Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results

Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions invol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of unmanned vehicle systems 2018-09, Vol.6 (3), p.109-127
Hauptverfasser: Angliss, R.P, Ferguson, M.C, Hall, P, Helker, V, Kennedy, A, Sformo, T
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 127
container_issue 3
container_start_page 109
container_title Journal of unmanned vehicle systems
container_volume 6
creator Angliss, R.P
Ferguson, M.C
Hall, P
Helker, V
Kennedy, A
Sformo, T
description Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions involving cetacean distribution and density can be addressed using manned and UAS technology in the Arctic, we conducted paired aerial surveys for cetaceans near Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska. We present the methods and operational results from the project, and challenges encountered during the field work. Fall arctic weather varied dramatically over small spatiotemporal scales and harsh environmental conditions increased the maintenance required for repeated UAS operations. Various technologies, such as temperature and humidity sensors, a software system that provided near-term forecasts of highly variable weather, and a surface-based air traffic radar feed, directly contributed to the ability to conduct routine, successful, beyond line-of-sight UAS flights under these situations. We provide recommendations for future projects to help streamline project planning and enhance researchers’ ability to use UAS to collect data needed for ecological research.
doi_str_mv 10.1139/juvs-2018-0001
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A554909044</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A554909044</galeid><sourcerecordid>A554909044</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d5a5a7d15588502125a08182203e3a853450bb0c483410e0b749228cedc9c6b43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptUT1rwzAUFKWFhjRrZ0Fnp_qM5W4h9AsCXdpZyPJzomBLQZID-fe12w4dwhve8bg7jncI3VOypJRXj4fhlApGqCoIIfQKzRiraMHFqrz-h2_RIqXDxJClEBWdobgJ_dFE53e4N95Dg3PAg__DBqIzHU5DPME54TZEbCEbC8bjPniXw4_SeZz3gNfRZmefcA95H5qEjW9wOEI02QU_2kRIQ5fTHbppTZdg8bfn6Ovl-XPzVmw_Xt83621hx6i5aKSRpmyolEpJwiiThiiqGCMcuFGSC0nqmlihuKAESF2KijFlobGVXdWCz9HDr-_OdKCdb0OOxvYuWb2WUlSkImJiLS-wxmmgdzZ4aN14vySwMaQUodXH6HoTz5oSPXWhpy701IWePs2_AT4QfL0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Angliss, R.P ; Ferguson, M.C ; Hall, P ; Helker, V ; Kennedy, A ; Sformo, T</creator><creatorcontrib>Angliss, R.P ; Ferguson, M.C ; Hall, P ; Helker, V ; Kennedy, A ; Sformo, T</creatorcontrib><description>Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions involving cetacean distribution and density can be addressed using manned and UAS technology in the Arctic, we conducted paired aerial surveys for cetaceans near Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska. We present the methods and operational results from the project, and challenges encountered during the field work. Fall arctic weather varied dramatically over small spatiotemporal scales and harsh environmental conditions increased the maintenance required for repeated UAS operations. Various technologies, such as temperature and humidity sensors, a software system that provided near-term forecasts of highly variable weather, and a surface-based air traffic radar feed, directly contributed to the ability to conduct routine, successful, beyond line-of-sight UAS flights under these situations. We provide recommendations for future projects to help streamline project planning and enhance researchers’ ability to use UAS to collect data needed for ecological research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2291-3467</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2291-3467</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/juvs-2018-0001</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>Observations ; Surveys (Studies) ; Technology application ; Unmanned aerial vehicles ; Whales</subject><ispartof>Journal of unmanned vehicle systems, 2018-09, Vol.6 (3), p.109-127</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 NRC Research Press</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d5a5a7d15588502125a08182203e3a853450bb0c483410e0b749228cedc9c6b43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d5a5a7d15588502125a08182203e3a853450bb0c483410e0b749228cedc9c6b43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Angliss, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, M.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helker, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sformo, T</creatorcontrib><title>Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results</title><title>Journal of unmanned vehicle systems</title><description>Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions involving cetacean distribution and density can be addressed using manned and UAS technology in the Arctic, we conducted paired aerial surveys for cetaceans near Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska. We present the methods and operational results from the project, and challenges encountered during the field work. Fall arctic weather varied dramatically over small spatiotemporal scales and harsh environmental conditions increased the maintenance required for repeated UAS operations. Various technologies, such as temperature and humidity sensors, a software system that provided near-term forecasts of highly variable weather, and a surface-based air traffic radar feed, directly contributed to the ability to conduct routine, successful, beyond line-of-sight UAS flights under these situations. We provide recommendations for future projects to help streamline project planning and enhance researchers’ ability to use UAS to collect data needed for ecological research.</description><subject>Observations</subject><subject>Surveys (Studies)</subject><subject>Technology application</subject><subject>Unmanned aerial vehicles</subject><subject>Whales</subject><issn>2291-3467</issn><issn>2291-3467</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptUT1rwzAUFKWFhjRrZ0Fnp_qM5W4h9AsCXdpZyPJzomBLQZID-fe12w4dwhve8bg7jncI3VOypJRXj4fhlApGqCoIIfQKzRiraMHFqrz-h2_RIqXDxJClEBWdobgJ_dFE53e4N95Dg3PAg__DBqIzHU5DPME54TZEbCEbC8bjPniXw4_SeZz3gNfRZmefcA95H5qEjW9wOEI02QU_2kRIQ5fTHbppTZdg8bfn6Ovl-XPzVmw_Xt83621hx6i5aKSRpmyolEpJwiiThiiqGCMcuFGSC0nqmlihuKAESF2KijFlobGVXdWCz9HDr-_OdKCdb0OOxvYuWb2WUlSkImJiLS-wxmmgdzZ4aN14vySwMaQUodXH6HoTz5oSPXWhpy701IWePs2_AT4QfL0</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Angliss, R.P</creator><creator>Ferguson, M.C</creator><creator>Hall, P</creator><creator>Helker, V</creator><creator>Kennedy, A</creator><creator>Sformo, T</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results</title><author>Angliss, R.P ; Ferguson, M.C ; Hall, P ; Helker, V ; Kennedy, A ; Sformo, T</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-d5a5a7d15588502125a08182203e3a853450bb0c483410e0b749228cedc9c6b43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Observations</topic><topic>Surveys (Studies)</topic><topic>Technology application</topic><topic>Unmanned aerial vehicles</topic><topic>Whales</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Angliss, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferguson, M.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helker, V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kennedy, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sformo, T</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Journal of unmanned vehicle systems</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Angliss, R.P</au><au>Ferguson, M.C</au><au>Hall, P</au><au>Helker, V</au><au>Kennedy, A</au><au>Sformo, T</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results</atitle><jtitle>Journal of unmanned vehicle systems</jtitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>109</spage><epage>127</epage><pages>109-127</pages><issn>2291-3467</issn><eissn>2291-3467</eissn><abstract>Manned aerial surveys are routinely used to assess cetacean distribution and density, often over large geographic areas. Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) have been identified as a technology that could augment or replace manned aerial surveys for cetaceans. To understand what research questions involving cetacean distribution and density can be addressed using manned and UAS technology in the Arctic, we conducted paired aerial surveys for cetaceans near Utqiaġvik (Barrow), Alaska. We present the methods and operational results from the project, and challenges encountered during the field work. Fall arctic weather varied dramatically over small spatiotemporal scales and harsh environmental conditions increased the maintenance required for repeated UAS operations. Various technologies, such as temperature and humidity sensors, a software system that provided near-term forecasts of highly variable weather, and a surface-based air traffic radar feed, directly contributed to the ability to conduct routine, successful, beyond line-of-sight UAS flights under these situations. We provide recommendations for future projects to help streamline project planning and enhance researchers’ ability to use UAS to collect data needed for ecological research.</abstract><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/juvs-2018-0001</doi><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2291-3467
ispartof Journal of unmanned vehicle systems, 2018-09, Vol.6 (3), p.109-127
issn 2291-3467
2291-3467
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A554909044
source Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Observations
Surveys (Studies)
Technology application
Unmanned aerial vehicles
Whales
title Comparing manned to unmanned aerial surveys for cetacean monitoring in the Arctic: methods and operational results
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T21%3A50%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparing%20manned%20to%20unmanned%20aerial%20surveys%20for%20cetacean%20monitoring%20in%20the%20Arctic:%20methods%20and%20operational%20results&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20unmanned%20vehicle%20systems&rft.au=Angliss,%20R.P&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=109&rft.epage=127&rft.pages=109-127&rft.issn=2291-3467&rft.eissn=2291-3467&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/juvs-2018-0001&rft_dat=%3Cgale_cross%3EA554909044%3C/gale_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A554909044&rfr_iscdi=true