Clinical Effectiveness of Selective Granulocyte, Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis with the Adacolumn.sup.® Device in Ulcerative Colitis

The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether selective adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA apheresis) using the Adacolumn.sup.® device can effectively reduce clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). A comprehensive...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Digestive diseases and sciences 2010-05, Vol.55 (5), p.1421
Hauptverfasser: Habermalz, Brigitte, Sauerland, Stefan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1421
container_title Digestive diseases and sciences
container_volume 55
creator Habermalz, Brigitte
Sauerland, Stefan
description The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether selective adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA apheresis) using the Adacolumn.sup.® device can effectively reduce clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to May 2008 was performed. Each study's quality was evaluated, and the data reported in the results were abstracted. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified statistically and explained by the variation in the trial design. Seven RCTs including 594 patients were found, and six RCTs on active UC contributed to the main analyses. In half of the trials, GMA apheresis was compared to steroids. Only one trial was fully blinded. A response or remission after 6 weeks was achieved more often in patients treated with GMA apheresis (RR 1.42; CI 1.15-1.75). Also, after 12 weeks, GMA apheresis produced significantly higher remission rates (RR 1.41; CI 1.08-1.83), but long-term data were sparse. In the trials that compared GMA apheresis and steroids (n = 220 patients), side effects were much less frequent in the GMA apheresis groups (RR 0.19; CI 0.11-0.34). Homogeneous evidence from seven RCTs shows that GMA apheresis induces a clinical remission in a higher proportion of UC patients as compared to conventional medical therapy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10620-009-0845-x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A712949855</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A712949855</galeid><sourcerecordid>A712949855</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g675-38a45ee295eece2479595e91dd3e350f371319b28f661489faea183418cb4fca3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjEFOwzAQRb0AiVI4ADtLbEmwYyexl1EoBamIBWVduc64MXLtKk4LHIDrcAhORmhZsEAjzXz9__4gdEFJSgkpryMlRUYSQmRCBM-TtyM0IrRgSUZpcYJOY3whQ1jSYoQ-ame91crhiTGge7sDDzHiYPATuIOBp53yWxf0ew9X-CH4vcJVE0O32QPVpoUOoo341fYt7tufVOngtmufxu0m_frEN7CzGrD1-Nlp6NS-WAdnexvP0LFRLsL57x2j-e1kXt8ls8fpfV3NklVR5gkTiucAmRyWhoyXMh-kpE3DgOXEsJIyKpeZMEVBuZBGgaKCcSr0khut2BhdHt6ulIOF9Sb0ndJrG_WiKmkmuRR5PlDpP9QwDaytDh6MHfw_hW8eL3NL</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Clinical Effectiveness of Selective Granulocyte, Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis with the Adacolumn.sup.® Device in Ulcerative Colitis</title><source>SpringerLink Journals</source><creator>Habermalz, Brigitte ; Sauerland, Stefan</creator><creatorcontrib>Habermalz, Brigitte ; Sauerland, Stefan</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether selective adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA apheresis) using the Adacolumn.sup.® device can effectively reduce clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to May 2008 was performed. Each study's quality was evaluated, and the data reported in the results were abstracted. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified statistically and explained by the variation in the trial design. Seven RCTs including 594 patients were found, and six RCTs on active UC contributed to the main analyses. In half of the trials, GMA apheresis was compared to steroids. Only one trial was fully blinded. A response or remission after 6 weeks was achieved more often in patients treated with GMA apheresis (RR 1.42; CI 1.15-1.75). Also, after 12 weeks, GMA apheresis produced significantly higher remission rates (RR 1.41; CI 1.08-1.83), but long-term data were sparse. In the trials that compared GMA apheresis and steroids (n = 220 patients), side effects were much less frequent in the GMA apheresis groups (RR 0.19; CI 0.11-0.34). Homogeneous evidence from seven RCTs shows that GMA apheresis induces a clinical remission in a higher proportion of UC patients as compared to conventional medical therapy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0163-2116</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0845-x</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Springer</publisher><subject>Inflammation ; Ulcerative colitis</subject><ispartof>Digestive diseases and sciences, 2010-05, Vol.55 (5), p.1421</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2010 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Habermalz, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauerland, Stefan</creatorcontrib><title>Clinical Effectiveness of Selective Granulocyte, Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis with the Adacolumn.sup.® Device in Ulcerative Colitis</title><title>Digestive diseases and sciences</title><description>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether selective adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA apheresis) using the Adacolumn.sup.® device can effectively reduce clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to May 2008 was performed. Each study's quality was evaluated, and the data reported in the results were abstracted. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified statistically and explained by the variation in the trial design. Seven RCTs including 594 patients were found, and six RCTs on active UC contributed to the main analyses. In half of the trials, GMA apheresis was compared to steroids. Only one trial was fully blinded. A response or remission after 6 weeks was achieved more often in patients treated with GMA apheresis (RR 1.42; CI 1.15-1.75). Also, after 12 weeks, GMA apheresis produced significantly higher remission rates (RR 1.41; CI 1.08-1.83), but long-term data were sparse. In the trials that compared GMA apheresis and steroids (n = 220 patients), side effects were much less frequent in the GMA apheresis groups (RR 0.19; CI 0.11-0.34). Homogeneous evidence from seven RCTs shows that GMA apheresis induces a clinical remission in a higher proportion of UC patients as compared to conventional medical therapy.</description><subject>Inflammation</subject><subject>Ulcerative colitis</subject><issn>0163-2116</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptjEFOwzAQRb0AiVI4ADtLbEmwYyexl1EoBamIBWVduc64MXLtKk4LHIDrcAhORmhZsEAjzXz9__4gdEFJSgkpryMlRUYSQmRCBM-TtyM0IrRgSUZpcYJOY3whQ1jSYoQ-ame91crhiTGge7sDDzHiYPATuIOBp53yWxf0ew9X-CH4vcJVE0O32QPVpoUOoo341fYt7tufVOngtmufxu0m_frEN7CzGrD1-Nlp6NS-WAdnexvP0LFRLsL57x2j-e1kXt8ls8fpfV3NklVR5gkTiucAmRyWhoyXMh-kpE3DgOXEsJIyKpeZMEVBuZBGgaKCcSr0khut2BhdHt6ulIOF9Sb0ndJrG_WiKmkmuRR5PlDpP9QwDaytDh6MHfw_hW8eL3NL</recordid><startdate>20100501</startdate><enddate>20100501</enddate><creator>Habermalz, Brigitte</creator><creator>Sauerland, Stefan</creator><general>Springer</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20100501</creationdate><title>Clinical Effectiveness of Selective Granulocyte, Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis with the Adacolumn.sup.® Device in Ulcerative Colitis</title><author>Habermalz, Brigitte ; Sauerland, Stefan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g675-38a45ee295eece2479595e91dd3e350f371319b28f661489faea183418cb4fca3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Inflammation</topic><topic>Ulcerative colitis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Habermalz, Brigitte</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sauerland, Stefan</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Habermalz, Brigitte</au><au>Sauerland, Stefan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Clinical Effectiveness of Selective Granulocyte, Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis with the Adacolumn.sup.® Device in Ulcerative Colitis</atitle><jtitle>Digestive diseases and sciences</jtitle><date>2010-05-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1421</spage><pages>1421-</pages><issn>0163-2116</issn><abstract>The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine whether selective adsorptive granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA apheresis) using the Adacolumn.sup.® device can effectively reduce clinical symptoms and endoscopic signs of inflammation in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). A comprehensive search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to May 2008 was performed. Each study's quality was evaluated, and the data reported in the results were abstracted. Pooled relative risk (RR) estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the fixed-effects model. Heterogeneity was quantified statistically and explained by the variation in the trial design. Seven RCTs including 594 patients were found, and six RCTs on active UC contributed to the main analyses. In half of the trials, GMA apheresis was compared to steroids. Only one trial was fully blinded. A response or remission after 6 weeks was achieved more often in patients treated with GMA apheresis (RR 1.42; CI 1.15-1.75). Also, after 12 weeks, GMA apheresis produced significantly higher remission rates (RR 1.41; CI 1.08-1.83), but long-term data were sparse. In the trials that compared GMA apheresis and steroids (n = 220 patients), side effects were much less frequent in the GMA apheresis groups (RR 0.19; CI 0.11-0.34). Homogeneous evidence from seven RCTs shows that GMA apheresis induces a clinical remission in a higher proportion of UC patients as compared to conventional medical therapy.</abstract><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10620-009-0845-x</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0163-2116
ispartof Digestive diseases and sciences, 2010-05, Vol.55 (5), p.1421
issn 0163-2116
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A712949855
source SpringerLink Journals
subjects Inflammation
Ulcerative colitis
title Clinical Effectiveness of Selective Granulocyte, Monocyte Adsorptive Apheresis with the Adacolumn.sup.® Device in Ulcerative Colitis
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T03%3A02%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Clinical%20Effectiveness%20of%20Selective%20Granulocyte,%20Monocyte%20Adsorptive%20Apheresis%20with%20the%20Adacolumn.sup.%C2%AE%20Device%20in%20Ulcerative%20Colitis&rft.jtitle=Digestive%20diseases%20and%20sciences&rft.au=Habermalz,%20Brigitte&rft.date=2010-05-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1421&rft.pages=1421-&rft.issn=0163-2116&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10620-009-0845-x&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA712949855%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A712949855&rfr_iscdi=true