The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia

Background Women-held maternity documents are well established for enabling continuity of maternity care worldwide, with the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommending their use in effective decision-making. We aimed to assess the presence, content and completeness of women-held maternity document...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:PloS one 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230063-e0230063, Article 0230063
Hauptverfasser: Gustafsson, Lotta, Lu, Fides, Rickard, Faith, MacArthur, Christine, Cummins, Carole, Coker, Ivan, Mane, Kebba, Manneh, Kebba, Wilson, Amie, Manaseki-Holland, Semira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page e0230063
container_issue 3
container_start_page e0230063
container_title PloS one
container_volume 15
creator Gustafsson, Lotta
Lu, Fides
Rickard, Faith
MacArthur, Christine
Cummins, Carole
Coker, Ivan
Mane, Kebba
Manneh, Kebba
Wilson, Amie
Manaseki-Holland, Semira
description Background Women-held maternity documents are well established for enabling continuity of maternity care worldwide, with the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommending their use in effective decision-making. We aimed to assess the presence, content and completeness of women-held maternity documents at admission to hospitals in The Gambia, and investigate barriers and facilitators to their completion. Methods We interviewed 250 women on maternity wards of all 3 Banjul hospitals and conducted content analysis of documentation brought by women on admission for their completeness against WHO referrals criteria. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of the minimum criteria being met. Two focus groups and 21 semi-structured interviews (8 doctors, 8 midwives and 5 nurses) were conducted with healthcare practitioners to explore barriers and facilitators to documented clinical information availability on admission. Findings Of the women admitted, all but 10/250 (4%) brought either a maternity card or a structured referral sheet. Of all forms of documentation, women most frequently brought the government-issued maternity card (235/250, 94%); 16% of cards had all 9 minimum criteria completed. Of the 79 referred women, 60% carried standardised referral forms. Only 30% of 97 high-risk women had risk-status recorded. Women were less likely to have documents complete if they were illiterate, had not attended three maternity appointments, or lived more than one hour from hospital. During qualitative interviews, three themes were identified: women as agents for transporting information and documents (e.g. remembering to bring maternity cards); role of individual healthcare professionals' actions (e.g. legibility of handwriting); system and organisational culture (e.g. standardised referral guidelines). Conclusion Women rarely forgot their maternity card, but documents brought at admission were frequently incomplete. This is a missed opportunity to enhance handover and quality of care, especially for high-risk women. National guidelines were recognised by providers as needed for good document keeping and would enhance the women-held maternity documents' contribution to improving both safety and continuity of care.
doi_str_mv 10.1371/journal.pone.0230063
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_plos_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A616535382</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A616535382</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_942eee7fe7c6486e8a81abb32e46581a</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A616535382</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-2ca869b880b0487e37adf72a620f6468f61e468fd3f3ccecedd41413e63a2f293</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNk19v0zAQwCMEYmPwDRBYQkIgaHHsxEl5QBoVjEmTJsHg1XLsc-sqsUvssO0T8LW5rN20oj1MefD5_Lu_ucuy5zmd5rzKP6zC0HvVTtfBw5QyTqngD7L9fMbZRDDKH96S97InMa4oLXktxONsj7O8YGVR7md_z5ZAdPAJfCLKG5S7dQt4hRhJsOQ8dOAnS2gN6VSC3rt0SUzQA6pTJA3Y0ANRpnMxuuAJXkmrGkzuIzkknbsANIS0DCaSmAZzSZwnn5VfDe17MgY_Ul3j1NPskVVthGfb8yD7-fXL2fzb5OT06Hh-eDLRgrE0YVrVYtbUNW1oUVfAK2VsxRQWaUUhaityGA_DLdcaNBhT5EXOQXDFLJvxg-zlxu-6DVFuexgl4xWry1yUNRLHG8IEtZLr3nWqv5RBOXmlCP1Cqj453YKcFQwAKguVFkUtoFZ1rpqGM8yhRBF9fdpGG5oOjMaW9ardcbr74t1SLsIfWdFyNuMVOnizddCH3wPEJLHPGtpWeQjDVd4Fp3VeCkRf_YfeXd2WWigswHkbMK4encpDgQTHEWFITe-g8DPQOZwWsA71OwZvdwyuJuoiLdQQozz-8f3-7OmvXfb1LXYJqk3LGNoh4ajFXbDYgLoPMfZgb5qcUznuy3U35LgvcrsvaPbi9g-6MbpeEATebYBzaIKN2oHXcIPRcaVKVuUCJT7S9f3puUtqrGMeBp_4PwcZMeo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2372851658</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020&lt;img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" /&gt;</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gustafsson, Lotta ; Lu, Fides ; Rickard, Faith ; MacArthur, Christine ; Cummins, Carole ; Coker, Ivan ; Mane, Kebba ; Manneh, Kebba ; Wilson, Amie ; Manaseki-Holland, Semira</creator><contributor>Kamperman, Astrid M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Lotta ; Lu, Fides ; Rickard, Faith ; MacArthur, Christine ; Cummins, Carole ; Coker, Ivan ; Mane, Kebba ; Manneh, Kebba ; Wilson, Amie ; Manaseki-Holland, Semira ; Kamperman, Astrid M.</creatorcontrib><description>Background Women-held maternity documents are well established for enabling continuity of maternity care worldwide, with the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommending their use in effective decision-making. We aimed to assess the presence, content and completeness of women-held maternity documents at admission to hospitals in The Gambia, and investigate barriers and facilitators to their completion. Methods We interviewed 250 women on maternity wards of all 3 Banjul hospitals and conducted content analysis of documentation brought by women on admission for their completeness against WHO referrals criteria. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of the minimum criteria being met. Two focus groups and 21 semi-structured interviews (8 doctors, 8 midwives and 5 nurses) were conducted with healthcare practitioners to explore barriers and facilitators to documented clinical information availability on admission. Findings Of the women admitted, all but 10/250 (4%) brought either a maternity card or a structured referral sheet. Of all forms of documentation, women most frequently brought the government-issued maternity card (235/250, 94%); 16% of cards had all 9 minimum criteria completed. Of the 79 referred women, 60% carried standardised referral forms. Only 30% of 97 high-risk women had risk-status recorded. Women were less likely to have documents complete if they were illiterate, had not attended three maternity appointments, or lived more than one hour from hospital. During qualitative interviews, three themes were identified: women as agents for transporting information and documents (e.g. remembering to bring maternity cards); role of individual healthcare professionals' actions (e.g. legibility of handwriting); system and organisational culture (e.g. standardised referral guidelines). Conclusion Women rarely forgot their maternity card, but documents brought at admission were frequently incomplete. This is a missed opportunity to enhance handover and quality of care, especially for high-risk women. National guidelines were recognised by providers as needed for good document keeping and would enhance the women-held maternity documents' contribution to improving both safety and continuity of care.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230063</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32142545</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>SAN FRANCISCO: Public Library Science</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Biology and Life Sciences ; Childrens health ; Clinical decision making ; Clinical trials ; Completeness ; Content analysis ; Continuity of care ; Criteria ; Decision making ; Documentation ; Guidelines ; Handwriting ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Information management ; Legibility ; Maternal &amp; child health ; Maternal child nursing ; Maternal mortality ; Medical care quality ; Medical personnel ; Medical research ; Medicine and Health Sciences ; Methods ; Midwives ; Mixed methods research ; Multidisciplinary Sciences ; Nurses ; People and Places ; Physicians ; Pregnancy ; Public health ; Quality ; Regression analysis ; Regression models ; Risk ; Science &amp; Technology ; Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics ; Social Sciences ; Studies ; Women ; Womens health</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230063-e0230063, Article 0230063</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 Public Library of Science</rights><rights>2020 Gustafsson et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2020 Gustafsson et al 2020 Gustafsson et al</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>true</woscitedreferencessubscribed><woscitedreferencescount>2</woscitedreferencescount><woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid>wos000535271600035</woscitedreferencesoriginalsourcerecordid><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-2ca869b880b0487e37adf72a620f6468f61e468fd3f3ccecedd41413e63a2f293</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-2ca869b880b0487e37adf72a620f6468f61e468fd3f3ccecedd41413e63a2f293</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0434-2158 ; 0000-0001-5464-1944 ; 0000-0001-5827-8855 ; 0000-0002-1015-3786</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059937/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7059937/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,728,781,785,865,886,2103,2115,2929,23871,27929,27930,28253,53796,53798</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32142545$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Kamperman, Astrid M.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Lotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Fides</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickard, Faith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacArthur, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummins, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coker, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mane, Kebba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manneh, Kebba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Amie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manaseki-Holland, Semira</creatorcontrib><title>The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia</title><title>PloS one</title><addtitle>PLOS ONE</addtitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><description>Background Women-held maternity documents are well established for enabling continuity of maternity care worldwide, with the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommending their use in effective decision-making. We aimed to assess the presence, content and completeness of women-held maternity documents at admission to hospitals in The Gambia, and investigate barriers and facilitators to their completion. Methods We interviewed 250 women on maternity wards of all 3 Banjul hospitals and conducted content analysis of documentation brought by women on admission for their completeness against WHO referrals criteria. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of the minimum criteria being met. Two focus groups and 21 semi-structured interviews (8 doctors, 8 midwives and 5 nurses) were conducted with healthcare practitioners to explore barriers and facilitators to documented clinical information availability on admission. Findings Of the women admitted, all but 10/250 (4%) brought either a maternity card or a structured referral sheet. Of all forms of documentation, women most frequently brought the government-issued maternity card (235/250, 94%); 16% of cards had all 9 minimum criteria completed. Of the 79 referred women, 60% carried standardised referral forms. Only 30% of 97 high-risk women had risk-status recorded. Women were less likely to have documents complete if they were illiterate, had not attended three maternity appointments, or lived more than one hour from hospital. During qualitative interviews, three themes were identified: women as agents for transporting information and documents (e.g. remembering to bring maternity cards); role of individual healthcare professionals' actions (e.g. legibility of handwriting); system and organisational culture (e.g. standardised referral guidelines). Conclusion Women rarely forgot their maternity card, but documents brought at admission were frequently incomplete. This is a missed opportunity to enhance handover and quality of care, especially for high-risk women. National guidelines were recognised by providers as needed for good document keeping and would enhance the women-held maternity documents' contribution to improving both safety and continuity of care.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Biology and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Childrens health</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Completeness</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Continuity of care</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Documentation</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Handwriting</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Information management</subject><subject>Legibility</subject><subject>Maternal &amp; child health</subject><subject>Maternal child nursing</subject><subject>Maternal mortality</subject><subject>Medical care quality</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Medicine and Health Sciences</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Midwives</subject><subject>Mixed methods research</subject><subject>Multidisciplinary Sciences</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>People and Places</subject><subject>Physicians</subject><subject>Pregnancy</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>Regression models</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology</subject><subject>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</subject><subject>Social Sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Womens health</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>AOWDO</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNk19v0zAQwCMEYmPwDRBYQkIgaHHsxEl5QBoVjEmTJsHg1XLsc-sqsUvssO0T8LW5rN20oj1MefD5_Lu_ucuy5zmd5rzKP6zC0HvVTtfBw5QyTqngD7L9fMbZRDDKH96S97InMa4oLXktxONsj7O8YGVR7md_z5ZAdPAJfCLKG5S7dQt4hRhJsOQ8dOAnS2gN6VSC3rt0SUzQA6pTJA3Y0ANRpnMxuuAJXkmrGkzuIzkknbsANIS0DCaSmAZzSZwnn5VfDe17MgY_Ul3j1NPskVVthGfb8yD7-fXL2fzb5OT06Hh-eDLRgrE0YVrVYtbUNW1oUVfAK2VsxRQWaUUhaityGA_DLdcaNBhT5EXOQXDFLJvxg-zlxu-6DVFuexgl4xWry1yUNRLHG8IEtZLr3nWqv5RBOXmlCP1Cqj453YKcFQwAKguVFkUtoFZ1rpqGM8yhRBF9fdpGG5oOjMaW9ardcbr74t1SLsIfWdFyNuMVOnizddCH3wPEJLHPGtpWeQjDVd4Fp3VeCkRf_YfeXd2WWigswHkbMK4encpDgQTHEWFITe-g8DPQOZwWsA71OwZvdwyuJuoiLdQQozz-8f3-7OmvXfb1LXYJqk3LGNoh4ajFXbDYgLoPMfZgb5qcUznuy3U35LgvcrsvaPbi9g-6MbpeEATebYBzaIKN2oHXcIPRcaVKVuUCJT7S9f3puUtqrGMeBp_4PwcZMeo</recordid><startdate>20200306</startdate><enddate>20200306</enddate><creator>Gustafsson, Lotta</creator><creator>Lu, Fides</creator><creator>Rickard, Faith</creator><creator>MacArthur, Christine</creator><creator>Cummins, Carole</creator><creator>Coker, Ivan</creator><creator>Mane, Kebba</creator><creator>Manneh, Kebba</creator><creator>Wilson, Amie</creator><creator>Manaseki-Holland, Semira</creator><general>Public Library Science</general><general>Public Library of Science</general><general>Public Library of Science (PLoS)</general><scope>AOWDO</scope><scope>BLEPL</scope><scope>DTL</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TM</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0434-2158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-1944</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-8855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1015-3786</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200306</creationdate><title>The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia</title><author>Gustafsson, Lotta ; Lu, Fides ; Rickard, Faith ; MacArthur, Christine ; Cummins, Carole ; Coker, Ivan ; Mane, Kebba ; Manneh, Kebba ; Wilson, Amie ; Manaseki-Holland, Semira</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-2ca869b880b0487e37adf72a620f6468f61e468fd3f3ccecedd41413e63a2f293</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Biology and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Childrens health</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Completeness</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Continuity of care</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Documentation</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Handwriting</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Information management</topic><topic>Legibility</topic><topic>Maternal &amp; child health</topic><topic>Maternal child nursing</topic><topic>Maternal mortality</topic><topic>Medical care quality</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Medicine and Health Sciences</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Midwives</topic><topic>Mixed methods research</topic><topic>Multidisciplinary Sciences</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>People and Places</topic><topic>Physicians</topic><topic>Pregnancy</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>Regression models</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology</topic><topic>Science &amp; Technology - Other Topics</topic><topic>Social Sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Womens health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gustafsson, Lotta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lu, Fides</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rickard, Faith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MacArthur, Christine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cummins, Carole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coker, Ivan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mane, Kebba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manneh, Kebba</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, Amie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manaseki-Holland, Semira</creatorcontrib><collection>Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020</collection><collection>Web of Science Core Collection</collection><collection>Science Citation Index Expanded</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Nucleic Acids Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gustafsson, Lotta</au><au>Lu, Fides</au><au>Rickard, Faith</au><au>MacArthur, Christine</au><au>Cummins, Carole</au><au>Coker, Ivan</au><au>Mane, Kebba</au><au>Manneh, Kebba</au><au>Wilson, Amie</au><au>Manaseki-Holland, Semira</au><au>Kamperman, Astrid M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><stitle>PLOS ONE</stitle><addtitle>PLoS One</addtitle><date>2020-03-06</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>e0230063</spage><epage>e0230063</epage><pages>e0230063-e0230063</pages><artnum>0230063</artnum><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>Background Women-held maternity documents are well established for enabling continuity of maternity care worldwide, with the World Health Organisation (WHO) recommending their use in effective decision-making. We aimed to assess the presence, content and completeness of women-held maternity documents at admission to hospitals in The Gambia, and investigate barriers and facilitators to their completion. Methods We interviewed 250 women on maternity wards of all 3 Banjul hospitals and conducted content analysis of documentation brought by women on admission for their completeness against WHO referrals criteria. Logistic regression models were used to estimate the odds of the minimum criteria being met. Two focus groups and 21 semi-structured interviews (8 doctors, 8 midwives and 5 nurses) were conducted with healthcare practitioners to explore barriers and facilitators to documented clinical information availability on admission. Findings Of the women admitted, all but 10/250 (4%) brought either a maternity card or a structured referral sheet. Of all forms of documentation, women most frequently brought the government-issued maternity card (235/250, 94%); 16% of cards had all 9 minimum criteria completed. Of the 79 referred women, 60% carried standardised referral forms. Only 30% of 97 high-risk women had risk-status recorded. Women were less likely to have documents complete if they were illiterate, had not attended three maternity appointments, or lived more than one hour from hospital. During qualitative interviews, three themes were identified: women as agents for transporting information and documents (e.g. remembering to bring maternity cards); role of individual healthcare professionals' actions (e.g. legibility of handwriting); system and organisational culture (e.g. standardised referral guidelines). Conclusion Women rarely forgot their maternity card, but documents brought at admission were frequently incomplete. This is a missed opportunity to enhance handover and quality of care, especially for high-risk women. National guidelines were recognised by providers as needed for good document keeping and would enhance the women-held maternity documents' contribution to improving both safety and continuity of care.</abstract><cop>SAN FRANCISCO</cop><pub>Public Library Science</pub><pmid>32142545</pmid><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0230063</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0434-2158</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5464-1944</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5827-8855</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1015-3786</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-6203
ispartof PloS one, 2020-03, Vol.15 (3), p.e0230063-e0230063, Article 0230063
issn 1932-6203
1932-6203
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A616535382
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; Web of Science - Science Citation Index Expanded - 2020<img src="https://exlibris-pub.s3.amazonaws.com/fromwos-v2.jpg" />; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Analysis
Biology and Life Sciences
Childrens health
Clinical decision making
Clinical trials
Completeness
Content analysis
Continuity of care
Criteria
Decision making
Documentation
Guidelines
Handwriting
Health care
Hospitals
Information management
Legibility
Maternal & child health
Maternal child nursing
Maternal mortality
Medical care quality
Medical personnel
Medical research
Medicine and Health Sciences
Methods
Midwives
Mixed methods research
Multidisciplinary Sciences
Nurses
People and Places
Physicians
Pregnancy
Public health
Quality
Regression analysis
Regression models
Risk
Science & Technology
Science & Technology - Other Topics
Social Sciences
Studies
Women
Womens health
title The content and completeness of women-held maternity documents before admission for labour: A mixed methods study in Banjul, The Gambia
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T13%3A06%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_plos_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20content%20and%20completeness%20of%20women-held%20maternity%20documents%20before%20admission%20for%20labour:%20A%20mixed%20methods%20study%20in%20Banjul,%20The%20Gambia&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Gustafsson,%20Lotta&rft.date=2020-03-06&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=e0230063&rft.epage=e0230063&rft.pages=e0230063-e0230063&rft.artnum=0230063&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0230063&rft_dat=%3Cgale_plos_%3EA616535382%3C/gale_plos_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2372851658&rft_id=info:pmid/32142545&rft_galeid=A616535382&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_942eee7fe7c6486e8a81abb32e46581a&rfr_iscdi=true