Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)
Background: Intervention fidelity is the core component of a well-designed clinical trial and processes that are used to ensure that the study intervention is delivered as planned. It affects the design and implementation of a study as well as the analysis of the results and interpretation of the fi...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine 2021-09, Vol.22 (1), p.644-644, Article 644 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 644 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 644 |
| container_title | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine |
| container_volume | 22 |
| creator | Tse, Mimi M. Y. Tang, Shuk Kwan Ng, Shamay Li, Yajie Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho |
| description | Background: Intervention fidelity is the core component of a well-designed clinical trial and processes that are used to ensure that the study intervention is delivered as planned. It affects the design and implementation of a study as well as the analysis of the results and interpretation of the findings. The objectives of this study are (a) to describe the methods of assessing the intervention fidelity used in the peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP) and (b) to report the findings on the PAP's intervention fidelity.
Methods: To optimize fidelity to the intervention, we used various strategies and measured them in a continuous process using several different approaches: (a) peer volunteer (PV) training workshop, (b) biweekly meetings with the research team, (c) a detailed teaching manual, (d) a fidelity checklist, (e) on-site visits and direct observations, and (f) semi-structured interview.
Results: The PVs' attendance was high, and most of them achieved a high level of implementation in following the fidelity checklist As part of a large clustered RCT, the fidelity assessment was carried out to help determine the effectiveness of the intervention.
Conclusions: Overall, the PVs successfully delivered the intervention, and the results of the study indicate the effectiveness of the PAP. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s13063-021-05599-6 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A678031252</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A678031252</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_3b8d6a5d871441479f0618ae6f3ce68c</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A678031252</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-c40360f4be7364566aa7603fc65bff26a1260391fb020f478aac1a39d1bc07473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIf4BSJSxFKGcdf8QVpteKjqBI9wNlynHHWq8Re7Cyo_x63WxUWcUCWxvb4veeZ0auqlwQuCOnE20woCNpASxrgXKlGPKpOiWS8ES3hj_84n1TPct4CMKooe1qdUMYZY0KdVp9XOWPOPoz1ssHa-QEnv9zU0dWm3iGmZsKhtpsUg7f1zvhQzyaYEWcMS71LcUxmrs-vV9evn1dPnJkyvrjfz6pvH95_XX9qrr58vFyvrhrLFFlKBCrAsR4lFYwLYYwUQJ0VvHeuFYa05aqI66EtMNkZY4mhaiC9BckkPasuD7pDNFu9S3426UZH4_VdIqZRm7R4O6GmfTcIw4dOEsYIk8qBIJ1B4ahF0dmi9e6gtdv3Mw62NJXMdCR6_BL8Ro_xh-7KBAnwInB-L5Di9z3mRc8-W5wmEzDus2655CCEVKRAX_0F3cZ9CmVUupUUaClQid-o0ZQGfHCx_GtvRfVKyA4oaXlbUBf_QJU14OxtDOh8yR8R2gPBpphzQvfQIwF96yZ9cJMubtJ3btK3tbw5kH5iH122HoPFByIASIBWqBIBaEF3_49e-8UsPoZ13IeF_gKtqthx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2730341496</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)</title><source>PubMed Central Free</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tse, Mimi M. Y. ; Tang, Shuk Kwan ; Ng, Shamay ; Li, Yajie ; Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki ; Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho</creator><creatorcontrib>Tse, Mimi M. Y. ; Tang, Shuk Kwan ; Ng, Shamay ; Li, Yajie ; Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki ; Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho</creatorcontrib><description>Background: Intervention fidelity is the core component of a well-designed clinical trial and processes that are used to ensure that the study intervention is delivered as planned. It affects the design and implementation of a study as well as the analysis of the results and interpretation of the findings. The objectives of this study are (a) to describe the methods of assessing the intervention fidelity used in the peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP) and (b) to report the findings on the PAP's intervention fidelity.
Methods: To optimize fidelity to the intervention, we used various strategies and measured them in a continuous process using several different approaches: (a) peer volunteer (PV) training workshop, (b) biweekly meetings with the research team, (c) a detailed teaching manual, (d) a fidelity checklist, (e) on-site visits and direct observations, and (f) semi-structured interview.
Results: The PVs' attendance was high, and most of them achieved a high level of implementation in following the fidelity checklist As part of a large clustered RCT, the fidelity assessment was carried out to help determine the effectiveness of the intervention.
Conclusions: Overall, the PVs successfully delivered the intervention, and the results of the study indicate the effectiveness of the PAP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1745-6215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05599-6</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34544469</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LONDON: Springer Nature</publisher><subject>Care and treatment ; Chronic illnesses ; Chronic pain ; Clinical trials ; Clustered randomized controlled trial ; Design ; Disease ; Education ; Hypertension ; Intervention ; Intervention fidelity ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Medicine, Research & Experimental ; Nursing homes ; Older people ; Pain ; Pain management ; Peer volunteer (PV) ; Peer-led pain management program (PAP) ; Research & Experimental Medicine ; Science & Technology ; Volunteers</subject><ispartof>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine, 2021-09, Vol.22 (1), p.644-644, Article 644</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>0</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000700269700003</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-c40360f4be7364566aa7603fc65bff26a1260391fb020f478aac1a39d1bc07473</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9428-8719</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454105/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8454105/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2115,27929,27930,39262,39263,53796,53798</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tse, Mimi M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shuk Kwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Shamay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yajie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)</title><title>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine</title><addtitle>TRIALS</addtitle><description>Background: Intervention fidelity is the core component of a well-designed clinical trial and processes that are used to ensure that the study intervention is delivered as planned. It affects the design and implementation of a study as well as the analysis of the results and interpretation of the findings. The objectives of this study are (a) to describe the methods of assessing the intervention fidelity used in the peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP) and (b) to report the findings on the PAP's intervention fidelity.
Methods: To optimize fidelity to the intervention, we used various strategies and measured them in a continuous process using several different approaches: (a) peer volunteer (PV) training workshop, (b) biweekly meetings with the research team, (c) a detailed teaching manual, (d) a fidelity checklist, (e) on-site visits and direct observations, and (f) semi-structured interview.
Results: The PVs' attendance was high, and most of them achieved a high level of implementation in following the fidelity checklist As part of a large clustered RCT, the fidelity assessment was carried out to help determine the effectiveness of the intervention.
Conclusions: Overall, the PVs successfully delivered the intervention, and the results of the study indicate the effectiveness of the PAP.</description><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Chronic illnesses</subject><subject>Chronic pain</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Clustered randomized controlled trial</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Hypertension</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Intervention fidelity</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Medicine, Research & Experimental</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Older people</subject><subject>Pain</subject><subject>Pain management</subject><subject>Peer volunteer (PV)</subject><subject>Peer-led pain management program (PAP)</subject><subject>Research & Experimental Medicine</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Volunteers</subject><issn>1745-6215</issn><issn>1745-6215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GIZIO</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk1v1DAQjRCIlsIf4BSJSxFKGcdf8QVpteKjqBI9wNlynHHWq8Re7Cyo_x63WxUWcUCWxvb4veeZ0auqlwQuCOnE20woCNpASxrgXKlGPKpOiWS8ES3hj_84n1TPct4CMKooe1qdUMYZY0KdVp9XOWPOPoz1ssHa-QEnv9zU0dWm3iGmZsKhtpsUg7f1zvhQzyaYEWcMS71LcUxmrs-vV9evn1dPnJkyvrjfz6pvH95_XX9qrr58vFyvrhrLFFlKBCrAsR4lFYwLYYwUQJ0VvHeuFYa05aqI66EtMNkZY4mhaiC9BckkPasuD7pDNFu9S3426UZH4_VdIqZRm7R4O6GmfTcIw4dOEsYIk8qBIJ1B4ahF0dmi9e6gtdv3Mw62NJXMdCR6_BL8Ro_xh-7KBAnwInB-L5Di9z3mRc8-W5wmEzDus2655CCEVKRAX_0F3cZ9CmVUupUUaClQid-o0ZQGfHCx_GtvRfVKyA4oaXlbUBf_QJU14OxtDOh8yR8R2gPBpphzQvfQIwF96yZ9cJMubtJ3btK3tbw5kH5iH122HoPFByIASIBWqBIBaEF3_49e-8UsPoZ13IeF_gKtqthx</recordid><startdate>20210920</startdate><enddate>20210920</enddate><creator>Tse, Mimi M. Y.</creator><creator>Tang, Shuk Kwan</creator><creator>Ng, Shamay</creator><creator>Li, Yajie</creator><creator>Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki</creator><creator>Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho</creator><general>Springer Nature</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>GIZIO</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9428-8719</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210920</creationdate><title>Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)</title><author>Tse, Mimi M. Y. ; Tang, Shuk Kwan ; Ng, Shamay ; Li, Yajie ; Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki ; Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c491t-c40360f4be7364566aa7603fc65bff26a1260391fb020f478aac1a39d1bc07473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Chronic illnesses</topic><topic>Chronic pain</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Clustered randomized controlled trial</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Hypertension</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Intervention fidelity</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Medicine, Research & Experimental</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Older people</topic><topic>Pain</topic><topic>Pain management</topic><topic>Peer volunteer (PV)</topic><topic>Peer-led pain management program (PAP)</topic><topic>Research & Experimental Medicine</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Volunteers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tse, Mimi M. Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Shuk Kwan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ng, Shamay</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yajie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tse, Mimi M. Y.</au><au>Tang, Shuk Kwan</au><au>Ng, Shamay</au><au>Li, Yajie</au><au>Cheung, Daphne Sze Ki</au><au>Kwan, Rick Yiu Cho</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP)</atitle><jtitle>Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine</jtitle><stitle>TRIALS</stitle><date>2021-09-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>644</spage><epage>644</epage><pages>644-644</pages><artnum>644</artnum><issn>1745-6215</issn><eissn>1745-6215</eissn><abstract>Background: Intervention fidelity is the core component of a well-designed clinical trial and processes that are used to ensure that the study intervention is delivered as planned. It affects the design and implementation of a study as well as the analysis of the results and interpretation of the findings. The objectives of this study are (a) to describe the methods of assessing the intervention fidelity used in the peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP) and (b) to report the findings on the PAP's intervention fidelity.
Methods: To optimize fidelity to the intervention, we used various strategies and measured them in a continuous process using several different approaches: (a) peer volunteer (PV) training workshop, (b) biweekly meetings with the research team, (c) a detailed teaching manual, (d) a fidelity checklist, (e) on-site visits and direct observations, and (f) semi-structured interview.
Results: The PVs' attendance was high, and most of them achieved a high level of implementation in following the fidelity checklist As part of a large clustered RCT, the fidelity assessment was carried out to help determine the effectiveness of the intervention.
Conclusions: Overall, the PVs successfully delivered the intervention, and the results of the study indicate the effectiveness of the PAP.</abstract><cop>LONDON</cop><pub>Springer Nature</pub><pmid>34544469</pmid><doi>10.1186/s13063-021-05599-6</doi><tpages>8</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9428-8719</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1745-6215 |
| ispartof | Current controlled trials in cardiovascular medicine, 2021-09, Vol.22 (1), p.644-644, Article 644 |
| issn | 1745-6215 1745-6215 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A678031252 |
| source | PubMed Central Free; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | Care and treatment Chronic illnesses Chronic pain Clinical trials Clustered randomized controlled trial Design Disease Education Hypertension Intervention Intervention fidelity Life Sciences & Biomedicine Medicine, Research & Experimental Nursing homes Older people Pain Pain management Peer volunteer (PV) Peer-led pain management program (PAP) Research & Experimental Medicine Science & Technology Volunteers |
| title | Assessing the fidelity of a peer-led chronic pain management program (PAP) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T08%3A16%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20the%20fidelity%20of%20a%20peer-led%20chronic%20pain%20management%20program%20(PAP)&rft.jtitle=Current%20controlled%20trials%20in%20cardiovascular%20medicine&rft.au=Tse,%20Mimi%20M.%20Y.&rft.date=2021-09-20&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=644&rft.epage=644&rft.pages=644-644&rft.artnum=644&rft.issn=1745-6215&rft.eissn=1745-6215&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s13063-021-05599-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA678031252%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2730341496&rft_id=info:pmid/34544469&rft_galeid=A678031252&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_3b8d6a5d871441479f0618ae6f3ce68c&rfr_iscdi=true |