Paper-based ELISA diagnosis technology for human brucellosis based on a multiepitope fusion protein

Brucellosis, as a serious zoonotic infectious disease, has been recognized as a re-emerging disease in the developing countries worldwide. In china, the incidence of brucellosis is increasing each year, seriously threatening the health of humans as well as animal populations. Despite a quite number...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PLoS neglected tropical diseases 2021-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0009695-e0009695
Hauptverfasser: Yin, Dehui, Bai, Qiongqiong, Wu, Xiling, Li, Han, Shao, Jihong, Sun, Mingjun, Jiang, Hai, Zhang, Jingpeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0009695
container_issue 8
container_start_page e0009695
container_title PLoS neglected tropical diseases
container_volume 15
creator Yin, Dehui
Bai, Qiongqiong
Wu, Xiling
Li, Han
Shao, Jihong
Sun, Mingjun
Jiang, Hai
Zhang, Jingpeng
description Brucellosis, as a serious zoonotic infectious disease, has been recognized as a re-emerging disease in the developing countries worldwide. In china, the incidence of brucellosis is increasing each year, seriously threatening the health of humans as well as animal populations. Despite a quite number of diagnostic methods currently being used for brucellosis, innovative technologies are still needed for its rapid and accurate diagnosis, especially in area where traditional diagnostic is unavailable. In this study, a total of 22 B cell linear epitopes were predicted from five Brucella outer membrane proteins (OMPs) using an immunoinformatic approach. These epitopes were then chemically synthesized, and with the method of indirect ELISA (iELISA), each of them displayed a certain degree of capability in identifying human brucellosis positive sera. Subsequently, a fusion protein consisting of the 22 predicted epitopes was prokaryotically expressed and used as diagnostic antigen in a newly established brucellosis testing method, nano-ZnO modified paper-based ELISA (nano-p-ELISA). According to the verifying test using a collection of sera collected from brucellosis and non-brucellosis patients, the sensitivity and specificity of multiepitope based nano-p-ELISA were 92.38% and 98.35% respectively. The positive predictive value was 98.26% and the negative predictive value was 91.67%. The multiepitope based fusion protein also displayed significantly higher specificity than Brucella lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigen. B cell epitopes are important candidates for serologically testing brucellosis. Multiepitope fusion protein based nano-p-ELISA displayed significantly sensitivity and specificity compared to Brucella LPS antigen. The strategy applied in this study will be helpful to develop rapid and accurate diagnostic method for brucellosis in human as well as animal populations.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009695
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A673927314</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A673927314</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_1afe1ff00dca4766bc49bdbd4f1f43d5</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A673927314</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-2ae11c7b9a306c4f39f471c60ab2195ff5628d20cdbe24c6a418c5c73f3764c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgngzY74zvVkYllUHBhTU65DmYyZDm9QkFfbfm-50lxlZetFy8rzvOTl9q-otBEuIOfx8CGP0slsOPuslAKBhDX1WXcIG0wXimD4_-b6oXqV0AIA2dAVfVheYEIAJgpeV-iEHExetTEbXt9vNz3Wtndz5kFyqs1F7H7qwu6ttiPV-7KWv2zgq03X3wFEWfC3rfuyyM4PLYTC1HZMr1SGGbJx_Xb2wskvmzfy-qn5_uf11822x_f51c7PeLhRDJC-QNBAq3jYSA6aIxY0lHCoGZItgQ62lDK00Akq3BhHFJIErRRXHFnNGVIOvqvdH36FMJ-b9JIEox4RSxmghNkdCB3kQQ3S9jHciSCfuCyHuhIzZqc4IKK2B1gKglSScsVaRptWtJhZagvXkdT13G9veaGV8jrI7Mz0_8W4vduGvWOGGcU6KwafZIIY_o0lZ9C5Nq5XehHGamyGK4Arjgn74D336djO1k-UCzttQ-qrJVKwZx01JApzaLp-gyqNN71TwxrpSPxN8PBHsjezyPoVuzOUXp3OQHEEVQ0rR2MdlQCCmzD5MLabMijmzRfbudJGPooeQ4n9WNuma</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2573455665</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Paper-based ELISA diagnosis technology for human brucellosis based on a multiepitope fusion protein</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Yin, Dehui ; Bai, Qiongqiong ; Wu, Xiling ; Li, Han ; Shao, Jihong ; Sun, Mingjun ; Jiang, Hai ; Zhang, Jingpeng</creator><contributor>Barry, Alyssa E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yin, Dehui ; Bai, Qiongqiong ; Wu, Xiling ; Li, Han ; Shao, Jihong ; Sun, Mingjun ; Jiang, Hai ; Zhang, Jingpeng ; Barry, Alyssa E</creatorcontrib><description>Brucellosis, as a serious zoonotic infectious disease, has been recognized as a re-emerging disease in the developing countries worldwide. In china, the incidence of brucellosis is increasing each year, seriously threatening the health of humans as well as animal populations. Despite a quite number of diagnostic methods currently being used for brucellosis, innovative technologies are still needed for its rapid and accurate diagnosis, especially in area where traditional diagnostic is unavailable. In this study, a total of 22 B cell linear epitopes were predicted from five Brucella outer membrane proteins (OMPs) using an immunoinformatic approach. These epitopes were then chemically synthesized, and with the method of indirect ELISA (iELISA), each of them displayed a certain degree of capability in identifying human brucellosis positive sera. Subsequently, a fusion protein consisting of the 22 predicted epitopes was prokaryotically expressed and used as diagnostic antigen in a newly established brucellosis testing method, nano-ZnO modified paper-based ELISA (nano-p-ELISA). According to the verifying test using a collection of sera collected from brucellosis and non-brucellosis patients, the sensitivity and specificity of multiepitope based nano-p-ELISA were 92.38% and 98.35% respectively. The positive predictive value was 98.26% and the negative predictive value was 91.67%. The multiepitope based fusion protein also displayed significantly higher specificity than Brucella lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigen. B cell epitopes are important candidates for serologically testing brucellosis. Multiepitope fusion protein based nano-p-ELISA displayed significantly sensitivity and specificity compared to Brucella LPS antigen. The strategy applied in this study will be helpful to develop rapid and accurate diagnostic method for brucellosis in human as well as animal populations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1935-2727</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-2735</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009695</identifier><identifier>PMID: 34403421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Agglutination tests ; Animal population ; Animal populations ; Antibodies ; Antigenic determinants ; Antigens ; Antigens, Bacterial - analysis ; Antigens, Bacterial - genetics ; Antigens, Bacterial - immunology ; Bacteria ; Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - analysis ; Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - genetics ; Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - immunology ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Biotechnology industry ; Brucella ; Brucella - genetics ; Brucella - immunology ; Brucella - isolation &amp; purification ; Brucellosis ; Brucellosis - diagnosis ; Brucellosis - microbiology ; China ; Developing countries ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Effluents ; ELISA ; Engineering and Technology ; Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - instrumentation ; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods ; Enzymes ; Epitopes ; Epitopes - analysis ; Epitopes - genetics ; Epitopes - immunology ; Fusion protein ; Health risks ; Humans ; Identification and classification ; Infectious diseases ; Laboratories ; LDCs ; Lipopolysaccharides ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Membrane proteins ; Methods ; Molecular diagnostic techniques ; Outer membrane proteins ; Packaging ; Peptides ; Populations ; Proteins ; Research and Analysis Methods ; Sensitivity ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Specificity ; Testing ; Tropical diseases ; Zinc oxide ; Zoonoses</subject><ispartof>PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0009695-e0009695</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2021 Yin et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2021 Yin et al 2021 Yin et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-2ae11c7b9a306c4f39f471c60ab2195ff5628d20cdbe24c6a418c5c73f3764c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-2ae11c7b9a306c4f39f471c60ab2195ff5628d20cdbe24c6a418c5c73f3764c93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7164-9320</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8396774/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8396774/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,724,777,781,861,882,2096,2915,23847,27905,27906,53772,53774,79349,79350</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34403421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Barry, Alyssa E</contributor><creatorcontrib>Yin, Dehui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Qiongqiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Jihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Mingjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Hai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jingpeng</creatorcontrib><title>Paper-based ELISA diagnosis technology for human brucellosis based on a multiepitope fusion protein</title><title>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</title><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><description>Brucellosis, as a serious zoonotic infectious disease, has been recognized as a re-emerging disease in the developing countries worldwide. In china, the incidence of brucellosis is increasing each year, seriously threatening the health of humans as well as animal populations. Despite a quite number of diagnostic methods currently being used for brucellosis, innovative technologies are still needed for its rapid and accurate diagnosis, especially in area where traditional diagnostic is unavailable. In this study, a total of 22 B cell linear epitopes were predicted from five Brucella outer membrane proteins (OMPs) using an immunoinformatic approach. These epitopes were then chemically synthesized, and with the method of indirect ELISA (iELISA), each of them displayed a certain degree of capability in identifying human brucellosis positive sera. Subsequently, a fusion protein consisting of the 22 predicted epitopes was prokaryotically expressed and used as diagnostic antigen in a newly established brucellosis testing method, nano-ZnO modified paper-based ELISA (nano-p-ELISA). According to the verifying test using a collection of sera collected from brucellosis and non-brucellosis patients, the sensitivity and specificity of multiepitope based nano-p-ELISA were 92.38% and 98.35% respectively. The positive predictive value was 98.26% and the negative predictive value was 91.67%. The multiepitope based fusion protein also displayed significantly higher specificity than Brucella lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigen. B cell epitopes are important candidates for serologically testing brucellosis. Multiepitope fusion protein based nano-p-ELISA displayed significantly sensitivity and specificity compared to Brucella LPS antigen. The strategy applied in this study will be helpful to develop rapid and accurate diagnostic method for brucellosis in human as well as animal populations.</description><subject>Agglutination tests</subject><subject>Animal population</subject><subject>Animal populations</subject><subject>Antibodies</subject><subject>Antigenic determinants</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Antigens, Bacterial - analysis</subject><subject>Antigens, Bacterial - genetics</subject><subject>Antigens, Bacterial - immunology</subject><subject>Bacteria</subject><subject>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - analysis</subject><subject>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - genetics</subject><subject>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - immunology</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Biotechnology industry</subject><subject>Brucella</subject><subject>Brucella - genetics</subject><subject>Brucella - immunology</subject><subject>Brucella - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Brucellosis</subject><subject>Brucellosis - diagnosis</subject><subject>Brucellosis - microbiology</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Developing countries</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Effluents</subject><subject>ELISA</subject><subject>Engineering and Technology</subject><subject>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - instrumentation</subject><subject>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</subject><subject>Enzymes</subject><subject>Epitopes</subject><subject>Epitopes - analysis</subject><subject>Epitopes - genetics</subject><subject>Epitopes - immunology</subject><subject>Fusion protein</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Identification and classification</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>LDCs</subject><subject>Lipopolysaccharides</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Membrane proteins</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Molecular diagnostic techniques</subject><subject>Outer membrane proteins</subject><subject>Packaging</subject><subject>Peptides</subject><subject>Populations</subject><subject>Proteins</subject><subject>Research and Analysis Methods</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Specificity</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>Tropical diseases</subject><subject>Zinc oxide</subject><subject>Zoonoses</subject><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><issn>1935-2735</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6D0QLgngzY74zvVkYllUHBhTU65DmYyZDm9QkFfbfm-50lxlZetFy8rzvOTl9q-otBEuIOfx8CGP0slsOPuslAKBhDX1WXcIG0wXimD4_-b6oXqV0AIA2dAVfVheYEIAJgpeV-iEHExetTEbXt9vNz3Wtndz5kFyqs1F7H7qwu6ttiPV-7KWv2zgq03X3wFEWfC3rfuyyM4PLYTC1HZMr1SGGbJx_Xb2wskvmzfy-qn5_uf11822x_f51c7PeLhRDJC-QNBAq3jYSA6aIxY0lHCoGZItgQ62lDK00Akq3BhHFJIErRRXHFnNGVIOvqvdH36FMJ-b9JIEox4RSxmghNkdCB3kQQ3S9jHciSCfuCyHuhIzZqc4IKK2B1gKglSScsVaRptWtJhZagvXkdT13G9veaGV8jrI7Mz0_8W4vduGvWOGGcU6KwafZIIY_o0lZ9C5Nq5XehHGamyGK4Arjgn74D336djO1k-UCzttQ-qrJVKwZx01JApzaLp-gyqNN71TwxrpSPxN8PBHsjezyPoVuzOUXp3OQHEEVQ0rR2MdlQCCmzD5MLabMijmzRfbudJGPooeQ4n9WNuma</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Yin, Dehui</creator><creator>Bai, Qiongqiong</creator><creator>Wu, Xiling</creator><creator>Li, Han</creator><creator>Shao, Jihong</creator><creator>Sun, Mingjun</creator><creator>Jiang, Hai</creator><creator>Zhang, Jingpeng</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-9320</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Paper-based ELISA diagnosis technology for human brucellosis based on a multiepitope fusion protein</title><author>Yin, Dehui ; Bai, Qiongqiong ; Wu, Xiling ; Li, Han ; Shao, Jihong ; Sun, Mingjun ; Jiang, Hai ; Zhang, Jingpeng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c624t-2ae11c7b9a306c4f39f471c60ab2195ff5628d20cdbe24c6a418c5c73f3764c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agglutination tests</topic><topic>Animal population</topic><topic>Animal populations</topic><topic>Antibodies</topic><topic>Antigenic determinants</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Antigens, Bacterial - analysis</topic><topic>Antigens, Bacterial - genetics</topic><topic>Antigens, Bacterial - immunology</topic><topic>Bacteria</topic><topic>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - analysis</topic><topic>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - genetics</topic><topic>Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - immunology</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Biotechnology industry</topic><topic>Brucella</topic><topic>Brucella - genetics</topic><topic>Brucella - immunology</topic><topic>Brucella - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Brucellosis</topic><topic>Brucellosis - diagnosis</topic><topic>Brucellosis - microbiology</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Developing countries</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Effluents</topic><topic>ELISA</topic><topic>Engineering and Technology</topic><topic>Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - instrumentation</topic><topic>Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods</topic><topic>Enzymes</topic><topic>Epitopes</topic><topic>Epitopes - analysis</topic><topic>Epitopes - genetics</topic><topic>Epitopes - immunology</topic><topic>Fusion protein</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Identification and classification</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>LDCs</topic><topic>Lipopolysaccharides</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Membrane proteins</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Molecular diagnostic techniques</topic><topic>Outer membrane proteins</topic><topic>Packaging</topic><topic>Peptides</topic><topic>Populations</topic><topic>Proteins</topic><topic>Research and Analysis Methods</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Specificity</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>Tropical diseases</topic><topic>Zinc oxide</topic><topic>Zoonoses</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yin, Dehui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Qiongqiong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiling</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Han</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shao, Jihong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Mingjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Hai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Jingpeng</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yin, Dehui</au><au>Bai, Qiongqiong</au><au>Wu, Xiling</au><au>Li, Han</au><au>Shao, Jihong</au><au>Sun, Mingjun</au><au>Jiang, Hai</au><au>Zhang, Jingpeng</au><au>Barry, Alyssa E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Paper-based ELISA diagnosis technology for human brucellosis based on a multiepitope fusion protein</atitle><jtitle>PLoS neglected tropical diseases</jtitle><addtitle>PLoS Negl Trop Dis</addtitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>e0009695</spage><epage>e0009695</epage><pages>e0009695-e0009695</pages><issn>1935-2735</issn><issn>1935-2727</issn><eissn>1935-2735</eissn><abstract>Brucellosis, as a serious zoonotic infectious disease, has been recognized as a re-emerging disease in the developing countries worldwide. In china, the incidence of brucellosis is increasing each year, seriously threatening the health of humans as well as animal populations. Despite a quite number of diagnostic methods currently being used for brucellosis, innovative technologies are still needed for its rapid and accurate diagnosis, especially in area where traditional diagnostic is unavailable. In this study, a total of 22 B cell linear epitopes were predicted from five Brucella outer membrane proteins (OMPs) using an immunoinformatic approach. These epitopes were then chemically synthesized, and with the method of indirect ELISA (iELISA), each of them displayed a certain degree of capability in identifying human brucellosis positive sera. Subsequently, a fusion protein consisting of the 22 predicted epitopes was prokaryotically expressed and used as diagnostic antigen in a newly established brucellosis testing method, nano-ZnO modified paper-based ELISA (nano-p-ELISA). According to the verifying test using a collection of sera collected from brucellosis and non-brucellosis patients, the sensitivity and specificity of multiepitope based nano-p-ELISA were 92.38% and 98.35% respectively. The positive predictive value was 98.26% and the negative predictive value was 91.67%. The multiepitope based fusion protein also displayed significantly higher specificity than Brucella lipopolysaccharide (LPS) antigen. B cell epitopes are important candidates for serologically testing brucellosis. Multiepitope fusion protein based nano-p-ELISA displayed significantly sensitivity and specificity compared to Brucella LPS antigen. The strategy applied in this study will be helpful to develop rapid and accurate diagnostic method for brucellosis in human as well as animal populations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><pmid>34403421</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pntd.0009695</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7164-9320</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-2735
ispartof PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2021-08, Vol.15 (8), p.e0009695-e0009695
issn 1935-2735
1935-2727
1935-2735
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A673927314
source MEDLINE; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Public Library of Science (PLoS); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central
subjects Agglutination tests
Animal population
Animal populations
Antibodies
Antigenic determinants
Antigens
Antigens, Bacterial - analysis
Antigens, Bacterial - genetics
Antigens, Bacterial - immunology
Bacteria
Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - analysis
Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - genetics
Bacterial Outer Membrane Proteins - immunology
Biology and Life Sciences
Biotechnology industry
Brucella
Brucella - genetics
Brucella - immunology
Brucella - isolation & purification
Brucellosis
Brucellosis - diagnosis
Brucellosis - microbiology
China
Developing countries
Diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Effluents
ELISA
Engineering and Technology
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - instrumentation
Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay - methods
Enzymes
Epitopes
Epitopes - analysis
Epitopes - genetics
Epitopes - immunology
Fusion protein
Health risks
Humans
Identification and classification
Infectious diseases
Laboratories
LDCs
Lipopolysaccharides
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Membrane proteins
Methods
Molecular diagnostic techniques
Outer membrane proteins
Packaging
Peptides
Populations
Proteins
Research and Analysis Methods
Sensitivity
Sensitivity and Specificity
Specificity
Testing
Tropical diseases
Zinc oxide
Zoonoses
title Paper-based ELISA diagnosis technology for human brucellosis based on a multiepitope fusion protein
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T04%3A52%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Paper-based%20ELISA%20diagnosis%20technology%20for%20human%20brucellosis%20based%20on%20a%20multiepitope%20fusion%20protein&rft.jtitle=PLoS%20neglected%20tropical%20diseases&rft.au=Yin,%20Dehui&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=e0009695&rft.epage=e0009695&rft.pages=e0009695-e0009695&rft.issn=1935-2735&rft.eissn=1935-2735&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009695&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA673927314%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2573455665&rft_id=info:pmid/34403421&rft_galeid=A673927314&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_1afe1ff00dca4766bc49bdbd4f1f43d5&rfr_iscdi=true