Judicial Review in the Age of Eduardo Cunha: Between Procedural Passivism and Substantive Activism in Brazil's Federal Supreme Court/ Jurisdicao Constitucional na Era Cunha: entre o Passivismo Procedimental e o Ativismo Substancialista do STF

Judicial Review in the Age of Eduardo Cunha: Between Procedural Passivism and Substantive Activism in Brazil's Federal Supreme Court/ Jurisdicao Constitucional na Era Cunha: entre o Passivismo Procedimental e o Ativismo Substancialista do STF

We argue, in this essay, that there is no intrinsic relationship between constitutional jurisdiction and democracy, and that the authority of constitutional courts can only be justified by instrumental reasons. Having said that, judicial activism seems something hard to maintain. Nonetheless, this a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Revista Direito e Práxis 2016-03, Vol.7 (1), p.346
Hauptverfasser: Bustamante, Thomas, Bustamante, Evanilda de Godoi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:por
Schlagworte:
Cunha, Eduardo
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 346
container_title Revista Direito e Práxis
container_volume 7
creator Bustamante, Thomas
Bustamante, Evanilda de Godoi
description We argue, in this essay, that there is no intrinsic relationship between constitutional jurisdiction and democracy, and that the authority of constitutional courts can only be justified by instrumental reasons. Having said that, judicial activism seems something hard to maintain. Nonetheless, this argument only makes sense if the court adopts a non-passivist attitude when it comes to assessing the regularity of the legislative process, in order to secure the full observance of the constitutional rules that define it. Hence, the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court must overrule its decision on MS 22.503 about the proper moment for the submission of amendments to legislative propositions.
doi_str_mv 10.12957/dep.2016.17530
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A571109860</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A571109860</galeid><sourcerecordid>A571109860</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-gale_infotracmisc_A5711098603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj09PwkAQxTdGE4ly9jqJB0_Abktb6g0IxHAiwp2s3SmMaXfJ_oHEj-0ncIk1evQ0L3lv3vyGsQfBhyIps2Kk8DhMuMiHoshSfsV6iSjKwaTM8-s_-pb1nXvnnIt0nKTjosc-V0FRRbKBVzwRnoE0-APCdI9galioIK0yMA_6IJ9hhv6MqGFtTYUq2Li2ls7RiVwLUivYhDfnpfZ0ihWV_zZi5czKD2qeHCxR4WVtE44WW4S5CdaPYBUsuQgi4ymjnScfKjI6BrWEhZU_AKi9jWC_V03HQm20YvxiTn1ndTSX9ygKiI9stst7dlPLxmG_m3fscbnYzl8Ge9ngjnRtvJVVS67aTbNCCF5Ocp7-L_UFIfCATQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Judicial Review in the Age of Eduardo Cunha: Between Procedural Passivism and Substantive Activism in Brazil's Federal Supreme Court/ Jurisdicao Constitucional na Era Cunha: entre o Passivismo Procedimental e o Ativismo Substancialista do STF</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Bustamante, Thomas ; Bustamante, Evanilda de Godoi</creator><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Thomas ; Bustamante, Evanilda de Godoi</creatorcontrib><description>We argue, in this essay, that there is no intrinsic relationship between constitutional jurisdiction and democracy, and that the authority of constitutional courts can only be justified by instrumental reasons. Having said that, judicial activism seems something hard to maintain. Nonetheless, this argument only makes sense if the court adopts a non-passivist attitude when it comes to assessing the regularity of the legislative process, in order to secure the full observance of the constitutional rules that define it. Hence, the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court must overrule its decision on MS 22.503 about the proper moment for the submission of amendments to legislative propositions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2179-8966</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2179-8966</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.12957/dep.2016.17530</identifier><language>por</language><publisher>Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</publisher><subject>Cunha, Eduardo</subject><ispartof>Revista Direito e Práxis, 2016-03, Vol.7 (1), p.346</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Evanilda de Godoi</creatorcontrib><title>Judicial Review in the Age of Eduardo Cunha: Between Procedural Passivism and Substantive Activism in Brazil's Federal Supreme Court/ Jurisdicao Constitucional na Era Cunha: entre o Passivismo Procedimental e o Ativismo Substancialista do STF</title><title>Revista Direito e Práxis</title><description>We argue, in this essay, that there is no intrinsic relationship between constitutional jurisdiction and democracy, and that the authority of constitutional courts can only be justified by instrumental reasons. Having said that, judicial activism seems something hard to maintain. Nonetheless, this argument only makes sense if the court adopts a non-passivist attitude when it comes to assessing the regularity of the legislative process, in order to secure the full observance of the constitutional rules that define it. Hence, the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court must overrule its decision on MS 22.503 about the proper moment for the submission of amendments to legislative propositions.</description><subject>Cunha, Eduardo</subject><issn>2179-8966</issn><issn>2179-8966</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNj09PwkAQxTdGE4ly9jqJB0_Abktb6g0IxHAiwp2s3SmMaXfJ_oHEj-0ncIk1evQ0L3lv3vyGsQfBhyIps2Kk8DhMuMiHoshSfsV6iSjKwaTM8-s_-pb1nXvnnIt0nKTjosc-V0FRRbKBVzwRnoE0-APCdI9galioIK0yMA_6IJ9hhv6MqGFtTYUq2Li2ls7RiVwLUivYhDfnpfZ0ihWV_zZi5czKD2qeHCxR4WVtE44WW4S5CdaPYBUsuQgi4ymjnScfKjI6BrWEhZU_AKi9jWC_V03HQm20YvxiTn1ndTSX9ygKiI9stst7dlPLxmG_m3fscbnYzl8Ge9ngjnRtvJVVS67aTbNCCF5Ocp7-L_UFIfCATQ</recordid><startdate>20160301</startdate><enddate>20160301</enddate><creator>Bustamante, Thomas</creator><creator>Bustamante, Evanilda de Godoi</creator><general>Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</general><scope>INF</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160301</creationdate><title>Judicial Review in the Age of Eduardo Cunha: Between Procedural Passivism and Substantive Activism in Brazil's Federal Supreme Court/ Jurisdicao Constitucional na Era Cunha: entre o Passivismo Procedimental e o Ativismo Substancialista do STF</title><author>Bustamante, Thomas ; Bustamante, Evanilda de Godoi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-gale_infotracmisc_A5711098603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>por</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Cunha, Eduardo</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bustamante, Evanilda de Godoi</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: Informe Academico</collection><jtitle>Revista Direito e Práxis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bustamante, Thomas</au><au>Bustamante, Evanilda de Godoi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Judicial Review in the Age of Eduardo Cunha: Between Procedural Passivism and Substantive Activism in Brazil's Federal Supreme Court/ Jurisdicao Constitucional na Era Cunha: entre o Passivismo Procedimental e o Ativismo Substancialista do STF</atitle><jtitle>Revista Direito e Práxis</jtitle><date>2016-03-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>346</spage><pages>346-</pages><issn>2179-8966</issn><eissn>2179-8966</eissn><abstract>We argue, in this essay, that there is no intrinsic relationship between constitutional jurisdiction and democracy, and that the authority of constitutional courts can only be justified by instrumental reasons. Having said that, judicial activism seems something hard to maintain. Nonetheless, this argument only makes sense if the court adopts a non-passivist attitude when it comes to assessing the regularity of the legislative process, in order to secure the full observance of the constitutional rules that define it. Hence, the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court must overrule its decision on MS 22.503 about the proper moment for the submission of amendments to legislative propositions.</abstract><pub>Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro- Uerj</pub><doi>10.12957/dep.2016.17530</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2179-8966
ispartof Revista Direito e Práxis, 2016-03, Vol.7 (1), p.346
issn 2179-8966
2179-8966
language por
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A571109860
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Cunha, Eduardo
title Judicial Review in the Age of Eduardo Cunha: Between Procedural Passivism and Substantive Activism in Brazil's Federal Supreme Court/ Jurisdicao Constitucional na Era Cunha: entre o Passivismo Procedimental e o Ativismo Substancialista do STF
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T05%3A03%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Judicial%20Review%20in%20the%20Age%20of%20Eduardo%20Cunha:%20Between%20Procedural%20Passivism%20and%20Substantive%20Activism%20in%20Brazil's%20Federal%20Supreme%20Court/%20Jurisdicao%20Constitucional%20na%20Era%20Cunha:%20entre%20o%20Passivismo%20Procedimental%20e%20o%20Ativismo%20Substancialista%20do%20STF&rft.jtitle=Revista%20Direito%20e%20Pr%C3%A1xis&rft.au=Bustamante,%20Thomas&rft.date=2016-03-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=346&rft.pages=346-&rft.issn=2179-8966&rft.eissn=2179-8966&rft_id=info:doi/10.12957/dep.2016.17530&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA571109860%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A571109860&rfr_iscdi=true