Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants
In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regard...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Botanical review 2020-12, Vol.86 (3-4), p.180-210 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 210 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 180 |
container_title | The Botanical review |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Sperotto, Patrícia Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro Vasconcelos, Thais N. C. Roque, Nádia |
description | In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regarding the climbing habit, with special attention to climbing mechanisms. We abide by previous suggestions that the terms “primary” and “secondary” hemiepiphyte be substituted by “hemiepiphyte” and “nomadic climber” respectively, thus emphasizing the relationship of the latter to the climbing habit. We also suggest that “climbing plant” or “climber” be used to describe plants displaying the climbing habit, and “liana” and “vine” be left for describing woody and herbaceous climbers respectively. As for climbing mechanisms, we propose an eight-category classification comprised of two major categories: passive climbing, containing scrambling, hooks or grapnels, and adhesive roots; and active climbing, containing twining, tendrils, prehensile branches, twining petioles, and twining inflorescences. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A646130042</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A646130042</galeid><sourcerecordid>A646130042</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-f616b53466840470908ee8c62f5e272f90c64811ca307aa620c41689f87309603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqV0k1LwzAcBvAgCs6XL-Cp4MlD9J-0S9OjDHXCcKLzHLIsqZE2kSSi89Mb3S6DIUoOeeH3BNI-CJ0QOCcA9UUklNIGAwUMDSUcL3fQgPC6wk1Z0100AACGOQGyjw5ifAEgpKn5AI1n_l2GRSxk8ZikW-S1_ZTJeld4U8x06K3znW-X39v0rItRZ_u5dW0xlnObCuuK-066FI_QnpFd1Mfr-RA9XV_NRmM8md7cji4nWA1LlrBhhM2HZcUYr6CqoQGuNVeMmqGmNTUNKFZxQpQsoZaSUVAVYbwxvC6hYVAeotPVva3stLDO-BSk6m1U4pJVjJQAFc0Kb1GtdjrIzjttbD7e8OdbfB4L3Vu1NXC2Ecgm6Y_UyrcYxe3jwz_s3Z8tv5n89si1Vb7rdKtF_uyj6aanK6-CjzFoI16D7WVYCgLiu0ZiVSORayR-aiSWOVSuQjFj1-ogXvxbcPkX_5b6AmhEwz4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Sperotto, Patrícia ; Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro ; Vasconcelos, Thais N. C. ; Roque, Nádia</creator><creatorcontrib>Sperotto, Patrícia ; Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro ; Vasconcelos, Thais N. C. ; Roque, Nádia</creatorcontrib><description>In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regarding the climbing habit, with special attention to climbing mechanisms. We abide by previous suggestions that the terms “primary” and “secondary” hemiepiphyte be substituted by “hemiepiphyte” and “nomadic climber” respectively, thus emphasizing the relationship of the latter to the climbing habit. We also suggest that “climbing plant” or “climber” be used to describe plants displaying the climbing habit, and “liana” and “vine” be left for describing woody and herbaceous climbers respectively. As for climbing mechanisms, we propose an eight-category classification comprised of two major categories: passive climbing, containing scrambling, hooks or grapnels, and adhesive roots; and active climbing, containing twining, tendrils, prehensile branches, twining petioles, and twining inflorescences.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-8101</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1874-9372</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Climbing plants ; Life Sciences ; Physiological aspects ; Plant Anatomy/Development ; Plant Ecology ; Plant Physiology ; Plant Sciences ; Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography ; Terms and phrases</subject><ispartof>The Botanical review, 2020-12, Vol.86 (3-4), p.180-210</ispartof><rights>The New York Botanical Garden 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 New York Botanical Garden</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 New York Botanical Garden</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-f616b53466840470908ee8c62f5e272f90c64811ca307aa620c41689f87309603</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-f616b53466840470908ee8c62f5e272f90c64811ca307aa620c41689f87309603</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sperotto, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Thais N. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Nádia</creatorcontrib><title>Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants</title><title>The Botanical review</title><addtitle>Bot. Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Botanical Review</addtitle><description>In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regarding the climbing habit, with special attention to climbing mechanisms. We abide by previous suggestions that the terms “primary” and “secondary” hemiepiphyte be substituted by “hemiepiphyte” and “nomadic climber” respectively, thus emphasizing the relationship of the latter to the climbing habit. We also suggest that “climbing plant” or “climber” be used to describe plants displaying the climbing habit, and “liana” and “vine” be left for describing woody and herbaceous climbers respectively. As for climbing mechanisms, we propose an eight-category classification comprised of two major categories: passive climbing, containing scrambling, hooks or grapnels, and adhesive roots; and active climbing, containing twining, tendrils, prehensile branches, twining petioles, and twining inflorescences.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Climbing plants</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Plant Anatomy/Development</subject><subject>Plant Ecology</subject><subject>Plant Physiology</subject><subject>Plant Sciences</subject><subject>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</subject><subject>Terms and phrases</subject><issn>0006-8101</issn><issn>1874-9372</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqV0k1LwzAcBvAgCs6XL-Cp4MlD9J-0S9OjDHXCcKLzHLIsqZE2kSSi89Mb3S6DIUoOeeH3BNI-CJ0QOCcA9UUklNIGAwUMDSUcL3fQgPC6wk1Z0100AACGOQGyjw5ifAEgpKn5AI1n_l2GRSxk8ZikW-S1_ZTJeld4U8x06K3znW-X39v0rItRZ_u5dW0xlnObCuuK-066FI_QnpFd1Mfr-RA9XV_NRmM8md7cji4nWA1LlrBhhM2HZcUYr6CqoQGuNVeMmqGmNTUNKFZxQpQsoZaSUVAVYbwxvC6hYVAeotPVva3stLDO-BSk6m1U4pJVjJQAFc0Kb1GtdjrIzjttbD7e8OdbfB4L3Vu1NXC2Ecgm6Y_UyrcYxe3jwz_s3Z8tv5n89si1Vb7rdKtF_uyj6aanK6-CjzFoI16D7WVYCgLiu0ZiVSORayR-aiSWOVSuQjFj1-ogXvxbcPkX_5b6AmhEwz4</recordid><startdate>20201201</startdate><enddate>20201201</enddate><creator>Sperotto, Patrícia</creator><creator>Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro</creator><creator>Vasconcelos, Thais N. C.</creator><creator>Roque, Nádia</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>New York Botanical Garden</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20201201</creationdate><title>Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants</title><author>Sperotto, Patrícia ; Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro ; Vasconcelos, Thais N. C. ; Roque, Nádia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c536t-f616b53466840470908ee8c62f5e272f90c64811ca307aa620c41689f87309603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Climbing plants</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Plant Anatomy/Development</topic><topic>Plant Ecology</topic><topic>Plant Physiology</topic><topic>Plant Sciences</topic><topic>Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography</topic><topic>Terms and phrases</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sperotto, Patrícia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vasconcelos, Thais N. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Roque, Nádia</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>The Botanical review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sperotto, Patrícia</au><au>Acevedo-Rodríguez, Pedro</au><au>Vasconcelos, Thais N. C.</au><au>Roque, Nádia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants</atitle><jtitle>The Botanical review</jtitle><stitle>Bot. Rev</stitle><addtitle>Botanical Review</addtitle><date>2020-12-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>180</spage><epage>210</epage><pages>180-210</pages><issn>0006-8101</issn><eissn>1874-9372</eissn><abstract>In science, standardization of terminology is crucial to make information accessible and allow proper comparison of studies’ results. Climbing plants and the climbing habit have been described in numerous ways, frequently with imprecise and dubious terms. We propose a standardization of terms regarding the climbing habit, with special attention to climbing mechanisms. We abide by previous suggestions that the terms “primary” and “secondary” hemiepiphyte be substituted by “hemiepiphyte” and “nomadic climber” respectively, thus emphasizing the relationship of the latter to the climbing habit. We also suggest that “climbing plant” or “climber” be used to describe plants displaying the climbing habit, and “liana” and “vine” be left for describing woody and herbaceous climbers respectively. As for climbing mechanisms, we propose an eight-category classification comprised of two major categories: passive climbing, containing scrambling, hooks or grapnels, and adhesive roots; and active climbing, containing twining, tendrils, prehensile branches, twining petioles, and twining inflorescences.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><doi>10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y</doi><tpages>31</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-8101 |
ispartof | The Botanical review, 2020-12, Vol.86 (3-4), p.180-210 |
issn | 0006-8101 1874-9372 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A646130042 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Analysis Biomedical and Life Sciences Climbing plants Life Sciences Physiological aspects Plant Anatomy/Development Plant Ecology Plant Physiology Plant Sciences Plant Systematics/Taxonomy/Biogeography Terms and phrases |
title | Towards a Standardization of Terminology of the Climbing Habit in Plants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T18%3A24%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Towards%20a%20Standardization%20of%20Terminology%20of%20the%20Climbing%20Habit%20in%20Plants&rft.jtitle=The%20Botanical%20review&rft.au=Sperotto,%20Patr%C3%ADcia&rft.date=2020-12-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=180&rft.epage=210&rft.pages=180-210&rft.issn=0006-8101&rft.eissn=1874-9372&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12229-020-09218-y&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA646130042%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A646130042&rfr_iscdi=true |