Visual processing speed in hemianopia patients secondary to acquired brain injury: a new assessment methodology

There is a clinical need to identify diagnostic parameters that objectively quantify and monitor the effective visual ability of patients with homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs). Visual processing speed (VPS) is an objective measure of visual ability. It is the reaction time (RT) needed to corr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation 2020-01, Vol.17 (1), p.12-12, Article 12
Hauptverfasser: Mena-Garcia, Laura, Maldonado-Lopez, Miguel J, Fernandez, Itziar, Coco-Martin, Maria B, Finat-Saez, Jaime, Martinez-Jimenez, Jose L, Pastor-Jimeno, Jose C, Arenillas, Juan F
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12
container_title Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation
container_volume 17
creator Mena-Garcia, Laura
Maldonado-Lopez, Miguel J
Fernandez, Itziar
Coco-Martin, Maria B
Finat-Saez, Jaime
Martinez-Jimenez, Jose L
Pastor-Jimeno, Jose C
Arenillas, Juan F
description There is a clinical need to identify diagnostic parameters that objectively quantify and monitor the effective visual ability of patients with homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs). Visual processing speed (VPS) is an objective measure of visual ability. It is the reaction time (RT) needed to correctly search and/or reach for a visual stimulus. VPS depends on six main brain processing systems: auditory-cognitive, attentional, working memory, visuocognitive, visuomotor, and executive. We designed a new assessment methodology capable of activating these six systems and measuring RTs to determine the VPS of patients with HVFDs. New software was designed for assessing subject visual stimulus search and reach times (S-RT and R-RT respectively), measured in seconds. Thirty-two different everyday visual stimuli were divided in four complexity groups that were presented along 8 radial visual field positions at three different eccentricities (10 , 20 , and 30 ). Thus, for each HVFD and control subject, 96 S- and R-RT measures related to VPS were registered. Three additional variables were measured to gather objective data on the validity of the test: eye-hand coordination mistakes (ehcM), eye-hand coordination accuracy (ehcA), and degrees of head movement (dHM, measured by a head-tracker system). HVFD patients and healthy controls (30 each) matched by age and gender were included. Each subject was assessed in a single visit. VPS measurements for HFVD patients and control subjects were compared for the complete test, for each stimulus complexity group, and for each eccentricity. VPS was significantly slower (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1186/s12984-020-0650-5
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A616343900</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A616343900</galeid><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_f77b313232f8498791c56d30f3e07272</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>A616343900</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-c6466eaefab5d41222e984a4bf02d89e1c1bd63e640fc85a65539b3a6a042b903</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUstu1DAUjRCIlsIHsEGW2LBJuX4mZoFUVQUqVWIDbC3HuZnxKIlTOwHN3-N0SukgZMm27HPOfZ2ieE3hnNJavU-U6VqUwKAEJaGUT4pTWgleAgB_-uh-UrxIaZcvAqR4XpxwBiCZkqdF-OHTYnsyxeAwJT9uSJoQW-JHssXB2zFM3pLJzh7HOZGELoytjXsyB2Ld7eJjBjfRZrwfd0vcfyCWjPiL2JSy4JBZZMB5G9rQh83-ZfGss33CV_fnWfH909W3yy_lzdfP15cXN6VTUM95F0qhxc42shWUMYa5UiuaDlhba6SONq3iqAR0rpZWScl1w62yIFijgZ8V1wfdNtidmaIfcs4mWG_uHkLcGBtn73o0XVU1nHLGWVcLXVeaOqlaDh1HqFjFstbHg9a0NAO2LpcUbX8kevwz-q3ZhJ9GaS2pXJN5dy8Qw-2CaTaDTw773o4YlmQYlwBaMr3GevsPdBeWOOZWrahKMsgJ_kVtbC7Aj13Icd0qai4UVVxwDWvY8_-g8mrzYPMYsfP5_YhADwQXQ0oRu4caKZjVcebgOJMdZ1bHGZk5bx4354Hxx2L8N3XQ0Lg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2357520879</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Visual processing speed in hemianopia patients secondary to acquired brain injury: a new assessment methodology</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Mena-Garcia, Laura ; Maldonado-Lopez, Miguel J ; Fernandez, Itziar ; Coco-Martin, Maria B ; Finat-Saez, Jaime ; Martinez-Jimenez, Jose L ; Pastor-Jimeno, Jose C ; Arenillas, Juan F</creator><creatorcontrib>Mena-Garcia, Laura ; Maldonado-Lopez, Miguel J ; Fernandez, Itziar ; Coco-Martin, Maria B ; Finat-Saez, Jaime ; Martinez-Jimenez, Jose L ; Pastor-Jimeno, Jose C ; Arenillas, Juan F</creatorcontrib><description>There is a clinical need to identify diagnostic parameters that objectively quantify and monitor the effective visual ability of patients with homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs). Visual processing speed (VPS) is an objective measure of visual ability. It is the reaction time (RT) needed to correctly search and/or reach for a visual stimulus. VPS depends on six main brain processing systems: auditory-cognitive, attentional, working memory, visuocognitive, visuomotor, and executive. We designed a new assessment methodology capable of activating these six systems and measuring RTs to determine the VPS of patients with HVFDs. New software was designed for assessing subject visual stimulus search and reach times (S-RT and R-RT respectively), measured in seconds. Thirty-two different everyday visual stimuli were divided in four complexity groups that were presented along 8 radial visual field positions at three different eccentricities (10 , 20 , and 30 ). Thus, for each HVFD and control subject, 96 S- and R-RT measures related to VPS were registered. Three additional variables were measured to gather objective data on the validity of the test: eye-hand coordination mistakes (ehcM), eye-hand coordination accuracy (ehcA), and degrees of head movement (dHM, measured by a head-tracker system). HVFD patients and healthy controls (30 each) matched by age and gender were included. Each subject was assessed in a single visit. VPS measurements for HFVD patients and control subjects were compared for the complete test, for each stimulus complexity group, and for each eccentricity. VPS was significantly slower (p &lt; 0.0001) in the HVFD group for the complete test, each stimulus complexity group, and each eccentricity. For the complete test, the VPS of the HVFD patients was 73.0% slower than controls. They also had 335.6% more ehcMs, 41.3% worse ehcA, and 189.0% more dHMs than the controls. Measurement of VPS by this new assessment methodology could be an effective tool for objectively quantifying the visual ability of HVFD patients. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of this novel method for measuring the impact that any specific neurovisual rehabilitation program has for these patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-0003</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12984-020-0650-5</identifier><identifier>PMID: 32005265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Acquired brain injury ; Brain ; Brain injuries ; Brain injury ; Cognitive ability ; Complexity ; Complications and side effects ; Coordination ; Diagnosis ; Diagnostic systems ; Eccentricity ; Eye ; Eye injuries ; Eye movements ; Eye-hand coordination ; Hand eye coordination ; Head injuries ; Head movement ; Health aspects ; Health care ; Hemianopia ; Hemianopsia ; Homonymous visual field defects ; Information processing ; Medical diagnostic software ; Medical research ; Memory ; Methodology ; Methods ; Novels ; Parameter identification ; Patients ; Psychological aspects ; Quality of life ; Reaction time ; Reaction time task ; Rehabilitation ; Saccades (Eye movements) ; Semantics ; Sensorimotor integration ; Short term memory ; Time ; Traumatic brain injury ; Vision ; Vision tests ; Visual ability ; Visual field ; Visual fields ; Visual perception ; Visual processing speed ; Visual stimuli</subject><ispartof>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020-01, Vol.17 (1), p.12-12, Article 12</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2020 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><rights>2020. This work is licensed under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>The Author(s). 2020</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-c6466eaefab5d41222e984a4bf02d89e1c1bd63e640fc85a65539b3a6a042b903</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-c6466eaefab5d41222e984a4bf02d89e1c1bd63e640fc85a65539b3a6a042b903</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5311-8262</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995150/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6995150/$$EHTML$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,864,885,2102,27924,27925,53791,53793</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32005265$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mena-Garcia, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Lopez, Miguel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Itziar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coco-Martin, Maria B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finat-Saez, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Jimenez, Jose L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor-Jimeno, Jose C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arenillas, Juan F</creatorcontrib><title>Visual processing speed in hemianopia patients secondary to acquired brain injury: a new assessment methodology</title><title>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</title><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><description>There is a clinical need to identify diagnostic parameters that objectively quantify and monitor the effective visual ability of patients with homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs). Visual processing speed (VPS) is an objective measure of visual ability. It is the reaction time (RT) needed to correctly search and/or reach for a visual stimulus. VPS depends on six main brain processing systems: auditory-cognitive, attentional, working memory, visuocognitive, visuomotor, and executive. We designed a new assessment methodology capable of activating these six systems and measuring RTs to determine the VPS of patients with HVFDs. New software was designed for assessing subject visual stimulus search and reach times (S-RT and R-RT respectively), measured in seconds. Thirty-two different everyday visual stimuli were divided in four complexity groups that were presented along 8 radial visual field positions at three different eccentricities (10 , 20 , and 30 ). Thus, for each HVFD and control subject, 96 S- and R-RT measures related to VPS were registered. Three additional variables were measured to gather objective data on the validity of the test: eye-hand coordination mistakes (ehcM), eye-hand coordination accuracy (ehcA), and degrees of head movement (dHM, measured by a head-tracker system). HVFD patients and healthy controls (30 each) matched by age and gender were included. Each subject was assessed in a single visit. VPS measurements for HFVD patients and control subjects were compared for the complete test, for each stimulus complexity group, and for each eccentricity. VPS was significantly slower (p &lt; 0.0001) in the HVFD group for the complete test, each stimulus complexity group, and each eccentricity. For the complete test, the VPS of the HVFD patients was 73.0% slower than controls. They also had 335.6% more ehcMs, 41.3% worse ehcA, and 189.0% more dHMs than the controls. Measurement of VPS by this new assessment methodology could be an effective tool for objectively quantifying the visual ability of HVFD patients. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of this novel method for measuring the impact that any specific neurovisual rehabilitation program has for these patients.</description><subject>Acquired brain injury</subject><subject>Brain</subject><subject>Brain injuries</subject><subject>Brain injury</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Eccentricity</subject><subject>Eye</subject><subject>Eye injuries</subject><subject>Eye movements</subject><subject>Eye-hand coordination</subject><subject>Hand eye coordination</subject><subject>Head injuries</subject><subject>Head movement</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hemianopia</subject><subject>Hemianopsia</subject><subject>Homonymous visual field defects</subject><subject>Information processing</subject><subject>Medical diagnostic software</subject><subject>Medical research</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Methodology</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Novels</subject><subject>Parameter identification</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Quality of life</subject><subject>Reaction time</subject><subject>Reaction time task</subject><subject>Rehabilitation</subject><subject>Saccades (Eye movements)</subject><subject>Semantics</subject><subject>Sensorimotor integration</subject><subject>Short term memory</subject><subject>Time</subject><subject>Traumatic brain injury</subject><subject>Vision</subject><subject>Vision tests</subject><subject>Visual ability</subject><subject>Visual field</subject><subject>Visual fields</subject><subject>Visual perception</subject><subject>Visual processing speed</subject><subject>Visual stimuli</subject><issn>1743-0003</issn><issn>1743-0003</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNptUstu1DAUjRCIlsIHsEGW2LBJuX4mZoFUVQUqVWIDbC3HuZnxKIlTOwHN3-N0SukgZMm27HPOfZ2ieE3hnNJavU-U6VqUwKAEJaGUT4pTWgleAgB_-uh-UrxIaZcvAqR4XpxwBiCZkqdF-OHTYnsyxeAwJT9uSJoQW-JHssXB2zFM3pLJzh7HOZGELoytjXsyB2Ld7eJjBjfRZrwfd0vcfyCWjPiL2JSy4JBZZMB5G9rQh83-ZfGss33CV_fnWfH909W3yy_lzdfP15cXN6VTUM95F0qhxc42shWUMYa5UiuaDlhba6SONq3iqAR0rpZWScl1w62yIFijgZ8V1wfdNtidmaIfcs4mWG_uHkLcGBtn73o0XVU1nHLGWVcLXVeaOqlaDh1HqFjFstbHg9a0NAO2LpcUbX8kevwz-q3ZhJ9GaS2pXJN5dy8Qw-2CaTaDTw773o4YlmQYlwBaMr3GevsPdBeWOOZWrahKMsgJ_kVtbC7Aj13Icd0qai4UVVxwDWvY8_-g8mrzYPMYsfP5_YhADwQXQ0oRu4caKZjVcebgOJMdZ1bHGZk5bx4354Hxx2L8N3XQ0Lg</recordid><startdate>20200131</startdate><enddate>20200131</enddate><creator>Mena-Garcia, Laura</creator><creator>Maldonado-Lopez, Miguel J</creator><creator>Fernandez, Itziar</creator><creator>Coco-Martin, Maria B</creator><creator>Finat-Saez, Jaime</creator><creator>Martinez-Jimenez, Jose L</creator><creator>Pastor-Jimeno, Jose C</creator><creator>Arenillas, Juan F</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><general>BioMed Central</general><general>BMC</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7TS</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5311-8262</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20200131</creationdate><title>Visual processing speed in hemianopia patients secondary to acquired brain injury: a new assessment methodology</title><author>Mena-Garcia, Laura ; Maldonado-Lopez, Miguel J ; Fernandez, Itziar ; Coco-Martin, Maria B ; Finat-Saez, Jaime ; Martinez-Jimenez, Jose L ; Pastor-Jimeno, Jose C ; Arenillas, Juan F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c608t-c6466eaefab5d41222e984a4bf02d89e1c1bd63e640fc85a65539b3a6a042b903</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Acquired brain injury</topic><topic>Brain</topic><topic>Brain injuries</topic><topic>Brain injury</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Eccentricity</topic><topic>Eye</topic><topic>Eye injuries</topic><topic>Eye movements</topic><topic>Eye-hand coordination</topic><topic>Hand eye coordination</topic><topic>Head injuries</topic><topic>Head movement</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hemianopia</topic><topic>Hemianopsia</topic><topic>Homonymous visual field defects</topic><topic>Information processing</topic><topic>Medical diagnostic software</topic><topic>Medical research</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Methodology</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Novels</topic><topic>Parameter identification</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Quality of life</topic><topic>Reaction time</topic><topic>Reaction time task</topic><topic>Rehabilitation</topic><topic>Saccades (Eye movements)</topic><topic>Semantics</topic><topic>Sensorimotor integration</topic><topic>Short term memory</topic><topic>Time</topic><topic>Traumatic brain injury</topic><topic>Vision</topic><topic>Vision tests</topic><topic>Visual ability</topic><topic>Visual field</topic><topic>Visual fields</topic><topic>Visual perception</topic><topic>Visual processing speed</topic><topic>Visual stimuli</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mena-Garcia, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maldonado-Lopez, Miguel J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Itziar</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coco-Martin, Maria B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Finat-Saez, Jaime</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martinez-Jimenez, Jose L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pastor-Jimeno, Jose C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arenillas, Juan F</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Physical Education Index</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mena-Garcia, Laura</au><au>Maldonado-Lopez, Miguel J</au><au>Fernandez, Itziar</au><au>Coco-Martin, Maria B</au><au>Finat-Saez, Jaime</au><au>Martinez-Jimenez, Jose L</au><au>Pastor-Jimeno, Jose C</au><au>Arenillas, Juan F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Visual processing speed in hemianopia patients secondary to acquired brain injury: a new assessment methodology</atitle><jtitle>Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation</jtitle><addtitle>J Neuroeng Rehabil</addtitle><date>2020-01-31</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>12-12</pages><artnum>12</artnum><issn>1743-0003</issn><eissn>1743-0003</eissn><abstract>There is a clinical need to identify diagnostic parameters that objectively quantify and monitor the effective visual ability of patients with homonymous visual field defects (HVFDs). Visual processing speed (VPS) is an objective measure of visual ability. It is the reaction time (RT) needed to correctly search and/or reach for a visual stimulus. VPS depends on six main brain processing systems: auditory-cognitive, attentional, working memory, visuocognitive, visuomotor, and executive. We designed a new assessment methodology capable of activating these six systems and measuring RTs to determine the VPS of patients with HVFDs. New software was designed for assessing subject visual stimulus search and reach times (S-RT and R-RT respectively), measured in seconds. Thirty-two different everyday visual stimuli were divided in four complexity groups that were presented along 8 radial visual field positions at three different eccentricities (10 , 20 , and 30 ). Thus, for each HVFD and control subject, 96 S- and R-RT measures related to VPS were registered. Three additional variables were measured to gather objective data on the validity of the test: eye-hand coordination mistakes (ehcM), eye-hand coordination accuracy (ehcA), and degrees of head movement (dHM, measured by a head-tracker system). HVFD patients and healthy controls (30 each) matched by age and gender were included. Each subject was assessed in a single visit. VPS measurements for HFVD patients and control subjects were compared for the complete test, for each stimulus complexity group, and for each eccentricity. VPS was significantly slower (p &lt; 0.0001) in the HVFD group for the complete test, each stimulus complexity group, and each eccentricity. For the complete test, the VPS of the HVFD patients was 73.0% slower than controls. They also had 335.6% more ehcMs, 41.3% worse ehcA, and 189.0% more dHMs than the controls. Measurement of VPS by this new assessment methodology could be an effective tool for objectively quantifying the visual ability of HVFD patients. Future research should evaluate the effectiveness of this novel method for measuring the impact that any specific neurovisual rehabilitation program has for these patients.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><pmid>32005265</pmid><doi>10.1186/s12984-020-0650-5</doi><tpages>1</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5311-8262</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1743-0003
ispartof Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2020-01, Vol.17 (1), p.12-12, Article 12
issn 1743-0003
1743-0003
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A616343900
source DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings
subjects Acquired brain injury
Brain
Brain injuries
Brain injury
Cognitive ability
Complexity
Complications and side effects
Coordination
Diagnosis
Diagnostic systems
Eccentricity
Eye
Eye injuries
Eye movements
Eye-hand coordination
Hand eye coordination
Head injuries
Head movement
Health aspects
Health care
Hemianopia
Hemianopsia
Homonymous visual field defects
Information processing
Medical diagnostic software
Medical research
Memory
Methodology
Methods
Novels
Parameter identification
Patients
Psychological aspects
Quality of life
Reaction time
Reaction time task
Rehabilitation
Saccades (Eye movements)
Semantics
Sensorimotor integration
Short term memory
Time
Traumatic brain injury
Vision
Vision tests
Visual ability
Visual field
Visual fields
Visual perception
Visual processing speed
Visual stimuli
title Visual processing speed in hemianopia patients secondary to acquired brain injury: a new assessment methodology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T21%3A42%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Visual%20processing%20speed%20in%20hemianopia%20patients%20secondary%20to%20acquired%20brain%20injury:%20a%20new%20assessment%20methodology&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20neuroengineering%20and%20rehabilitation&rft.au=Mena-Garcia,%20Laura&rft.date=2020-01-31&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=12-12&rft.artnum=12&rft.issn=1743-0003&rft.eissn=1743-0003&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12984-020-0650-5&rft_dat=%3Cgale_doaj_%3EA616343900%3C/gale_doaj_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2357520879&rft_id=info:pmid/32005265&rft_galeid=A616343900&rft_doaj_id=oai_doaj_org_article_f77b313232f8498791c56d30f3e07272&rfr_iscdi=true