Comparative study Of TVS cervical score and Bishop score in prediction of successful labour induction
Background In today's obstetric practice, induction of labour is a common procedure. Before the imaging era, the favourability of the cervix was assessed by manual examination scored as the Bishop Score. However, subjectivity and high inter- and intra-observer variability are limitations of thi...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2022-06, Vol.53 (1), p.1-7, Article 138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 7 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine |
container_volume | 53 |
creator | Agrawal, Alka Tripathi, P. S. Bhandari, Gaurav Kheti, Pramita Madhpuriya, Gulshan Rathore, Roshani |
description | Background
In today's obstetric practice, induction of labour is a common procedure. Before the imaging era, the favourability of the cervix was assessed by manual examination scored as the Bishop Score. However, subjectivity and high inter- and intra-observer variability are limitations of this approach. This necessitates the implementation of an objective method of assessment. We used transvaginal sonography (TVS) as an objective method of assessment of cervix by TVS cervical score comprising of five different parameters; cervical length, funnelling at the internal os, distance from the presenting part to the external os, and cervix position. This study aims to evaluate the role of the pre-induction transvaginal ultrasonographic (TVS) cervical score in predicting labour outcome and comparing it to the Bishop score in patients undergoing induction of labour.
Methodology
This observational prospective study included 100 pregnant women admitted for labour induction at a single tertiary care centre. The TVS examination which consisted of five parameters was performed after the clinical Bishop scoring. The TVS scores were compared with the Bishop scores for all patients. Labour induction was done within one hour of examination and the outcome of the induction was recorded.
Results
The mean age was 25.87 years [SD = 4.35]. Labour induction was successful in 74% of patients. At cut-off Scores of ≥ 4, TVS cervical Score performed better than Bishop Score (Sensitivity 93.24 vs. 67.57%, Specificity 73.08 vs. 65.38%). ROC analysis indicated that Area Under Curve (AUC) was more for TVS Score (0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.97), compared to Bishop Score.
Conclusion
Transvaginal ultrasonography is an objective method of cervical assessment. We conclude from our study that the use of TVS score which consists of five different parameters in cervical assessment provides a better prediction of successful labour induction than the Bishop score, and so can prevent various complications associated with induction failure. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s43055-022-00794-0 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A707514586</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A707514586</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_2cd5fe32867a4dc9b9319bffb0f0b9f2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A707514586</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3130-429ccc9ffada927c3a91a75e4c435e25b35db64e5495d80d237e83033f5664463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UU1LJDEQbURBUf-Ap4Dn1spXd-eow-4qCB78uIZ0JZnN0NMZkm7Bf79xWpZdEFOHhFfvvRT1quqCwhWlXXOdBQcpa2CsBmiVqOGgOmGgoBZtww7_eR9X5zlvoBwBQBtxUrlV3O5MMlN4cyRPs30nj548vz4RdOktoBlIxpgcMaMltyH_jrtPIIxkl5wNOIU4kuhJnhFdzn4eyGD6OKdCsfO-fVYdeTNkd_55n1YvP388r-7qh8df96ubhxo55WVEphBReW-sUaxFbhQ1rXQCBZeOyZ5L2zfCSaGk7cAy3rqOA-deNo0QDT-t7hdfG81G71LYmvSuowl6D8S01iZNAQenGVrpHWdd0xphUfWKU9V734OHXnlWvC4Xr7Up9DD6OCWD25BR37TQSipk9_Hj1ResUtZtA8bR-VDw_wRsEWCKOSfn_45JQX_EqZc4dYlT7-PUUER8EeVCHtcu6U3Z71hW-Z3qDyifoZY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative study Of TVS cervical score and Bishop score in prediction of successful labour induction</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Agrawal, Alka ; Tripathi, P. S. ; Bhandari, Gaurav ; Kheti, Pramita ; Madhpuriya, Gulshan ; Rathore, Roshani</creator><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Alka ; Tripathi, P. S. ; Bhandari, Gaurav ; Kheti, Pramita ; Madhpuriya, Gulshan ; Rathore, Roshani</creatorcontrib><description>Background
In today's obstetric practice, induction of labour is a common procedure. Before the imaging era, the favourability of the cervix was assessed by manual examination scored as the Bishop Score. However, subjectivity and high inter- and intra-observer variability are limitations of this approach. This necessitates the implementation of an objective method of assessment. We used transvaginal sonography (TVS) as an objective method of assessment of cervix by TVS cervical score comprising of five different parameters; cervical length, funnelling at the internal os, distance from the presenting part to the external os, and cervix position. This study aims to evaluate the role of the pre-induction transvaginal ultrasonographic (TVS) cervical score in predicting labour outcome and comparing it to the Bishop score in patients undergoing induction of labour.
Methodology
This observational prospective study included 100 pregnant women admitted for labour induction at a single tertiary care centre. The TVS examination which consisted of five parameters was performed after the clinical Bishop scoring. The TVS scores were compared with the Bishop scores for all patients. Labour induction was done within one hour of examination and the outcome of the induction was recorded.
Results
The mean age was 25.87 years [SD = 4.35]. Labour induction was successful in 74% of patients. At cut-off Scores of ≥ 4, TVS cervical Score performed better than Bishop Score (Sensitivity 93.24 vs. 67.57%, Specificity 73.08 vs. 65.38%). ROC analysis indicated that Area Under Curve (AUC) was more for TVS Score (0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.97), compared to Bishop Score.
Conclusion
Transvaginal ultrasonography is an objective method of cervical assessment. We conclude from our study that the use of TVS score which consists of five different parameters in cervical assessment provides a better prediction of successful labour induction than the Bishop score, and so can prevent various complications associated with induction failure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2090-4762</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0378-603X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2090-4762</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s43055-022-00794-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Bishop score ; Cervical length ; Comparative analysis ; Imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Nuclear Medicine ; Obstetrics ; Pregnant women ; Radiology ; Transvaginal ultrasonography ; TVS score ; Ultrasound imaging</subject><ispartof>Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 2022-06, Vol.53 (1), p.1-7, Article 138</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2022 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3130-429ccc9ffada927c3a91a75e4c435e25b35db64e5495d80d237e83033f5664463</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3130-429ccc9ffada927c3a91a75e4c435e25b35db64e5495d80d237e83033f5664463</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Alka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kheti, Pramita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhpuriya, Gulshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Roshani</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative study Of TVS cervical score and Bishop score in prediction of successful labour induction</title><title>Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine</title><addtitle>Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med</addtitle><description>Background
In today's obstetric practice, induction of labour is a common procedure. Before the imaging era, the favourability of the cervix was assessed by manual examination scored as the Bishop Score. However, subjectivity and high inter- and intra-observer variability are limitations of this approach. This necessitates the implementation of an objective method of assessment. We used transvaginal sonography (TVS) as an objective method of assessment of cervix by TVS cervical score comprising of five different parameters; cervical length, funnelling at the internal os, distance from the presenting part to the external os, and cervix position. This study aims to evaluate the role of the pre-induction transvaginal ultrasonographic (TVS) cervical score in predicting labour outcome and comparing it to the Bishop score in patients undergoing induction of labour.
Methodology
This observational prospective study included 100 pregnant women admitted for labour induction at a single tertiary care centre. The TVS examination which consisted of five parameters was performed after the clinical Bishop scoring. The TVS scores were compared with the Bishop scores for all patients. Labour induction was done within one hour of examination and the outcome of the induction was recorded.
Results
The mean age was 25.87 years [SD = 4.35]. Labour induction was successful in 74% of patients. At cut-off Scores of ≥ 4, TVS cervical Score performed better than Bishop Score (Sensitivity 93.24 vs. 67.57%, Specificity 73.08 vs. 65.38%). ROC analysis indicated that Area Under Curve (AUC) was more for TVS Score (0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.97), compared to Bishop Score.
Conclusion
Transvaginal ultrasonography is an objective method of cervical assessment. We conclude from our study that the use of TVS score which consists of five different parameters in cervical assessment provides a better prediction of successful labour induction than the Bishop score, and so can prevent various complications associated with induction failure.</description><subject>Bishop score</subject><subject>Cervical length</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Obstetrics</subject><subject>Pregnant women</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Transvaginal ultrasonography</subject><subject>TVS score</subject><subject>Ultrasound imaging</subject><issn>2090-4762</issn><issn>0378-603X</issn><issn>2090-4762</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UU1LJDEQbURBUf-Ap4Dn1spXd-eow-4qCB78uIZ0JZnN0NMZkm7Bf79xWpZdEFOHhFfvvRT1quqCwhWlXXOdBQcpa2CsBmiVqOGgOmGgoBZtww7_eR9X5zlvoBwBQBtxUrlV3O5MMlN4cyRPs30nj548vz4RdOktoBlIxpgcMaMltyH_jrtPIIxkl5wNOIU4kuhJnhFdzn4eyGD6OKdCsfO-fVYdeTNkd_55n1YvP388r-7qh8df96ubhxo55WVEphBReW-sUaxFbhQ1rXQCBZeOyZ5L2zfCSaGk7cAy3rqOA-deNo0QDT-t7hdfG81G71LYmvSuowl6D8S01iZNAQenGVrpHWdd0xphUfWKU9V734OHXnlWvC4Xr7Up9DD6OCWD25BR37TQSipk9_Hj1ResUtZtA8bR-VDw_wRsEWCKOSfn_45JQX_EqZc4dYlT7-PUUER8EeVCHtcu6U3Z71hW-Z3qDyifoZY</recordid><startdate>20220617</startdate><enddate>20220617</enddate><creator>Agrawal, Alka</creator><creator>Tripathi, P. S.</creator><creator>Bhandari, Gaurav</creator><creator>Kheti, Pramita</creator><creator>Madhpuriya, Gulshan</creator><creator>Rathore, Roshani</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><general>SpringerOpen</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20220617</creationdate><title>Comparative study Of TVS cervical score and Bishop score in prediction of successful labour induction</title><author>Agrawal, Alka ; Tripathi, P. S. ; Bhandari, Gaurav ; Kheti, Pramita ; Madhpuriya, Gulshan ; Rathore, Roshani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3130-429ccc9ffada927c3a91a75e4c435e25b35db64e5495d80d237e83033f5664463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Bishop score</topic><topic>Cervical length</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Obstetrics</topic><topic>Pregnant women</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Transvaginal ultrasonography</topic><topic>TVS score</topic><topic>Ultrasound imaging</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Agrawal, Alka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tripathi, P. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bhandari, Gaurav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kheti, Pramita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhpuriya, Gulshan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rathore, Roshani</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Agrawal, Alka</au><au>Tripathi, P. S.</au><au>Bhandari, Gaurav</au><au>Kheti, Pramita</au><au>Madhpuriya, Gulshan</au><au>Rathore, Roshani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparative study Of TVS cervical score and Bishop score in prediction of successful labour induction</atitle><jtitle>Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine</jtitle><stitle>Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med</stitle><date>2022-06-17</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>7</epage><pages>1-7</pages><artnum>138</artnum><issn>2090-4762</issn><issn>0378-603X</issn><eissn>2090-4762</eissn><abstract>Background
In today's obstetric practice, induction of labour is a common procedure. Before the imaging era, the favourability of the cervix was assessed by manual examination scored as the Bishop Score. However, subjectivity and high inter- and intra-observer variability are limitations of this approach. This necessitates the implementation of an objective method of assessment. We used transvaginal sonography (TVS) as an objective method of assessment of cervix by TVS cervical score comprising of five different parameters; cervical length, funnelling at the internal os, distance from the presenting part to the external os, and cervix position. This study aims to evaluate the role of the pre-induction transvaginal ultrasonographic (TVS) cervical score in predicting labour outcome and comparing it to the Bishop score in patients undergoing induction of labour.
Methodology
This observational prospective study included 100 pregnant women admitted for labour induction at a single tertiary care centre. The TVS examination which consisted of five parameters was performed after the clinical Bishop scoring. The TVS scores were compared with the Bishop scores for all patients. Labour induction was done within one hour of examination and the outcome of the induction was recorded.
Results
The mean age was 25.87 years [SD = 4.35]. Labour induction was successful in 74% of patients. At cut-off Scores of ≥ 4, TVS cervical Score performed better than Bishop Score (Sensitivity 93.24 vs. 67.57%, Specificity 73.08 vs. 65.38%). ROC analysis indicated that Area Under Curve (AUC) was more for TVS Score (0.91, 95% CI 0.84–0.97), compared to Bishop Score.
Conclusion
Transvaginal ultrasonography is an objective method of cervical assessment. We conclude from our study that the use of TVS score which consists of five different parameters in cervical assessment provides a better prediction of successful labour induction than the Bishop score, and so can prevent various complications associated with induction failure.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1186/s43055-022-00794-0</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2090-4762 |
ispartof | Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 2022-06, Vol.53 (1), p.1-7, Article 138 |
issn | 2090-4762 0378-603X 2090-4762 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A707514586 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals |
subjects | Bishop score Cervical length Comparative analysis Imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Nuclear Medicine Obstetrics Pregnant women Radiology Transvaginal ultrasonography TVS score Ultrasound imaging |
title | Comparative study Of TVS cervical score and Bishop score in prediction of successful labour induction |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A08%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparative%20study%20Of%20TVS%20cervical%20score%20and%20Bishop%20score%20in%20prediction%20of%20successful%20labour%20induction&rft.jtitle=Egyptian%20Journal%20of%20Radiology%20and%20Nuclear%20Medicine&rft.au=Agrawal,%20Alka&rft.date=2022-06-17&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=7&rft.pages=1-7&rft.artnum=138&rft.issn=2090-4762&rft.eissn=2090-4762&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s43055-022-00794-0&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA707514586%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A707514586&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_2cd5fe32867a4dc9b9319bffb0f0b9f2&rfr_iscdi=true |