Evaluation of the Oxford Hip Score: Does it still have content validity? Interviews of total hip arthroplasty patients

The Oxford Hip Score is used to evaluate the outcome after total hip arthroplasty. The Oxford Hip Score was developed more than 20 years ago with only some degree of patient involvement. We question if the Oxford Hip Score is still relevant for the present-day total hip artrhoplasty patients. We aim...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Health and quality of life outcomes 2021-10, Vol.19 (1), p.1-237, Article 237
Hauptverfasser: Holmenlund, Camilla, Overgaard, Saren, Bilberg, Randi, Varnum, Claus
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 237
container_issue 1
container_start_page 1
container_title Health and quality of life outcomes
container_volume 19
creator Holmenlund, Camilla
Overgaard, Saren
Bilberg, Randi
Varnum, Claus
description The Oxford Hip Score is used to evaluate the outcome after total hip arthroplasty. The Oxford Hip Score was developed more than 20 years ago with only some degree of patient involvement. We question if the Oxford Hip Score is still relevant for the present-day total hip artrhoplasty patients. We aimed to determine whether the Oxford Hip Score contains items that are relevant for present-day patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty, thus investigating the content validity. We identified 6 general items with 41 sub-items. The 6 general items were pain, walking, physical activities, functional abilities, quality of life and psychological health. We found that items in the Oxford Hip Score were all in some way relevant to the patients but that the Oxford Hip Score lacks several important items relevant for present-day total hip artrhoplasty patients, including several physical activities, functional abilities and certain aspects of quality of life and psychological health. We found that the Oxford Hip Score lacks important items for present-day patients in our population. Due to findings regarding several additional items that are not present in the Oxford Hip Score, particularly concerning physical activities and quality of life, we question the content validity of the Oxford Hip Score for a present-day population. Our findings indicate a need for a revision of the Oxford Hip Score.
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12955-021-01869-8
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A681623667</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A681623667</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_163d4d6f8ef44250a48a6f87f6daab76</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A681623667</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-675c60b4347dbbd592261a494db9aa4f2a2d366ca9d8ceea52db8dbfb2f48d263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkktv1DAQgCMEoqXwBzhZ4gKHlNjxKxyoqlLoSpUqUThbEz92vcrGi-0s3X-Pd7cCFqEcEk---cYeT1W9xs05xpK_T5h0jNUNwXVT1l0tn1SnmApRC0bY07--T6oXKS2bhrSEsOfVSUs5EYR3p9XmegPDBNmHEQWH8sKiuwcXokE3fo3udYj2A_oUbEI-o5T9MKAFbCzSYcx2zKhke-Pz9gLNSiBuvP2Z9qKQoaDFATEvYlgPkPIWrUulkpZeVs8cDMm-enyfVd8_X3-7uqlv777Mri5va80EzTUXTPOmpy0Vpu8N6wjhGGhHTd8BUEeAmJZzDZ2R2lpgxPTS9K4njkpDeHtWzQ5eE2Cp1tGvIG5VAK_2gRDnquzP68EqzFtDDXfSOkoJa4BKKCvhuAHoxc718eBaT_3KGl3OEWE4kh7_Gf1CzcNGSdZg0e4Ebx8FMfyYbMpq5ZO2wwCjDVNShMmmK6UJLuibf9BlmOJYWrWjWtIIxvgfag7lAH50odTVO6m65BJzUnojCnX-H6o8xq58uUfrfIkfJbw7Stjf9UOew5SSmt1_PWbJgdUxpBSt-90P3KjdlKrDlKoypWo_pUq2vwDlcNj8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2583207556</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Oxford Hip Score: Does it still have content validity? Interviews of total hip arthroplasty patients</title><source>SpringerOpen</source><source>Springer journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><creator>Holmenlund, Camilla ; Overgaard, Saren ; Bilberg, Randi ; Varnum, Claus</creator><creatorcontrib>Holmenlund, Camilla ; Overgaard, Saren ; Bilberg, Randi ; Varnum, Claus</creatorcontrib><description>The Oxford Hip Score is used to evaluate the outcome after total hip arthroplasty. The Oxford Hip Score was developed more than 20 years ago with only some degree of patient involvement. We question if the Oxford Hip Score is still relevant for the present-day total hip artrhoplasty patients. We aimed to determine whether the Oxford Hip Score contains items that are relevant for present-day patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty, thus investigating the content validity. We identified 6 general items with 41 sub-items. The 6 general items were pain, walking, physical activities, functional abilities, quality of life and psychological health. We found that items in the Oxford Hip Score were all in some way relevant to the patients but that the Oxford Hip Score lacks several important items relevant for present-day total hip artrhoplasty patients, including several physical activities, functional abilities and certain aspects of quality of life and psychological health. We found that the Oxford Hip Score lacks important items for present-day patients in our population. Due to findings regarding several additional items that are not present in the Oxford Hip Score, particularly concerning physical activities and quality of life, we question the content validity of the Oxford Hip Score for a present-day population. Our findings indicate a need for a revision of the Oxford Hip Score.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12955-021-01869-8</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34627269</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Biomedical materials ; Care and treatment ; Content validity ; Evaluation ; Focus group interviews ; Focus groups ; Gender ; Health surveys ; Hip ; Interviews ; Joint replacement surgery ; Joint surgery ; Orthopaedic implants ; Osteoarthritis ; Oxford Hip Score ; Pain ; Patient outcomes ; Patient-reported outcome measures ; Patients ; Qualitative study ; Quality of life ; Questions ; Sleep ; Surveys ; Total hip arthroplasty ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021-10, Vol.19 (1), p.1-237, Article 237</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-675c60b4347dbbd592261a494db9aa4f2a2d366ca9d8ceea52db8dbfb2f48d263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-675c60b4347dbbd592261a494db9aa4f2a2d366ca9d8ceea52db8dbfb2f48d263</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7420-0385</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501736/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8501736/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Holmenlund, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overgaard, Saren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilberg, Randi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnum, Claus</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Oxford Hip Score: Does it still have content validity? Interviews of total hip arthroplasty patients</title><title>Health and quality of life outcomes</title><description>The Oxford Hip Score is used to evaluate the outcome after total hip arthroplasty. The Oxford Hip Score was developed more than 20 years ago with only some degree of patient involvement. We question if the Oxford Hip Score is still relevant for the present-day total hip artrhoplasty patients. We aimed to determine whether the Oxford Hip Score contains items that are relevant for present-day patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty, thus investigating the content validity. We identified 6 general items with 41 sub-items. The 6 general items were pain, walking, physical activities, functional abilities, quality of life and psychological health. We found that items in the Oxford Hip Score were all in some way relevant to the patients but that the Oxford Hip Score lacks several important items relevant for present-day total hip artrhoplasty patients, including several physical activities, functional abilities and certain aspects of quality of life and psychological health. We found that the Oxford Hip Score lacks important items for present-day patients in our population. Due to findings regarding several additional items that are not present in the Oxford Hip Score, particularly concerning physical activities and quality of life, we question the content validity of the Oxford Hip Score for a present-day population. Our findings indicate a need for a revision of the Oxford Hip Score.</description><subject>Biomedical materials</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Content validity</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Focus group interviews</subject><subject>Focus groups</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Health surveys</subject><subject>Hip</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Joint replacement surgery</subject><subject>Joint surgery</subject><subject>Orthopaedic implants</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Oxford Hip Score</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Patient-reported outcome measures</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Qualitative study</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Sleep</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Total hip arthroplasty</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>1477-7525</issn><issn>1477-7525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkktv1DAQgCMEoqXwBzhZ4gKHlNjxKxyoqlLoSpUqUThbEz92vcrGi-0s3X-Pd7cCFqEcEk---cYeT1W9xs05xpK_T5h0jNUNwXVT1l0tn1SnmApRC0bY07--T6oXKS2bhrSEsOfVSUs5EYR3p9XmegPDBNmHEQWH8sKiuwcXokE3fo3udYj2A_oUbEI-o5T9MKAFbCzSYcx2zKhke-Pz9gLNSiBuvP2Z9qKQoaDFATEvYlgPkPIWrUulkpZeVs8cDMm-enyfVd8_X3-7uqlv777Mri5va80EzTUXTPOmpy0Vpu8N6wjhGGhHTd8BUEeAmJZzDZ2R2lpgxPTS9K4njkpDeHtWzQ5eE2Cp1tGvIG5VAK_2gRDnquzP68EqzFtDDXfSOkoJa4BKKCvhuAHoxc718eBaT_3KGl3OEWE4kh7_Gf1CzcNGSdZg0e4Ebx8FMfyYbMpq5ZO2wwCjDVNShMmmK6UJLuibf9BlmOJYWrWjWtIIxvgfag7lAH50odTVO6m65BJzUnojCnX-H6o8xq58uUfrfIkfJbw7Stjf9UOew5SSmt1_PWbJgdUxpBSt-90P3KjdlKrDlKoypWo_pUq2vwDlcNj8</recordid><startdate>20211009</startdate><enddate>20211009</enddate><creator>Holmenlund, Camilla</creator><creator>Overgaard, Saren</creator><creator>Bilberg, Randi</creator><creator>Varnum, Claus</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7420-0385</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211009</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Oxford Hip Score: Does it still have content validity? Interviews of total hip arthroplasty patients</title><author>Holmenlund, Camilla ; Overgaard, Saren ; Bilberg, Randi ; Varnum, Claus</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-675c60b4347dbbd592261a494db9aa4f2a2d366ca9d8ceea52db8dbfb2f48d263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Biomedical materials</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Content validity</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Focus group interviews</topic><topic>Focus groups</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Health surveys</topic><topic>Hip</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Joint replacement surgery</topic><topic>Joint surgery</topic><topic>Orthopaedic implants</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Oxford Hip Score</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Patient-reported outcome measures</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Qualitative study</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Sleep</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Total hip arthroplasty</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Holmenlund, Camilla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Overgaard, Saren</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilberg, Randi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Varnum, Claus</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Science (Gale in Context)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Health and quality of life outcomes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Holmenlund, Camilla</au><au>Overgaard, Saren</au><au>Bilberg, Randi</au><au>Varnum, Claus</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Oxford Hip Score: Does it still have content validity? Interviews of total hip arthroplasty patients</atitle><jtitle>Health and quality of life outcomes</jtitle><date>2021-10-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>237</epage><pages>1-237</pages><artnum>237</artnum><issn>1477-7525</issn><eissn>1477-7525</eissn><abstract>The Oxford Hip Score is used to evaluate the outcome after total hip arthroplasty. The Oxford Hip Score was developed more than 20 years ago with only some degree of patient involvement. We question if the Oxford Hip Score is still relevant for the present-day total hip artrhoplasty patients. We aimed to determine whether the Oxford Hip Score contains items that are relevant for present-day patients with osteoarthritis undergoing total hip arthroplasty, thus investigating the content validity. We identified 6 general items with 41 sub-items. The 6 general items were pain, walking, physical activities, functional abilities, quality of life and psychological health. We found that items in the Oxford Hip Score were all in some way relevant to the patients but that the Oxford Hip Score lacks several important items relevant for present-day total hip artrhoplasty patients, including several physical activities, functional abilities and certain aspects of quality of life and psychological health. We found that the Oxford Hip Score lacks important items for present-day patients in our population. Due to findings regarding several additional items that are not present in the Oxford Hip Score, particularly concerning physical activities and quality of life, we question the content validity of the Oxford Hip Score for a present-day population. Our findings indicate a need for a revision of the Oxford Hip Score.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>34627269</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12955-021-01869-8</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7420-0385</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1477-7525
ispartof Health and quality of life outcomes, 2021-10, Vol.19 (1), p.1-237, Article 237
issn 1477-7525
1477-7525
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A681623667
source SpringerOpen; Springer journals; PubMed Central; Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB Electronic Journals Library; PubMed Central Open Access
subjects Biomedical materials
Care and treatment
Content validity
Evaluation
Focus group interviews
Focus groups
Gender
Health surveys
Hip
Interviews
Joint replacement surgery
Joint surgery
Orthopaedic implants
Osteoarthritis
Oxford Hip Score
Pain
Patient outcomes
Patient-reported outcome measures
Patients
Qualitative study
Quality of life
Questions
Sleep
Surveys
Total hip arthroplasty
Validity
title Evaluation of the Oxford Hip Score: Does it still have content validity? Interviews of total hip arthroplasty patients
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A50%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Oxford%20Hip%20Score:%20Does%20it%20still%20have%20content%20validity?%20Interviews%20of%20total%20hip%20arthroplasty%20patients&rft.jtitle=Health%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20outcomes&rft.au=Holmenlund,%20Camilla&rft.date=2021-10-09&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=237&rft.pages=1-237&rft.artnum=237&rft.issn=1477-7525&rft.eissn=1477-7525&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12955-021-01869-8&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA681623667%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2583207556&rft_id=info:pmid/34627269&rft_galeid=A681623667&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_163d4d6f8ef44250a48a6f87f6daab76&rfr_iscdi=true