JACOBSON 2.0: POLICE POWER IN THE TIME OF COVID-19
The COVID-19 pandemic has become a legal, as well as a public health, crisis. In response to the pandemic, state and municipal governments have imposed unprecedented constraints on Americans' daily activities. These restrictions provoked a wave of constitutional challenges that have revealed th...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Albany law review 2021-12, Vol.84 (4), p.1 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Albany law review |
container_volume | 84 |
creator | Steiner-Dillon, James R Ryan, Elisabeth J |
description | The COVID-19 pandemic has become a legal, as well as a public health, crisis. In response to the pandemic, state and municipal governments have imposed unprecedented constraints on Americans' daily activities. These restrictions provoked a wave of constitutional challenges that have revealed the antiquated doctrinal foundations of states' police power in the area of public health. It has been over a century since the Supreme Court, in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, articulated a broadly deferential approach to constitutional review of state orders issued in response to a public health emergency. The constitutional order has changed since Jacobson was decided; many provisions of the Bill of Rights have been incorporated against the states, the Court has developed tiers of constitutional scrutiny, and constitutional doctrine has evolved a deeper regard for the rights of privacy and bodily autonomy. The Jacobson doctrine must be updated to incorporate contemporary constitutional norms. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A740260212</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A740260212</galeid><sourcerecordid>A740260212</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1422-1110a7cc3ef2d423e15be08a733795396e4ee54d3d0c64c96860f9a4eead27b23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjF9LwzAUxfOg4Jx-h4CvZuRfk9a3WrutUlfRqo8jTW9rpOtg2b6_EX2YMA7cwz38zjlDE0opJ1Lp-AJdev8VXq1UPEH8Mc2q-9dqhfmM3uHnqiyyPNhH_oKLFa6XOa6LpxxXc5xV78UDYckVOu_M4OH6z6fobZ7X2ZKU1aLI0pL0THJOGGPUaGsFdLyVXACLGqCx0ULoJBKJAgkQyVa01CppExUr2iUmhKbluuFiim5-d3szwNqN3Xa_M3bjvF2nWlKuKGc_FDlB9TDCzgzbEToX4n_87AQf1MLG2ZOF26NCc_BuBB-Od_3n3vfm4P0x_g1752be</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>JACOBSON 2.0: POLICE POWER IN THE TIME OF COVID-19</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><creator>Steiner-Dillon, James R ; Ryan, Elisabeth J</creator><creatorcontrib>Steiner-Dillon, James R ; Ryan, Elisabeth J</creatorcontrib><description>The COVID-19 pandemic has become a legal, as well as a public health, crisis. In response to the pandemic, state and municipal governments have imposed unprecedented constraints on Americans' daily activities. These restrictions provoked a wave of constitutional challenges that have revealed the antiquated doctrinal foundations of states' police power in the area of public health. It has been over a century since the Supreme Court, in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, articulated a broadly deferential approach to constitutional review of state orders issued in response to a public health emergency. The constitutional order has changed since Jacobson was decided; many provisions of the Bill of Rights have been incorporated against the states, the Court has developed tiers of constitutional scrutiny, and constitutional doctrine has evolved a deeper regard for the rights of privacy and bodily autonomy. The Jacobson doctrine must be updated to incorporate contemporary constitutional norms.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-4678</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Albany Law School</publisher><subject>Ethical aspects ; Health aspects ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Police power ; Political aspects ; Public health</subject><ispartof>Albany law review, 2021-12, Vol.84 (4), p.1</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Albany Law School</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Steiner-Dillon, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Elisabeth J</creatorcontrib><title>JACOBSON 2.0: POLICE POWER IN THE TIME OF COVID-19</title><title>Albany law review</title><description>The COVID-19 pandemic has become a legal, as well as a public health, crisis. In response to the pandemic, state and municipal governments have imposed unprecedented constraints on Americans' daily activities. These restrictions provoked a wave of constitutional challenges that have revealed the antiquated doctrinal foundations of states' police power in the area of public health. It has been over a century since the Supreme Court, in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, articulated a broadly deferential approach to constitutional review of state orders issued in response to a public health emergency. The constitutional order has changed since Jacobson was decided; many provisions of the Bill of Rights have been incorporated against the states, the Court has developed tiers of constitutional scrutiny, and constitutional doctrine has evolved a deeper regard for the rights of privacy and bodily autonomy. The Jacobson doctrine must be updated to incorporate contemporary constitutional norms.</description><subject>Ethical aspects</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Police power</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Public health</subject><issn>0002-4678</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNptjF9LwzAUxfOg4Jx-h4CvZuRfk9a3WrutUlfRqo8jTW9rpOtg2b6_EX2YMA7cwz38zjlDE0opJ1Lp-AJdev8VXq1UPEH8Mc2q-9dqhfmM3uHnqiyyPNhH_oKLFa6XOa6LpxxXc5xV78UDYckVOu_M4OH6z6fobZ7X2ZKU1aLI0pL0THJOGGPUaGsFdLyVXACLGqCx0ULoJBKJAgkQyVa01CppExUr2iUmhKbluuFiim5-d3szwNqN3Xa_M3bjvF2nWlKuKGc_FDlB9TDCzgzbEToX4n_87AQf1MLG2ZOF26NCc_BuBB-Od_3n3vfm4P0x_g1752be</recordid><startdate>20211222</startdate><enddate>20211222</enddate><creator>Steiner-Dillon, James R</creator><creator>Ryan, Elisabeth J</creator><general>Albany Law School</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211222</creationdate><title>JACOBSON 2.0: POLICE POWER IN THE TIME OF COVID-19</title><author>Steiner-Dillon, James R ; Ryan, Elisabeth J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1422-1110a7cc3ef2d423e15be08a733795396e4ee54d3d0c64c96860f9a4eead27b23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Ethical aspects</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Police power</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Public health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Steiner-Dillon, James R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Elisabeth J</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Albany law review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Steiner-Dillon, James R</au><au>Ryan, Elisabeth J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>JACOBSON 2.0: POLICE POWER IN THE TIME OF COVID-19</atitle><jtitle>Albany law review</jtitle><date>2021-12-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>84</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>0002-4678</issn><abstract>The COVID-19 pandemic has become a legal, as well as a public health, crisis. In response to the pandemic, state and municipal governments have imposed unprecedented constraints on Americans' daily activities. These restrictions provoked a wave of constitutional challenges that have revealed the antiquated doctrinal foundations of states' police power in the area of public health. It has been over a century since the Supreme Court, in Jacobson v. Massachusetts, articulated a broadly deferential approach to constitutional review of state orders issued in response to a public health emergency. The constitutional order has changed since Jacobson was decided; many provisions of the Bill of Rights have been incorporated against the states, the Court has developed tiers of constitutional scrutiny, and constitutional doctrine has evolved a deeper regard for the rights of privacy and bodily autonomy. The Jacobson doctrine must be updated to incorporate contemporary constitutional norms.</abstract><pub>Albany Law School</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0002-4678 |
ispartof | Albany law review, 2021-12, Vol.84 (4), p.1 |
issn | 0002-4678 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A740260212 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library |
subjects | Ethical aspects Health aspects Laws, regulations and rules Police power Political aspects Public health |
title | JACOBSON 2.0: POLICE POWER IN THE TIME OF COVID-19 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T00%3A05%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=JACOBSON%202.0:%20POLICE%20POWER%20IN%20THE%20TIME%20OF%20COVID-19&rft.jtitle=Albany%20law%20review&rft.au=Steiner-Dillon,%20James%20R&rft.date=2021-12-22&rft.volume=84&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=0002-4678&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA740260212%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A740260212&rfr_iscdi=true |