Exploring subjective constructions of health in China: a Q-methodological investigation
Background With an increasing awareness of people's satisfaction and feeling, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an essential aspect of measuring health. HRQoL is fundamentally a foreign concept introduced to China from the West. While a growing number of studies applied western...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Health and quality of life outcomes 2020-06, Vol.18 (1), p.1-165, Article 165 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 165 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Health and quality of life outcomes |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Mao, Zhuxin Ahmed, Shenaz Graham, Christopher Kind, Paul |
description | Background With an increasing awareness of people's satisfaction and feeling, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an essential aspect of measuring health. HRQoL is fundamentally a foreign concept introduced to China from the West. While a growing number of studies applied western HRQoL measures, few content validity tests examined the legitimacy of applying Western developed HRQoL measures in a Chinese cultural setting. If there are distinct differences in health conceptualisation between China and the West, it can be argued that those western measures may fail to ask the most appropriate and important questions among a Chinese population in assessing health. As a limited number of studies have investigated Chinese people's understandings of health, this study aimed to explore how health is defined and described in China. Methods A Q-methodological study was conducted to explore subjective constructions of health among Chinese participants. A scoping review of Chinese generic HRQoL measures, supplemented by a series of qualitative interviews conducted in China, produced a list of 42 statements representing aspects of health considered as being important in a Chinese cultural setting. Chinese participants in face-to-face interviews ranked and sorted these statements. Data were analysed to identify clusters of participants who shared a similar perspective, using a by-person factor analysis procedure. Results 110 Chinese participants with various demographics characteristics completed sorting interviews. Five independent factors emerged: (I) "Physical independence and social interaction skills"; (II) "Physical health"; (III) "Sensations and feelings"; (IV) "Lifestyles"; (V) "Learning and working abilities". Conclusions The Q-study showed that many health statements were rated highly as most important by a diverse range of Chinese participants but were not covered in the commonly used Western HRQoL measure EQ-5D. It then suggests that the EQ-5D descriptive system might need modification to improve its capacity to measure health status in China. The study thus raises a general question as to how appropriate the Western-developed HRQoL measures are when used to assess health in a significantly different cultural setting. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12955-020-01414-z |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A627389890</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A627389890</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_35b8c3fe81664708a62bee333bfbcaae</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A627389890</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-4a8e3356d762618b6c9847b58c4787bcc21da51e5fcb1e87e77b7e6018db8f8f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6B7wqeKNI13wn9UJYhlUHFsQvvAxJetrJ0GnGJh3X_fVmpsvqiBeSi5wkz_uGnLxF8RSjc4yVeBUxqTmvEEEVwgyz6uZecYqZlJXkhN__oz4pHsW4RohQQvjD4oQSVlPKyGnx7fJ624fRD10ZJ7sGl_wOSheGmMYpL3JRhrZcgenTqvRDuVj5wbwuTfmx2kBahSb0ofPO9PlwBzH5zuxVj4sHrekjPLmdz4qvby-_LN5XVx_eLRcXV5XjkqWKGQWUctFIQQRWVrhaMWm5ckwqaZ0juDEcA2-dxaAkSGklCIRVY1WrWnpWLGffJpi13o5-Y8afOhivDxth7LQZk3c9aMqtcrQFhYVgEikjiIV8O7WtdcZA9noze20nu4HGwZBG0x-ZHp8MfqW7sNOSCCUxzQbPbw3G8H3KzdAbHx30vRkgTFEThmpBa1LLjD77C12HaRxyqzKFWY0EkuI31Zn8AD-0Id_r9qb6QhBJVa1qlKnzf1B5NLDx-Suh9Xn_SPDiSJCZBNepM1OMevn50zFLZtaNIcYR2rt-YKT3MdRzDHWOoT7EUN9kkZpFP8CGNjoPg4M7IUKIsxxGxXOFyMKnQ2QWYRpSlr78fyn9BQQK7pI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2414906076</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Exploring subjective constructions of health in China: a Q-methodological investigation</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>SpringerNature Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /></source><source>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</source><creator>Mao, Zhuxin ; Ahmed, Shenaz ; Graham, Christopher ; Kind, Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Mao, Zhuxin ; Ahmed, Shenaz ; Graham, Christopher ; Kind, Paul</creatorcontrib><description>Background With an increasing awareness of people's satisfaction and feeling, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an essential aspect of measuring health. HRQoL is fundamentally a foreign concept introduced to China from the West. While a growing number of studies applied western HRQoL measures, few content validity tests examined the legitimacy of applying Western developed HRQoL measures in a Chinese cultural setting. If there are distinct differences in health conceptualisation between China and the West, it can be argued that those western measures may fail to ask the most appropriate and important questions among a Chinese population in assessing health. As a limited number of studies have investigated Chinese people's understandings of health, this study aimed to explore how health is defined and described in China. Methods A Q-methodological study was conducted to explore subjective constructions of health among Chinese participants. A scoping review of Chinese generic HRQoL measures, supplemented by a series of qualitative interviews conducted in China, produced a list of 42 statements representing aspects of health considered as being important in a Chinese cultural setting. Chinese participants in face-to-face interviews ranked and sorted these statements. Data were analysed to identify clusters of participants who shared a similar perspective, using a by-person factor analysis procedure. Results 110 Chinese participants with various demographics characteristics completed sorting interviews. Five independent factors emerged: (I) "Physical independence and social interaction skills"; (II) "Physical health"; (III) "Sensations and feelings"; (IV) "Lifestyles"; (V) "Learning and working abilities". Conclusions The Q-study showed that many health statements were rated highly as most important by a diverse range of Chinese participants but were not covered in the commonly used Western HRQoL measure EQ-5D. It then suggests that the EQ-5D descriptive system might need modification to improve its capacity to measure health status in China. The study thus raises a general question as to how appropriate the Western-developed HRQoL measures are when used to assess health in a significantly different cultural setting.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1477-7525</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1477-7525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12955-020-01414-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32493342</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>LONDON: Springer Nature</publisher><subject>Analysis ; China ; Cluster analysis ; Cultural differences ; Demographics ; Demography ; Factor analysis ; Health ; Health Care Sciences & Services ; Health Policy & Services ; Health-related quality of life ; Interviews ; Investigations ; Life Sciences & Biomedicine ; Nursing homes ; Population ; Q-methodology ; Qualitative study ; Quality of life ; Quantitative psychology ; Questions ; Researchers ; Science & Technology ; Social aspects ; Social factors ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020-06, Vol.18 (1), p.1-165, Article 165</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>9</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000540028500002</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-4a8e3356d762618b6c9847b58c4787bcc21da51e5fcb1e87e77b7e6018db8f8f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-4a8e3356d762618b6c9847b58c4787bcc21da51e5fcb1e87e77b7e6018db8f8f3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8456-9154 ; 0000-0002-7444-1584</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268713/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7268713/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2115,27929,27930,28253,28254,53796,53798</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mao, Zhuxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shenaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kind, Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Exploring subjective constructions of health in China: a Q-methodological investigation</title><title>Health and quality of life outcomes</title><addtitle>HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT</addtitle><description>Background With an increasing awareness of people's satisfaction and feeling, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an essential aspect of measuring health. HRQoL is fundamentally a foreign concept introduced to China from the West. While a growing number of studies applied western HRQoL measures, few content validity tests examined the legitimacy of applying Western developed HRQoL measures in a Chinese cultural setting. If there are distinct differences in health conceptualisation between China and the West, it can be argued that those western measures may fail to ask the most appropriate and important questions among a Chinese population in assessing health. As a limited number of studies have investigated Chinese people's understandings of health, this study aimed to explore how health is defined and described in China. Methods A Q-methodological study was conducted to explore subjective constructions of health among Chinese participants. A scoping review of Chinese generic HRQoL measures, supplemented by a series of qualitative interviews conducted in China, produced a list of 42 statements representing aspects of health considered as being important in a Chinese cultural setting. Chinese participants in face-to-face interviews ranked and sorted these statements. Data were analysed to identify clusters of participants who shared a similar perspective, using a by-person factor analysis procedure. Results 110 Chinese participants with various demographics characteristics completed sorting interviews. Five independent factors emerged: (I) "Physical independence and social interaction skills"; (II) "Physical health"; (III) "Sensations and feelings"; (IV) "Lifestyles"; (V) "Learning and working abilities". Conclusions The Q-study showed that many health statements were rated highly as most important by a diverse range of Chinese participants but were not covered in the commonly used Western HRQoL measure EQ-5D. It then suggests that the EQ-5D descriptive system might need modification to improve its capacity to measure health status in China. The study thus raises a general question as to how appropriate the Western-developed HRQoL measures are when used to assess health in a significantly different cultural setting.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Demographics</subject><subject>Demography</subject><subject>Factor analysis</subject><subject>Health</subject><subject>Health Care Sciences & Services</subject><subject>Health Policy & Services</subject><subject>Health-related quality of life</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Investigations</subject><subject>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</subject><subject>Nursing homes</subject><subject>Population</subject><subject>Q-methodology</subject><subject>Qualitative study</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Quantitative psychology</subject><subject>Questions</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science & Technology</subject><subject>Social aspects</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1477-7525</issn><issn>1477-7525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ARHDP</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkl2L1DAUhoso7rr6B7wqeKNI13wn9UJYhlUHFsQvvAxJetrJ0GnGJh3X_fVmpsvqiBeSi5wkz_uGnLxF8RSjc4yVeBUxqTmvEEEVwgyz6uZecYqZlJXkhN__oz4pHsW4RohQQvjD4oQSVlPKyGnx7fJ624fRD10ZJ7sGl_wOSheGmMYpL3JRhrZcgenTqvRDuVj5wbwuTfmx2kBahSb0ofPO9PlwBzH5zuxVj4sHrekjPLmdz4qvby-_LN5XVx_eLRcXV5XjkqWKGQWUctFIQQRWVrhaMWm5ckwqaZ0juDEcA2-dxaAkSGklCIRVY1WrWnpWLGffJpi13o5-Y8afOhivDxth7LQZk3c9aMqtcrQFhYVgEikjiIV8O7WtdcZA9noze20nu4HGwZBG0x-ZHp8MfqW7sNOSCCUxzQbPbw3G8H3KzdAbHx30vRkgTFEThmpBa1LLjD77C12HaRxyqzKFWY0EkuI31Zn8AD-0Id_r9qb6QhBJVa1qlKnzf1B5NLDx-Suh9Xn_SPDiSJCZBNepM1OMevn50zFLZtaNIcYR2rt-YKT3MdRzDHWOoT7EUN9kkZpFP8CGNjoPg4M7IUKIsxxGxXOFyMKnQ2QWYRpSlr78fyn9BQQK7pI</recordid><startdate>20200603</startdate><enddate>20200603</enddate><creator>Mao, Zhuxin</creator><creator>Ahmed, Shenaz</creator><creator>Graham, Christopher</creator><creator>Kind, Paul</creator><general>Springer Nature</general><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>17B</scope><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>ARHDP</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>DVR</scope><scope>EGQ</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-9154</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-1584</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200603</creationdate><title>Exploring subjective constructions of health in China: a Q-methodological investigation</title><author>Mao, Zhuxin ; Ahmed, Shenaz ; Graham, Christopher ; Kind, Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c574t-4a8e3356d762618b6c9847b58c4787bcc21da51e5fcb1e87e77b7e6018db8f8f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Demographics</topic><topic>Demography</topic><topic>Factor analysis</topic><topic>Health</topic><topic>Health Care Sciences & Services</topic><topic>Health Policy & Services</topic><topic>Health-related quality of life</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Investigations</topic><topic>Life Sciences & Biomedicine</topic><topic>Nursing homes</topic><topic>Population</topic><topic>Q-methodology</topic><topic>Qualitative study</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Quantitative psychology</topic><topic>Questions</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science & Technology</topic><topic>Social aspects</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mao, Zhuxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ahmed, Shenaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Graham, Christopher</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kind, Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Knowledge</collection><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>Social Sciences Citation Index</collection><collection>Web of Science Primary (SCIE, SSCI & AHCI)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Health and quality of life outcomes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mao, Zhuxin</au><au>Ahmed, Shenaz</au><au>Graham, Christopher</au><au>Kind, Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Exploring subjective constructions of health in China: a Q-methodological investigation</atitle><jtitle>Health and quality of life outcomes</jtitle><stitle>HEALTH QUAL LIFE OUT</stitle><date>2020-06-03</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>165</epage><pages>1-165</pages><artnum>165</artnum><issn>1477-7525</issn><eissn>1477-7525</eissn><abstract>Background With an increasing awareness of people's satisfaction and feeling, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has become an essential aspect of measuring health. HRQoL is fundamentally a foreign concept introduced to China from the West. While a growing number of studies applied western HRQoL measures, few content validity tests examined the legitimacy of applying Western developed HRQoL measures in a Chinese cultural setting. If there are distinct differences in health conceptualisation between China and the West, it can be argued that those western measures may fail to ask the most appropriate and important questions among a Chinese population in assessing health. As a limited number of studies have investigated Chinese people's understandings of health, this study aimed to explore how health is defined and described in China. Methods A Q-methodological study was conducted to explore subjective constructions of health among Chinese participants. A scoping review of Chinese generic HRQoL measures, supplemented by a series of qualitative interviews conducted in China, produced a list of 42 statements representing aspects of health considered as being important in a Chinese cultural setting. Chinese participants in face-to-face interviews ranked and sorted these statements. Data were analysed to identify clusters of participants who shared a similar perspective, using a by-person factor analysis procedure. Results 110 Chinese participants with various demographics characteristics completed sorting interviews. Five independent factors emerged: (I) "Physical independence and social interaction skills"; (II) "Physical health"; (III) "Sensations and feelings"; (IV) "Lifestyles"; (V) "Learning and working abilities". Conclusions The Q-study showed that many health statements were rated highly as most important by a diverse range of Chinese participants but were not covered in the commonly used Western HRQoL measure EQ-5D. It then suggests that the EQ-5D descriptive system might need modification to improve its capacity to measure health status in China. The study thus raises a general question as to how appropriate the Western-developed HRQoL measures are when used to assess health in a significantly different cultural setting.</abstract><cop>LONDON</cop><pub>Springer Nature</pub><pmid>32493342</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12955-020-01414-z</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8456-9154</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7444-1584</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1477-7525 |
ispartof | Health and quality of life outcomes, 2020-06, Vol.18 (1), p.1-165, Article 165 |
issn | 1477-7525 1477-7525 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A627389890 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; SpringerNature Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Web of Science - Social Sciences Citation Index – 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; Springer Nature OA/Free Journals |
subjects | Analysis China Cluster analysis Cultural differences Demographics Demography Factor analysis Health Health Care Sciences & Services Health Policy & Services Health-related quality of life Interviews Investigations Life Sciences & Biomedicine Nursing homes Population Q-methodology Qualitative study Quality of life Quantitative psychology Questions Researchers Science & Technology Social aspects Social factors Studies |
title | Exploring subjective constructions of health in China: a Q-methodological investigation |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T03%3A24%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Exploring%20subjective%20constructions%20of%20health%20in%20China:%20a%20Q-methodological%20investigation&rft.jtitle=Health%20and%20quality%20of%20life%20outcomes&rft.au=Mao,%20Zhuxin&rft.date=2020-06-03&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=165&rft.pages=1-165&rft.artnum=165&rft.issn=1477-7525&rft.eissn=1477-7525&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12955-020-01414-z&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA627389890%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2414906076&rft_id=info:pmid/32493342&rft_galeid=A627389890&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_35b8c3fe81664708a62bee333bfbcaae&rfr_iscdi=true |