Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants

In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regard...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Botanical review 2020-12, Vol.86 (3-4), p.180-210
Hauptverfasser: Sperotto, Patrícia, Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro, Vasconcelos, Thais N. C., Roque, Nádia
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 210
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 180
container_title The Botanical review
container_volume 86
creator Sperotto, Patrícia
Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro
Vasconcelos, Thais N. C.
Roque, Nádia
description In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regarding the climbing habit, with special attention to climbing mechanisms. We abide by previous suggestions that the terms “primary” and “secondary” hemiepiphyte be substituted by “hemiepiphyte” and “nomadic climber” respectively, thus emphasizing the relationship of the latter to the climbing habit. We also suggest that “climbing plant” or “climber” be used to describe plants displaying the climbing habit, and “liana” and “vine” be left for describing woody and herbaceous climbers respectively. As for climbing mechanisms, we propose an eight-category classification comprised of two major categories: passive climbing, containing scrambling, hooks or grapnels, and adhesive roots; and active climbing, containing twining, tendrils, prehensile branches, twining petioles, and twining inflorescences.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A646130042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A646130042</galeid><sourcerecordid>A646130042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-f616b53466840470908ee8c62f5e272f90c64811ca307aa620c41689f87309603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0k1LwzAcBvAgCs6XL-Cp4MlD9J-0S9OjDHXCcKLzHLIsqZE2kSSi89Mb3S6DIUoOeeH3BNI-CJ0QOCcA9UUklNIGAwUMDSUcL3fQgPC6wk1Z0100AACGOQGyjw5ifAEgpKn5AI1n_l2GRSxk8ZikW-S1_ZTJeld4U8x06K3znW-X39v0rItRZ_u5dW0xlnObCuuK-066FI_QnpFd1Mfr-RA9XV_NRmM8md7cji4nWA1LlrBhhM2HZcUYr6CqoQGuNVeMmqGmNTUNKFZxQpQsoZaSUVAVYbwxvC6hYVAeotPVva3stLDO-BSk6m1U4pJVjJQAFc0Kb1GtdjrIzjttbD7e8OdbfB4L3Vu1NXC2Ecgm6Y_UyrcYxe3jwz_s3Z8tv5n89si1Vb7rdKtF_uyj6aanK6-CjzFoI16D7WVYCgLiu0ZiVSORayR-aiSWOVSuQjFj1-ogXvxbcPkX_5b6AmhEwz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Sperotto, Patrícia ; Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro ; Vasconcelos, Thais N. C. ; Roque, Nádia</creator><creatorcontrib>Sperotto, Patrícia ; Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro ; Vasconcelos, Thais N. C. ; Roque, Nádia</creatorcontrib><description>In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regarding the climbing habit, with special attention to climbing mechanisms. We abide by previous suggestions that the terms “primary” and “secondary” hemiepiphyte be substituted by “hemiepiphyte” and “nomadic climber” respectively, thus emphasizing the relationship of the latter to the climbing habit. We also suggest that “climbing plant” or “climber” be used to describe plants displaying the climbing habit, and “liana” and “vine” be left for describing woody and herbaceous climbers respectively. As for climbing mechanisms, we propose an eight-category classification comprised of two major categories: passive climbing, containing scrambling, hooks or grapnels, and adhesive roots; and active climbing, containing twining, tendrils, prehensile branches, twining petioles, and twining inflorescences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-9372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climbing plants ; Life Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Terms and phrases</subject><ispartof>The Botanical review, 2020-12, Vol.86 (3-4), p.180-210</ispartof><rights>The New York Botanical Garden 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 New York Botanical Garden</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 New York Botanical Garden</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-f616b53466840470908ee8c62f5e272f90c64811ca307aa620c41689f87309603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-f616b53466840470908ee8c62f5e272f90c64811ca307aa620c41689f87309603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sperotto, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Thais N. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Nádia</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants</title><title>The Botanical review</title><addtitle>Bot. Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Botanical Review</addtitle><description>In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regarding the climbing habit, with special attention to climbing mechanisms. We abide by previous suggestions that the terms “primary” and “secondary” hemiepiphyte be substituted by “hemiepiphyte” and “nomadic climber” respectively, thus emphasizing the relationship of the latter to the climbing habit. We also suggest that “climbing plant” or “climber” be used to describe plants displaying the climbing habit, and “liana” and “vine” be left for describing woody and herbaceous climbers respectively. As for climbing mechanisms, we propose an eight-category classification comprised of two major categories: passive climbing, containing scrambling, hooks or grapnels, and adhesive roots; and active climbing, containing twining, tendrils, prehensile branches, twining petioles, and twining inflorescences.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climbing plants</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Terms and phrases</subject><issn>0006-8101</issn><issn>1874-9372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqV0k1LwzAcBvAgCs6XL-Cp4MlD9J-0S9OjDHXCcKLzHLIsqZE2kSSi89Mb3S6DIUoOeeH3BNI-CJ0QOCcA9UUklNIGAwUMDSUcL3fQgPC6wk1Z0100AACGOQGyjw5ifAEgpKn5AI1n_l2GRSxk8ZikW-S1_ZTJeld4U8x06K3znW-X39v0rItRZ_u5dW0xlnObCuuK-066FI_QnpFd1Mfr-RA9XV_NRmM8md7cji4nWA1LlrBhhM2HZcUYr6CqoQGuNVeMmqGmNTUNKFZxQpQsoZaSUVAVYbwxvC6hYVAeotPVva3stLDO-BSk6m1U4pJVjJQAFc0Kb1GtdjrIzjttbD7e8OdbfB4L3Vu1NXC2Ecgm6Y_UyrcYxe3jwz_s3Z8tv5n89si1Vb7rdKtF_uyj6aanK6-CjzFoI16D7WVYCgLiu0ZiVSORayR-aiSWOVSuQjFj1-ogXvxbcPkX_5b6AmhEwz4</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Sperotto, Patrícia</creator><creator>Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro</creator><creator>Vasconcelos, Thais N. C.</creator><creator>Roque, Nádia</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>New York Botanical Garden</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants</title><author>Sperotto, Patrícia ; Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro ; Vasconcelos, Thais N. C. ; Roque, Nádia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-f616b53466840470908ee8c62f5e272f90c64811ca307aa620c41689f87309603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climbing plants</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Terms and phrases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sperotto, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Thais N. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Nádia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>The Botanical review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sperotto, Patrícia</au><au>Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro</au><au>Vasconcelos, Thais N. C.</au><au>Roque, Nádia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants</atitle><jtitle>The Botanical review</jtitle><stitle>Bot. Rev</stitle><addtitle>Botanical Review</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>180-210</pages><issn>0006-8101</issn><eissn>1874-9372</eissn><abstract>In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regarding the climbing habit, with special attention to climbing mechanisms. We abide by previous suggestions that the terms “primary” and “secondary” hemiepiphyte be substituted by “hemiepiphyte” and “nomadic climber” respectively, thus emphasizing the relationship of the latter to the climbing habit. We also suggest that “climbing plant” or “climber” be used to describe plants displaying the climbing habit, and “liana” and “vine” be left for describing woody and herbaceous climbers respectively. As for climbing mechanisms, we propose an eight-category classification comprised of two major categories: passive climbing, containing scrambling, hooks or grapnels, and adhesive roots; and active climbing, containing twining, tendrils, prehensile branches, twining petioles, and twining inflorescences.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0006-8101
ispartof The Botanical review, 2020-12, Vol.86 (3-4), p.180-210
issn 0006-8101
1874-9372
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A646130042
source Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals
subjects Analysis
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Climbing plants
Life Sciences
Physiological aspects
Plant Anatomy/Development
Plant Ecology
Plant Physiology
Plant Sciences
Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography
Terms and phrases
title Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20Standardization%20of%20Terminology%20of%20the%20Climbing%20Habit%20in%20Plants&rft.jtitle=The%20Botanical%20review&rft.au=Sperotto,%20Patr%C3%ADcia&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=180-210&rft.issn=0006-8101&rft.eissn=1874-9372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA646130042%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A646130042&rfr_iscdi=true