Is Component Separation a Safe Method in Incisional Hernias?/Insizyonel Hernilerde Komponent Seperasyon Teknigi Guvenli Bir Yontem midir?

Introduction: Incisional hernias after abdominal surgical procedures cause morbidity, significant loss of labor and affect quality of life. In this study, we investigated whether component separation (CS) technique is a safe method in patients with incisional hernia. We evaluated the results of this...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Istanbul medical journal 2019-07, Vol.20 (4), p.342
Hauptverfasser: Arslan, Ufuk, Bilecik, Tuna
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng ; tur
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 4
container_start_page 342
container_title Istanbul medical journal
container_volume 20
creator Arslan, Ufuk
Bilecik, Tuna
description Introduction: Incisional hernias after abdominal surgical procedures cause morbidity, significant loss of labor and affect quality of life. In this study, we investigated whether component separation (CS) technique is a safe method in patients with incisional hernia. We evaluated the results of this technique in terms of wound infection and recurrence. Methods: Thirty incisional hernia cases operated with CS technique between February 2012 and February 2014 were included in the study. Demographic data, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, defect size, wound complications and recurrences after one-year follow-up were evaluated. Results: Seventeen patients were female and 13 were male. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 years (range: 29-76). The mean BMI of the patients was 26.8 kg/[m.sup.2] (range: 20.5-32.9). The mean hernia transverse diameter was 9.6 cm (range: 6.523). Mortality was not observed in any of the patients. Wound problems were observed in six of 30 patients in CS repair, and recurrence was observed in three of these patients. Recurrence was observed in only one of the remaining 24 patients without a wound problem. Recurrence was found to be statistically related to wound problem. There was also a significant relationship between BMI, hernia transverse diameter, ASA score and recurrence. Conclusion: In selected cases, CS technique is a safe technique for incisional hernia repair. It can be performed by paying attention to wound problems. Keywords: Component separation, wound infection, Amac: Abdominal cerrahi girisimler sonrasinda ortaya cikan insizyonel herniler onemli oranda isgucu kaybina, morbiditeye neden olur, yasam kalitesini etkiler. Bu calismada insizyonel hernili hastalarda Komponent Seperasyon (KS) tekniginin guvenli bir yontem olup olmadigini arastirdik. Bu teknigin; yara yeri enfeksiyonu ve nuks acisindan sonuclarini degerlendirdik. Yontemler: Subat 2012- Subat 2014 tarihleri arasinda hastanemizde KS teknigi ile ameliyat edilen 30 insizyonel herni olgusu calismaya dahil edildi. Hastalarin demografik bilgileri, vucut kitle indeksi (VKI), Amerikan Anesteziyoloji Dernegi (ASA) skoru, defektin boyu, yara komplikasyonlari ve bir yillik takip sonrasi nuksler degerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastalarin 17'si kadin, 13'u erkekti. Hastalarin yas ortalamasi 54,8 (29-76) idi. Hastalarin VKI ortalamasi 26,8 kg/ [m.sup.2] (20,5-32,9) idi. Bu hastalarin ortalama fitik transvers capi 9,6 cm (6,5-23) idi. Hastala
doi_str_mv 10.4274/imj.galenos.2019.47124
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A660990044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A660990044</galeid><sourcerecordid>A660990044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g954-5abb194024efcf13e3fccd7bb487b69eebacac098bcf2f12deb1371bfb67edee3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURj2ARFV4BWSJOan_EsdTVSpoI4oY2oWpsp3r4pI4VRyQ4A14a4Lo0AGhO1zpfuee4UPompJUMCkmvtmnO11DaGPKCFWpkJSJMzRiOVWJkopfoKsY94QQVmR5kbER-iojnrfNoQ0QeryGg-5079uANV5rB_gR-pe2wj7gMlgfh0TXeAld8DpOJ2WI_vNj-D3eaugqwA-nPuh0HAi8gdfgdx4v3t4h1B7f-g4_t6GHBje-8t30Ep07XUe4Ou4x2tzfbebLZPW0KOezVbJTmUgybQxVgjABzjrKgTtrK2mMKKTJFYDRVluiCmMdc5RVYCiX1DiTS6gA-Bjd_Gp_mtr64Nq-07bx0W5neU6UIkSI_ynKCJecZgOV_kENU0Hj7VCBGxo51X4D4g2Eqw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Is Component Separation a Safe Method in Incisional Hernias?/Insizyonel Hernilerde Komponent Seperasyon Teknigi Guvenli Bir Yontem midir?</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Arslan, Ufuk ; Bilecik, Tuna</creator><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Ufuk ; Bilecik, Tuna</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Incisional hernias after abdominal surgical procedures cause morbidity, significant loss of labor and affect quality of life. In this study, we investigated whether component separation (CS) technique is a safe method in patients with incisional hernia. We evaluated the results of this technique in terms of wound infection and recurrence. Methods: Thirty incisional hernia cases operated with CS technique between February 2012 and February 2014 were included in the study. Demographic data, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, defect size, wound complications and recurrences after one-year follow-up were evaluated. Results: Seventeen patients were female and 13 were male. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 years (range: 29-76). The mean BMI of the patients was 26.8 kg/[m.sup.2] (range: 20.5-32.9). The mean hernia transverse diameter was 9.6 cm (range: 6.523). Mortality was not observed in any of the patients. Wound problems were observed in six of 30 patients in CS repair, and recurrence was observed in three of these patients. Recurrence was observed in only one of the remaining 24 patients without a wound problem. Recurrence was found to be statistically related to wound problem. There was also a significant relationship between BMI, hernia transverse diameter, ASA score and recurrence. Conclusion: In selected cases, CS technique is a safe technique for incisional hernia repair. It can be performed by paying attention to wound problems. Keywords: Component separation, wound infection, Amac: Abdominal cerrahi girisimler sonrasinda ortaya cikan insizyonel herniler onemli oranda isgucu kaybina, morbiditeye neden olur, yasam kalitesini etkiler. Bu calismada insizyonel hernili hastalarda Komponent Seperasyon (KS) tekniginin guvenli bir yontem olup olmadigini arastirdik. Bu teknigin; yara yeri enfeksiyonu ve nuks acisindan sonuclarini degerlendirdik. Yontemler: Subat 2012- Subat 2014 tarihleri arasinda hastanemizde KS teknigi ile ameliyat edilen 30 insizyonel herni olgusu calismaya dahil edildi. Hastalarin demografik bilgileri, vucut kitle indeksi (VKI), Amerikan Anesteziyoloji Dernegi (ASA) skoru, defektin boyu, yara komplikasyonlari ve bir yillik takip sonrasi nuksler degerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastalarin 17'si kadin, 13'u erkekti. Hastalarin yas ortalamasi 54,8 (29-76) idi. Hastalarin VKI ortalamasi 26,8 kg/ [m.sup.2] (20,5-32,9) idi. Bu hastalarin ortalama fitik transvers capi 9,6 cm (6,5-23) idi. Hastalarin hicbirinde mortalite izlenmedi. KS onariminda 30 hastanin altisinda yara yeri problemleri gozlenirken bu hastalarin ucunde nuks gozlendi. Yara yeri problemi olmayan 24 olgunun ise sadece birinde nuks gozlendi. Yara yeri problemi olan hastalarda nuks istatistiksel olarak iliskili bulundu. VKI, fitik transvers capi yuksekligi ve ASA skoru ile de nuks arasinda anlamli iliski saptandi. Sonuc: Insizyonel herni onariminda uygun olgularda komponent separasyon teknigi guvenli bir tekniktir. Yara problemlerine dikkat edilerek uygulanabilir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Komponent seperasyon, yara yeri enfeksiyonu, rekurrens</description><identifier>ISSN: 2619-9793</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1304-8503</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.4274/imj.galenos.2019.47124</identifier><language>eng ; tur</language><publisher>Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Body mass index ; Health aspects ; Hernia ; Infection ; Medical societies ; Methods ; Morbidity ; Mortality ; Recurrence (Disease) ; Surgery ; Wounds</subject><ispartof>Istanbul medical journal, 2019-07, Vol.20 (4), p.342</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd.</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 AVES</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilecik, Tuna</creatorcontrib><title>Is Component Separation a Safe Method in Incisional Hernias?/Insizyonel Hernilerde Komponent Seperasyon Teknigi Guvenli Bir Yontem midir?</title><title>Istanbul medical journal</title><description>Introduction: Incisional hernias after abdominal surgical procedures cause morbidity, significant loss of labor and affect quality of life. In this study, we investigated whether component separation (CS) technique is a safe method in patients with incisional hernia. We evaluated the results of this technique in terms of wound infection and recurrence. Methods: Thirty incisional hernia cases operated with CS technique between February 2012 and February 2014 were included in the study. Demographic data, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, defect size, wound complications and recurrences after one-year follow-up were evaluated. Results: Seventeen patients were female and 13 were male. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 years (range: 29-76). The mean BMI of the patients was 26.8 kg/[m.sup.2] (range: 20.5-32.9). The mean hernia transverse diameter was 9.6 cm (range: 6.523). Mortality was not observed in any of the patients. Wound problems were observed in six of 30 patients in CS repair, and recurrence was observed in three of these patients. Recurrence was observed in only one of the remaining 24 patients without a wound problem. Recurrence was found to be statistically related to wound problem. There was also a significant relationship between BMI, hernia transverse diameter, ASA score and recurrence. Conclusion: In selected cases, CS technique is a safe technique for incisional hernia repair. It can be performed by paying attention to wound problems. Keywords: Component separation, wound infection, Amac: Abdominal cerrahi girisimler sonrasinda ortaya cikan insizyonel herniler onemli oranda isgucu kaybina, morbiditeye neden olur, yasam kalitesini etkiler. Bu calismada insizyonel hernili hastalarda Komponent Seperasyon (KS) tekniginin guvenli bir yontem olup olmadigini arastirdik. Bu teknigin; yara yeri enfeksiyonu ve nuks acisindan sonuclarini degerlendirdik. Yontemler: Subat 2012- Subat 2014 tarihleri arasinda hastanemizde KS teknigi ile ameliyat edilen 30 insizyonel herni olgusu calismaya dahil edildi. Hastalarin demografik bilgileri, vucut kitle indeksi (VKI), Amerikan Anesteziyoloji Dernegi (ASA) skoru, defektin boyu, yara komplikasyonlari ve bir yillik takip sonrasi nuksler degerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastalarin 17'si kadin, 13'u erkekti. Hastalarin yas ortalamasi 54,8 (29-76) idi. Hastalarin VKI ortalamasi 26,8 kg/ [m.sup.2] (20,5-32,9) idi. Bu hastalarin ortalama fitik transvers capi 9,6 cm (6,5-23) idi. Hastalarin hicbirinde mortalite izlenmedi. KS onariminda 30 hastanin altisinda yara yeri problemleri gozlenirken bu hastalarin ucunde nuks gozlendi. Yara yeri problemi olmayan 24 olgunun ise sadece birinde nuks gozlendi. Yara yeri problemi olan hastalarda nuks istatistiksel olarak iliskili bulundu. VKI, fitik transvers capi yuksekligi ve ASA skoru ile de nuks arasinda anlamli iliski saptandi. Sonuc: Insizyonel herni onariminda uygun olgularda komponent separasyon teknigi guvenli bir tekniktir. Yara problemlerine dikkat edilerek uygulanabilir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Komponent seperasyon, yara yeri enfeksiyonu, rekurrens</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Body mass index</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hernia</subject><subject>Infection</subject><subject>Medical societies</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Recurrence (Disease)</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Wounds</subject><issn>2619-9793</issn><issn>1304-8503</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNp9kL1OwzAURj2ARFV4BWSJOan_EsdTVSpoI4oY2oWpsp3r4pI4VRyQ4A14a4Lo0AGhO1zpfuee4UPompJUMCkmvtmnO11DaGPKCFWpkJSJMzRiOVWJkopfoKsY94QQVmR5kbER-iojnrfNoQ0QeryGg-5079uANV5rB_gR-pe2wj7gMlgfh0TXeAld8DpOJ2WI_vNj-D3eaugqwA-nPuh0HAi8gdfgdx4v3t4h1B7f-g4_t6GHBje-8t30Ep07XUe4Ou4x2tzfbebLZPW0KOezVbJTmUgybQxVgjABzjrKgTtrK2mMKKTJFYDRVluiCmMdc5RVYCiX1DiTS6gA-Bjd_Gp_mtr64Nq-07bx0W5neU6UIkSI_ynKCJecZgOV_kENU0Hj7VCBGxo51X4D4g2Eqw</recordid><startdate>20190701</startdate><enddate>20190701</enddate><creator>Arslan, Ufuk</creator><creator>Bilecik, Tuna</creator><general>Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd</general><general>AVES</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20190701</creationdate><title>Is Component Separation a Safe Method in Incisional Hernias?/Insizyonel Hernilerde Komponent Seperasyon Teknigi Guvenli Bir Yontem midir?</title><author>Arslan, Ufuk ; Bilecik, Tuna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g954-5abb194024efcf13e3fccd7bb487b69eebacac098bcf2f12deb1371bfb67edee3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng ; tur</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Body mass index</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hernia</topic><topic>Infection</topic><topic>Medical societies</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Recurrence (Disease)</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Wounds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Arslan, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bilecik, Tuna</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Istanbul medical journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Arslan, Ufuk</au><au>Bilecik, Tuna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Is Component Separation a Safe Method in Incisional Hernias?/Insizyonel Hernilerde Komponent Seperasyon Teknigi Guvenli Bir Yontem midir?</atitle><jtitle>Istanbul medical journal</jtitle><date>2019-07-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>342</spage><pages>342-</pages><issn>2619-9793</issn><issn>1304-8503</issn><abstract>Introduction: Incisional hernias after abdominal surgical procedures cause morbidity, significant loss of labor and affect quality of life. In this study, we investigated whether component separation (CS) technique is a safe method in patients with incisional hernia. We evaluated the results of this technique in terms of wound infection and recurrence. Methods: Thirty incisional hernia cases operated with CS technique between February 2012 and February 2014 were included in the study. Demographic data, body mass index (BMI), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, defect size, wound complications and recurrences after one-year follow-up were evaluated. Results: Seventeen patients were female and 13 were male. The mean age of the patients was 54.8 years (range: 29-76). The mean BMI of the patients was 26.8 kg/[m.sup.2] (range: 20.5-32.9). The mean hernia transverse diameter was 9.6 cm (range: 6.523). Mortality was not observed in any of the patients. Wound problems were observed in six of 30 patients in CS repair, and recurrence was observed in three of these patients. Recurrence was observed in only one of the remaining 24 patients without a wound problem. Recurrence was found to be statistically related to wound problem. There was also a significant relationship between BMI, hernia transverse diameter, ASA score and recurrence. Conclusion: In selected cases, CS technique is a safe technique for incisional hernia repair. It can be performed by paying attention to wound problems. Keywords: Component separation, wound infection, Amac: Abdominal cerrahi girisimler sonrasinda ortaya cikan insizyonel herniler onemli oranda isgucu kaybina, morbiditeye neden olur, yasam kalitesini etkiler. Bu calismada insizyonel hernili hastalarda Komponent Seperasyon (KS) tekniginin guvenli bir yontem olup olmadigini arastirdik. Bu teknigin; yara yeri enfeksiyonu ve nuks acisindan sonuclarini degerlendirdik. Yontemler: Subat 2012- Subat 2014 tarihleri arasinda hastanemizde KS teknigi ile ameliyat edilen 30 insizyonel herni olgusu calismaya dahil edildi. Hastalarin demografik bilgileri, vucut kitle indeksi (VKI), Amerikan Anesteziyoloji Dernegi (ASA) skoru, defektin boyu, yara komplikasyonlari ve bir yillik takip sonrasi nuksler degerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastalarin 17'si kadin, 13'u erkekti. Hastalarin yas ortalamasi 54,8 (29-76) idi. Hastalarin VKI ortalamasi 26,8 kg/ [m.sup.2] (20,5-32,9) idi. Bu hastalarin ortalama fitik transvers capi 9,6 cm (6,5-23) idi. Hastalarin hicbirinde mortalite izlenmedi. KS onariminda 30 hastanin altisinda yara yeri problemleri gozlenirken bu hastalarin ucunde nuks gozlendi. Yara yeri problemi olmayan 24 olgunun ise sadece birinde nuks gozlendi. Yara yeri problemi olan hastalarda nuks istatistiksel olarak iliskili bulundu. VKI, fitik transvers capi yuksekligi ve ASA skoru ile de nuks arasinda anlamli iliski saptandi. Sonuc: Insizyonel herni onariminda uygun olgularda komponent separasyon teknigi guvenli bir tekniktir. Yara problemlerine dikkat edilerek uygulanabilir. Anahtar Kelimeler: Komponent seperasyon, yara yeri enfeksiyonu, rekurrens</abstract><pub>Galenos Yayinevi Tic. Ltd</pub><doi>10.4274/imj.galenos.2019.47124</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2619-9793
ispartof Istanbul medical journal, 2019-07, Vol.20 (4), p.342
issn 2619-9793
1304-8503
language eng ; tur
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A660990044
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Body mass index
Health aspects
Hernia
Infection
Medical societies
Methods
Morbidity
Mortality
Recurrence (Disease)
Surgery
Wounds
title Is Component Separation a Safe Method in Incisional Hernias?/Insizyonel Hernilerde Komponent Seperasyon Teknigi Guvenli Bir Yontem midir?
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T07%3A25%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Is%20Component%20Separation%20a%20Safe%20Method%20in%20Incisional%20Hernias?/Insizyonel%20Hernilerde%20Komponent%20Seperasyon%20Teknigi%20Guvenli%20Bir%20Yontem%20midir?&rft.jtitle=Istanbul%20medical%20journal&rft.au=Arslan,%20Ufuk&rft.date=2019-07-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=342&rft.pages=342-&rft.issn=2619-9793&rft_id=info:doi/10.4274/imj.galenos.2019.47124&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA660990044%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A660990044&rfr_iscdi=true