpeDpOyrVmgaLvOKn5Hx5d_Lu14wh1oMNLfb9Un2dS1lUSkquEj1b6L3usbajcanv9oHXl7LkIAoAntTFEyqtDgfbpt6MTfH_Ej4sCa13IXg09eTtoP2hZlA_DLA-DjDZ94_Vzs2A3VH-m1gC7xbwU_t79EdwzD978nq3uV1EPXWG_wUFu6oi</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Xiao, Bo</creator><creator>Zeng, Xue</creator><creator>Zhang, Gang</creator><creator>Ji, Chaoyue</creator><creator>Jin, Song</creator><creator>Bai, Wenjie</creator><creator>Tang, Yuzhe</creator><creator>Wang, Bixiao</creator><creator>Li, Jianxing</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-3532</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?</title><author>Xiao, Bo ; Zeng, Xue ; Zhang, Gang ; Ji, Chaoyue ; Jin, Song ; Bai, Wenjie ; Tang, Yuzhe ; Wang, Bixiao ; Li, Jianxing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-65fa308652a29b6b331aebb9330f81560effb08a7d506db8e76300589cfbe4283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - complications</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney stones</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Percutaneous nephrostomy</topic><topic>Prone Position</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Supine Position</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Chaoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bixiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jianxing</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, Bo</au><au>Zeng, Xue</au><au>Zhang, Gang</au><au>Ji, Chaoyue</au><au>Jin, Song</au><au>Bai, Wenjie</au><au>Tang, Yuzhe</au><au>Wang, Bixiao</au><au>Li, Jianxing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?</atitle><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>550-556</pages><issn>0042-1138</issn><eissn>1423-0399</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex renal stones at our institution between August 2018 and December 2021. During this time, 188 consecutive patients underwent US-guided PCNL in the prone position (P group, n = 129) or in the flank-free modified supine position (S group, n = 59). Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Successful renal access was achieved in all patients. The baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The numbers of renal access were significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.002), and the operation time was comparable (79.1 ± 14.6 min vs. 96.2 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.06) between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the P group (6.2 ± 1.5 d vs. 10.2 ± 1.7 d, p = 0.008). The postoperative hemoglobin loss was similar between the P and S groups (1.7 ± 0.4 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.12). The stone-free rate was significantly lower in the S group (57.5% vs. 82.7%, p &lt; 0.001). There were no embolization or septic complications. Twelve patients (20.3%) in the S group underwent simultaneous or staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to remove residual stones. Conclusion: US-guided PCNL in the modified supine position was a safe treatment for complex renal stones. However, the single-session stone clearance rate was not ideal. The supine flank-free position may be unsuitable for US-guided PCNL in patients with complex renal stones according to our preliminary findings.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>36754041</pmid><doi>10.1159/000528677</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-3532</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0042-1138
ispartof Urologia internationalis, 2023-06, Vol.107 (6), p.550-556
issn 0042-1138
1423-0399
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A753064003
source MEDLINE; Karger Journals
subjects Adult
Aged
Care and treatment
Complications and side effects
Female
Humans
Kidney Calculi - complications
Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging
Kidney Calculi - surgery
Kidney stones
Male
Middle Aged
Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous
Patient outcomes
Percutaneous nephrostomy
Prone Position
Research Article
Retrospective Studies
Supine Position
Treatment Outcome
Ultrasonography, Interventional
title Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T15%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20Supine%20Position%20Suitable%20for%20Ultrasound-Guided%20Percutaneous%20Nephrolithotomy%20in%20Patients%20with%20Complex%20Renal%20Stones?&rft.jtitle=Urologia%20internationalis&rft.au=Xiao,%20Bo&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=550-556&rft.issn=0042-1138&rft.eissn=1423-0399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000528677&rft_dat=%3Cgale_karge%3EA753064003%3C/gale_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774897739&rft_id=info:pmid/36754041&rft_galeid=A753064003&rfr_iscdi=true