Knowledge, perceptions, and management of cancer-related fatigue: the patients' perspective

Purpose This study aimed to assess cancer patients’ knowledge and perceptions regarding fatigue and to provide up-to-date information on the current fatigue management from the patients’ perspective. Methods The FiX study recruited 2508 cancer patients approximately 2 years after diagnosis via a can...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Supportive care in cancer 2021-04, Vol.29 (4), p.2063-2071
Hauptverfasser: Schmidt, Martina E., Bergbold, Susanne, Hermann, Silke, Steindorf, Karen
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2071
container_issue 4
container_start_page 2063
container_title Supportive care in cancer
container_volume 29
creator Schmidt, Martina E.
Bergbold, Susanne
Hermann, Silke
Steindorf, Karen
description Purpose This study aimed to assess cancer patients’ knowledge and perceptions regarding fatigue and to provide up-to-date information on the current fatigue management from the patients’ perspective. Methods The FiX study recruited 2508 cancer patients approximately 2 years after diagnosis via a cancer registry in Germany. Participants completed a questionnaire on their knowledge and perceptions of fatigue and the management received. Results More than half of respondents (58%), especially among the elderly patients, did not feel well informed about fatigue. Overall, 41% reported having never been asked about being exhausted by their treating physician. Even fewer patients stated that general practitioners or nurses have asked if they felt exhausted. Only 13% of patients who had experienced severe fatigue had received a fatigue assessment by means of a rating scale or questionnaire—although this is recommended by existing guidelines for fatigue screening. Health care professionals seemed less likely to address fatigue with elderly as well as female patients. The most commonly reported measure against fatigue was exercise or regular physical activity (68%). However, this was mostly done on patients’ own initiative. Psychological support was rarely used (13%) and only in approximately half of the cases upon the advice of a physician. Yoga, another promising intervention against fatigue, was performed by only 9% of patients. Conclusions Our study indicates deficits in terms of knowledge, education, screening, counseling, and treatment for fatigue and highlights starting points for targeted improvements in fatigue management based on patients’ needs.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00520-020-05686-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A652303280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A652303280</galeid><sourcerecordid>A652303280</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-745a0a257c030719fce638958c00b5560eedfb69f2647b273652e1bdd9c0c8d33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl9r1jAUxoso7t30C3ghBS8cuM7TpElaL4Tx4j8ceKNXXoQ0Pe0y2qRL0g2_vSnvfOdEREpo0_6ep-ecPFn2rITTEkC8DgCMQAHrYrzmBXuQbcqK0kJQ2jzMNtBUZVFRxg6ywxAuAUohGHmcHVBS83Wzyb5_tu5mxG7Ak3xGr3GOxtlwkivb5ZOyasAJbcxdn2tlNfrC46gidnmvohkWfJPHC8zntElYeLmahBl1NNf4JHvUqzHg09v7Ufbt_buv24_F-ZcPn7Zn54VmVRkLUTEFijChgYIom14jp3XDag3QMsYBsetb3vSEV6IlgnJGsGy7rtGg647So-ztznde2gk7nQrxapSzN5PyP6RTRt7_Ys2FHNy1FHVDGLBkcHxr4N3VgiHKyQSN46gsuiVIUtGap9HVIqEv_kAv3eJtai9RDdSckorcUYMaURrbu_RfvZrKs1Q9hXQAkKjTv1Dp6nAy2lnsTXp_T0B2Au1dCB77fY8lyDUSchcJCetaIyHX5p7_Pp295FcGEvBqB9xg6_qg00Fq3GOQHDnlpKHpCcpE1_9Pb01Ua562brExSelOGhJuB_R3s_tH_T8BaKrg5g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2490863242</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge, perceptions, and management of cancer-related fatigue: the patients' perspective</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><creator>Schmidt, Martina E. ; Bergbold, Susanne ; Hermann, Silke ; Steindorf, Karen</creator><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Martina E. ; Bergbold, Susanne ; Hermann, Silke ; Steindorf, Karen</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose This study aimed to assess cancer patients’ knowledge and perceptions regarding fatigue and to provide up-to-date information on the current fatigue management from the patients’ perspective. Methods The FiX study recruited 2508 cancer patients approximately 2 years after diagnosis via a cancer registry in Germany. Participants completed a questionnaire on their knowledge and perceptions of fatigue and the management received. Results More than half of respondents (58%), especially among the elderly patients, did not feel well informed about fatigue. Overall, 41% reported having never been asked about being exhausted by their treating physician. Even fewer patients stated that general practitioners or nurses have asked if they felt exhausted. Only 13% of patients who had experienced severe fatigue had received a fatigue assessment by means of a rating scale or questionnaire—although this is recommended by existing guidelines for fatigue screening. Health care professionals seemed less likely to address fatigue with elderly as well as female patients. The most commonly reported measure against fatigue was exercise or regular physical activity (68%). However, this was mostly done on patients’ own initiative. Psychological support was rarely used (13%) and only in approximately half of the cases upon the advice of a physician. Yoga, another promising intervention against fatigue, was performed by only 9% of patients. Conclusions Our study indicates deficits in terms of knowledge, education, screening, counseling, and treatment for fatigue and highlights starting points for targeted improvements in fatigue management based on patients’ needs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0941-4355</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7339</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05686-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32860177</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Aged ; Cancer ; Cancer patients ; Care and treatment ; Family physicians ; Fatigue ; Fatigue - therapy ; Female ; Health Care Sciences &amp; Services ; Humans ; Knowledge ; Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine ; Male ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medical screening ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Medicine, Experimental ; Neoplasms - psychology ; Nursing ; Nursing Research ; Oncology ; Original ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Patient satisfaction ; Perception ; Quality of life ; Quality of Life - psychology ; Questionnaires ; Rehabilitation ; Rehabilitation Medicine ; Science &amp; Technology ; Survivor</subject><ispartof>Supportive care in cancer, 2021-04, Vol.29 (4), p.2063-2071</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2021 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>27</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000563629300001</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-745a0a257c030719fce638958c00b5560eedfb69f2647b273652e1bdd9c0c8d33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-745a0a257c030719fce638958c00b5560eedfb69f2647b273652e1bdd9c0c8d33</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5215-5651 ; 0000-0002-2095-2426</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00520-020-05686-5$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00520-020-05686-5$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,782,786,887,27931,27932,39265,41495,42564,51326</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32860177$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Martina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergbold, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steindorf, Karen</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge, perceptions, and management of cancer-related fatigue: the patients' perspective</title><title>Supportive care in cancer</title><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><addtitle>SUPPORT CARE CANCER</addtitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><description>Purpose This study aimed to assess cancer patients’ knowledge and perceptions regarding fatigue and to provide up-to-date information on the current fatigue management from the patients’ perspective. Methods The FiX study recruited 2508 cancer patients approximately 2 years after diagnosis via a cancer registry in Germany. Participants completed a questionnaire on their knowledge and perceptions of fatigue and the management received. Results More than half of respondents (58%), especially among the elderly patients, did not feel well informed about fatigue. Overall, 41% reported having never been asked about being exhausted by their treating physician. Even fewer patients stated that general practitioners or nurses have asked if they felt exhausted. Only 13% of patients who had experienced severe fatigue had received a fatigue assessment by means of a rating scale or questionnaire—although this is recommended by existing guidelines for fatigue screening. Health care professionals seemed less likely to address fatigue with elderly as well as female patients. The most commonly reported measure against fatigue was exercise or regular physical activity (68%). However, this was mostly done on patients’ own initiative. Psychological support was rarely used (13%) and only in approximately half of the cases upon the advice of a physician. Yoga, another promising intervention against fatigue, was performed by only 9% of patients. Conclusions Our study indicates deficits in terms of knowledge, education, screening, counseling, and treatment for fatigue and highlights starting points for targeted improvements in fatigue management based on patients’ needs.</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Cancer patients</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Family physicians</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue - therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Care Sciences &amp; Services</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medical screening</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Medicine, Experimental</subject><subject>Neoplasms - psychology</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Nursing Research</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Original</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quality of Life - psychology</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Rehabilitation Medicine</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Survivor</subject><issn>0941-4355</issn><issn>1433-7339</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>HGBXW</sourceid><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl9r1jAUxoso7t30C3ghBS8cuM7TpElaL4Tx4j8ceKNXXoQ0Pe0y2qRL0g2_vSnvfOdEREpo0_6ep-ecPFn2rITTEkC8DgCMQAHrYrzmBXuQbcqK0kJQ2jzMNtBUZVFRxg6ywxAuAUohGHmcHVBS83Wzyb5_tu5mxG7Ak3xGr3GOxtlwkivb5ZOyasAJbcxdn2tlNfrC46gidnmvohkWfJPHC8zntElYeLmahBl1NNf4JHvUqzHg09v7Ufbt_buv24_F-ZcPn7Zn54VmVRkLUTEFijChgYIom14jp3XDag3QMsYBsetb3vSEV6IlgnJGsGy7rtGg647So-ztznde2gk7nQrxapSzN5PyP6RTRt7_Ys2FHNy1FHVDGLBkcHxr4N3VgiHKyQSN46gsuiVIUtGap9HVIqEv_kAv3eJtai9RDdSckorcUYMaURrbu_RfvZrKs1Q9hXQAkKjTv1Dp6nAy2lnsTXp_T0B2Au1dCB77fY8lyDUSchcJCetaIyHX5p7_Pp295FcGEvBqB9xg6_qg00Fq3GOQHDnlpKHpCcpE1_9Pb01Ua562brExSelOGhJuB_R3s_tH_T8BaKrg5g</recordid><startdate>20210401</startdate><enddate>20210401</enddate><creator>Schmidt, Martina E.</creator><creator>Bergbold, Susanne</creator><creator>Hermann, Silke</creator><creator>Steindorf, Karen</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>HGBXW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88J</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2R</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5215-5651</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-2426</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210401</creationdate><title>Knowledge, perceptions, and management of cancer-related fatigue: the patients' perspective</title><author>Schmidt, Martina E. ; Bergbold, Susanne ; Hermann, Silke ; Steindorf, Karen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c541t-745a0a257c030719fce638958c00b5560eedfb69f2647b273652e1bdd9c0c8d33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Cancer patients</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Family physicians</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue - therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Care Sciences &amp; Services</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Life Sciences &amp; Biomedicine</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medical screening</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Medicine, Experimental</topic><topic>Neoplasms - psychology</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Nursing Research</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Original</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quality of Life - psychology</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Rehabilitation Medicine</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Survivor</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Schmidt, Martina E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bergbold, Susanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hermann, Silke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Steindorf, Karen</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Social Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Social Science Database</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Schmidt, Martina E.</au><au>Bergbold, Susanne</au><au>Hermann, Silke</au><au>Steindorf, Karen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge, perceptions, and management of cancer-related fatigue: the patients' perspective</atitle><jtitle>Supportive care in cancer</jtitle><stitle>Support Care Cancer</stitle><stitle>SUPPORT CARE CANCER</stitle><addtitle>Support Care Cancer</addtitle><date>2021-04-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>2063</spage><epage>2071</epage><pages>2063-2071</pages><issn>0941-4355</issn><eissn>1433-7339</eissn><abstract>Purpose This study aimed to assess cancer patients’ knowledge and perceptions regarding fatigue and to provide up-to-date information on the current fatigue management from the patients’ perspective. Methods The FiX study recruited 2508 cancer patients approximately 2 years after diagnosis via a cancer registry in Germany. Participants completed a questionnaire on their knowledge and perceptions of fatigue and the management received. Results More than half of respondents (58%), especially among the elderly patients, did not feel well informed about fatigue. Overall, 41% reported having never been asked about being exhausted by their treating physician. Even fewer patients stated that general practitioners or nurses have asked if they felt exhausted. Only 13% of patients who had experienced severe fatigue had received a fatigue assessment by means of a rating scale or questionnaire—although this is recommended by existing guidelines for fatigue screening. Health care professionals seemed less likely to address fatigue with elderly as well as female patients. The most commonly reported measure against fatigue was exercise or regular physical activity (68%). However, this was mostly done on patients’ own initiative. Psychological support was rarely used (13%) and only in approximately half of the cases upon the advice of a physician. Yoga, another promising intervention against fatigue, was performed by only 9% of patients. Conclusions Our study indicates deficits in terms of knowledge, education, screening, counseling, and treatment for fatigue and highlights starting points for targeted improvements in fatigue management based on patients’ needs.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><pmid>32860177</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00520-020-05686-5</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5215-5651</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2095-2426</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0941-4355
ispartof Supportive care in cancer, 2021-04, Vol.29 (4), p.2063-2071
issn 0941-4355
1433-7339
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A652303280
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2021<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />
subjects Aged
Cancer
Cancer patients
Care and treatment
Family physicians
Fatigue
Fatigue - therapy
Female
Health Care Sciences & Services
Humans
Knowledge
Life Sciences & Biomedicine
Male
Medical personnel
Medical research
Medical screening
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Medicine, Experimental
Neoplasms - psychology
Nursing
Nursing Research
Oncology
Original
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Patient satisfaction
Perception
Quality of life
Quality of Life - psychology
Questionnaires
Rehabilitation
Rehabilitation Medicine
Science & Technology
Survivor
title Knowledge, perceptions, and management of cancer-related fatigue: the patients' perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-04T19%3A30%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge,%20perceptions,%20and%20management%20of%20cancer-related%20fatigue:%20the%20patients'%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Supportive%20care%20in%20cancer&rft.au=Schmidt,%20Martina%20E.&rft.date=2021-04-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=2063&rft.epage=2071&rft.pages=2063-2071&rft.issn=0941-4355&rft.eissn=1433-7339&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00520-020-05686-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_sprin%3EA652303280%3C/gale_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2490863242&rft_id=info:pmid/32860177&rft_galeid=A652303280&rfr_iscdi=true