Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete
[Display omitted] •Engineering properties of FAGP and AAS concrete have been investigated.•The FAGP concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with FA.•The AAS concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with GGBFS.•The FAGP concrete has been produced using heat cu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Construction & building materials 2019-01, Vol.196, p.26-42 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 42 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 26 |
container_title | Construction & building materials |
container_volume | 196 |
creator | Farhan, Nabeel A. Sheikh, M. Neaz Hadi, Muhammad N.S. |
description | [Display omitted]
•Engineering properties of FAGP and AAS concrete have been investigated.•The FAGP concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with FA.•The AAS concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with GGBFS.•The FAGP concrete has been produced using heat curing at 80 °C for 24 h.•The AAS has been produced at ambient curing condition.
Fly ash-based geopolymer (FAGP) and alkali-activated slag (AAS) concrete are produced by mixing alkaline solutions with aluminosilicate materials. As the FAGP and AAS concrete are free of Portland cement, they have a low carbon footprint and consume low energy during the production process. This paper compares the engineering properties of normal strength and high strength FAGP and AAS concrete with OPC concrete. The engineering properties considered in this study included workability, dry density, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), compressive strength, indirect tensile strength, flexural strength, direct tensile strength, and stress-strain behaviour in compression and direct tension. Microstructural observations using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) are also presented. It was found that the dry density and UPV of FAGP and AAS concrete were lower than those of OPC concrete of similar compressive strength. The tensile strength of FAGP and AAS concrete was comparable to the tensile strength of OPC concrete when the compressive strength of the concrete was about 35 MPa (normal strength concrete). However, the tensile strength of FAGP and AAS concrete was higher than the tensile strength of OPC concrete when the compressive strength of concrete was about 65 MPa (high strength concrete). The modulus of elasticity of FAGP and AAS concrete in compression and direct tension was lower than the modulus of elasticity of OPC concrete of similar compressive strength. The SEM results indicated that the microstructures of FAGP and AAS concrete were more compact and homogeneous than the microstructures of OPC concrete at 7 days, but less compact and homogeneous than the microstructures of OPC concrete at 28 days for the concrete of similar compressive strength. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.083 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A574175863</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A574175863</galeid><els_id>S0950061818327508</els_id><sourcerecordid>A574175863</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-a6b6deffa1fb57cb812721953eddcd507708f85146d9d9c2adf25a05a8a261273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkt-K3CAUxkNpodNt38HS2ybVZDXJ5TL0z8JCe9Fey4keM06NBnUG5qH6jnU6pezCXBRB5Zzfd5DPr6reMtowysSHfaOCnw7W6QVy01I2NIw1dOieVRs29GNNeSueVxs6clpTwYaX1auU9pRS0Yp2U_2690dM2c6QbfAkGIJ-th4xWj-TNYYVY7aYzh0f4gKOgNdkZ-cdSTkWOO-IcScCaUcmSKjJjGEN7rRg_IOC-wnO1qCyPUIu_eRgJuXVKmLGcllWiKWcAwlRWw_xRL6FmN1ZrHBBn__Rr6sXBlzCN3_Pm-rHp4_ft1_qh6-f77d3D7XivMs1iEloNAaYmXivpoG1fctG3qHWSnPa93QwA2e3Qo96VC1o03KgHAZoRWG7m-rdZe4MDqX1JuQIarFJyTve37KeD6IrVH2FmtFjBBc8GlvKT_jmCl-WxsWqq4L3jwTTIZWPSWVLxf2cZjik9BQfL7iKIaWIRq7RLsVPyag8p0Xu5aO0yHNaJGOypKVotxctFluPFqNMyqJXqG1ElaUO9j-m_Aafq9Kx</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete</title><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Farhan, Nabeel A. ; Sheikh, M. Neaz ; Hadi, Muhammad N.S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Farhan, Nabeel A. ; Sheikh, M. Neaz ; Hadi, Muhammad N.S.</creatorcontrib><description>[Display omitted]
•Engineering properties of FAGP and AAS concrete have been investigated.•The FAGP concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with FA.•The AAS concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with GGBFS.•The FAGP concrete has been produced using heat curing at 80 °C for 24 h.•The AAS has been produced at ambient curing condition.
Fly ash-based geopolymer (FAGP) and alkali-activated slag (AAS) concrete are produced by mixing alkaline solutions with aluminosilicate materials. As the FAGP and AAS concrete are free of Portland cement, they have a low carbon footprint and consume low energy during the production process. This paper compares the engineering properties of normal strength and high strength FAGP and AAS concrete with OPC concrete. The engineering properties considered in this study included workability, dry density, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), compressive strength, indirect tensile strength, flexural strength, direct tensile strength, and stress-strain behaviour in compression and direct tension. Microstructural observations using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) are also presented. It was found that the dry density and UPV of FAGP and AAS concrete were lower than those of OPC concrete of similar compressive strength. The tensile strength of FAGP and AAS concrete was comparable to the tensile strength of OPC concrete when the compressive strength of the concrete was about 35 MPa (normal strength concrete). However, the tensile strength of FAGP and AAS concrete was higher than the tensile strength of OPC concrete when the compressive strength of concrete was about 65 MPa (high strength concrete). The modulus of elasticity of FAGP and AAS concrete in compression and direct tension was lower than the modulus of elasticity of OPC concrete of similar compressive strength. The SEM results indicated that the microstructures of FAGP and AAS concrete were more compact and homogeneous than the microstructures of OPC concrete at 7 days, but less compact and homogeneous than the microstructures of OPC concrete at 28 days for the concrete of similar compressive strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0618</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-0526</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.083</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alkali-activated slag concrete ; Anabolic steroids ; Analysis ; Concretes ; Ecological footprint ; Engineering properties ; Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete ; High strength ; Mechanical properties ; Normal strength ; Polymers ; Portland cement ; Production management ; Strength (Materials)</subject><ispartof>Construction & building materials, 2019-01, Vol.196, p.26-42</ispartof><rights>2018 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2019 Reed Business Information, Inc. (US)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-a6b6deffa1fb57cb812721953eddcd507708f85146d9d9c2adf25a05a8a261273</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-a6b6deffa1fb57cb812721953eddcd507708f85146d9d9c2adf25a05a8a261273</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.083$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Farhan, Nabeel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheikh, M. Neaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Muhammad N.S.</creatorcontrib><title>Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete</title><title>Construction & building materials</title><description>[Display omitted]
•Engineering properties of FAGP and AAS concrete have been investigated.•The FAGP concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with FA.•The AAS concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with GGBFS.•The FAGP concrete has been produced using heat curing at 80 °C for 24 h.•The AAS has been produced at ambient curing condition.
Fly ash-based geopolymer (FAGP) and alkali-activated slag (AAS) concrete are produced by mixing alkaline solutions with aluminosilicate materials. As the FAGP and AAS concrete are free of Portland cement, they have a low carbon footprint and consume low energy during the production process. This paper compares the engineering properties of normal strength and high strength FAGP and AAS concrete with OPC concrete. The engineering properties considered in this study included workability, dry density, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), compressive strength, indirect tensile strength, flexural strength, direct tensile strength, and stress-strain behaviour in compression and direct tension. Microstructural observations using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) are also presented. It was found that the dry density and UPV of FAGP and AAS concrete were lower than those of OPC concrete of similar compressive strength. The tensile strength of FAGP and AAS concrete was comparable to the tensile strength of OPC concrete when the compressive strength of the concrete was about 35 MPa (normal strength concrete). However, the tensile strength of FAGP and AAS concrete was higher than the tensile strength of OPC concrete when the compressive strength of concrete was about 65 MPa (high strength concrete). The modulus of elasticity of FAGP and AAS concrete in compression and direct tension was lower than the modulus of elasticity of OPC concrete of similar compressive strength. The SEM results indicated that the microstructures of FAGP and AAS concrete were more compact and homogeneous than the microstructures of OPC concrete at 7 days, but less compact and homogeneous than the microstructures of OPC concrete at 28 days for the concrete of similar compressive strength.</description><subject>Alkali-activated slag concrete</subject><subject>Anabolic steroids</subject><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Concretes</subject><subject>Ecological footprint</subject><subject>Engineering properties</subject><subject>Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete</subject><subject>High strength</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Normal strength</subject><subject>Polymers</subject><subject>Portland cement</subject><subject>Production management</subject><subject>Strength (Materials)</subject><issn>0950-0618</issn><issn>1879-0526</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkt-K3CAUxkNpodNt38HS2ybVZDXJ5TL0z8JCe9Fey4keM06NBnUG5qH6jnU6pezCXBRB5Zzfd5DPr6reMtowysSHfaOCnw7W6QVy01I2NIw1dOieVRs29GNNeSueVxs6clpTwYaX1auU9pRS0Yp2U_2690dM2c6QbfAkGIJ-th4xWj-TNYYVY7aYzh0f4gKOgNdkZ-cdSTkWOO-IcScCaUcmSKjJjGEN7rRg_IOC-wnO1qCyPUIu_eRgJuXVKmLGcllWiKWcAwlRWw_xRL6FmN1ZrHBBn__Rr6sXBlzCN3_Pm-rHp4_ft1_qh6-f77d3D7XivMs1iEloNAaYmXivpoG1fctG3qHWSnPa93QwA2e3Qo96VC1o03KgHAZoRWG7m-rdZe4MDqX1JuQIarFJyTve37KeD6IrVH2FmtFjBBc8GlvKT_jmCl-WxsWqq4L3jwTTIZWPSWVLxf2cZjik9BQfL7iKIaWIRq7RLsVPyag8p0Xu5aO0yHNaJGOypKVotxctFluPFqNMyqJXqG1ElaUO9j-m_Aafq9Kx</recordid><startdate>20190130</startdate><enddate>20190130</enddate><creator>Farhan, Nabeel A.</creator><creator>Sheikh, M. Neaz</creator><creator>Hadi, Muhammad N.S.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Reed Business Information, Inc. (US)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190130</creationdate><title>Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete</title><author>Farhan, Nabeel A. ; Sheikh, M. Neaz ; Hadi, Muhammad N.S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c553t-a6b6deffa1fb57cb812721953eddcd507708f85146d9d9c2adf25a05a8a261273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Alkali-activated slag concrete</topic><topic>Anabolic steroids</topic><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Concretes</topic><topic>Ecological footprint</topic><topic>Engineering properties</topic><topic>Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete</topic><topic>High strength</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Normal strength</topic><topic>Polymers</topic><topic>Portland cement</topic><topic>Production management</topic><topic>Strength (Materials)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Farhan, Nabeel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sheikh, M. Neaz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hadi, Muhammad N.S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><jtitle>Construction & building materials</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Farhan, Nabeel A.</au><au>Sheikh, M. Neaz</au><au>Hadi, Muhammad N.S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete</atitle><jtitle>Construction & building materials</jtitle><date>2019-01-30</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>196</volume><spage>26</spage><epage>42</epage><pages>26-42</pages><issn>0950-0618</issn><eissn>1879-0526</eissn><abstract>[Display omitted]
•Engineering properties of FAGP and AAS concrete have been investigated.•The FAGP concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with FA.•The AAS concrete has been produced by blending an alkaline activator with GGBFS.•The FAGP concrete has been produced using heat curing at 80 °C for 24 h.•The AAS has been produced at ambient curing condition.
Fly ash-based geopolymer (FAGP) and alkali-activated slag (AAS) concrete are produced by mixing alkaline solutions with aluminosilicate materials. As the FAGP and AAS concrete are free of Portland cement, they have a low carbon footprint and consume low energy during the production process. This paper compares the engineering properties of normal strength and high strength FAGP and AAS concrete with OPC concrete. The engineering properties considered in this study included workability, dry density, ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), compressive strength, indirect tensile strength, flexural strength, direct tensile strength, and stress-strain behaviour in compression and direct tension. Microstructural observations using scanning electronic microscopy (SEM) are also presented. It was found that the dry density and UPV of FAGP and AAS concrete were lower than those of OPC concrete of similar compressive strength. The tensile strength of FAGP and AAS concrete was comparable to the tensile strength of OPC concrete when the compressive strength of the concrete was about 35 MPa (normal strength concrete). However, the tensile strength of FAGP and AAS concrete was higher than the tensile strength of OPC concrete when the compressive strength of concrete was about 65 MPa (high strength concrete). The modulus of elasticity of FAGP and AAS concrete in compression and direct tension was lower than the modulus of elasticity of OPC concrete of similar compressive strength. The SEM results indicated that the microstructures of FAGP and AAS concrete were more compact and homogeneous than the microstructures of OPC concrete at 7 days, but less compact and homogeneous than the microstructures of OPC concrete at 28 days for the concrete of similar compressive strength.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.083</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-0618 |
ispartof | Construction & building materials, 2019-01, Vol.196, p.26-42 |
issn | 0950-0618 1879-0526 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A574175863 |
source | Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | Alkali-activated slag concrete Anabolic steroids Analysis Concretes Ecological footprint Engineering properties Fly ash-based geopolymer concrete High strength Mechanical properties Normal strength Polymers Portland cement Production management Strength (Materials) |
title | Investigation of engineering properties of normal and high strength fly ash based geopolymer and alkali-activated slag concrete compared to ordinary Portland cement concrete |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-18T22%3A56%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigation%20of%20engineering%20properties%20of%20normal%20and%20high%20strength%20fly%20ash%20based%20geopolymer%20and%20alkali-activated%20slag%20concrete%20compared%20to%20ordinary%20Portland%20cement%20concrete&rft.jtitle=Construction%20&%20building%20materials&rft.au=Farhan,%20Nabeel%20A.&rft.date=2019-01-30&rft.volume=196&rft.spage=26&rft.epage=42&rft.pages=26-42&rft.issn=0950-0618&rft.eissn=1879-0526&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.11.083&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA574175863%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A574175863&rft_els_id=S0950061818327508&rfr_iscdi=true |