Evolution of the Agronomic and Environmental Phosphorus Status of Soils in Mauritius After a Seven Year Sugarcane Crop Cycle
The intensive application of P fertilisers in sugarcane production has probably resulted in P levels which could be of concern to freshwater quality in Mauritius. Only very small amounts of P must be lost from the soil to create a P concentration in freshwater ecosystems likely to cause eutrophicati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Sugar tech : an international journal of sugar crops & related industries 2012-09, Vol.14 (3), p.266-274 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | The intensive application of P fertilisers in sugarcane production has probably resulted in P levels which could be of concern to freshwater quality in Mauritius. Only very small amounts of P must be lost from the soil to create a P concentration in freshwater ecosystems likely to cause eutrophication. To prevent eutrophication, total P should not exceed 0.05 mg L
−1
in streams entering lakes/reservoirs as per directives of the United States Environmental Protection Agency. For this reason, the scope of the current agronomic soil P test (using 0.1 M H
2
SO
4
as extractant) was broadened to be used also in the evaluation of the environmental P status of soils for freshwater protection in Mauritius. The environmental threshold was determined by establishing the relationship between 0.01 M CaCl
2
and 0.1 M H
2
SO
4
soil extractable P. It was inferred that above 85 mg kg
−1
0.1 M H
2
SO
4
extractable P, the soil P represents a potential risk for contamination of runoff waters. The number of fields with unacceptably high levels of P (
P
≥ 95 mg kg
−1
) increased from 42 to 53 % in just one sugarcane crop cycle. In 2005/2006 more that 50 % of the sugarcane soils had an unsafe environmental soil P status and the majority of the sugarcane fields with an environmentally unacceptable soil P level were located on the two latosolic soil groups. Hence revision of P management practices or implementation of other corrective measures such as creation of riparian zones should primarily be directed towards those two soil groups. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0972-1525 0974-0740 0972-1525 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s12355-012-0157-x |