Exempting low-risk health and medical research from ethics reviews: comparing Australia, the United Kingdom, the United States and the Netherlands

Background Disproportionate regulation of health and medical research contributes to research waste. Better understanding of exemptions of research from ethics review in different jurisdictions may help to guide modification of review processes and reduce research waste. Our aim was to identify exam...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	Health research policy and systems 2020-01, Vol.18 (1), p.11-11, Article 11
Hauptverfasser:	Scott, Anna Mae, Kolstoe, Simon, Ploem, M. C. (Corrette), Hammatt, Zoe, Glasziou, Paul
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Accounting departments Audits Australia Biomedical Research - ethics Categories CFR Committees Costs Councils Efficiency Ethics Ethics Committees, Research - organization & administration Ethics Committees, Research - standards Evaluation exemption Guidelines as Topic - standards Health Health aspects Health Care Sciences & Services Health Policy & Services Health risks Health services Health Services Research - ethics Humans Informed consent international variation Jurisdiction Laws, regulations and rules Life Sciences & Biomedicine low-risk research Marketing Medical ethics Medical law Medical research Medical schools Netherlands Professional practice Public Health Randomization Regulation research committees Research Design Research ethics Research projects Reviews Risk Assessment Science & Technology Socialized medicine United Kingdom United States waste in research
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

Schreiben Sie den ersten Kommentar!