Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?
Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex ren...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Urologia internationalis 2023-06, Vol.107 (6), p.550-556 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 556 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 550 |
container_title | Urologia internationalis |
container_volume | 107 |
creator | Xiao, Bo Zeng, Xue Zhang, Gang Ji, Chaoyue Jin, Song Bai, Wenjie Tang, Yuzhe Wang, Bixiao Li, Jianxing |
description | Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex renal stones at our institution between August 2018 and December 2021. During this time, 188 consecutive patients underwent US-guided PCNL in the prone position (P group, n = 129) or in the flank-free modified supine position (S group, n = 59). Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Successful renal access was achieved in all patients. The baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The numbers of renal access were significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.002), and the operation time was comparable (79.1 ± 14.6 min vs. 96.2 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.06) between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the P group (6.2 ± 1.5 d vs. 10.2 ± 1.7 d, p = 0.008). The postoperative hemoglobin loss was similar between the P and S groups (1.7 ± 0.4 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.12). The stone-free rate was significantly lower in the S group (57.5% vs. 82.7%, p < 0.001). There were no embolization or septic complications. Twelve patients (20.3%) in the S group underwent simultaneous or staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to remove residual stones. Conclusion: US-guided PCNL in the modified supine position was a safe treatment for complex renal stones. However, the single-session stone clearance rate was not ideal. The supine flank-free position may be unsuitable for US-guided PCNL in patients with complex renal stones according to our preliminary findings. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000528677 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_karge</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A753064003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A753064003</galeid><sourcerecordid>A753064003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-65fa308652a29b6b331aebb9330f81560effb08a7d506db8e76300589cfbe4283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpt0cFu1DAQAFALgehSOHBHyFIv5ZAyjhM7PqFqVcpKVVlR9hw5ybhrSOJgO4L9e1ylrIRU-WB5_Maa8RDylsEFY6X6CABlXgkpn5EVK3KeAVfqOVkBFHnGGK9OyKsQfgAkrORLcsKFLAso2IocNoHGPdK7ebIj0q0LNlo3prONuumRGufpro9eBzePXXY92w47ukXfzlGP6OZAb3Hae9fbuHfRDQdqR7rV0eIYA_2donTthqnHP_Qbjrqnd9GNGD69Ji-M7gO-edxPye7z1ff1l-zm6_VmfXmTtVyJmInSaA6VKHOdq0Y0nDONTaM4B1OxUgAa00ClZVeC6JoKpeDpOyrVmgaLvOKn5Hx5d_Lu14wh1oMNLfb9Un2dS1lUSkquEj1b6L3usbajcanv9oHXl7LkIAoAntTFEyqtDgfbpt6MTfH_Ej4sCa13IXg09eTtoP2hZlA_DLA-DjDZ94_Vzs2A3VH-m1gC7xbwU_t79EdwzD978nq3uV1EPXWG_wUFu6oi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2774897739</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Karger Journals</source><creator>Xiao, Bo ; Zeng, Xue ; Zhang, Gang ; Ji, Chaoyue ; Jin, Song ; Bai, Wenjie ; Tang, Yuzhe ; Wang, Bixiao ; Li, Jianxing</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Bo ; Zeng, Xue ; Zhang, Gang ; Ji, Chaoyue ; Jin, Song ; Bai, Wenjie ; Tang, Yuzhe ; Wang, Bixiao ; Li, Jianxing</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex renal stones at our institution between August 2018 and December 2021. During this time, 188 consecutive patients underwent US-guided PCNL in the prone position (P group, n = 129) or in the flank-free modified supine position (S group, n = 59). Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Successful renal access was achieved in all patients. The baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The numbers of renal access were significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.002), and the operation time was comparable (79.1 ± 14.6 min vs. 96.2 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.06) between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the P group (6.2 ± 1.5 d vs. 10.2 ± 1.7 d, p = 0.008). The postoperative hemoglobin loss was similar between the P and S groups (1.7 ± 0.4 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.12). The stone-free rate was significantly lower in the S group (57.5% vs. 82.7%, p < 0.001). There were no embolization or septic complications. Twelve patients (20.3%) in the S group underwent simultaneous or staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to remove residual stones. Conclusion: US-guided PCNL in the modified supine position was a safe treatment for complex renal stones. However, the single-session stone clearance rate was not ideal. The supine flank-free position may be unsuitable for US-guided PCNL in patients with complex renal stones according to our preliminary findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0042-1138</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1423-0399</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000528677</identifier><identifier>PMID: 36754041</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: S. Karger AG</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Care and treatment ; Complications and side effects ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Calculi - complications ; Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging ; Kidney Calculi - surgery ; Kidney stones ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous ; Patient outcomes ; Percutaneous nephrostomy ; Prone Position ; Research Article ; Retrospective Studies ; Supine Position ; Treatment Outcome ; Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><ispartof>Urologia internationalis, 2023-06, Vol.107 (6), p.550-556</ispartof><rights>2023 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 S. Karger AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-65fa308652a29b6b331aebb9330f81560effb08a7d506db8e76300589cfbe4283</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6961-3532</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2422,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36754041$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Chaoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bixiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jianxing</creatorcontrib><title>Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?</title><title>Urologia internationalis</title><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><description>Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex renal stones at our institution between August 2018 and December 2021. During this time, 188 consecutive patients underwent US-guided PCNL in the prone position (P group, n = 129) or in the flank-free modified supine position (S group, n = 59). Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Successful renal access was achieved in all patients. The baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The numbers of renal access were significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.002), and the operation time was comparable (79.1 ± 14.6 min vs. 96.2 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.06) between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the P group (6.2 ± 1.5 d vs. 10.2 ± 1.7 d, p = 0.008). The postoperative hemoglobin loss was similar between the P and S groups (1.7 ± 0.4 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.12). The stone-free rate was significantly lower in the S group (57.5% vs. 82.7%, p < 0.001). There were no embolization or septic complications. Twelve patients (20.3%) in the S group underwent simultaneous or staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to remove residual stones. Conclusion: US-guided PCNL in the modified supine position was a safe treatment for complex renal stones. However, the single-session stone clearance rate was not ideal. The supine flank-free position may be unsuitable for US-guided PCNL in patients with complex renal stones according to our preliminary findings.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - complications</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Kidney Calculi - surgery</subject><subject>Kidney stones</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Percutaneous nephrostomy</subject><subject>Prone Position</subject><subject>Research Article</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>Supine Position</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Ultrasonography, Interventional</subject><issn>0042-1138</issn><issn>1423-0399</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNpt0cFu1DAQAFALgehSOHBHyFIv5ZAyjhM7PqFqVcpKVVlR9hw5ybhrSOJgO4L9e1ylrIRU-WB5_Maa8RDylsEFY6X6CABlXgkpn5EVK3KeAVfqOVkBFHnGGK9OyKsQfgAkrORLcsKFLAso2IocNoHGPdK7ebIj0q0LNlo3prONuumRGufpro9eBzePXXY92w47ukXfzlGP6OZAb3Hae9fbuHfRDQdqR7rV0eIYA_2donTthqnHP_Qbjrqnd9GNGD69Ji-M7gO-edxPye7z1ff1l-zm6_VmfXmTtVyJmInSaA6VKHOdq0Y0nDONTaM4B1OxUgAa00ClZVeC6JoKpeDpOyrVmgaLvOKn5Hx5d_Lu14wh1oMNLfb9Un2dS1lUSkquEj1b6L3usbajcanv9oHXl7LkIAoAntTFEyqtDgfbpt6MTfH_Ej4sCa13IXg09eTtoP2hZlA_DLA-DjDZ94_Vzs2A3VH-m1gC7xbwU_t79EdwzD978nq3uV1EPXWG_wUFu6oi</recordid><startdate>20230601</startdate><enddate>20230601</enddate><creator>Xiao, Bo</creator><creator>Zeng, Xue</creator><creator>Zhang, Gang</creator><creator>Ji, Chaoyue</creator><creator>Jin, Song</creator><creator>Bai, Wenjie</creator><creator>Tang, Yuzhe</creator><creator>Wang, Bixiao</creator><creator>Li, Jianxing</creator><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-3532</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230601</creationdate><title>Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?</title><author>Xiao, Bo ; Zeng, Xue ; Zhang, Gang ; Ji, Chaoyue ; Jin, Song ; Bai, Wenjie ; Tang, Yuzhe ; Wang, Bixiao ; Li, Jianxing</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c396t-65fa308652a29b6b331aebb9330f81560effb08a7d506db8e76300589cfbe4283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - complications</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Kidney Calculi - surgery</topic><topic>Kidney stones</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Percutaneous nephrostomy</topic><topic>Prone Position</topic><topic>Research Article</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>Supine Position</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Ultrasonography, Interventional</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zeng, Xue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Gang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ji, Chaoyue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Song</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Wenjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Yuzhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Bixiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Jianxing</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, Bo</au><au>Zeng, Xue</au><au>Zhang, Gang</au><au>Ji, Chaoyue</au><au>Jin, Song</au><au>Bai, Wenjie</au><au>Tang, Yuzhe</au><au>Wang, Bixiao</au><au>Li, Jianxing</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones?</atitle><jtitle>Urologia internationalis</jtitle><addtitle>Urol Int</addtitle><date>2023-06-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>107</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>550</spage><epage>556</epage><pages>550-556</pages><issn>0042-1138</issn><eissn>1423-0399</eissn><abstract>Introduction: The aim of the study was to assess the safety and efficacy of ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for complex renal stones when performed in a modified supine position. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of patients who underwent PCNL for complex renal stones at our institution between August 2018 and December 2021. During this time, 188 consecutive patients underwent US-guided PCNL in the prone position (P group, n = 129) or in the flank-free modified supine position (S group, n = 59). Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative data were analyzed. Results: Successful renal access was achieved in all patients. The baseline demographics were comparable between the two groups. The numbers of renal access were significantly higher (2.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.2 ± 0.2, p = 0.002), and the operation time was comparable (79.1 ± 14.6 min vs. 96.2 ± 19.6 min, p = 0.06) between the two groups. The postoperative hospital stay was also shorter in the P group (6.2 ± 1.5 d vs. 10.2 ± 1.7 d, p = 0.008). The postoperative hemoglobin loss was similar between the P and S groups (1.7 ± 0.4 g/dL vs. 1.8 ± 0.3 g/dL, p = 0.12). The stone-free rate was significantly lower in the S group (57.5% vs. 82.7%, p < 0.001). There were no embolization or septic complications. Twelve patients (20.3%) in the S group underwent simultaneous or staged retrograde flexible ureteroscopy to remove residual stones. Conclusion: US-guided PCNL in the modified supine position was a safe treatment for complex renal stones. However, the single-session stone clearance rate was not ideal. The supine flank-free position may be unsuitable for US-guided PCNL in patients with complex renal stones according to our preliminary findings.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>S. Karger AG</pub><pmid>36754041</pmid><doi>10.1159/000528677</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6961-3532</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0042-1138 |
ispartof | Urologia internationalis, 2023-06, Vol.107 (6), p.550-556 |
issn | 0042-1138 1423-0399 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A753064003 |
source | MEDLINE; Karger Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Care and treatment Complications and side effects Female Humans Kidney Calculi - complications Kidney Calculi - diagnostic imaging Kidney Calculi - surgery Kidney stones Male Middle Aged Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous Patient outcomes Percutaneous nephrostomy Prone Position Research Article Retrospective Studies Supine Position Treatment Outcome Ultrasonography, Interventional |
title | Is the Supine Position Suitable for Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in Patients with Complex Renal Stones? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T15%3A46%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_karge&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20the%20Supine%20Position%20Suitable%20for%20Ultrasound-Guided%20Percutaneous%20Nephrolithotomy%20in%20Patients%20with%20Complex%20Renal%20Stones?&rft.jtitle=Urologia%20internationalis&rft.au=Xiao,%20Bo&rft.date=2023-06-01&rft.volume=107&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=550&rft.epage=556&rft.pages=550-556&rft.issn=0042-1138&rft.eissn=1423-0399&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000528677&rft_dat=%3Cgale_karge%3EA753064003%3C/gale_karge%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2774897739&rft_id=info:pmid/36754041&rft_galeid=A753064003&rfr_iscdi=true |