Food Attractants for Mass Trapping of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Its Selectivity for Beneficial Arthropods

Fruit fly control in Uruguay is based mainly on toxic baits which are insufficient to reduce the damage caused by these pests. Therefore, alternative management measures such as mass trapping gain relevance for control of flies. Attractants commercially available were designed mainly for Ceratitis c...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Florida entomologist 2022-09, Vol.105 (3), p.185-193
Hauptverfasser: Delgado, Soledad, Calvo, María Victoria, Duarte, Felicia, Borges, Alejandra, Scatoni, Iris Beatriz
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 193
container_issue 3
container_start_page 185
container_title The Florida entomologist
container_volume 105
creator Delgado, Soledad
Calvo, María Victoria
Duarte, Felicia
Borges, Alejandra
Scatoni, Iris Beatriz
description Fruit fly control in Uruguay is based mainly on toxic baits which are insufficient to reduce the damage caused by these pests. Therefore, alternative management measures such as mass trapping gain relevance for control of flies. Attractants commercially available were designed mainly for Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). However, they also should be attractive to Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in our fruit orchards. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of food-based attractants for the capture of sexually immature females of C. capitata and A. fraterculus, as well as their selectivity on the populations of beneficial arthropods (pollinators, predators, and parasitoids). Seven attractants were evaluated in 3 commercial fruit crops during 2 seasons; 4 commercial attractants (hydrolyzed protein, liquid trimethylamine, trimethylamine diffuser card, and ammonium acetate + putrescine diffuser card), 20% natural Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) O. Berg (Myrtaceae) juice, 6% sugarcane molasses, and Torula yeast. The attractants were placed in McPhail traps, which were checked each wk and all captured arthropods were removed, counted, and classified. Captured female tephritids were dissected to determine the presence of eggs. All commercial attractants evaluated were effective at capturing sexually immature females of C. capitata in the 3 fruit crops evaluated during both seasons. Hydrolyzed protein, liquid trimethylamine, and trimethylamine diffuser card were effective at capturing young females of both species. Most of the captures are post-harvest, so we suggest not moving traps after commercial harvest. These attractants also were selective, capturing few beneficial arthropods. Sugarcane molasses and pineapple guava juice were not effective at capturing fruit fly females. El control de las moscas de la fruta en Uruguay se basa principalmente en el uso de cebos tóxicos, los cuales han mostrado ser insuficientes para reducir sus daños. Debido a esto, estrategias de control alternativas como el trampeo masivo han tomado mayor relevancia. Los atrayentes disponibles comercialmente fueron diseñados para Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sin embargo, en nuestros cultivos frutales también deberían ser efectivos para Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar la eficiencia de diferentes atrayentes alimenticios en la captura de
doi_str_mv 10.1653/024.105.0302
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_JFNAL</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A727287643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A727287643</galeid><jstor_id>48713598</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A727287643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b361t-6feaa750177cebe61195f647a1903244e19abecff8aed8beb95d58f7746bb983</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kdFr2zAQxkVZYVnbt70WBHtZxpxKtmTZfcvapg20FJq8m7N9SlQcy0hKWf_7KU0ZBEq5Bx2n3_dxx0fId84mPJfZBUvFhDM5YRlLj8iIl1mRSM7SL2TEGJeJYIJ9Jd-8f2aMlamUI_Iys7al0xAcNAH64Km2jj6A93TpYBhMv6JW05nbmkBnnUFPf16bIaCDS7rEYe1MMC3gmELf0nnUL7DDJpgXE17fvP5gj9o0Bjo6dWHt7GBbf0qONXQez97fE7Kc3Syv7pL7x9v51fQ-qbOchyTXCKAk40o1WGPOeSl1LhTwkmWpEMhLqLHRugBsixrrUray0EqJvK7LIjshP_a2K-iwMr22uzs3xjfVVKUqLVQuskhNPqBitbgxjd2tH-cHgvGBIDIB_4YVbL2v5ounQ_b3nm2c9d6hrgZnNuBeK86qXWpVTC32stqlFvHzPf7sg3X_WVEonsm3i37t_2tj42afm_0DTmqfIw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Food Attractants for Mass Trapping of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Its Selectivity for Beneficial Arthropods</title><source>Jstor Journals Open Access</source><creator>Delgado, Soledad ; Calvo, María Victoria ; Duarte, Felicia ; Borges, Alejandra ; Scatoni, Iris Beatriz</creator><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Soledad ; Calvo, María Victoria ; Duarte, Felicia ; Borges, Alejandra ; Scatoni, Iris Beatriz</creatorcontrib><description>Fruit fly control in Uruguay is based mainly on toxic baits which are insufficient to reduce the damage caused by these pests. Therefore, alternative management measures such as mass trapping gain relevance for control of flies. Attractants commercially available were designed mainly for Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). However, they also should be attractive to Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in our fruit orchards. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of food-based attractants for the capture of sexually immature females of C. capitata and A. fraterculus, as well as their selectivity on the populations of beneficial arthropods (pollinators, predators, and parasitoids). Seven attractants were evaluated in 3 commercial fruit crops during 2 seasons; 4 commercial attractants (hydrolyzed protein, liquid trimethylamine, trimethylamine diffuser card, and ammonium acetate + putrescine diffuser card), 20% natural Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) O. Berg (Myrtaceae) juice, 6% sugarcane molasses, and Torula yeast. The attractants were placed in McPhail traps, which were checked each wk and all captured arthropods were removed, counted, and classified. Captured female tephritids were dissected to determine the presence of eggs. All commercial attractants evaluated were effective at capturing sexually immature females of C. capitata in the 3 fruit crops evaluated during both seasons. Hydrolyzed protein, liquid trimethylamine, and trimethylamine diffuser card were effective at capturing young females of both species. Most of the captures are post-harvest, so we suggest not moving traps after commercial harvest. These attractants also were selective, capturing few beneficial arthropods. Sugarcane molasses and pineapple guava juice were not effective at capturing fruit fly females. El control de las moscas de la fruta en Uruguay se basa principalmente en el uso de cebos tóxicos, los cuales han mostrado ser insuficientes para reducir sus daños. Debido a esto, estrategias de control alternativas como el trampeo masivo han tomado mayor relevancia. Los atrayentes disponibles comercialmente fueron diseñados para Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sin embargo, en nuestros cultivos frutales también deberían ser efectivos para Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar la eficiencia de diferentes atrayentes alimenticios en la captura de hembras sexualmente inmaduras de C. capitata y A. fraterculus, y su selectividad respecto a las poblaciones de artrópodos benéficos. Siete atrayentes diferentes fueron evaluados en tres cultivos frutícolas comerciales en dos temporadas; cuatro atrayentes comerciales (proteína hidrolizada, trimethylamine líquido, trimethylamine tarjeta difusora, y acetato de amonio + putrescina), jugo natural de Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) O. Berg (Myrtaceae) al 20%, melaza de caña al 6% y levadura Torula. Los atrayentes se colocaron en trampas McPhail, las que se revisaron semanalmente y todos los artrópodos capturados fueron retirados, contados y clasificados. Las hembras de tefrítidos capturadas fueron disecadas para determinar la presencia de huevos. Los atrayentes comerciales evaluados fueron eficaces en la captura de hembras jóvenes de C. capitata en los tres cultivos frutales evaluados y ambas temporadas. La proteína hidrolizada, el trimethylamine líquido, y la trimethylamine tarjeta difusora fueron efectivos en la captura de hembras jóvenes de ambas especies. La mayoría de las capturas se dieron en el período poscosecha, por lo que sugerimos que las trampas de trampeo masivo no se muevan de los cuadros luego de la cosecha comercial. Estos atrayentes fueron además muy selectivos, capturando pocos artrópodos benéficos. La melaza de caña y el jugo de guayabo no fueron eficaces en la captura de hembras de tefrítidos.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0015-4040</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1938-5102</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1653/024.105.0302</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Florida Entomological Society</publisher><subject>Agricultural pests ; Anastrepha fraterculus ; auxiliary entomofauna ; Biological control ; cebos alimenticios ; Ceratitis capitata ; citrus fruit trees ; Control ; cítricos ; deciduous fruit trees ; entomofauna auxiliar ; food baits ; Fruit-flies ; frutales de hoja caduca ; Insect pests ; Insecticides ; RESEARCH PAPERS</subject><ispartof>The Florida entomologist, 2022-09, Vol.105 (3), p.185-193</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Florida Entomological Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b361t-6feaa750177cebe61195f647a1903244e19abecff8aed8beb95d58f7746bb983</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b361t-6feaa750177cebe61195f647a1903244e19abecff8aed8beb95d58f7746bb983</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://bioone.org/doi/pdf/10.1653/024.105.0302$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbioone$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48713598$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>109,314,776,780,860,25333,27903,27904,52697,54502,54508</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/48713598$$EView_record_in_JSTOR$$FView_record_in_$$GJSTOR</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Soledad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, María Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scatoni, Iris Beatriz</creatorcontrib><title>Food Attractants for Mass Trapping of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Its Selectivity for Beneficial Arthropods</title><title>The Florida entomologist</title><description>Fruit fly control in Uruguay is based mainly on toxic baits which are insufficient to reduce the damage caused by these pests. Therefore, alternative management measures such as mass trapping gain relevance for control of flies. Attractants commercially available were designed mainly for Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). However, they also should be attractive to Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in our fruit orchards. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of food-based attractants for the capture of sexually immature females of C. capitata and A. fraterculus, as well as their selectivity on the populations of beneficial arthropods (pollinators, predators, and parasitoids). Seven attractants were evaluated in 3 commercial fruit crops during 2 seasons; 4 commercial attractants (hydrolyzed protein, liquid trimethylamine, trimethylamine diffuser card, and ammonium acetate + putrescine diffuser card), 20% natural Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) O. Berg (Myrtaceae) juice, 6% sugarcane molasses, and Torula yeast. The attractants were placed in McPhail traps, which were checked each wk and all captured arthropods were removed, counted, and classified. Captured female tephritids were dissected to determine the presence of eggs. All commercial attractants evaluated were effective at capturing sexually immature females of C. capitata in the 3 fruit crops evaluated during both seasons. Hydrolyzed protein, liquid trimethylamine, and trimethylamine diffuser card were effective at capturing young females of both species. Most of the captures are post-harvest, so we suggest not moving traps after commercial harvest. These attractants also were selective, capturing few beneficial arthropods. Sugarcane molasses and pineapple guava juice were not effective at capturing fruit fly females. El control de las moscas de la fruta en Uruguay se basa principalmente en el uso de cebos tóxicos, los cuales han mostrado ser insuficientes para reducir sus daños. Debido a esto, estrategias de control alternativas como el trampeo masivo han tomado mayor relevancia. Los atrayentes disponibles comercialmente fueron diseñados para Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sin embargo, en nuestros cultivos frutales también deberían ser efectivos para Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar la eficiencia de diferentes atrayentes alimenticios en la captura de hembras sexualmente inmaduras de C. capitata y A. fraterculus, y su selectividad respecto a las poblaciones de artrópodos benéficos. Siete atrayentes diferentes fueron evaluados en tres cultivos frutícolas comerciales en dos temporadas; cuatro atrayentes comerciales (proteína hidrolizada, trimethylamine líquido, trimethylamine tarjeta difusora, y acetato de amonio + putrescina), jugo natural de Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) O. Berg (Myrtaceae) al 20%, melaza de caña al 6% y levadura Torula. Los atrayentes se colocaron en trampas McPhail, las que se revisaron semanalmente y todos los artrópodos capturados fueron retirados, contados y clasificados. Las hembras de tefrítidos capturadas fueron disecadas para determinar la presencia de huevos. Los atrayentes comerciales evaluados fueron eficaces en la captura de hembras jóvenes de C. capitata en los tres cultivos frutales evaluados y ambas temporadas. La proteína hidrolizada, el trimethylamine líquido, y la trimethylamine tarjeta difusora fueron efectivos en la captura de hembras jóvenes de ambas especies. La mayoría de las capturas se dieron en el período poscosecha, por lo que sugerimos que las trampas de trampeo masivo no se muevan de los cuadros luego de la cosecha comercial. Estos atrayentes fueron además muy selectivos, capturando pocos artrópodos benéficos. La melaza de caña y el jugo de guayabo no fueron eficaces en la captura de hembras de tefrítidos.</description><subject>Agricultural pests</subject><subject>Anastrepha fraterculus</subject><subject>auxiliary entomofauna</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>cebos alimenticios</subject><subject>Ceratitis capitata</subject><subject>citrus fruit trees</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>cítricos</subject><subject>deciduous fruit trees</subject><subject>entomofauna auxiliar</subject><subject>food baits</subject><subject>Fruit-flies</subject><subject>frutales de hoja caduca</subject><subject>Insect pests</subject><subject>Insecticides</subject><subject>RESEARCH PAPERS</subject><issn>0015-4040</issn><issn>1938-5102</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kdFr2zAQxkVZYVnbt70WBHtZxpxKtmTZfcvapg20FJq8m7N9SlQcy0hKWf_7KU0ZBEq5Bx2n3_dxx0fId84mPJfZBUvFhDM5YRlLj8iIl1mRSM7SL2TEGJeJYIJ9Jd-8f2aMlamUI_Iys7al0xAcNAH64Km2jj6A93TpYBhMv6JW05nbmkBnnUFPf16bIaCDS7rEYe1MMC3gmELf0nnUL7DDJpgXE17fvP5gj9o0Bjo6dWHt7GBbf0qONXQez97fE7Kc3Syv7pL7x9v51fQ-qbOchyTXCKAk40o1WGPOeSl1LhTwkmWpEMhLqLHRugBsixrrUray0EqJvK7LIjshP_a2K-iwMr22uzs3xjfVVKUqLVQuskhNPqBitbgxjd2tH-cHgvGBIDIB_4YVbL2v5ounQ_b3nm2c9d6hrgZnNuBeK86qXWpVTC32stqlFvHzPf7sg3X_WVEonsm3i37t_2tj42afm_0DTmqfIw</recordid><startdate>20220901</startdate><enddate>20220901</enddate><creator>Delgado, Soledad</creator><creator>Calvo, María Victoria</creator><creator>Duarte, Felicia</creator><creator>Borges, Alejandra</creator><creator>Scatoni, Iris Beatriz</creator><general>Florida Entomological Society</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220901</creationdate><title>Food Attractants for Mass Trapping of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Its Selectivity for Beneficial Arthropods</title><author>Delgado, Soledad ; Calvo, María Victoria ; Duarte, Felicia ; Borges, Alejandra ; Scatoni, Iris Beatriz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b361t-6feaa750177cebe61195f647a1903244e19abecff8aed8beb95d58f7746bb983</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agricultural pests</topic><topic>Anastrepha fraterculus</topic><topic>auxiliary entomofauna</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>cebos alimenticios</topic><topic>Ceratitis capitata</topic><topic>citrus fruit trees</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>cítricos</topic><topic>deciduous fruit trees</topic><topic>entomofauna auxiliar</topic><topic>food baits</topic><topic>Fruit-flies</topic><topic>frutales de hoja caduca</topic><topic>Insect pests</topic><topic>Insecticides</topic><topic>RESEARCH PAPERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Delgado, Soledad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Calvo, María Victoria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duarte, Felicia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Borges, Alejandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Scatoni, Iris Beatriz</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Delgado, Soledad</au><au>Calvo, María Victoria</au><au>Duarte, Felicia</au><au>Borges, Alejandra</au><au>Scatoni, Iris Beatriz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Food Attractants for Mass Trapping of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Its Selectivity for Beneficial Arthropods</atitle><jtitle>The Florida entomologist</jtitle><date>2022-09-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>105</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>185</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>185-193</pages><issn>0015-4040</issn><eissn>1938-5102</eissn><abstract>Fruit fly control in Uruguay is based mainly on toxic baits which are insufficient to reduce the damage caused by these pests. Therefore, alternative management measures such as mass trapping gain relevance for control of flies. Attractants commercially available were designed mainly for Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). However, they also should be attractive to Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae) in our fruit orchards. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effectiveness of food-based attractants for the capture of sexually immature females of C. capitata and A. fraterculus, as well as their selectivity on the populations of beneficial arthropods (pollinators, predators, and parasitoids). Seven attractants were evaluated in 3 commercial fruit crops during 2 seasons; 4 commercial attractants (hydrolyzed protein, liquid trimethylamine, trimethylamine diffuser card, and ammonium acetate + putrescine diffuser card), 20% natural Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) O. Berg (Myrtaceae) juice, 6% sugarcane molasses, and Torula yeast. The attractants were placed in McPhail traps, which were checked each wk and all captured arthropods were removed, counted, and classified. Captured female tephritids were dissected to determine the presence of eggs. All commercial attractants evaluated were effective at capturing sexually immature females of C. capitata in the 3 fruit crops evaluated during both seasons. Hydrolyzed protein, liquid trimethylamine, and trimethylamine diffuser card were effective at capturing young females of both species. Most of the captures are post-harvest, so we suggest not moving traps after commercial harvest. These attractants also were selective, capturing few beneficial arthropods. Sugarcane molasses and pineapple guava juice were not effective at capturing fruit fly females. El control de las moscas de la fruta en Uruguay se basa principalmente en el uso de cebos tóxicos, los cuales han mostrado ser insuficientes para reducir sus daños. Debido a esto, estrategias de control alternativas como el trampeo masivo han tomado mayor relevancia. Los atrayentes disponibles comercialmente fueron diseñados para Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). Sin embargo, en nuestros cultivos frutales también deberían ser efectivos para Anastrepha fraterculus (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae). El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar la eficiencia de diferentes atrayentes alimenticios en la captura de hembras sexualmente inmaduras de C. capitata y A. fraterculus, y su selectividad respecto a las poblaciones de artrópodos benéficos. Siete atrayentes diferentes fueron evaluados en tres cultivos frutícolas comerciales en dos temporadas; cuatro atrayentes comerciales (proteína hidrolizada, trimethylamine líquido, trimethylamine tarjeta difusora, y acetato de amonio + putrescina), jugo natural de Acca sellowiana (O. Berg) O. Berg (Myrtaceae) al 20%, melaza de caña al 6% y levadura Torula. Los atrayentes se colocaron en trampas McPhail, las que se revisaron semanalmente y todos los artrópodos capturados fueron retirados, contados y clasificados. Las hembras de tefrítidos capturadas fueron disecadas para determinar la presencia de huevos. Los atrayentes comerciales evaluados fueron eficaces en la captura de hembras jóvenes de C. capitata en los tres cultivos frutales evaluados y ambas temporadas. La proteína hidrolizada, el trimethylamine líquido, y la trimethylamine tarjeta difusora fueron efectivos en la captura de hembras jóvenes de ambas especies. La mayoría de las capturas se dieron en el período poscosecha, por lo que sugerimos que las trampas de trampeo masivo no se muevan de los cuadros luego de la cosecha comercial. Estos atrayentes fueron además muy selectivos, capturando pocos artrópodos benéficos. La melaza de caña y el jugo de guayabo no fueron eficaces en la captura de hembras de tefrítidos.</abstract><pub>Florida Entomological Society</pub><doi>10.1653/024.105.0302</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0015-4040
ispartof The Florida entomologist, 2022-09, Vol.105 (3), p.185-193
issn 0015-4040
1938-5102
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A727287643
source Jstor Journals Open Access
subjects Agricultural pests
Anastrepha fraterculus
auxiliary entomofauna
Biological control
cebos alimenticios
Ceratitis capitata
citrus fruit trees
Control
cítricos
deciduous fruit trees
entomofauna auxiliar
food baits
Fruit-flies
frutales de hoja caduca
Insect pests
Insecticides
RESEARCH PAPERS
title Food Attractants for Mass Trapping of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) and Its Selectivity for Beneficial Arthropods
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T05%3A43%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_JFNAL&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Food%20Attractants%20for%20Mass%20Trapping%20of%20Fruit%20Flies%20(Diptera:%20Tephritidae)%20and%20Its%20Selectivity%20for%20Beneficial%20Arthropods&rft.jtitle=The%20Florida%20entomologist&rft.au=Delgado,%20Soledad&rft.date=2022-09-01&rft.volume=105&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=185&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=185-193&rft.issn=0015-4040&rft.eissn=1938-5102&rft_id=info:doi/10.1653/024.105.0302&rft_dat=%3Cgale_JFNAL%3EA727287643%3C/gale_JFNAL%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A727287643&rft_jstor_id=48713598&rfr_iscdi=true