Sensitization potential of medical devices detected by in vitro and in vivo methods
Medical devices have to be tested before marketing in accordance with ISO EN 10993-10 in order to avoid skin sensitization. This standard predominantly refers to the in vivo test; however, it doesn't exclude the use of in vitro methods, which have been sufficiently technically and scientificall...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation alternatives to animal experimentation, 2021-01, Vol.38 (3), p.419 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 419 |
container_title | ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Svobodová, Lada Rucki, Marian Vlkova, Alena Kejlova, Kristina Jírová, Dagmar Dvorakova, Marketa Kolarova, Hana Kandárová, Helena Pôbiš, Peter Heinonen, Tuula Maly, Marek |
description | Medical devices have to be tested before marketing in accordance with ISO EN 10993-10 in order to avoid skin sensitization. This standard predominantly refers to the in vivo test; however, it doesn't exclude the use of in vitro methods, which have been sufficiently technically and scientifically validated for the purpose of medical devices testing. It is foreseen that due to the complexity of the sensitization endpoint, combination of several methods will be needed to address all key events occurring in the sensitization process. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate sensitization potential of selected medical devices using a combination of in vitro (LuSens, OECD TG 442D), in chemico (DPRA, OECD TG 442C) and in vivo (LLNA DA, OECD TG 442A) methods and to suggest a possible testing strategy for the safety assessment of medical devices extracts. Overall, one of the 42 tested samples exhibited positive results in all employed test methods, while 33 samples were predicted as samples with non-sensitizing potential in all three performed methods. This study demonstrated good agreement between in vitro and in vivo results regarding the absence of skin sensitization potential; however, discrepancies in positive classification have been recorded. The mismatch between in vitro and in vivo results might be caused by specific response of the immune system of the living organism. The in vitro methods require optimization of procedure, in particular the choice of appropriate extraction vehicle and applied volumes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14573/altex.2008142 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A670493943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A670493943</galeid><sourcerecordid>A670493943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4959b9b4956e414e010f5c026e4d3210b46a876cf5330f4dd92f1dfb427f6dc03</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMottRePcqC56352uzmWIpfUPBQBW9LNploZHdTNrFY_3pDW8VDZw5vZnhvDj-ELgmeEV6U7Ea1Eb5mFOOKcHqCxqQSVV5I8Xr6bx6haQgfOJXAlJT0HI0Y47LkgozRagV9cNF9q-h8n619hD461WbeZh0Yp9NoYOM0hKQRdASTNdvM9dnGxcFnqjf7ZeNTIL57Ey7QmVVtgOlBJ-jl7vZ58ZAvn-4fF_NlrpmgMeeykI1skgjghAMm2BYa07QZRgluuFBVKbQtGMOWGyOpJcY2nJZWGI3ZBF3v_76pFmrXWx8HpTsXdD0XJeaSSc6Sa3bEldpA57Tvwbp0PxbQgw9hAFuvB9epYVsTXO-41zvu9YF7ClztA-vPJjH7s_9SZj-38X3R</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sensitization potential of medical devices detected by in vitro and in vivo methods</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Svobodová, Lada ; Rucki, Marian ; Vlkova, Alena ; Kejlova, Kristina ; Jírová, Dagmar ; Dvorakova, Marketa ; Kolarova, Hana ; Kandárová, Helena ; Pôbiš, Peter ; Heinonen, Tuula ; Maly, Marek</creator><creatorcontrib>Svobodová, Lada ; Rucki, Marian ; Vlkova, Alena ; Kejlova, Kristina ; Jírová, Dagmar ; Dvorakova, Marketa ; Kolarova, Hana ; Kandárová, Helena ; Pôbiš, Peter ; Heinonen, Tuula ; Maly, Marek</creatorcontrib><description>Medical devices have to be tested before marketing in accordance with ISO EN 10993-10 in order to avoid skin sensitization. This standard predominantly refers to the in vivo test; however, it doesn't exclude the use of in vitro methods, which have been sufficiently technically and scientifically validated for the purpose of medical devices testing. It is foreseen that due to the complexity of the sensitization endpoint, combination of several methods will be needed to address all key events occurring in the sensitization process. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate sensitization potential of selected medical devices using a combination of in vitro (LuSens, OECD TG 442D), in chemico (DPRA, OECD TG 442C) and in vivo (LLNA DA, OECD TG 442A) methods and to suggest a possible testing strategy for the safety assessment of medical devices extracts. Overall, one of the 42 tested samples exhibited positive results in all employed test methods, while 33 samples were predicted as samples with non-sensitizing potential in all three performed methods. This study demonstrated good agreement between in vitro and in vivo results regarding the absence of skin sensitization potential; however, discrepancies in positive classification have been recorded. The mismatch between in vitro and in vivo results might be caused by specific response of the immune system of the living organism. The in vitro methods require optimization of procedure, in particular the choice of appropriate extraction vehicle and applied volumes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1868-596X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1868-596X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14573/altex.2008142</identifier><identifier>PMID: 33497461</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Spektrum</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Detectors ; Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid ; Medical equipment ; Methods ; Physiological apparatus ; Skin</subject><ispartof>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation, 2021-01, Vol.38 (3), p.419</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer Spektrum</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4959b9b4956e414e010f5c026e4d3210b46a876cf5330f4dd92f1dfb427f6dc03</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33497461$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Svobodová, Lada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rucki, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlkova, Alena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kejlova, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jírová, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvorakova, Marketa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolarova, Hana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandárová, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pôbiš, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinonen, Tuula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maly, Marek</creatorcontrib><title>Sensitization potential of medical devices detected by in vitro and in vivo methods</title><title>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</title><addtitle>ALTEX</addtitle><description>Medical devices have to be tested before marketing in accordance with ISO EN 10993-10 in order to avoid skin sensitization. This standard predominantly refers to the in vivo test; however, it doesn't exclude the use of in vitro methods, which have been sufficiently technically and scientifically validated for the purpose of medical devices testing. It is foreseen that due to the complexity of the sensitization endpoint, combination of several methods will be needed to address all key events occurring in the sensitization process. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate sensitization potential of selected medical devices using a combination of in vitro (LuSens, OECD TG 442D), in chemico (DPRA, OECD TG 442C) and in vivo (LLNA DA, OECD TG 442A) methods and to suggest a possible testing strategy for the safety assessment of medical devices extracts. Overall, one of the 42 tested samples exhibited positive results in all employed test methods, while 33 samples were predicted as samples with non-sensitizing potential in all three performed methods. This study demonstrated good agreement between in vitro and in vivo results regarding the absence of skin sensitization potential; however, discrepancies in positive classification have been recorded. The mismatch between in vitro and in vivo results might be caused by specific response of the immune system of the living organism. The in vitro methods require optimization of procedure, in particular the choice of appropriate extraction vehicle and applied volumes.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Detectors</subject><subject>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</subject><subject>Medical equipment</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Physiological apparatus</subject><subject>Skin</subject><issn>1868-596X</issn><issn>1868-596X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1LAzEQxYMottRePcqC56352uzmWIpfUPBQBW9LNploZHdTNrFY_3pDW8VDZw5vZnhvDj-ELgmeEV6U7Ea1Eb5mFOOKcHqCxqQSVV5I8Xr6bx6haQgfOJXAlJT0HI0Y47LkgozRagV9cNF9q-h8n619hD461WbeZh0Yp9NoYOM0hKQRdASTNdvM9dnGxcFnqjf7ZeNTIL57Ey7QmVVtgOlBJ-jl7vZ58ZAvn-4fF_NlrpmgMeeykI1skgjghAMm2BYa07QZRgluuFBVKbQtGMOWGyOpJcY2nJZWGI3ZBF3v_76pFmrXWx8HpTsXdD0XJeaSSc6Sa3bEldpA57Tvwbp0PxbQgw9hAFuvB9epYVsTXO-41zvu9YF7ClztA-vPJjH7s_9SZj-38X3R</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Svobodová, Lada</creator><creator>Rucki, Marian</creator><creator>Vlkova, Alena</creator><creator>Kejlova, Kristina</creator><creator>Jírová, Dagmar</creator><creator>Dvorakova, Marketa</creator><creator>Kolarova, Hana</creator><creator>Kandárová, Helena</creator><creator>Pôbiš, Peter</creator><creator>Heinonen, Tuula</creator><creator>Maly, Marek</creator><general>Springer Spektrum</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Sensitization potential of medical devices detected by in vitro and in vivo methods</title><author>Svobodová, Lada ; Rucki, Marian ; Vlkova, Alena ; Kejlova, Kristina ; Jírová, Dagmar ; Dvorakova, Marketa ; Kolarova, Hana ; Kandárová, Helena ; Pôbiš, Peter ; Heinonen, Tuula ; Maly, Marek</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c362t-4959b9b4956e414e010f5c026e4d3210b46a876cf5330f4dd92f1dfb427f6dc03</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Detectors</topic><topic>Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid</topic><topic>Medical equipment</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Physiological apparatus</topic><topic>Skin</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Svobodová, Lada</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rucki, Marian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vlkova, Alena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kejlova, Kristina</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jírová, Dagmar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dvorakova, Marketa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolarova, Hana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kandárová, Helena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pôbiš, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heinonen, Tuula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maly, Marek</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Svobodová, Lada</au><au>Rucki, Marian</au><au>Vlkova, Alena</au><au>Kejlova, Kristina</au><au>Jírová, Dagmar</au><au>Dvorakova, Marketa</au><au>Kolarova, Hana</au><au>Kandárová, Helena</au><au>Pôbiš, Peter</au><au>Heinonen, Tuula</au><au>Maly, Marek</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sensitization potential of medical devices detected by in vitro and in vivo methods</atitle><jtitle>ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation</jtitle><addtitle>ALTEX</addtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>419</spage><pages>419-</pages><issn>1868-596X</issn><eissn>1868-596X</eissn><abstract>Medical devices have to be tested before marketing in accordance with ISO EN 10993-10 in order to avoid skin sensitization. This standard predominantly refers to the in vivo test; however, it doesn't exclude the use of in vitro methods, which have been sufficiently technically and scientifically validated for the purpose of medical devices testing. It is foreseen that due to the complexity of the sensitization endpoint, combination of several methods will be needed to address all key events occurring in the sensitization process. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate sensitization potential of selected medical devices using a combination of in vitro (LuSens, OECD TG 442D), in chemico (DPRA, OECD TG 442C) and in vivo (LLNA DA, OECD TG 442A) methods and to suggest a possible testing strategy for the safety assessment of medical devices extracts. Overall, one of the 42 tested samples exhibited positive results in all employed test methods, while 33 samples were predicted as samples with non-sensitizing potential in all three performed methods. This study demonstrated good agreement between in vitro and in vivo results regarding the absence of skin sensitization potential; however, discrepancies in positive classification have been recorded. The mismatch between in vitro and in vivo results might be caused by specific response of the immune system of the living organism. The in vitro methods require optimization of procedure, in particular the choice of appropriate extraction vehicle and applied volumes.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Spektrum</pub><pmid>33497461</pmid><doi>10.14573/altex.2008142</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1868-596X |
ispartof | ALTEX, alternatives to animal experimentation, 2021-01, Vol.38 (3), p.419 |
issn | 1868-596X 1868-596X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A670493943 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Analysis Detectors Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid Medical equipment Methods Physiological apparatus Skin |
title | Sensitization potential of medical devices detected by in vitro and in vivo methods |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T21%3A34%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sensitization%20potential%20of%20medical%20devices%20detected%20by%20in%20vitro%20and%20in%20vivo%20methods&rft.jtitle=ALTEX,%20alternatives%20to%20animal%20experimentation&rft.au=Svobodov%C3%A1,%20Lada&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=419&rft.pages=419-&rft.issn=1868-596X&rft.eissn=1868-596X&rft_id=info:doi/10.14573/altex.2008142&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA670493943%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/33497461&rft_galeid=A670493943&rfr_iscdi=true |