Use of acceptable daily intake : a systematic map

Background It is well-recognized that consumers face many challenges in understanding and applying nutritional guidance for low-calorie sweeteners (LCS). Thus, this research aims to (1) assess how benchmarks for safe levels of consumption of LCS are utilized by researchers, and (2) understand how va...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:BMC public health 2021-05, Vol.21 (1)
Hauptverfasser: Fitch, Seneca E, Payne, Lauren E, van de Ligt, Jennifer L. G, Doepker, Candace, Handu, Deepa, Cohen, Samuel M, Anyangwe, Njwen, Wikoff, Daniele
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title BMC public health
container_volume 21
creator Fitch, Seneca E
Payne, Lauren E
van de Ligt, Jennifer L. G
Doepker, Candace
Handu, Deepa
Cohen, Samuel M
Anyangwe, Njwen
Wikoff, Daniele
description Background It is well-recognized that consumers face many challenges in understanding and applying nutritional guidance for low-calorie sweeteners (LCS). Thus, this research aims to (1) assess how benchmarks for safe levels of consumption of LCS are utilized by researchers, and (2) understand how varying use of such benchmarks may contribute to challenges in understanding and applying nutritional guidance for LCS consumption. Methods A systematic mapping exercise was employed to characterize when and how acceptable daily intake (ADI) values are used as health-based benchmarks in nutrition research studies that consider the safety of LCS. Results Based on results from charting 121 studies, our findings demonstrate that comparisons of LCS intake to an ADI derived by an authoritative body have been made in a diverse set of published literature, varying widely in their objectives, approaches, and populations of interest. The majority of studies compared the ADI to intake in a population under study; these represent the type of comparison that is most consistent with the intent of the ADI. Other applications of the ADI included use as a benchmark in experimental studies, risk-benefit analyses, and metabolism studies. Conclusion Although most instances of ADI use were reasonable within the context of the individual studies' objectives, the diversity in use by original-study authors amplifies the continued need for development of "best practices" regarding the use and interpretation of the ADIs in current research. Using comparisons to the ADI can be a helpful way to provide context to research findings. However, in doing so, it is important that researchers utilize the value in a manner specific with its intent, as the ADI is a metric that represents an estimate of the amount of a substance that can be consumed daily over a lifetime without presenting an appreciable risk to health. Keywords: Acceptable daily intake, Low-calorie sweetener, Systematic map, Scoping review, Estimated daily intake
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12889-021-10934-2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A665437658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A665437658</galeid><sourcerecordid>A665437658</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g678-f883213dc5614fdb02282de05c329b588eecfa36b1f4bac305d4a131c361dd363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjE9LAzEUxIMoWKtfwFPAc2pe_u2rt1K0CgUv9VzeJi8lutstZi_99hb00IPMYYbhNyPEPegZAIbHCgZxrrQBBXpunTIXYgKuAWWcx8uzfC1uav3UGhr0ZiLgo7IcsqQY-TBS27FMVLqjLPuRvlg-SZL1WEfuaSxR9nS4FVeZusp3fz4Vm5fnzfJVrd9Xb8vFWu1CgyojWgM2RR_A5dRqY9Ak1j5aM289InPMZEML2bUUrfbJEViINkBKNtipePi93VHH27LPw_hNsS81bhcheGeb4PFEzf6hTkrclzjsOZdTfzb4ATW5VIs</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Use of acceptable daily intake : a systematic map</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>Fitch, Seneca E ; Payne, Lauren E ; van de Ligt, Jennifer L. G ; Doepker, Candace ; Handu, Deepa ; Cohen, Samuel M ; Anyangwe, Njwen ; Wikoff, Daniele</creator><creatorcontrib>Fitch, Seneca E ; Payne, Lauren E ; van de Ligt, Jennifer L. G ; Doepker, Candace ; Handu, Deepa ; Cohen, Samuel M ; Anyangwe, Njwen ; Wikoff, Daniele</creatorcontrib><description>Background It is well-recognized that consumers face many challenges in understanding and applying nutritional guidance for low-calorie sweeteners (LCS). Thus, this research aims to (1) assess how benchmarks for safe levels of consumption of LCS are utilized by researchers, and (2) understand how varying use of such benchmarks may contribute to challenges in understanding and applying nutritional guidance for LCS consumption. Methods A systematic mapping exercise was employed to characterize when and how acceptable daily intake (ADI) values are used as health-based benchmarks in nutrition research studies that consider the safety of LCS. Results Based on results from charting 121 studies, our findings demonstrate that comparisons of LCS intake to an ADI derived by an authoritative body have been made in a diverse set of published literature, varying widely in their objectives, approaches, and populations of interest. The majority of studies compared the ADI to intake in a population under study; these represent the type of comparison that is most consistent with the intent of the ADI. Other applications of the ADI included use as a benchmark in experimental studies, risk-benefit analyses, and metabolism studies. Conclusion Although most instances of ADI use were reasonable within the context of the individual studies' objectives, the diversity in use by original-study authors amplifies the continued need for development of "best practices" regarding the use and interpretation of the ADIs in current research. Using comparisons to the ADI can be a helpful way to provide context to research findings. However, in doing so, it is important that researchers utilize the value in a manner specific with its intent, as the ADI is a metric that represents an estimate of the amount of a substance that can be consumed daily over a lifetime without presenting an appreciable risk to health. Keywords: Acceptable daily intake, Low-calorie sweetener, Systematic map, Scoping review, Estimated daily intake</description><identifier>ISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1471-2458</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10934-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Dietary Reference Intakes ; Health aspects ; Medical research ; Medicine, Experimental ; Sugar substitutes</subject><ispartof>BMC public health, 2021-05, Vol.21 (1)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fitch, Seneca E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Ligt, Jennifer L. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doepker, Candace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handu, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Samuel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anyangwe, Njwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wikoff, Daniele</creatorcontrib><title>Use of acceptable daily intake : a systematic map</title><title>BMC public health</title><description>Background It is well-recognized that consumers face many challenges in understanding and applying nutritional guidance for low-calorie sweeteners (LCS). Thus, this research aims to (1) assess how benchmarks for safe levels of consumption of LCS are utilized by researchers, and (2) understand how varying use of such benchmarks may contribute to challenges in understanding and applying nutritional guidance for LCS consumption. Methods A systematic mapping exercise was employed to characterize when and how acceptable daily intake (ADI) values are used as health-based benchmarks in nutrition research studies that consider the safety of LCS. Results Based on results from charting 121 studies, our findings demonstrate that comparisons of LCS intake to an ADI derived by an authoritative body have been made in a diverse set of published literature, varying widely in their objectives, approaches, and populations of interest. The majority of studies compared the ADI to intake in a population under study; these represent the type of comparison that is most consistent with the intent of the ADI. Other applications of the ADI included use as a benchmark in experimental studies, risk-benefit analyses, and metabolism studies. Conclusion Although most instances of ADI use were reasonable within the context of the individual studies' objectives, the diversity in use by original-study authors amplifies the continued need for development of "best practices" regarding the use and interpretation of the ADIs in current research. Using comparisons to the ADI can be a helpful way to provide context to research findings. However, in doing so, it is important that researchers utilize the value in a manner specific with its intent, as the ADI is a metric that represents an estimate of the amount of a substance that can be consumed daily over a lifetime without presenting an appreciable risk to health. Keywords: Acceptable daily intake, Low-calorie sweetener, Systematic map, Scoping review, Estimated daily intake</description><subject>Dietary Reference Intakes</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Sugar substitutes</subject><issn>1471-2458</issn><issn>1471-2458</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptjE9LAzEUxIMoWKtfwFPAc2pe_u2rt1K0CgUv9VzeJi8lutstZi_99hb00IPMYYbhNyPEPegZAIbHCgZxrrQBBXpunTIXYgKuAWWcx8uzfC1uav3UGhr0ZiLgo7IcsqQY-TBS27FMVLqjLPuRvlg-SZL1WEfuaSxR9nS4FVeZusp3fz4Vm5fnzfJVrd9Xb8vFWu1CgyojWgM2RR_A5dRqY9Ak1j5aM289InPMZEML2bUUrfbJEViINkBKNtipePi93VHH27LPw_hNsS81bhcheGeb4PFEzf6hTkrclzjsOZdTfzb4ATW5VIs</recordid><startdate>20210520</startdate><enddate>20210520</enddate><creator>Fitch, Seneca E</creator><creator>Payne, Lauren E</creator><creator>van de Ligt, Jennifer L. G</creator><creator>Doepker, Candace</creator><creator>Handu, Deepa</creator><creator>Cohen, Samuel M</creator><creator>Anyangwe, Njwen</creator><creator>Wikoff, Daniele</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20210520</creationdate><title>Use of acceptable daily intake : a systematic map</title><author>Fitch, Seneca E ; Payne, Lauren E ; van de Ligt, Jennifer L. G ; Doepker, Candace ; Handu, Deepa ; Cohen, Samuel M ; Anyangwe, Njwen ; Wikoff, Daniele</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g678-f883213dc5614fdb02282de05c329b588eecfa36b1f4bac305d4a131c361dd363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Dietary Reference Intakes</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Sugar substitutes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fitch, Seneca E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Payne, Lauren E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Ligt, Jennifer L. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Doepker, Candace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Handu, Deepa</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cohen, Samuel M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anyangwe, Njwen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wikoff, Daniele</creatorcontrib><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fitch, Seneca E</au><au>Payne, Lauren E</au><au>van de Ligt, Jennifer L. G</au><au>Doepker, Candace</au><au>Handu, Deepa</au><au>Cohen, Samuel M</au><au>Anyangwe, Njwen</au><au>Wikoff, Daniele</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Use of acceptable daily intake : a systematic map</atitle><jtitle>BMC public health</jtitle><date>2021-05-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1471-2458</issn><eissn>1471-2458</eissn><abstract>Background It is well-recognized that consumers face many challenges in understanding and applying nutritional guidance for low-calorie sweeteners (LCS). Thus, this research aims to (1) assess how benchmarks for safe levels of consumption of LCS are utilized by researchers, and (2) understand how varying use of such benchmarks may contribute to challenges in understanding and applying nutritional guidance for LCS consumption. Methods A systematic mapping exercise was employed to characterize when and how acceptable daily intake (ADI) values are used as health-based benchmarks in nutrition research studies that consider the safety of LCS. Results Based on results from charting 121 studies, our findings demonstrate that comparisons of LCS intake to an ADI derived by an authoritative body have been made in a diverse set of published literature, varying widely in their objectives, approaches, and populations of interest. The majority of studies compared the ADI to intake in a population under study; these represent the type of comparison that is most consistent with the intent of the ADI. Other applications of the ADI included use as a benchmark in experimental studies, risk-benefit analyses, and metabolism studies. Conclusion Although most instances of ADI use were reasonable within the context of the individual studies' objectives, the diversity in use by original-study authors amplifies the continued need for development of "best practices" regarding the use and interpretation of the ADIs in current research. Using comparisons to the ADI can be a helpful way to provide context to research findings. However, in doing so, it is important that researchers utilize the value in a manner specific with its intent, as the ADI is a metric that represents an estimate of the amount of a substance that can be consumed daily over a lifetime without presenting an appreciable risk to health. Keywords: Acceptable daily intake, Low-calorie sweetener, Systematic map, Scoping review, Estimated daily intake</abstract><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/s12889-021-10934-2</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1471-2458
ispartof BMC public health, 2021-05, Vol.21 (1)
issn 1471-2458
1471-2458
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A665437658
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings; Springer Nature OA Free Journals
subjects Dietary Reference Intakes
Health aspects
Medical research
Medicine, Experimental
Sugar substitutes
title Use of acceptable daily intake : a systematic map
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T13%3A47%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Use%20of%20acceptable%20daily%20intake%20:%20a%20systematic%20map&rft.jtitle=BMC%20public%20health&rft.au=Fitch,%20Seneca%20E&rft.date=2021-05-20&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1471-2458&rft.eissn=1471-2458&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12889-021-10934-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA665437658%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A665437658&rfr_iscdi=true