EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY

Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over person...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Duke journal of comparative & international law 2017-09, Vol.28 (1), p.99
1. Verfasser: Park, S. Nathan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 99
container_title Duke journal of comparative & international law
container_volume 28
creator Park, S. Nathan
description Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over persons, properties and conducts outside of the territorial borders of the United States. This paper argues that such a conception of the extraterritoriality doctrine only reveals half of the picture, because U.S. courts may indirectly apply U.S. law beyond U.S. borders through extraterritorial court orders without relying on extraterritorial jurisdiction. I term such exercise of extraterritorial power "Equity Extraterritoriality, " because the court's power to make such extraterritorial orders stems from the equity tradition.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A550015359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A550015359</galeid><sourcerecordid>A550015359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1059-bfffa756f0fd3ecc483898663a516afea943be3ceedc300ba1163011e52d68553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptjEFLw0AQhfdQwdr6BzwJnldmO5ltcgwlaiBQGragp7LZzISUNIXG_48LehHCOzx4fO9bqKUBQm23aO_VwzSdAYAoMUv1VByOpft6Lj5dnbuirku3r8u8itta3YkfJn7865U6vhVu96Gr_Xu5yyvdRWmmGxHxW7IC0iKHkKSYZqm16MlYL-yzBBvGwNwGBGi8MRbBGKZNa1MiXKmXX2_nBz71o1y_bz5c-imcciIAQ0hZpPQM1fHINz9cR5Y-zv_41xk-puVLH2YOP4SaUzY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>HeinOnline Law Journal Library</source><source>Duke Law Journals</source><creator>Park, S. Nathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, S. Nathan</creatorcontrib><description>Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over persons, properties and conducts outside of the territorial borders of the United States. This paper argues that such a conception of the extraterritoriality doctrine only reveals half of the picture, because U.S. courts may indirectly apply U.S. law beyond U.S. borders through extraterritorial court orders without relying on extraterritorial jurisdiction. I term such exercise of extraterritorial power "Equity Extraterritoriality, " because the court's power to make such extraterritorial orders stems from the equity tradition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-6736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Duke University, School of Law</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Economic aspects ; Equitable remedies ; Exterritoriality ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Presumptions (Law)</subject><ispartof>Duke journal of comparative &amp; international law, 2017-09, Vol.28 (1), p.99</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Duke University, School of Law</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, S. Nathan</creatorcontrib><title>EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY</title><title>Duke journal of comparative &amp; international law</title><description>Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over persons, properties and conducts outside of the territorial borders of the United States. This paper argues that such a conception of the extraterritoriality doctrine only reveals half of the picture, because U.S. courts may indirectly apply U.S. law beyond U.S. borders through extraterritorial court orders without relying on extraterritorial jurisdiction. I term such exercise of extraterritorial power "Equity Extraterritoriality, " because the court's power to make such extraterritorial orders stems from the equity tradition.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Economic aspects</subject><subject>Equitable remedies</subject><subject>Exterritoriality</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Presumptions (Law)</subject><issn>1053-6736</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptjEFLw0AQhfdQwdr6BzwJnldmO5ltcgwlaiBQGragp7LZzISUNIXG_48LehHCOzx4fO9bqKUBQm23aO_VwzSdAYAoMUv1VByOpft6Lj5dnbuirku3r8u8itta3YkfJn7865U6vhVu96Gr_Xu5yyvdRWmmGxHxW7IC0iKHkKSYZqm16MlYL-yzBBvGwNwGBGi8MRbBGKZNa1MiXKmXX2_nBz71o1y_bz5c-imcciIAQ0hZpPQM1fHINz9cR5Y-zv_41xk-puVLH2YOP4SaUzY</recordid><startdate>20170922</startdate><enddate>20170922</enddate><creator>Park, S. Nathan</creator><general>Duke University, School of Law</general><scope>ILT</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170922</creationdate><title>EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY</title><author>Park, S. Nathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1059-bfffa756f0fd3ecc483898663a516afea943be3ceedc300ba1163011e52d68553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Economic aspects</topic><topic>Equitable remedies</topic><topic>Exterritoriality</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Presumptions (Law)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, S. Nathan</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale OneFile: LegalTrac</collection><jtitle>Duke journal of comparative &amp; international law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, S. Nathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY</atitle><jtitle>Duke journal of comparative &amp; international law</jtitle><date>2017-09-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>99</spage><pages>99-</pages><issn>1053-6736</issn><abstract>Territoriality is a foundational principle of international order, and U.S. laws have always operated on a territorial basis. However, when U.S. jurisprudence speaks of extraterritorial application of its laws, it is usually assessing whether the legislature or the court has jurisdiction over persons, properties and conducts outside of the territorial borders of the United States. This paper argues that such a conception of the extraterritoriality doctrine only reveals half of the picture, because U.S. courts may indirectly apply U.S. law beyond U.S. borders through extraterritorial court orders without relying on extraterritorial jurisdiction. I term such exercise of extraterritorial power "Equity Extraterritoriality, " because the court's power to make such extraterritorial orders stems from the equity tradition.</abstract><pub>Duke University, School of Law</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-6736
ispartof Duke journal of comparative & international law, 2017-09, Vol.28 (1), p.99
issn 1053-6736
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A550015359
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; HeinOnline Law Journal Library; Duke Law Journals
subjects Analysis
Economic aspects
Equitable remedies
Exterritoriality
Laws, regulations and rules
Presumptions (Law)
title EQUITY EXTRATERRITORIALITY
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T23%3A38%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=EQUITY%20EXTRATERRITORIALITY&rft.jtitle=Duke%20journal%20of%20comparative%20&%20international%20law&rft.au=Park,%20S.%20Nathan&rft.date=2017-09-22&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=99&rft.pages=99-&rft.issn=1053-6736&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA550015359%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A550015359&rfr_iscdi=true