Shoot Nutrition and Flavor Variation in Two IPhyllostachys/I Species: Does the Quality of Edible Bamboo Shoot Diaphragm and Flesh Differ?

For their quality evaluation, it is essential to determine both bamboo shoot nutrition and palatability, which will have a decisive effect on their economic value and market potential. However, differences in shoot nutrition and flavor variation among bamboo species, positions, and components have n...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Foods 2023-03, Vol.12 (6)
Hauptverfasser: Fan, Lili, Hu, Junjing, Guo, Ziwu, Chen, Shuanglin, He, Qijiang
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 6
container_start_page
container_title Foods
container_volume 12
creator Fan, Lili
Hu, Junjing
Guo, Ziwu
Chen, Shuanglin
He, Qijiang
description For their quality evaluation, it is essential to determine both bamboo shoot nutrition and palatability, which will have a decisive effect on their economic value and market potential. However, differences in shoot nutrition and flavor variation among bamboo species, positions, and components have not been scientifically validated. This study assessed nutritional and flavor differences in two components (i.e., shoot flesh (BSF) and diaphragm (BSD)) of two Phyllostachys species (i.e., Phyllostachys edulis and Phyllostachys violascens) and analyzed any positional variation. Results showed that BSF protein, starch, fat, and vitamin C contents were comparatively higher. Nutrient compounds in the upper shoot segment of Ph. edulis were higher and contained less cellulose and lignin. However, both species’ BSD total acid, oxalic acid, and tannin contents were comparable. BSD soluble sugar and sugar:acid ratio were higher than upper BSD total amino acid, four key amino acids (i.e., essential amino acid, bitter amino acid, umami amino acid, and sweet amino acid flavor compounds), and associated ratios were all higher than BSF while also being rich in amino acids. The content and proportion of BSF essential and bitter amino acid flavor compounds in Ph. edulis were high relative to Ph. violascens. Conversely, the content and proportion of BSD umami and sweet amino acid flavor compounds were comparable to that of Ph. edulis. Our results showed that bamboo shoot quality was affected by flavor compound differences and that interspecific and shoot components interact. This study offers a new perspective to determine the formative mechanisms involved in bamboo shoot quality while providing a basis for their different usages.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/foods12061180
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A743764648</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A743764648</galeid><sourcerecordid>A743764648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g678-6f2c79fa524fa80ec92cfc33c8cb1dc5430ff28c33b55e10efd5c6a6be0bb6bc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjTtPwzAQxy0EElXpyG6JOa0dJ47DgkofUKnioVas1dmxGyMnruIU1I_AtyaiHTpwN9zpp_8DoVtKhozlZGS8LwKNCadUkAvUixlJIkFTcXn2X6NBCJ-km5wyweIe-lmV3rf4Zd82trW-xlAXeO7gyzf4AxoLf9DWeP3t8eKtPDjnQwuqPITRAq92Wlkd7vHU64DbUuP3PTjbHrA3eFZY6TR-hEp6j489Uwu7soFtderRoeyYMbp5uEFXBlzQg9Pto_V8tp48R8vXp8VkvIy2PBMRN7HKcgNpnBgQRKs8VkYxpoSStFBpwogxseiITFNNiTZFqjhwqYmUXCrWR3fH2C04vbG18W0DqrJBbcZZwjKe8ER0quE_qm4LXVnla21sx88Mvzendjg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Shoot Nutrition and Flavor Variation in Two IPhyllostachys/I Species: Does the Quality of Edible Bamboo Shoot Diaphragm and Flesh Differ?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Fan, Lili ; Hu, Junjing ; Guo, Ziwu ; Chen, Shuanglin ; He, Qijiang</creator><creatorcontrib>Fan, Lili ; Hu, Junjing ; Guo, Ziwu ; Chen, Shuanglin ; He, Qijiang</creatorcontrib><description>For their quality evaluation, it is essential to determine both bamboo shoot nutrition and palatability, which will have a decisive effect on their economic value and market potential. However, differences in shoot nutrition and flavor variation among bamboo species, positions, and components have not been scientifically validated. This study assessed nutritional and flavor differences in two components (i.e., shoot flesh (BSF) and diaphragm (BSD)) of two Phyllostachys species (i.e., Phyllostachys edulis and Phyllostachys violascens) and analyzed any positional variation. Results showed that BSF protein, starch, fat, and vitamin C contents were comparatively higher. Nutrient compounds in the upper shoot segment of Ph. edulis were higher and contained less cellulose and lignin. However, both species’ BSD total acid, oxalic acid, and tannin contents were comparable. BSD soluble sugar and sugar:acid ratio were higher than upper BSD total amino acid, four key amino acids (i.e., essential amino acid, bitter amino acid, umami amino acid, and sweet amino acid flavor compounds), and associated ratios were all higher than BSF while also being rich in amino acids. The content and proportion of BSF essential and bitter amino acid flavor compounds in Ph. edulis were high relative to Ph. violascens. Conversely, the content and proportion of BSD umami and sweet amino acid flavor compounds were comparable to that of Ph. edulis. Our results showed that bamboo shoot quality was affected by flavor compound differences and that interspecific and shoot components interact. This study offers a new perspective to determine the formative mechanisms involved in bamboo shoot quality while providing a basis for their different usages.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2304-8158</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2304-8158</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/foods12061180</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Bamboo ; Nutritional aspects ; Shoots (Botany)</subject><ispartof>Foods, 2023-03, Vol.12 (6)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fan, Lili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Junjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Ziwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuanglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Qijiang</creatorcontrib><title>Shoot Nutrition and Flavor Variation in Two IPhyllostachys/I Species: Does the Quality of Edible Bamboo Shoot Diaphragm and Flesh Differ?</title><title>Foods</title><description>For their quality evaluation, it is essential to determine both bamboo shoot nutrition and palatability, which will have a decisive effect on their economic value and market potential. However, differences in shoot nutrition and flavor variation among bamboo species, positions, and components have not been scientifically validated. This study assessed nutritional and flavor differences in two components (i.e., shoot flesh (BSF) and diaphragm (BSD)) of two Phyllostachys species (i.e., Phyllostachys edulis and Phyllostachys violascens) and analyzed any positional variation. Results showed that BSF protein, starch, fat, and vitamin C contents were comparatively higher. Nutrient compounds in the upper shoot segment of Ph. edulis were higher and contained less cellulose and lignin. However, both species’ BSD total acid, oxalic acid, and tannin contents were comparable. BSD soluble sugar and sugar:acid ratio were higher than upper BSD total amino acid, four key amino acids (i.e., essential amino acid, bitter amino acid, umami amino acid, and sweet amino acid flavor compounds), and associated ratios were all higher than BSF while also being rich in amino acids. The content and proportion of BSF essential and bitter amino acid flavor compounds in Ph. edulis were high relative to Ph. violascens. Conversely, the content and proportion of BSD umami and sweet amino acid flavor compounds were comparable to that of Ph. edulis. Our results showed that bamboo shoot quality was affected by flavor compound differences and that interspecific and shoot components interact. This study offers a new perspective to determine the formative mechanisms involved in bamboo shoot quality while providing a basis for their different usages.</description><subject>Bamboo</subject><subject>Nutritional aspects</subject><subject>Shoots (Botany)</subject><issn>2304-8158</issn><issn>2304-8158</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptjTtPwzAQxy0EElXpyG6JOa0dJ47DgkofUKnioVas1dmxGyMnruIU1I_AtyaiHTpwN9zpp_8DoVtKhozlZGS8LwKNCadUkAvUixlJIkFTcXn2X6NBCJ-km5wyweIe-lmV3rf4Zd82trW-xlAXeO7gyzf4AxoLf9DWeP3t8eKtPDjnQwuqPITRAq92Wlkd7vHU64DbUuP3PTjbHrA3eFZY6TR-hEp6j489Uwu7soFtderRoeyYMbp5uEFXBlzQg9Pto_V8tp48R8vXp8VkvIy2PBMRN7HKcgNpnBgQRKs8VkYxpoSStFBpwogxseiITFNNiTZFqjhwqYmUXCrWR3fH2C04vbG18W0DqrJBbcZZwjKe8ER0quE_qm4LXVnla21sx88Mvzendjg</recordid><startdate>20230301</startdate><enddate>20230301</enddate><creator>Fan, Lili</creator><creator>Hu, Junjing</creator><creator>Guo, Ziwu</creator><creator>Chen, Shuanglin</creator><creator>He, Qijiang</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20230301</creationdate><title>Shoot Nutrition and Flavor Variation in Two IPhyllostachys/I Species: Does the Quality of Edible Bamboo Shoot Diaphragm and Flesh Differ?</title><author>Fan, Lili ; Hu, Junjing ; Guo, Ziwu ; Chen, Shuanglin ; He, Qijiang</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g678-6f2c79fa524fa80ec92cfc33c8cb1dc5430ff28c33b55e10efd5c6a6be0bb6bc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bamboo</topic><topic>Nutritional aspects</topic><topic>Shoots (Botany)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fan, Lili</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Junjing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Ziwu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Shuanglin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Qijiang</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Foods</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fan, Lili</au><au>Hu, Junjing</au><au>Guo, Ziwu</au><au>Chen, Shuanglin</au><au>He, Qijiang</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Shoot Nutrition and Flavor Variation in Two IPhyllostachys/I Species: Does the Quality of Edible Bamboo Shoot Diaphragm and Flesh Differ?</atitle><jtitle>Foods</jtitle><date>2023-03-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>12</volume><issue>6</issue><issn>2304-8158</issn><eissn>2304-8158</eissn><abstract>For their quality evaluation, it is essential to determine both bamboo shoot nutrition and palatability, which will have a decisive effect on their economic value and market potential. However, differences in shoot nutrition and flavor variation among bamboo species, positions, and components have not been scientifically validated. This study assessed nutritional and flavor differences in two components (i.e., shoot flesh (BSF) and diaphragm (BSD)) of two Phyllostachys species (i.e., Phyllostachys edulis and Phyllostachys violascens) and analyzed any positional variation. Results showed that BSF protein, starch, fat, and vitamin C contents were comparatively higher. Nutrient compounds in the upper shoot segment of Ph. edulis were higher and contained less cellulose and lignin. However, both species’ BSD total acid, oxalic acid, and tannin contents were comparable. BSD soluble sugar and sugar:acid ratio were higher than upper BSD total amino acid, four key amino acids (i.e., essential amino acid, bitter amino acid, umami amino acid, and sweet amino acid flavor compounds), and associated ratios were all higher than BSF while also being rich in amino acids. The content and proportion of BSF essential and bitter amino acid flavor compounds in Ph. edulis were high relative to Ph. violascens. Conversely, the content and proportion of BSD umami and sweet amino acid flavor compounds were comparable to that of Ph. edulis. Our results showed that bamboo shoot quality was affected by flavor compound differences and that interspecific and shoot components interact. This study offers a new perspective to determine the formative mechanisms involved in bamboo shoot quality while providing a basis for their different usages.</abstract><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/foods12061180</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2304-8158
ispartof Foods, 2023-03, Vol.12 (6)
issn 2304-8158
2304-8158
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A743764648
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; MDPI - Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute; PubMed Central
subjects Bamboo
Nutritional aspects
Shoots (Botany)
title Shoot Nutrition and Flavor Variation in Two IPhyllostachys/I Species: Does the Quality of Edible Bamboo Shoot Diaphragm and Flesh Differ?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T19%3A28%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Shoot%20Nutrition%20and%20Flavor%20Variation%20in%20Two%20IPhyllostachys/I%20Species:%20Does%20the%20Quality%20of%20Edible%20Bamboo%20Shoot%20Diaphragm%20and%20Flesh%20Differ?&rft.jtitle=Foods&rft.au=Fan,%20Lili&rft.date=2023-03-01&rft.volume=12&rft.issue=6&rft.issn=2304-8158&rft.eissn=2304-8158&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/foods12061180&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA743764648%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A743764648&rfr_iscdi=true