Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results
Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions invol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of unmanned vehicle systems 2018-09, Vol.6 (3), p.109-127 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 127 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 109 |
container_title | Journal of unmanned vehicle systems |
container_volume | 6 |
creator | Angliss, R.P Ferguson, M.C Hall, P Helker, V Kennedy, A Sformo, T |
description | Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions involving cetacean distribution and density can be addressed using manned and UAS technology in the Arctic, we conducted paired aerial surveys for cetaceans near Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska. We present the methods and operational results from the project, and challenges encountered during the field work. Fall arctic weather varied dramatically over small spatiotemporal scales and harsh environmental conditions increased the maintenance required for repeated UAS operations. Various technologies, such as temperature and humidity sensors, a software system that provided near-term forecasts of highly variable weather, and a surface-based air traffic radar feed, directly contributed to the ability to conduct routine, successful, beyond line-of-sight UAS flights under these situations. We provide recommendations for future projects to help streamline project planning and enhance researchers’ ability to use UAS to collect data needed for ecological research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/juvs-2018-0001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A554909044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A554909044</galeid><sourcerecordid>A554909044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d5a5a7d15588502125a08182203e3a853450bb0c483410e0b749228cedc9c6b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUT1rwzAUFKWFhjRrZ0Fnp_qM5W4h9AsCXdpZyPJzomBLQZID-fe12w4dwhve8bg7jncI3VOypJRXj4fhlApGqCoIIfQKzRiraMHFqrz-h2_RIqXDxJClEBWdobgJ_dFE53e4N95Dg3PAg__DBqIzHU5DPME54TZEbCEbC8bjPniXw4_SeZz3gNfRZmefcA95H5qEjW9wOEI02QU_2kRIQ5fTHbppTZdg8bfn6Ovl-XPzVmw_Xt83621hx6i5aKSRpmyolEpJwiiThiiqGCMcuFGSC0nqmlihuKAESF2KijFlobGVXdWCz9HDr-_OdKCdb0OOxvYuWb2WUlSkImJiLS-wxmmgdzZ4aN14vySwMaQUodXH6HoTz5oSPXWhpy701IWePs2_AT4QfL0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Angliss, R.P ; Ferguson, M.C ; Hall, P ; Helker, V ; Kennedy, A ; Sformo, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Angliss, R.P ; Ferguson, M.C ; Hall, P ; Helker, V ; Kennedy, A ; Sformo, T</creatorcontrib><description>Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions involving cetacean distribution and density can be addressed using manned and UAS technology in the Arctic, we conducted paired aerial surveys for cetaceans near Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska. We present the methods and operational results from the project, and challenges encountered during the field work. Fall arctic weather varied dramatically over small spatiotemporal scales and harsh environmental conditions increased the maintenance required for repeated UAS operations. Various technologies, such as temperature and humidity sensors, a software system that provided near-term forecasts of highly variable weather, and a surface-based air traffic radar feed, directly contributed to the ability to conduct routine, successful, beyond line-of-sight UAS flights under these situations. We provide recommendations for future projects to help streamline project planning and enhance researchers’ ability to use UAS to collect data needed for ecological research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2291-3467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2291-3467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/juvs-2018-0001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Observations ; Surveys (Studies) ; Technology application ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Whales</subject><ispartof>Journal of unmanned vehicle systems, 2018-09, Vol.6 (3), p.109-127</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 NRC Research Press</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d5a5a7d15588502125a08182203e3a853450bb0c483410e0b749228cedc9c6b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d5a5a7d15588502125a08182203e3a853450bb0c483410e0b749228cedc9c6b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Angliss, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, M.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helker, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sformo, T</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results</title><title>Journal of unmanned vehicle systems</title><description>Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions involving cetacean distribution and density can be addressed using manned and UAS technology in the Arctic, we conducted paired aerial surveys for cetaceans near Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska. We present the methods and operational results from the project, and challenges encountered during the field work. Fall arctic weather varied dramatically over small spatiotemporal scales and harsh environmental conditions increased the maintenance required for repeated UAS operations. Various technologies, such as temperature and humidity sensors, a software system that provided near-term forecasts of highly variable weather, and a surface-based air traffic radar feed, directly contributed to the ability to conduct routine, successful, beyond line-of-sight UAS flights under these situations. We provide recommendations for future projects to help streamline project planning and enhance researchers’ ability to use UAS to collect data needed for ecological research.</description><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Surveys (Studies)</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Whales</subject><issn>2291-3467</issn><issn>2291-3467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUT1rwzAUFKWFhjRrZ0Fnp_qM5W4h9AsCXdpZyPJzomBLQZID-fe12w4dwhve8bg7jncI3VOypJRXj4fhlApGqCoIIfQKzRiraMHFqrz-h2_RIqXDxJClEBWdobgJ_dFE53e4N95Dg3PAg__DBqIzHU5DPME54TZEbCEbC8bjPniXw4_SeZz3gNfRZmefcA95H5qEjW9wOEI02QU_2kRIQ5fTHbppTZdg8bfn6Ovl-XPzVmw_Xt83621hx6i5aKSRpmyolEpJwiiThiiqGCMcuFGSC0nqmlihuKAESF2KijFlobGVXdWCz9HDr-_OdKCdb0OOxvYuWb2WUlSkImJiLS-wxmmgdzZ4aN14vySwMaQUodXH6HoTz5oSPXWhpy701IWePs2_AT4QfL0</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Angliss, R.P</creator><creator>Ferguson, M.C</creator><creator>Hall, P</creator><creator>Helker, V</creator><creator>Kennedy, A</creator><creator>Sformo, T</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results</title><author>Angliss, R.P ; Ferguson, M.C ; Hall, P ; Helker, V ; Kennedy, A ; Sformo, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d5a5a7d15588502125a08182203e3a853450bb0c483410e0b749228cedc9c6b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Surveys (Studies)</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Whales</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Angliss, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, M.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helker, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sformo, T</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of unmanned vehicle systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Angliss, R.P</au><au>Ferguson, M.C</au><au>Hall, P</au><au>Helker, V</au><au>Kennedy, A</au><au>Sformo, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results</atitle><jtitle>Journal of unmanned vehicle systems</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>109-127</pages><issn>2291-3467</issn><eissn>2291-3467</eissn><abstract>Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions involving cetacean distribution and density can be addressed using manned and UAS technology in the Arctic, we conducted paired aerial surveys for cetaceans near Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska. We present the methods and operational results from the project, and challenges encountered during the field work. Fall arctic weather varied dramatically over small spatiotemporal scales and harsh environmental conditions increased the maintenance required for repeated UAS operations. Various technologies, such as temperature and humidity sensors, a software system that provided near-term forecasts of highly variable weather, and a surface-based air traffic radar feed, directly contributed to the ability to conduct routine, successful, beyond line-of-sight UAS flights under these situations. We provide recommendations for future projects to help streamline project planning and enhance researchers’ ability to use UAS to collect data needed for ecological research.</abstract><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/juvs-2018-0001</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2291-3467 |
ispartof | Journal of unmanned vehicle systems, 2018-09, Vol.6 (3), p.109-127 |
issn | 2291-3467 2291-3467 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A554909044 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Observations Surveys (Studies) Technology application Unmanned aerial vehicles Whales |
title | Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T21%3A50%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20manned%20to%20unmanned%20aerial%20surveys%20for%20cetacean%20monitoring%20in%20the%20Arctic:%20methods%20and%20operational%20results&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20unmanned%20vehicle%20systems&rft.au=Angliss,%20R.P&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=109-127&rft.issn=2291-3467&rft.eissn=2291-3467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/juvs-2018-0001&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA554909044%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A554909044&rfr_iscdi=true |