Bronchodilator Response in [FEF.sub.25-75] for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children

BACKGROUND: Spirometry tests with a bronchodilator response (BDR) in [FEV.sub.1], a methacho-line concentration that produces a 20% drop in [FEV.sub.1] ([PC.sub.20]) [less than or equal to] 2 mg/mL, and a positive exercise test have high specificity for the diagnosis of asthma in children. However,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Respiratory care 2023-04, Vol.68 (4), p.505
Hauptverfasser: Linares, Marcela B, Rodriguez, Maria Angelica, Olmos, Claudio R, Icarte, Danae M, Martinez, Bitter A, Milla, Valentina P, Zygier, Noelia F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 505
container_title Respiratory care
container_volume 68
creator Linares, Marcela B
Rodriguez, Maria Angelica
Olmos, Claudio R
Icarte, Danae M
Martinez, Bitter A
Milla, Valentina P
Zygier, Noelia F
description BACKGROUND: Spirometry tests with a bronchodilator response (BDR) in [FEV.sub.1], a methacho-line concentration that produces a 20% drop in [FEV.sub.1] ([PC.sub.20]) [less than or equal to] 2 mg/mL, and a positive exercise test have high specificity for the diagnosis of asthma in children. However, the value of forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC maneuver ([FEF.sub.25-75]) in spirometry has been questioned. The objective of this study was to relate the BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75] of spirometry tests with normal [FEV.sub.1] and [FEV.sub.1]/FVC to airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to methacholine or exercise in children age 5-15 y with clinical suspicion of asthma. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of spirometry tests performed between January 2017-December 2019 in children age 5-15 y with diagnostic suspicion of asthma who had a methacholine and/or exercise testing within a period not exceeding 60 d between exams. RESULTS: The mean ([+ or -] SD) age of the children was 9.04 [+ or -] 2.67 y, with a range of 5-15 y, and 56.17% were male. Of the 324 spirometry tests with normal [FEV.sub.1] and [FEV.sub.1]/FVC, 66 (20.4%) tests showed BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75]. A total of 46.9% and 33.3% of the children with and without BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75], respectively, had a [PC.sub.20] value [less than or equal to] 2 mg/mL and/or a positive exercise testing (P 5 .039). CONCLUSIONS: Children with suspected asthma and normal spirometry, other than BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75], had greater AHR than those without BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75]. BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75] was not always accompanied by AHR to confirm the diagnosis of asthma, so this study suggests that assessment of [FEF.sub.25-75] alone is not always reliable for ruling in or ruling out AHR in the setting of otherwise normal spirometry results in children with suspected asthma. Key words: spirometry; asthma; bronchial hyper-responsiveness; methacholine; exercise test; child; bronchodilator.
doi_str_mv 10.4187/respcare.10177
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A744057693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A744057693</galeid><sourcerecordid>A744057693</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g983-22dc3d38c882b4169f09c6d5d780810721878d2b6a5e7587b1cd12f457f4cf63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkE1LxDAQQHNQcF29eg4I3lqTNGnSY61bFRaE1ZvIkuajjbSJNN3_b0QPK8gchpl5b2AGgCuMcooFv51N_FRyNjlGmPMTsEKIoAwXhJ6B8xg_UllSVq3A7m4OXg1Bu1EuYYa7JAYfDXQevrWbNo-HLics4-wd2jRfBgPvnex9iC7CYGEdl2GS33gzuFHPxl-AUyvHaC5_8xq8tJvX5jHbPj88NfU26ytRZIRoVehCKCFIR3FZWVSpUjPNBRIYcZLOEJp0pWSGM8E7rDQmljJuqbJlsQbXP1t7OZq98zYss1STi2pfc0oR42VVJCr_h0qhzeRU8Ma61P8j3BwJg5HjMsQwHhaXvnIMfgGksWpH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Bronchodilator Response in [FEF.sub.25-75] for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Linares, Marcela B ; Rodriguez, Maria Angelica ; Olmos, Claudio R ; Icarte, Danae M ; Martinez, Bitter A ; Milla, Valentina P ; Zygier, Noelia F</creator><creatorcontrib>Linares, Marcela B ; Rodriguez, Maria Angelica ; Olmos, Claudio R ; Icarte, Danae M ; Martinez, Bitter A ; Milla, Valentina P ; Zygier, Noelia F</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: Spirometry tests with a bronchodilator response (BDR) in [FEV.sub.1], a methacho-line concentration that produces a 20% drop in [FEV.sub.1] ([PC.sub.20]) [less than or equal to] 2 mg/mL, and a positive exercise test have high specificity for the diagnosis of asthma in children. However, the value of forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC maneuver ([FEF.sub.25-75]) in spirometry has been questioned. The objective of this study was to relate the BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75] of spirometry tests with normal [FEV.sub.1] and [FEV.sub.1]/FVC to airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to methacholine or exercise in children age 5-15 y with clinical suspicion of asthma. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of spirometry tests performed between January 2017-December 2019 in children age 5-15 y with diagnostic suspicion of asthma who had a methacholine and/or exercise testing within a period not exceeding 60 d between exams. RESULTS: The mean ([+ or -] SD) age of the children was 9.04 [+ or -] 2.67 y, with a range of 5-15 y, and 56.17% were male. Of the 324 spirometry tests with normal [FEV.sub.1] and [FEV.sub.1]/FVC, 66 (20.4%) tests showed BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75]. A total of 46.9% and 33.3% of the children with and without BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75], respectively, had a [PC.sub.20] value [less than or equal to] 2 mg/mL and/or a positive exercise testing (P 5 .039). CONCLUSIONS: Children with suspected asthma and normal spirometry, other than BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75], had greater AHR than those without BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75]. BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75] was not always accompanied by AHR to confirm the diagnosis of asthma, so this study suggests that assessment of [FEF.sub.25-75] alone is not always reliable for ruling in or ruling out AHR in the setting of otherwise normal spirometry results in children with suspected asthma. Key words: spirometry; asthma; bronchial hyper-responsiveness; methacholine; exercise test; child; bronchodilator.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0020-1324</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4187/respcare.10177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</publisher><subject>Asthma in children ; Bronchodilator agents ; Diagnosis ; Exercise tests ; Methods ; Pediatric research ; Spirometry</subject><ispartof>Respiratory care, 2023-04, Vol.68 (4), p.505</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Daedalus Enterprises, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Linares, Marcela B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Maria Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmos, Claudio R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icarte, Danae M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Bitter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milla, Valentina P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zygier, Noelia F</creatorcontrib><title>Bronchodilator Response in [FEF.sub.25-75] for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children</title><title>Respiratory care</title><description>BACKGROUND: Spirometry tests with a bronchodilator response (BDR) in [FEV.sub.1], a methacho-line concentration that produces a 20% drop in [FEV.sub.1] ([PC.sub.20]) [less than or equal to] 2 mg/mL, and a positive exercise test have high specificity for the diagnosis of asthma in children. However, the value of forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC maneuver ([FEF.sub.25-75]) in spirometry has been questioned. The objective of this study was to relate the BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75] of spirometry tests with normal [FEV.sub.1] and [FEV.sub.1]/FVC to airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to methacholine or exercise in children age 5-15 y with clinical suspicion of asthma. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of spirometry tests performed between January 2017-December 2019 in children age 5-15 y with diagnostic suspicion of asthma who had a methacholine and/or exercise testing within a period not exceeding 60 d between exams. RESULTS: The mean ([+ or -] SD) age of the children was 9.04 [+ or -] 2.67 y, with a range of 5-15 y, and 56.17% were male. Of the 324 spirometry tests with normal [FEV.sub.1] and [FEV.sub.1]/FVC, 66 (20.4%) tests showed BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75]. A total of 46.9% and 33.3% of the children with and without BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75], respectively, had a [PC.sub.20] value [less than or equal to] 2 mg/mL and/or a positive exercise testing (P 5 .039). CONCLUSIONS: Children with suspected asthma and normal spirometry, other than BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75], had greater AHR than those without BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75]. BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75] was not always accompanied by AHR to confirm the diagnosis of asthma, so this study suggests that assessment of [FEF.sub.25-75] alone is not always reliable for ruling in or ruling out AHR in the setting of otherwise normal spirometry results in children with suspected asthma. Key words: spirometry; asthma; bronchial hyper-responsiveness; methacholine; exercise test; child; bronchodilator.</description><subject>Asthma in children</subject><subject>Bronchodilator agents</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Exercise tests</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pediatric research</subject><subject>Spirometry</subject><issn>0020-1324</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptkE1LxDAQQHNQcF29eg4I3lqTNGnSY61bFRaE1ZvIkuajjbSJNN3_b0QPK8gchpl5b2AGgCuMcooFv51N_FRyNjlGmPMTsEKIoAwXhJ6B8xg_UllSVq3A7m4OXg1Bu1EuYYa7JAYfDXQevrWbNo-HLics4-wd2jRfBgPvnex9iC7CYGEdl2GS33gzuFHPxl-AUyvHaC5_8xq8tJvX5jHbPj88NfU26ytRZIRoVehCKCFIR3FZWVSpUjPNBRIYcZLOEJp0pWSGM8E7rDQmljJuqbJlsQbXP1t7OZq98zYss1STi2pfc0oR42VVJCr_h0qhzeRU8Ma61P8j3BwJg5HjMsQwHhaXvnIMfgGksWpH</recordid><startdate>20230401</startdate><enddate>20230401</enddate><creator>Linares, Marcela B</creator><creator>Rodriguez, Maria Angelica</creator><creator>Olmos, Claudio R</creator><creator>Icarte, Danae M</creator><creator>Martinez, Bitter A</creator><creator>Milla, Valentina P</creator><creator>Zygier, Noelia F</creator><general>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20230401</creationdate><title>Bronchodilator Response in [FEF.sub.25-75] for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children</title><author>Linares, Marcela B ; Rodriguez, Maria Angelica ; Olmos, Claudio R ; Icarte, Danae M ; Martinez, Bitter A ; Milla, Valentina P ; Zygier, Noelia F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g983-22dc3d38c882b4169f09c6d5d780810721878d2b6a5e7587b1cd12f457f4cf63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Asthma in children</topic><topic>Bronchodilator agents</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Exercise tests</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pediatric research</topic><topic>Spirometry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Linares, Marcela B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, Maria Angelica</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olmos, Claudio R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Icarte, Danae M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez, Bitter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milla, Valentina P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zygier, Noelia F</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Linares, Marcela B</au><au>Rodriguez, Maria Angelica</au><au>Olmos, Claudio R</au><au>Icarte, Danae M</au><au>Martinez, Bitter A</au><au>Milla, Valentina P</au><au>Zygier, Noelia F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Bronchodilator Response in [FEF.sub.25-75] for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children</atitle><jtitle>Respiratory care</jtitle><date>2023-04-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>68</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>505</spage><pages>505-</pages><issn>0020-1324</issn><abstract>BACKGROUND: Spirometry tests with a bronchodilator response (BDR) in [FEV.sub.1], a methacho-line concentration that produces a 20% drop in [FEV.sub.1] ([PC.sub.20]) [less than or equal to] 2 mg/mL, and a positive exercise test have high specificity for the diagnosis of asthma in children. However, the value of forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC maneuver ([FEF.sub.25-75]) in spirometry has been questioned. The objective of this study was to relate the BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75] of spirometry tests with normal [FEV.sub.1] and [FEV.sub.1]/FVC to airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) to methacholine or exercise in children age 5-15 y with clinical suspicion of asthma. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of spirometry tests performed between January 2017-December 2019 in children age 5-15 y with diagnostic suspicion of asthma who had a methacholine and/or exercise testing within a period not exceeding 60 d between exams. RESULTS: The mean ([+ or -] SD) age of the children was 9.04 [+ or -] 2.67 y, with a range of 5-15 y, and 56.17% were male. Of the 324 spirometry tests with normal [FEV.sub.1] and [FEV.sub.1]/FVC, 66 (20.4%) tests showed BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75]. A total of 46.9% and 33.3% of the children with and without BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75], respectively, had a [PC.sub.20] value [less than or equal to] 2 mg/mL and/or a positive exercise testing (P 5 .039). CONCLUSIONS: Children with suspected asthma and normal spirometry, other than BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75], had greater AHR than those without BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75]. BDR in [FEF.sub.25-75] was not always accompanied by AHR to confirm the diagnosis of asthma, so this study suggests that assessment of [FEF.sub.25-75] alone is not always reliable for ruling in or ruling out AHR in the setting of otherwise normal spirometry results in children with suspected asthma. Key words: spirometry; asthma; bronchial hyper-responsiveness; methacholine; exercise test; child; bronchodilator.</abstract><pub>Daedalus Enterprises, Inc</pub><doi>10.4187/respcare.10177</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0020-1324
ispartof Respiratory care, 2023-04, Vol.68 (4), p.505
issn 0020-1324
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A744057693
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Asthma in children
Bronchodilator agents
Diagnosis
Exercise tests
Methods
Pediatric research
Spirometry
title Bronchodilator Response in [FEF.sub.25-75] for the Diagnosis of Asthma in Children
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T11%3A43%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Bronchodilator%20Response%20in%20%5BFEF.sub.25-75%5D%20for%20the%20Diagnosis%20of%20Asthma%20in%20Children&rft.jtitle=Respiratory%20care&rft.au=Linares,%20Marcela%20B&rft.date=2023-04-01&rft.volume=68&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=505&rft.pages=505-&rft.issn=0020-1324&rft_id=info:doi/10.4187/respcare.10177&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA744057693%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A744057693&rfr_iscdi=true