EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY
Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over person...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Duke journal of comparative & international law 2017-09, Vol.28 (1), p.99 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 99 |
container_title | Duke journal of comparative & international law |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Park, S. Nathan |
description | Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over persons, properties and conducts outside of the territorial borders of the United States. This paper argues that such a conception of the extraterritoriality doctrine only reveals half of the picture, because U.S. courts may indirectly apply U.S. law beyond U.S. borders through extraterritorial court orders without relying on extraterritorial jurisdiction. I term such exercise of extraterritorial power "Equity Extraterritoriality, " because the court's power to make such extraterritorial orders stems from the equity tradition. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A550015359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A550015359</galeid><sourcerecordid>A550015359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1059-bfffa756f0fd3ecc483898663a516afea943be3ceedc300ba1163011e52d68553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjEFLw0AQhfdQwdr6BzwJnldmO5ltcgwlaiBQGragp7LZzISUNIXG_48LehHCOzx4fO9bqKUBQm23aO_VwzSdAYAoMUv1VByOpft6Lj5dnbuirku3r8u8itta3YkfJn7865U6vhVu96Gr_Xu5yyvdRWmmGxHxW7IC0iKHkKSYZqm16MlYL-yzBBvGwNwGBGi8MRbBGKZNa1MiXKmXX2_nBz71o1y_bz5c-imcciIAQ0hZpPQM1fHINz9cR5Y-zv_41xk-puVLH2YOP4SaUzY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Duke Law Journals</source><creator>Park, S. Nathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, S. Nathan</creatorcontrib><description>Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over persons, properties and conducts outside of the territorial borders of the United States. This paper argues that such a conception of the extraterritoriality doctrine only reveals half of the picture, because U.S. courts may indirectly apply U.S. law beyond U.S. borders through extraterritorial court orders without relying on extraterritorial jurisdiction. I term such exercise of extraterritorial power "Equity Extraterritoriality, " because the court's power to make such extraterritorial orders stems from the equity tradition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-6736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Duke University, School of Law</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Economic aspects ; Equitable remedies ; Exterritoriality ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Presumptions (Law)</subject><ispartof>Duke journal of comparative & international law, 2017-09, Vol.28 (1), p.99</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Duke University, School of Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, S. Nathan</creatorcontrib><title>EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY</title><title>Duke journal of comparative & international law</title><description>Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over persons, properties and conducts outside of the territorial borders of the United States. This paper argues that such a conception of the extraterritoriality doctrine only reveals half of the picture, because U.S. courts may indirectly apply U.S. law beyond U.S. borders through extraterritorial court orders without relying on extraterritorial jurisdiction. I term such exercise of extraterritorial power "Equity Extraterritoriality, " because the court's power to make such extraterritorial orders stems from the equity tradition.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Equitable remedies</subject><subject>Exterritoriality</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Presumptions (Law)</subject><issn>1053-6736</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptjEFLw0AQhfdQwdr6BzwJnldmO5ltcgwlaiBQGragp7LZzISUNIXG_48LehHCOzx4fO9bqKUBQm23aO_VwzSdAYAoMUv1VByOpft6Lj5dnbuirku3r8u8itta3YkfJn7865U6vhVu96Gr_Xu5yyvdRWmmGxHxW7IC0iKHkKSYZqm16MlYL-yzBBvGwNwGBGi8MRbBGKZNa1MiXKmXX2_nBz71o1y_bz5c-imcciIAQ0hZpPQM1fHINz9cR5Y-zv_41xk-puVLH2YOP4SaUzY</recordid><startdate>20170922</startdate><enddate>20170922</enddate><creator>Park, S. Nathan</creator><general>Duke University, School of Law</general><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170922</creationdate><title>EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY</title><author>Park, S. Nathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1059-bfffa756f0fd3ecc483898663a516afea943be3ceedc300ba1163011e52d68553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Equitable remedies</topic><topic>Exterritoriality</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Presumptions (Law)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, S. Nathan</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Duke journal of comparative & international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, S. Nathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY</atitle><jtitle>Duke journal of comparative & international law</jtitle><date>2017-09-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><pages>99-</pages><issn>1053-6736</issn><abstract>Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over persons, properties and conducts outside of the territorial borders of the United States. This paper argues that such a conception of the extraterritoriality doctrine only reveals half of the picture, because U.S. courts may indirectly apply U.S. law beyond U.S. borders through extraterritorial court orders without relying on extraterritorial jurisdiction. I term such exercise of extraterritorial power "Equity Extraterritoriality, " because the court's power to make such extraterritorial orders stems from the equity tradition.</abstract><pub>Duke University, School of Law</pub></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1053-6736 |
ispartof | Duke journal of comparative & international law, 2017-09, Vol.28 (1), p.99 |
issn | 1053-6736 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A550015359 |
source | Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Duke Law Journals |
subjects | Analysis Economic aspects Equitable remedies Exterritoriality Laws, regulations and rules Presumptions (Law) |
title | EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A38%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EQUITY%20EXTRATERRITORIALITY&rft.jtitle=Duke%20journal%20of%20comparative%20&%20international%20law&rft.au=Park,%20S.%20Nathan&rft.date=2017-09-22&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.pages=99-&rft.issn=1053-6736&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA550015359%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A550015359&rfr_iscdi=true |