Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in high-risk surgical patients (ASA Class III): results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparative trial

Purpose Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative is equally effective as propofol in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia with improved hemodynamic stability in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I and II patients. This trial investigated remimazolam’s eff...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of anesthesia 2020-08, Vol.34 (4), p.491-501
Hauptverfasser: Doi, Matsuyuki, Hirata, Naoyuki, Suzuki, Toshiyasu, Morisaki, Hiroshi, Morimatsu, Hiroshi, Sakamoto, Atsuhiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 501
container_issue 4
container_start_page 491
container_title Journal of anesthesia
container_volume 34
creator Doi, Matsuyuki
Hirata, Naoyuki
Suzuki, Toshiyasu
Morisaki, Hiroshi
Morimatsu, Hiroshi
Sakamoto, Atsuhiro
description Purpose Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative is equally effective as propofol in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia with improved hemodynamic stability in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I and II patients. This trial investigated remimazolam’s efficacy and safety in vulnerable patients (ASA Class III) undergoing elective general surgery. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 67 adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia with two remimazolam induction doses (6 mg kg −1  h −1 —group A and 12 mg kg −1  h −1 —group B) has been conducted in 6 trials sites in Japan. Remimazolam was infused up to 2 mg kg −1  h −1 for maintenance of anesthesia in both groups. Results The functional anesthetic capability of the investigated drug was 100% in both arms. The mean time to loss of consciousness (LoC) was significantly shorter in group B (81.7 s) compared to group A (97.2 s), p  = 0.0139. The mean bispectral index (BIS) value during maintenance of anesthesia ranged from 46.0 to 68.0 and from 44.7 to 67.5 in group A and B, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the remimazolam arms concerning the incidence of blood pressure (BP) decrease (67.7% in group B vs. 54.8% in group A), recovery profile or the incidence or severity of adverse events (AEs) or adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Conclusion Both induction regimens (6 and 12 mg kg −1  h −1 ) were equally efficacious and safe in surgical patients ASA Class III. A significantly shorter time to LoC was observed with the higher remimazolam dosage. Clinical trial registration This trial is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center—Clinical Trials Information (JapicCTI). JapicCTI number: 121977.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00540-020-02776-w
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A630446943</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A630446943</galeid><sourcerecordid>A630446943</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-2dd82f6846ec0802fbd8bbd8bd93720c6eaa30022e71f8589d9a9b5db608f1773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ktGK1DAUhoso7rj6Al5IwBsXpmvadNJ074Zh1YEFL1avS5qcdLKmyZC0LrOP6tN4urMKwiBpSMn5_v-E5M-ytwW9LCitPyZKVxXNaTnPuub5_bNsUVRM5IKtmufZgjYFywXn4ix7ldIdpZQXBXuZnbGSUSZEtch-3UoD44FIrwkYY5VUBxIMiTDYQT4EJwdiPX56UqMN_hEcpPUjeOkVzGwPHqJ0WII07iBZOUt2tt_l0aYfJE2xR2NH9nK04MdEPqxv12TjZEpku91eXGG7NDksoJskA_5ahSDEJYnYMAz2AfSS6DB1DvLO4XGW6IZNHbi8j2HaExWGeWe0P4GM0Ur3OnthpEvw5mk9z75_uv62-ZLffP283axvcrXizZiXWovScFFxUFTQ0nRadPPUDatLqjhIySgtS6gLI1ai0Y1supXuOBWmqGt2nr0_-vbSQWu9CWOUarBJtWvOaFXxpmJI5Seop6sLHozF7X_4yxM8Do0vo04KyqNAxZBSBNPuIz5hPLQFbee8tMe8tJiX9jEv7T2K3h1F-6kbQP-V_AkIAuwIJCz5HmJ7F6bo8T7_Z_sb0eHO6g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in high-risk surgical patients (ASA Class III): results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparative trial</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><creator>Doi, Matsuyuki ; Hirata, Naoyuki ; Suzuki, Toshiyasu ; Morisaki, Hiroshi ; Morimatsu, Hiroshi ; Sakamoto, Atsuhiro</creator><creatorcontrib>Doi, Matsuyuki ; Hirata, Naoyuki ; Suzuki, Toshiyasu ; Morisaki, Hiroshi ; Morimatsu, Hiroshi ; Sakamoto, Atsuhiro</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative is equally effective as propofol in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia with improved hemodynamic stability in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I and II patients. This trial investigated remimazolam’s efficacy and safety in vulnerable patients (ASA Class III) undergoing elective general surgery. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 67 adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia with two remimazolam induction doses (6 mg kg −1  h −1 —group A and 12 mg kg −1  h −1 —group B) has been conducted in 6 trials sites in Japan. Remimazolam was infused up to 2 mg kg −1  h −1 for maintenance of anesthesia in both groups. Results The functional anesthetic capability of the investigated drug was 100% in both arms. The mean time to loss of consciousness (LoC) was significantly shorter in group B (81.7 s) compared to group A (97.2 s), p  = 0.0139. The mean bispectral index (BIS) value during maintenance of anesthesia ranged from 46.0 to 68.0 and from 44.7 to 67.5 in group A and B, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the remimazolam arms concerning the incidence of blood pressure (BP) decrease (67.7% in group B vs. 54.8% in group A), recovery profile or the incidence or severity of adverse events (AEs) or adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Conclusion Both induction regimens (6 and 12 mg kg −1  h −1 ) were equally efficacious and safe in surgical patients ASA Class III. A significantly shorter time to LoC was observed with the higher remimazolam dosage. Clinical trial registration This trial is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center—Clinical Trials Information (JapicCTI). JapicCTI number: 121977.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0913-8668</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1438-8359</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00540-020-02776-w</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32303884</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Singapore: Springer Singapore</publisher><subject>Adult ; Anesthesia ; Anesthesia, General - adverse effects ; Anesthesiology ; Benzodiazepines ; Clinical trials ; Comparative analysis ; Critical Care Medicine ; Double-Blind Method ; Emergency Medicine ; Hospital patients ; Humans ; Hypnotics and Sedatives ; Intensive ; Japan ; Maintenance ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Midazolam - adverse effects ; Original Article ; Pain Medicine ; Pharmaceutical industry ; Propofol - adverse effects</subject><ispartof>Journal of anesthesia, 2020-08, Vol.34 (4), p.491-501</ispartof><rights>Japanese Society of Anesthesiologists 2020</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Springer</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-2dd82f6846ec0802fbd8bbd8bd93720c6eaa30022e71f8589d9a9b5db608f1773</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-2dd82f6846ec0802fbd8bbd8bd93720c6eaa30022e71f8589d9a9b5db608f1773</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s00540-020-02776-w$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00540-020-02776-w$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,41488,42557,51319</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32303884$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Doi, Matsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirata, Naoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Toshiyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morisaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimatsu, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Atsuhiro</creatorcontrib><title>Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in high-risk surgical patients (ASA Class III): results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparative trial</title><title>Journal of anesthesia</title><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><description>Purpose Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative is equally effective as propofol in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia with improved hemodynamic stability in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I and II patients. This trial investigated remimazolam’s efficacy and safety in vulnerable patients (ASA Class III) undergoing elective general surgery. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 67 adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia with two remimazolam induction doses (6 mg kg −1  h −1 —group A and 12 mg kg −1  h −1 —group B) has been conducted in 6 trials sites in Japan. Remimazolam was infused up to 2 mg kg −1  h −1 for maintenance of anesthesia in both groups. Results The functional anesthetic capability of the investigated drug was 100% in both arms. The mean time to loss of consciousness (LoC) was significantly shorter in group B (81.7 s) compared to group A (97.2 s), p  = 0.0139. The mean bispectral index (BIS) value during maintenance of anesthesia ranged from 46.0 to 68.0 and from 44.7 to 67.5 in group A and B, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the remimazolam arms concerning the incidence of blood pressure (BP) decrease (67.7% in group B vs. 54.8% in group A), recovery profile or the incidence or severity of adverse events (AEs) or adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Conclusion Both induction regimens (6 and 12 mg kg −1  h −1 ) were equally efficacious and safe in surgical patients ASA Class III. A significantly shorter time to LoC was observed with the higher remimazolam dosage. Clinical trial registration This trial is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center—Clinical Trials Information (JapicCTI). JapicCTI number: 121977.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Anesthesia, General - adverse effects</subject><subject>Anesthesiology</subject><subject>Benzodiazepines</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Critical Care Medicine</subject><subject>Double-Blind Method</subject><subject>Emergency Medicine</subject><subject>Hospital patients</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Hypnotics and Sedatives</subject><subject>Intensive</subject><subject>Japan</subject><subject>Maintenance</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Midazolam - adverse effects</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Pain Medicine</subject><subject>Pharmaceutical industry</subject><subject>Propofol - adverse effects</subject><issn>0913-8668</issn><issn>1438-8359</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9ktGK1DAUhoso7rj6Al5IwBsXpmvadNJ074Zh1YEFL1avS5qcdLKmyZC0LrOP6tN4urMKwiBpSMn5_v-E5M-ytwW9LCitPyZKVxXNaTnPuub5_bNsUVRM5IKtmufZgjYFywXn4ix7ldIdpZQXBXuZnbGSUSZEtch-3UoD44FIrwkYY5VUBxIMiTDYQT4EJwdiPX56UqMN_hEcpPUjeOkVzGwPHqJ0WII07iBZOUt2tt_l0aYfJE2xR2NH9nK04MdEPqxv12TjZEpku91eXGG7NDksoJskA_5ahSDEJYnYMAz2AfSS6DB1DvLO4XGW6IZNHbi8j2HaExWGeWe0P4GM0Ur3OnthpEvw5mk9z75_uv62-ZLffP283axvcrXizZiXWovScFFxUFTQ0nRadPPUDatLqjhIySgtS6gLI1ai0Y1supXuOBWmqGt2nr0_-vbSQWu9CWOUarBJtWvOaFXxpmJI5Seop6sLHozF7X_4yxM8Do0vo04KyqNAxZBSBNPuIz5hPLQFbee8tMe8tJiX9jEv7T2K3h1F-6kbQP-V_AkIAuwIJCz5HmJ7F6bo8T7_Z_sb0eHO6g</recordid><startdate>20200801</startdate><enddate>20200801</enddate><creator>Doi, Matsuyuki</creator><creator>Hirata, Naoyuki</creator><creator>Suzuki, Toshiyasu</creator><creator>Morisaki, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Morimatsu, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Sakamoto, Atsuhiro</creator><general>Springer Singapore</general><general>Springer</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200801</creationdate><title>Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in high-risk surgical patients (ASA Class III): results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparative trial</title><author>Doi, Matsuyuki ; Hirata, Naoyuki ; Suzuki, Toshiyasu ; Morisaki, Hiroshi ; Morimatsu, Hiroshi ; Sakamoto, Atsuhiro</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c569t-2dd82f6846ec0802fbd8bbd8bd93720c6eaa30022e71f8589d9a9b5db608f1773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Anesthesia, General - adverse effects</topic><topic>Anesthesiology</topic><topic>Benzodiazepines</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Critical Care Medicine</topic><topic>Double-Blind Method</topic><topic>Emergency Medicine</topic><topic>Hospital patients</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Hypnotics and Sedatives</topic><topic>Intensive</topic><topic>Japan</topic><topic>Maintenance</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Midazolam - adverse effects</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Pain Medicine</topic><topic>Pharmaceutical industry</topic><topic>Propofol - adverse effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Doi, Matsuyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirata, Naoyuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suzuki, Toshiyasu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morisaki, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morimatsu, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sakamoto, Atsuhiro</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Doi, Matsuyuki</au><au>Hirata, Naoyuki</au><au>Suzuki, Toshiyasu</au><au>Morisaki, Hiroshi</au><au>Morimatsu, Hiroshi</au><au>Sakamoto, Atsuhiro</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in high-risk surgical patients (ASA Class III): results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparative trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of anesthesia</jtitle><stitle>J Anesth</stitle><addtitle>J Anesth</addtitle><date>2020-08-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>501</epage><pages>491-501</pages><issn>0913-8668</issn><eissn>1438-8359</eissn><abstract>Purpose Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting benzodiazepine sedative is equally effective as propofol in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia with improved hemodynamic stability in American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Class I and II patients. This trial investigated remimazolam’s efficacy and safety in vulnerable patients (ASA Class III) undergoing elective general surgery. Methods A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial in 67 adult surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia with two remimazolam induction doses (6 mg kg −1  h −1 —group A and 12 mg kg −1  h −1 —group B) has been conducted in 6 trials sites in Japan. Remimazolam was infused up to 2 mg kg −1  h −1 for maintenance of anesthesia in both groups. Results The functional anesthetic capability of the investigated drug was 100% in both arms. The mean time to loss of consciousness (LoC) was significantly shorter in group B (81.7 s) compared to group A (97.2 s), p  = 0.0139. The mean bispectral index (BIS) value during maintenance of anesthesia ranged from 46.0 to 68.0 and from 44.7 to 67.5 in group A and B, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between the remimazolam arms concerning the incidence of blood pressure (BP) decrease (67.7% in group B vs. 54.8% in group A), recovery profile or the incidence or severity of adverse events (AEs) or adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Conclusion Both induction regimens (6 and 12 mg kg −1  h −1 ) were equally efficacious and safe in surgical patients ASA Class III. A significantly shorter time to LoC was observed with the higher remimazolam dosage. Clinical trial registration This trial is registered with the Japan Pharmaceutical Information Center—Clinical Trials Information (JapicCTI). JapicCTI number: 121977.</abstract><cop>Singapore</cop><pub>Springer Singapore</pub><pmid>32303884</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00540-020-02776-w</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0913-8668
ispartof Journal of anesthesia, 2020-08, Vol.34 (4), p.491-501
issn 0913-8668
1438-8359
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A630446943
source MEDLINE; SpringerNature Journals
subjects Adult
Anesthesia
Anesthesia, General - adverse effects
Anesthesiology
Benzodiazepines
Clinical trials
Comparative analysis
Critical Care Medicine
Double-Blind Method
Emergency Medicine
Hospital patients
Humans
Hypnotics and Sedatives
Intensive
Japan
Maintenance
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Midazolam - adverse effects
Original Article
Pain Medicine
Pharmaceutical industry
Propofol - adverse effects
title Safety and efficacy of remimazolam in induction and maintenance of general anesthesia in high-risk surgical patients (ASA Class III): results of a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group comparative trial
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T10%3A48%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Safety%20and%20efficacy%20of%20remimazolam%20in%20induction%20and%20maintenance%20of%20general%20anesthesia%20in%20high-risk%20surgical%20patients%20(ASA%20Class%20III):%20results%20of%20a%20multicenter,%20randomized,%20double-blind,%20parallel-group%20comparative%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20anesthesia&rft.au=Doi,%20Matsuyuki&rft.date=2020-08-01&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=501&rft.pages=491-501&rft.issn=0913-8668&rft.eissn=1438-8359&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00540-020-02776-w&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA630446943%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/32303884&rft_galeid=A630446943&rfr_iscdi=true