Fairness, distributive justice and the apportionment of the pre-salt royalties: a new analysis from Rawls' theory/Equidade, justica distributiva e a reparticao dos royalties do pre-sal: uma releitura de J. Rawls

This paper revisits John Rawls's theory of justice to address the judicial debate on the rules for distribution of royalties and special participations due to oil exploration in the Pre-Salt (Federal Law 12.734 / 2012), emphasizing the relevance of the Criterion of fairness for the analysis of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista brasileira de estudos políticos 2019-01 (118), p.439
Hauptverfasser: Siqueira, Natercia Sampaio, Moron, Eduardo Daniel Lazarte
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 118
container_start_page 439
container_title Revista brasileira de estudos políticos
container_volume
creator Siqueira, Natercia Sampaio
Moron, Eduardo Daniel Lazarte
description This paper revisits John Rawls's theory of justice to address the judicial debate on the rules for distribution of royalties and special participations due to oil exploration in the Pre-Salt (Federal Law 12.734 / 2012), emphasizing the relevance of the Criterion of fairness for the analysis of this case that is under judgment in the Federal Supreme Court. From the examination of the arguments presented so far by the STF Ministers in Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 4,917, it is assessed how close or distant they are to the basic premises set by Rawls for a fair distribution in a cooperative scheme. Although Rawls's theory of justice was intended for a society of people, the hypothesis is that, in essence, it could also be valid for the analysis of a cooperative scheme such as federation, where state federative entities would be equivalent to people. Three possible distributive models are thought of: (i) one in which states of the federation that are potentially affected (to some extent) by the holding must receive exclusive and equal amounts of royalties from each other; (II) one in which states that are potentially most affected by exploitation should receive a larger share of royalties, but other states should also receive a portion, albeit a minor one, as they are all part of a federation; And (iii) one in which all States, regardless of whether or not they are potentially affected, shall receive equal shares of the Earnings from the pre-salt exploitation, since the federation's earnings (proceeds) shall enjoy all. Interested in knowing how much it is up to who, and how the notion of fairness can offer the most appropriate answer, this article, from the case study, uses a qualitative-quantitative method. It is concluded that the distributive model most compatible with the principles of justice advocated by Rawls, including the principle of difference, would be the one in which the states that are potentially more affected by the exploitation must receive a greater part of the royalties. Keywords: Royalties Pre-Salt; Justice as fairness; John Rawls; Brazilian Supreme Court. Este artigo revisita a teoria da justica de John Rawls para abordar o debate judicial sobre as regras de distribuicao dos royalties e participacoes especiais devidos pela exploracao de petroleo no Pre-Sal (pela Lei federal no. 12.734/2012), enfatizando a relevancia do criterio da equidade para a analise desse caso que se encontra sob julgamento no Supremo Tribunal Federal. A parti
doi_str_mv 10.9732/P.0034-7191.2019V118P439
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A596469629</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A596469629</galeid><sourcerecordid>A596469629</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-2d18d6df9c620bf43f121b9b9fb397cdf7027d2415f5d71e6cca7b65ec1724273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkM1KAzEUhWehYNG-Q8CFm86YZH7SuCvFXwqKFLclk9zUlJlJTTJKn9MXMrVVu5AsDrn3nPPBTRJEcMZZTi-fMozzImWEk4xiwl8IGT8VOT9KBr-Lk2To_QpjTCihJWeD5PNGGNeB9yOkjA_O1H0w74BWvQ9GAhKdQuE16nptXTC2a6ELyOrv4dpB6kUTkLObKAb8FRKog48YE83GG4-0sy16Fh-Nv9hGrNtcXr_1RgkFoz1EHJIFiizkYC3cdmWRsv6vPv5-oFeob7fGBkzoXewA9JDtSGfJsRaNh-FeT5P5zfV8epfOHm_vp5NZuqwYT6kiY1UpzWVFca2LXMej1Lzmus45k0ozTJmiBSl1qRiBSkrB6qoESRgtKMtPk_Nd7VI0sDCdtsEJ2RovF5OSV0XFK8qjK_vHFZ-C1kjbgTZxfhD4AooIkXQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fairness, distributive justice and the apportionment of the pre-salt royalties: a new analysis from Rawls' theory/Equidade, justica distributiva e a reparticao dos royalties do pre-sal: uma releitura de J. Rawls</title><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>EBSCOhost Political Science Complete</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals(OpenAccess)</source><source>EZB Electronic Journals Library</source><creator>Siqueira, Natercia Sampaio ; Moron, Eduardo Daniel Lazarte</creator><creatorcontrib>Siqueira, Natercia Sampaio ; Moron, Eduardo Daniel Lazarte</creatorcontrib><description>This paper revisits John Rawls's theory of justice to address the judicial debate on the rules for distribution of royalties and special participations due to oil exploration in the Pre-Salt (Federal Law 12.734 / 2012), emphasizing the relevance of the Criterion of fairness for the analysis of this case that is under judgment in the Federal Supreme Court. From the examination of the arguments presented so far by the STF Ministers in Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 4,917, it is assessed how close or distant they are to the basic premises set by Rawls for a fair distribution in a cooperative scheme. Although Rawls's theory of justice was intended for a society of people, the hypothesis is that, in essence, it could also be valid for the analysis of a cooperative scheme such as federation, where state federative entities would be equivalent to people. Three possible distributive models are thought of: (i) one in which states of the federation that are potentially affected (to some extent) by the holding must receive exclusive and equal amounts of royalties from each other; (II) one in which states that are potentially most affected by exploitation should receive a larger share of royalties, but other states should also receive a portion, albeit a minor one, as they are all part of a federation; And (iii) one in which all States, regardless of whether or not they are potentially affected, shall receive equal shares of the Earnings from the pre-salt exploitation, since the federation's earnings (proceeds) shall enjoy all. Interested in knowing how much it is up to who, and how the notion of fairness can offer the most appropriate answer, this article, from the case study, uses a qualitative-quantitative method. It is concluded that the distributive model most compatible with the principles of justice advocated by Rawls, including the principle of difference, would be the one in which the states that are potentially more affected by the exploitation must receive a greater part of the royalties. Keywords: Royalties Pre-Salt; Justice as fairness; John Rawls; Brazilian Supreme Court. Este artigo revisita a teoria da justica de John Rawls para abordar o debate judicial sobre as regras de distribuicao dos royalties e participacoes especiais devidos pela exploracao de petroleo no Pre-Sal (pela Lei federal no. 12.734/2012), enfatizando a relevancia do criterio da equidade para a analise desse caso que se encontra sob julgamento no Supremo Tribunal Federal. A partir do exame dos argumentos apresentados ate o momento pelos Ministros do STF na Acao Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 4.917, avalia-se o quanto se aproximam ou se distanciam das premissas basicas fixadas por Rawls para uma justa distribuicao em um esquema cooperativo. Embora a teoria da justica de Rawls tenha sido pensada para uma sociedade de pessoas, a hipotese e que, na sua essencia, poderia ser valida tambem para a analise de um esquema cooperativo como a federacao, em que os entes federativos estaduais seriam equivalentes as pessoas. Sao pensados desde logo tres modelos distributivos possiveis: (I) um em que os Estados da federacao que sao potencialmente afetados (em alguma medida) pela exploracao devem receber com exclusividade e de forma igual entre si os royalties; (II) um em que os Estados que sao potencialmente mais afetados pela exploracao devem receber uma parte maior dos royalties, mas os demais Estados tambem devem receber uma parte, ainda que menor, pois fazem todos parte de uma federacao; e (III) um em que os Estados todos, independente do quanto sejam, ou nao, potencialmente afetados, devem receber partes iguais dos ganhos da exploracao do Pre-Sal, de vez que os ganhos (receitas) da federacao devem aproveitar a todos. Interessado em saber quanto cabe a quem, e como a nocao de equidade pode oferecer a resposta mais apropriada, este artigo, a partir do estudo de caso, utiliza-se de um metodo quali-quantitativo. Conclui-se que o modelo distributivo mais compativel com os principios de justica defendidos por Rawls, incluindo o principio da diferenca, seria aquele em que os Estados que sao potencialmente mais afetados pela exploracao devem receber uma parte maior dos royalties. Palavras-chave: Royalties do Pre-Sal; Justica como equidade; John Rawls; Supremo Tribunal Federal.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0034-7191</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.9732/P.0034-7191.2019V118P439</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de direito</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Case studies ; Judgments (Law) ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Ministers (Clergy) ; Petroleum exploration</subject><ispartof>Revista brasileira de estudos políticos, 2019-01 (118), p.439</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de direito.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Siqueira, Natercia Sampaio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moron, Eduardo Daniel Lazarte</creatorcontrib><title>Fairness, distributive justice and the apportionment of the pre-salt royalties: a new analysis from Rawls' theory/Equidade, justica distributiva e a reparticao dos royalties do pre-sal: uma releitura de J. Rawls</title><title>Revista brasileira de estudos políticos</title><description>This paper revisits John Rawls's theory of justice to address the judicial debate on the rules for distribution of royalties and special participations due to oil exploration in the Pre-Salt (Federal Law 12.734 / 2012), emphasizing the relevance of the Criterion of fairness for the analysis of this case that is under judgment in the Federal Supreme Court. From the examination of the arguments presented so far by the STF Ministers in Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 4,917, it is assessed how close or distant they are to the basic premises set by Rawls for a fair distribution in a cooperative scheme. Although Rawls's theory of justice was intended for a society of people, the hypothesis is that, in essence, it could also be valid for the analysis of a cooperative scheme such as federation, where state federative entities would be equivalent to people. Three possible distributive models are thought of: (i) one in which states of the federation that are potentially affected (to some extent) by the holding must receive exclusive and equal amounts of royalties from each other; (II) one in which states that are potentially most affected by exploitation should receive a larger share of royalties, but other states should also receive a portion, albeit a minor one, as they are all part of a federation; And (iii) one in which all States, regardless of whether or not they are potentially affected, shall receive equal shares of the Earnings from the pre-salt exploitation, since the federation's earnings (proceeds) shall enjoy all. Interested in knowing how much it is up to who, and how the notion of fairness can offer the most appropriate answer, this article, from the case study, uses a qualitative-quantitative method. It is concluded that the distributive model most compatible with the principles of justice advocated by Rawls, including the principle of difference, would be the one in which the states that are potentially more affected by the exploitation must receive a greater part of the royalties. Keywords: Royalties Pre-Salt; Justice as fairness; John Rawls; Brazilian Supreme Court. Este artigo revisita a teoria da justica de John Rawls para abordar o debate judicial sobre as regras de distribuicao dos royalties e participacoes especiais devidos pela exploracao de petroleo no Pre-Sal (pela Lei federal no. 12.734/2012), enfatizando a relevancia do criterio da equidade para a analise desse caso que se encontra sob julgamento no Supremo Tribunal Federal. A partir do exame dos argumentos apresentados ate o momento pelos Ministros do STF na Acao Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 4.917, avalia-se o quanto se aproximam ou se distanciam das premissas basicas fixadas por Rawls para uma justa distribuicao em um esquema cooperativo. Embora a teoria da justica de Rawls tenha sido pensada para uma sociedade de pessoas, a hipotese e que, na sua essencia, poderia ser valida tambem para a analise de um esquema cooperativo como a federacao, em que os entes federativos estaduais seriam equivalentes as pessoas. Sao pensados desde logo tres modelos distributivos possiveis: (I) um em que os Estados da federacao que sao potencialmente afetados (em alguma medida) pela exploracao devem receber com exclusividade e de forma igual entre si os royalties; (II) um em que os Estados que sao potencialmente mais afetados pela exploracao devem receber uma parte maior dos royalties, mas os demais Estados tambem devem receber uma parte, ainda que menor, pois fazem todos parte de uma federacao; e (III) um em que os Estados todos, independente do quanto sejam, ou nao, potencialmente afetados, devem receber partes iguais dos ganhos da exploracao do Pre-Sal, de vez que os ganhos (receitas) da federacao devem aproveitar a todos. Interessado em saber quanto cabe a quem, e como a nocao de equidade pode oferecer a resposta mais apropriada, este artigo, a partir do estudo de caso, utiliza-se de um metodo quali-quantitativo. Conclui-se que o modelo distributivo mais compativel com os principios de justica defendidos por Rawls, incluindo o principio da diferenca, seria aquele em que os Estados que sao potencialmente mais afetados pela exploracao devem receber uma parte maior dos royalties. Palavras-chave: Royalties do Pre-Sal; Justica como equidade; John Rawls; Supremo Tribunal Federal.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Judgments (Law)</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Ministers (Clergy)</subject><subject>Petroleum exploration</subject><issn>0034-7191</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkM1KAzEUhWehYNG-Q8CFm86YZH7SuCvFXwqKFLclk9zUlJlJTTJKn9MXMrVVu5AsDrn3nPPBTRJEcMZZTi-fMozzImWEk4xiwl8IGT8VOT9KBr-Lk2To_QpjTCihJWeD5PNGGNeB9yOkjA_O1H0w74BWvQ9GAhKdQuE16nptXTC2a6ELyOrv4dpB6kUTkLObKAb8FRKog48YE83GG4-0sy16Fh-Nv9hGrNtcXr_1RgkFoz1EHJIFiizkYC3cdmWRsv6vPv5-oFeob7fGBkzoXewA9JDtSGfJsRaNh-FeT5P5zfV8epfOHm_vp5NZuqwYT6kiY1UpzWVFca2LXMej1Lzmus45k0ozTJmiBSl1qRiBSkrB6qoESRgtKMtPk_Nd7VI0sDCdtsEJ2RovF5OSV0XFK8qjK_vHFZ-C1kjbgTZxfhD4AooIkXQ</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Siqueira, Natercia Sampaio</creator><creator>Moron, Eduardo Daniel Lazarte</creator><general>Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de direito</general><scope>INF</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Fairness, distributive justice and the apportionment of the pre-salt royalties: a new analysis from Rawls' theory/Equidade, justica distributiva e a reparticao dos royalties do pre-sal: uma releitura de J. Rawls</title><author>Siqueira, Natercia Sampaio ; Moron, Eduardo Daniel Lazarte</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g679-2d18d6df9c620bf43f121b9b9fb397cdf7027d2415f5d71e6cca7b65ec1724273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Judgments (Law)</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Ministers (Clergy)</topic><topic>Petroleum exploration</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Siqueira, Natercia Sampaio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moron, Eduardo Daniel Lazarte</creatorcontrib><collection>¡Informe!</collection><jtitle>Revista brasileira de estudos políticos</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Siqueira, Natercia Sampaio</au><au>Moron, Eduardo Daniel Lazarte</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fairness, distributive justice and the apportionment of the pre-salt royalties: a new analysis from Rawls' theory/Equidade, justica distributiva e a reparticao dos royalties do pre-sal: uma releitura de J. Rawls</atitle><jtitle>Revista brasileira de estudos políticos</jtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><issue>118</issue><spage>439</spage><pages>439-</pages><issn>0034-7191</issn><abstract>This paper revisits John Rawls's theory of justice to address the judicial debate on the rules for distribution of royalties and special participations due to oil exploration in the Pre-Salt (Federal Law 12.734 / 2012), emphasizing the relevance of the Criterion of fairness for the analysis of this case that is under judgment in the Federal Supreme Court. From the examination of the arguments presented so far by the STF Ministers in Direct Action of Unconstitutionality 4,917, it is assessed how close or distant they are to the basic premises set by Rawls for a fair distribution in a cooperative scheme. Although Rawls's theory of justice was intended for a society of people, the hypothesis is that, in essence, it could also be valid for the analysis of a cooperative scheme such as federation, where state federative entities would be equivalent to people. Three possible distributive models are thought of: (i) one in which states of the federation that are potentially affected (to some extent) by the holding must receive exclusive and equal amounts of royalties from each other; (II) one in which states that are potentially most affected by exploitation should receive a larger share of royalties, but other states should also receive a portion, albeit a minor one, as they are all part of a federation; And (iii) one in which all States, regardless of whether or not they are potentially affected, shall receive equal shares of the Earnings from the pre-salt exploitation, since the federation's earnings (proceeds) shall enjoy all. Interested in knowing how much it is up to who, and how the notion of fairness can offer the most appropriate answer, this article, from the case study, uses a qualitative-quantitative method. It is concluded that the distributive model most compatible with the principles of justice advocated by Rawls, including the principle of difference, would be the one in which the states that are potentially more affected by the exploitation must receive a greater part of the royalties. Keywords: Royalties Pre-Salt; Justice as fairness; John Rawls; Brazilian Supreme Court. Este artigo revisita a teoria da justica de John Rawls para abordar o debate judicial sobre as regras de distribuicao dos royalties e participacoes especiais devidos pela exploracao de petroleo no Pre-Sal (pela Lei federal no. 12.734/2012), enfatizando a relevancia do criterio da equidade para a analise desse caso que se encontra sob julgamento no Supremo Tribunal Federal. A partir do exame dos argumentos apresentados ate o momento pelos Ministros do STF na Acao Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 4.917, avalia-se o quanto se aproximam ou se distanciam das premissas basicas fixadas por Rawls para uma justa distribuicao em um esquema cooperativo. Embora a teoria da justica de Rawls tenha sido pensada para uma sociedade de pessoas, a hipotese e que, na sua essencia, poderia ser valida tambem para a analise de um esquema cooperativo como a federacao, em que os entes federativos estaduais seriam equivalentes as pessoas. Sao pensados desde logo tres modelos distributivos possiveis: (I) um em que os Estados da federacao que sao potencialmente afetados (em alguma medida) pela exploracao devem receber com exclusividade e de forma igual entre si os royalties; (II) um em que os Estados que sao potencialmente mais afetados pela exploracao devem receber uma parte maior dos royalties, mas os demais Estados tambem devem receber uma parte, ainda que menor, pois fazem todos parte de uma federacao; e (III) um em que os Estados todos, independente do quanto sejam, ou nao, potencialmente afetados, devem receber partes iguais dos ganhos da exploracao do Pre-Sal, de vez que os ganhos (receitas) da federacao devem aproveitar a todos. Interessado em saber quanto cabe a quem, e como a nocao de equidade pode oferecer a resposta mais apropriada, este artigo, a partir do estudo de caso, utiliza-se de um metodo quali-quantitativo. Conclui-se que o modelo distributivo mais compativel com os principios de justica defendidos por Rawls, incluindo o principio da diferenca, seria aquele em que os Estados que sao potencialmente mais afetados pela exploracao devem receber uma parte maior dos royalties. Palavras-chave: Royalties do Pre-Sal; Justica como equidade; John Rawls; Supremo Tribunal Federal.</abstract><pub>Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais. Faculdade de direito</pub><doi>10.9732/P.0034-7191.2019V118P439</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0034-7191
ispartof Revista brasileira de estudos políticos, 2019-01 (118), p.439
issn 0034-7191
language por
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A596469629
source HeinOnline Law Journal Library; EBSCOhost Political Science Complete; Directory of Open Access Journals(OpenAccess); EZB Electronic Journals Library
subjects Analysis
Case studies
Judgments (Law)
Laws, regulations and rules
Ministers (Clergy)
Petroleum exploration
title Fairness, distributive justice and the apportionment of the pre-salt royalties: a new analysis from Rawls' theory/Equidade, justica distributiva e a reparticao dos royalties do pre-sal: uma releitura de J. Rawls
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T10%3A17%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fairness,%20distributive%20justice%20and%20the%20apportionment%20of%20the%20pre-salt%20royalties:%20a%20new%20analysis%20from%20Rawls'%20theory/Equidade,%20justica%20distributiva%20e%20a%20reparticao%20dos%20royalties%20do%20pre-sal:%20uma%20releitura%20de%20J.%20Rawls&rft.jtitle=Revista%20brasileira%20de%20estudos%20pol%C3%ADticos&rft.au=Siqueira,%20Natercia%20Sampaio&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.issue=118&rft.spage=439&rft.pages=439-&rft.issn=0034-7191&rft_id=info:doi/10.9732/P.0034-7191.2019V118P439&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA596469629%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A596469629&rfr_iscdi=true