Daoist Reflections on the See-Saw of Contingency and Autonomy: The ILaozi/I and IZhuangzi/I in Dialogue with Sandel, Rosa, Rorty, Gray
Nearly all philosophical inquiry is rooted in contingency. From ontology and theories of God to politics and ethics, dealing with, explaining, planning for, or even following contingency is a consistent theme. In the background of their recent works, Michael Sandel, Hartmut Rosa, John Gray, and Rich...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Religions (Basel, Switzerland ) Switzerland ), 2022-10, Vol.13 (10) |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | Religions (Basel, Switzerland ) |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | D’Ambrosio, Paul Joseph |
| description | Nearly all philosophical inquiry is rooted in contingency. From ontology and theories of God to politics and ethics, dealing with, explaining, planning for, or even following contingency is a consistent theme. In the background of their recent works, Michael Sandel, Hartmut Rosa, John Gray, and Richard Rorty all see contingency and autonomy in a see-saw relationship: more of one correspondingly results in less of the other. Daoist philosophical reflections provide a different take on contingency. We can still have an experience of "self" and of making choices without positing any notion of autonomy outside of contingency. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.3390/rel13100972 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A746535570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A746535570</galeid><sourcerecordid>A746535570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1350-9e7f257cb82348f4ae0a17f561d948f289274ad37681ec78a11b3720b8cb6f943</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjMFKw0AQhoMoWGpPvsCCJ6Fpd7NJNvFWWq2BoNDUi5eySWbTlXQXshtqfACf21g9tODBGZiZf-b7x3GuCZ5QGuNpAzWhBOOYeWfOwMOMucT3_fOj-dIZGfOG-4gwZjQeOJ8LrqWxaAWihsJKrQzSCtktoAzAzfgeaYHmWlmpKlBFh7gq0ay1Wuldd4fWPZikXH_IaXI4Ja_blqvqoKVCC8lrXbWA9tJuUdYTUI_RShv-XRvbjdGy4d2VcyF4bWD024fOy8P9ev7ops_LZD5L3YrQALsxMOEFrMgjj_qR8DlgTpgIQlLGvfai2GM-LykLIwIFizghOWUezqMiD0Xs06Fz8_O34jVspBLaNrzYSVNsZswPAxoEDPfU5A-qzxJ2stAKhOz3J4bbE0PPWHi3FW-N2STZ07_ZaJkes19wtIyX</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Daoist Reflections on the See-Saw of Contingency and Autonomy: The ILaozi/I and IZhuangzi/I in Dialogue with Sandel, Rosa, Rorty, Gray</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>D’Ambrosio, Paul Joseph</creator><creatorcontrib>D’Ambrosio, Paul Joseph</creatorcontrib><description>Nearly all philosophical inquiry is rooted in contingency. From ontology and theories of God to politics and ethics, dealing with, explaining, planning for, or even following contingency is a consistent theme. In the background of their recent works, Michael Sandel, Hartmut Rosa, John Gray, and Richard Rorty all see contingency and autonomy in a see-saw relationship: more of one correspondingly results in less of the other. Daoist philosophical reflections provide a different take on contingency. We can still have an experience of "self" and of making choices without positing any notion of autonomy outside of contingency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2077-1444</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2077-1444</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/rel13100972</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Autonomy (Psychology) ; Evaluation ; Gray, John (American psychotherapist) ; Philosophers ; Political scientists ; Psychological aspects ; Psychotherapists ; Rorty, Richard ; Rosa, Hartmut (American political scientist) ; Sandel, Michael J ; Taoism ; Works</subject><ispartof>Religions (Basel, Switzerland ), 2022-10, Vol.13 (10)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 MDPI AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>D’Ambrosio, Paul Joseph</creatorcontrib><title>Daoist Reflections on the See-Saw of Contingency and Autonomy: The ILaozi/I and IZhuangzi/I in Dialogue with Sandel, Rosa, Rorty, Gray</title><title>Religions (Basel, Switzerland )</title><description>Nearly all philosophical inquiry is rooted in contingency. From ontology and theories of God to politics and ethics, dealing with, explaining, planning for, or even following contingency is a consistent theme. In the background of their recent works, Michael Sandel, Hartmut Rosa, John Gray, and Richard Rorty all see contingency and autonomy in a see-saw relationship: more of one correspondingly results in less of the other. Daoist philosophical reflections provide a different take on contingency. We can still have an experience of "self" and of making choices without positing any notion of autonomy outside of contingency.</description><subject>Autonomy (Psychology)</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Gray, John (American psychotherapist)</subject><subject>Philosophers</subject><subject>Political scientists</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Psychotherapists</subject><subject>Rorty, Richard</subject><subject>Rosa, Hartmut (American political scientist)</subject><subject>Sandel, Michael J</subject><subject>Taoism</subject><subject>Works</subject><issn>2077-1444</issn><issn>2077-1444</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjMFKw0AQhoMoWGpPvsCCJ6Fpd7NJNvFWWq2BoNDUi5eySWbTlXQXshtqfACf21g9tODBGZiZf-b7x3GuCZ5QGuNpAzWhBOOYeWfOwMOMucT3_fOj-dIZGfOG-4gwZjQeOJ8LrqWxaAWihsJKrQzSCtktoAzAzfgeaYHmWlmpKlBFh7gq0ay1Wuldd4fWPZikXH_IaXI4Ja_blqvqoKVCC8lrXbWA9tJuUdYTUI_RShv-XRvbjdGy4d2VcyF4bWD024fOy8P9ev7ops_LZD5L3YrQALsxMOEFrMgjj_qR8DlgTpgIQlLGvfai2GM-LykLIwIFizghOWUezqMiD0Xs06Fz8_O34jVspBLaNrzYSVNsZswPAxoEDPfU5A-qzxJ2stAKhOz3J4bbE0PPWHi3FW-N2STZ07_ZaJkes19wtIyX</recordid><startdate>20221001</startdate><enddate>20221001</enddate><creator>D’Ambrosio, Paul Joseph</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20221001</creationdate><title>Daoist Reflections on the See-Saw of Contingency and Autonomy: The ILaozi/I and IZhuangzi/I in Dialogue with Sandel, Rosa, Rorty, Gray</title><author>D’Ambrosio, Paul Joseph</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1350-9e7f257cb82348f4ae0a17f561d948f289274ad37681ec78a11b3720b8cb6f943</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Autonomy (Psychology)</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Gray, John (American psychotherapist)</topic><topic>Philosophers</topic><topic>Political scientists</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Psychotherapists</topic><topic>Rorty, Richard</topic><topic>Rosa, Hartmut (American political scientist)</topic><topic>Sandel, Michael J</topic><topic>Taoism</topic><topic>Works</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D’Ambrosio, Paul Joseph</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><jtitle>Religions (Basel, Switzerland )</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D’Ambrosio, Paul Joseph</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Daoist Reflections on the See-Saw of Contingency and Autonomy: The ILaozi/I and IZhuangzi/I in Dialogue with Sandel, Rosa, Rorty, Gray</atitle><jtitle>Religions (Basel, Switzerland )</jtitle><date>2022-10-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>10</issue><issn>2077-1444</issn><eissn>2077-1444</eissn><abstract>Nearly all philosophical inquiry is rooted in contingency. From ontology and theories of God to politics and ethics, dealing with, explaining, planning for, or even following contingency is a consistent theme. In the background of their recent works, Michael Sandel, Hartmut Rosa, John Gray, and Richard Rorty all see contingency and autonomy in a see-saw relationship: more of one correspondingly results in less of the other. Daoist philosophical reflections provide a different take on contingency. We can still have an experience of "self" and of making choices without positing any notion of autonomy outside of contingency.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/rel13100972</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| ispartof | Religions (Basel, Switzerland ), 2022-10, Vol.13 (10) |
| issn | 2077-1444 2077-1444 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A746535570 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
| subjects | Autonomy (Psychology) Evaluation Gray, John (American psychotherapist) Philosophers Political scientists Psychological aspects Psychotherapists Rorty, Richard Rosa, Hartmut (American political scientist) Sandel, Michael J Taoism Works |
| title | Daoist Reflections on the See-Saw of Contingency and Autonomy: The ILaozi/I and IZhuangzi/I in Dialogue with Sandel, Rosa, Rorty, Gray |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T11%3A54%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Daoist%20Reflections%20on%20the%20See-Saw%20of%20Contingency%20and%20Autonomy:%20The%20ILaozi/I%20and%20IZhuangzi/I%20in%20Dialogue%20with%20Sandel,%20Rosa,%20Rorty,%20Gray&rft.jtitle=Religions%20(Basel,%20Switzerland%20)&rft.au=D%E2%80%99Ambrosio,%20Paul%20Joseph&rft.date=2022-10-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=10&rft.issn=2077-1444&rft.eissn=2077-1444&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/rel13100972&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA746535570%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A746535570&rfr_iscdi=true |