The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Background Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it i...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | BMC women's health 2018-05, Vol.18 (1) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | BMC women's health |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | van Rijswijk, Joukje van Welie, Nienke Dreyer, Kim van Hooff, Machiel H. A de Bruin, Jan Peter Verhoeve, Harold R Mol, Femke Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A Traas, Maaike A. F Muijsers, Guido J. J. M Manger, Arentje P Gianotten, Judith de Koning, Cornelia H Koning, Aafke M. H Bayram, Neriman van der Ham, David P Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M Kalafusova, Michaela van de Laar, Bob I. G Kaijser, Jeroen van Oostwaard, Miriam F Meijer, Wouter J Broekmans, Frank J. M Valkenburg, Olivier van der Voet, Lucy F van Disseldorp, Jeroen Lambers, Marieke J Peters, Henrike E Lier, Marit C. I Lambalk, Cornelis B van Wely, Madelon Bossuyt, Patrick M. M Stoker, Jaap van der Veen, Fulco Mol, Ben W. J Mijatovic, Velja |
description | Background Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it is less expensive and more patient friendly. HyFoSy would be an acceptable alternative for HSG, provided it has similar effectiveness in terms of patient outcomes. Methods/design We aim to compare the effectiveness and costs of management guided by HyFoSy or by HSG. Consenting women will undergo tubal testing by both HyFoSy and HSG in a randomized order during fertility work-up. The study group will consist of 1163 subfertile women between 18 and 41 years old who are scheduled for tubal patency testing during their fertility work-up. Women with anovulatory cycles not responding to ovulation induction, endometriosis, severe male subfertility or a known contrast (iodine) allergy will be excluded. We anticipate that 7 % (N = 82) of the participants will have discordant test results for HyFoSy and HSG. These participants will be randomly allocated to either a management strategy based on HyFoSy or a management strategy based on HSG, resulting in either a diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation or a strategy that assumes tubal patency (intrauterine insemination or expectant management). The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes are patient pain scores, time to pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate and number of additional treatments. Costs will be estimated by counting resource use and calculating unit prices. Discussion This trial will compare the effectiveness and costs of HyFoSy versus HSG in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register (NTR 4746, Keywords: Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy), Hysterosalpingography (HSG), Fertility work-up, Tubal patency testing, Ongoing pregnancy, Cost-effectiveness, Subfertility, Randomized controlled trial, Budget impact |
doi_str_mv | 10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A546418881</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A546418881</galeid><sourcerecordid>A546418881</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g671-36980819c84030bba003f2974698e253afcf97a93813fa8b4dc530284f597b2a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj01OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAfsOI4dNqiqKEUq6oLuq0lip0ZOHNmuULkGF8b8LLpAs5inefM-zSB0TcktpbK8CzSvCM8IlRnhvMzKEzShhcizUori9Eifo4sQ3gihQnIxQZ-bncKL9ewFh7hvD_fYBLw8hKi8C2BHM3QOawc9Dm5wnYdxd8BmwBCCCiG5OO5rsHiEqIbmxwr7WisfjVX43fVqeMCv32Q8ehdd42zCeQzYw9C63nyoFjduiN5Zm2T0BuwlOtNgg7r661O0WTxu5ststX56ns9WWVcKmrGykkTSqpEFYaSugRCm80oUaa5yzkA3uhJQMUmZBlkXbcMZyWWheSXqHNgU3fxiO7BqawbtooemN6HZznhRFlTKFJ2i23-2UrWqN-lypdOnx4EvbEB5Mg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><creator>van Rijswijk, Joukje ; van Welie, Nienke ; Dreyer, Kim ; van Hooff, Machiel H. A ; de Bruin, Jan Peter ; Verhoeve, Harold R ; Mol, Femke ; Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A ; Traas, Maaike A. F ; Muijsers, Guido J. J. M ; Manger, Arentje P ; Gianotten, Judith ; de Koning, Cornelia H ; Koning, Aafke M. H ; Bayram, Neriman ; van der Ham, David P ; Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M ; Kalafusova, Michaela ; van de Laar, Bob I. G ; Kaijser, Jeroen ; van Oostwaard, Miriam F ; Meijer, Wouter J ; Broekmans, Frank J. M ; Valkenburg, Olivier ; van der Voet, Lucy F ; van Disseldorp, Jeroen ; Lambers, Marieke J ; Peters, Henrike E ; Lier, Marit C. I ; Lambalk, Cornelis B ; van Wely, Madelon ; Bossuyt, Patrick M. M ; Stoker, Jaap ; van der Veen, Fulco ; Mol, Ben W. J ; Mijatovic, Velja</creator><creatorcontrib>van Rijswijk, Joukje ; van Welie, Nienke ; Dreyer, Kim ; van Hooff, Machiel H. A ; de Bruin, Jan Peter ; Verhoeve, Harold R ; Mol, Femke ; Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A ; Traas, Maaike A. F ; Muijsers, Guido J. J. M ; Manger, Arentje P ; Gianotten, Judith ; de Koning, Cornelia H ; Koning, Aafke M. H ; Bayram, Neriman ; van der Ham, David P ; Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M ; Kalafusova, Michaela ; van de Laar, Bob I. G ; Kaijser, Jeroen ; van Oostwaard, Miriam F ; Meijer, Wouter J ; Broekmans, Frank J. M ; Valkenburg, Olivier ; van der Voet, Lucy F ; van Disseldorp, Jeroen ; Lambers, Marieke J ; Peters, Henrike E ; Lier, Marit C. I ; Lambalk, Cornelis B ; van Wely, Madelon ; Bossuyt, Patrick M. M ; Stoker, Jaap ; van der Veen, Fulco ; Mol, Ben W. J ; Mijatovic, Velja</creatorcontrib><description>Background Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it is less expensive and more patient friendly. HyFoSy would be an acceptable alternative for HSG, provided it has similar effectiveness in terms of patient outcomes. Methods/design We aim to compare the effectiveness and costs of management guided by HyFoSy or by HSG. Consenting women will undergo tubal testing by both HyFoSy and HSG in a randomized order during fertility work-up. The study group will consist of 1163 subfertile women between 18 and 41 years old who are scheduled for tubal patency testing during their fertility work-up. Women with anovulatory cycles not responding to ovulation induction, endometriosis, severe male subfertility or a known contrast (iodine) allergy will be excluded. We anticipate that 7 % (N = 82) of the participants will have discordant test results for HyFoSy and HSG. These participants will be randomly allocated to either a management strategy based on HyFoSy or a management strategy based on HSG, resulting in either a diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation or a strategy that assumes tubal patency (intrauterine insemination or expectant management). The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes are patient pain scores, time to pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate and number of additional treatments. Costs will be estimated by counting resource use and calculating unit prices. Discussion This trial will compare the effectiveness and costs of HyFoSy versus HSG in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register (NTR 4746, Keywords: Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy), Hysterosalpingography (HSG), Fertility work-up, Tubal patency testing, Ongoing pregnancy, Cost-effectiveness, Subfertility, Randomized controlled trial, Budget impact</description><identifier>ISSN: 1472-6874</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1472-6874</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Anovulation ; Diagnosis ; Health aspects ; Hysterosalpingography ; Patient outcomes ; Tubal sterilization ; Women</subject><ispartof>BMC women's health, 2018-05, Vol.18 (1)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,860,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Rijswijk, Joukje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Welie, Nienke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyer, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hooff, Machiel H. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bruin, Jan Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeve, Harold R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Femke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traas, Maaike A. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muijsers, Guido J. J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manger, Arentje P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianotten, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koning, Cornelia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koning, Aafke M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayram, Neriman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Ham, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalafusova, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Laar, Bob I. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaijser, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oostwaard, Miriam F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Wouter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broekmans, Frank J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkenburg, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Voet, Lucy F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Disseldorp, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambers, Marieke J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Henrike E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lier, Marit C. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambalk, Cornelis B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wely, Madelon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossuyt, Patrick M. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoker, Jaap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Veen, Fulco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Ben W. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mijatovic, Velja</creatorcontrib><title>The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><title>BMC women's health</title><description>Background Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it is less expensive and more patient friendly. HyFoSy would be an acceptable alternative for HSG, provided it has similar effectiveness in terms of patient outcomes. Methods/design We aim to compare the effectiveness and costs of management guided by HyFoSy or by HSG. Consenting women will undergo tubal testing by both HyFoSy and HSG in a randomized order during fertility work-up. The study group will consist of 1163 subfertile women between 18 and 41 years old who are scheduled for tubal patency testing during their fertility work-up. Women with anovulatory cycles not responding to ovulation induction, endometriosis, severe male subfertility or a known contrast (iodine) allergy will be excluded. We anticipate that 7 % (N = 82) of the participants will have discordant test results for HyFoSy and HSG. These participants will be randomly allocated to either a management strategy based on HyFoSy or a management strategy based on HSG, resulting in either a diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation or a strategy that assumes tubal patency (intrauterine insemination or expectant management). The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes are patient pain scores, time to pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate and number of additional treatments. Costs will be estimated by counting resource use and calculating unit prices. Discussion This trial will compare the effectiveness and costs of HyFoSy versus HSG in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register (NTR 4746, Keywords: Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy), Hysterosalpingography (HSG), Fertility work-up, Tubal patency testing, Ongoing pregnancy, Cost-effectiveness, Subfertility, Randomized controlled trial, Budget impact</description><subject>Anovulation</subject><subject>Diagnosis</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Hysterosalpingography</subject><subject>Patient outcomes</subject><subject>Tubal sterilization</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>1472-6874</issn><issn>1472-6874</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptj01OwzAQhS0EEqVwAHaWWAfsOI4dNqiqKEUq6oLuq0lip0ZOHNmuULkGF8b8LLpAs5inefM-zSB0TcktpbK8CzSvCM8IlRnhvMzKEzShhcizUori9Eifo4sQ3gihQnIxQZ-bncKL9ewFh7hvD_fYBLw8hKi8C2BHM3QOawc9Dm5wnYdxd8BmwBCCCiG5OO5rsHiEqIbmxwr7WisfjVX43fVqeMCv32Q8ehdd42zCeQzYw9C63nyoFjduiN5Zm2T0BuwlOtNgg7r661O0WTxu5ststX56ns9WWVcKmrGykkTSqpEFYaSugRCm80oUaa5yzkA3uhJQMUmZBlkXbcMZyWWheSXqHNgU3fxiO7BqawbtooemN6HZznhRFlTKFJ2i23-2UrWqN-lypdOnx4EvbEB5Mg</recordid><startdate>20180509</startdate><enddate>20180509</enddate><creator>van Rijswijk, Joukje</creator><creator>van Welie, Nienke</creator><creator>Dreyer, Kim</creator><creator>van Hooff, Machiel H. A</creator><creator>de Bruin, Jan Peter</creator><creator>Verhoeve, Harold R</creator><creator>Mol, Femke</creator><creator>Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A</creator><creator>Traas, Maaike A. F</creator><creator>Muijsers, Guido J. J. M</creator><creator>Manger, Arentje P</creator><creator>Gianotten, Judith</creator><creator>de Koning, Cornelia H</creator><creator>Koning, Aafke M. H</creator><creator>Bayram, Neriman</creator><creator>van der Ham, David P</creator><creator>Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M</creator><creator>Kalafusova, Michaela</creator><creator>van de Laar, Bob I. G</creator><creator>Kaijser, Jeroen</creator><creator>van Oostwaard, Miriam F</creator><creator>Meijer, Wouter J</creator><creator>Broekmans, Frank J. M</creator><creator>Valkenburg, Olivier</creator><creator>van der Voet, Lucy F</creator><creator>van Disseldorp, Jeroen</creator><creator>Lambers, Marieke J</creator><creator>Peters, Henrike E</creator><creator>Lier, Marit C. I</creator><creator>Lambalk, Cornelis B</creator><creator>van Wely, Madelon</creator><creator>Bossuyt, Patrick M. M</creator><creator>Stoker, Jaap</creator><creator>van der Veen, Fulco</creator><creator>Mol, Ben W. J</creator><creator>Mijatovic, Velja</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20180509</creationdate><title>The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</title><author>van Rijswijk, Joukje ; van Welie, Nienke ; Dreyer, Kim ; van Hooff, Machiel H. A ; de Bruin, Jan Peter ; Verhoeve, Harold R ; Mol, Femke ; Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A ; Traas, Maaike A. F ; Muijsers, Guido J. J. M ; Manger, Arentje P ; Gianotten, Judith ; de Koning, Cornelia H ; Koning, Aafke M. H ; Bayram, Neriman ; van der Ham, David P ; Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M ; Kalafusova, Michaela ; van de Laar, Bob I. G ; Kaijser, Jeroen ; van Oostwaard, Miriam F ; Meijer, Wouter J ; Broekmans, Frank J. M ; Valkenburg, Olivier ; van der Voet, Lucy F ; van Disseldorp, Jeroen ; Lambers, Marieke J ; Peters, Henrike E ; Lier, Marit C. I ; Lambalk, Cornelis B ; van Wely, Madelon ; Bossuyt, Patrick M. M ; Stoker, Jaap ; van der Veen, Fulco ; Mol, Ben W. J ; Mijatovic, Velja</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g671-36980819c84030bba003f2974698e253afcf97a93813fa8b4dc530284f597b2a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Anovulation</topic><topic>Diagnosis</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Hysterosalpingography</topic><topic>Patient outcomes</topic><topic>Tubal sterilization</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Rijswijk, Joukje</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Welie, Nienke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dreyer, Kim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Hooff, Machiel H. A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Bruin, Jan Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Verhoeve, Harold R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Femke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Traas, Maaike A. F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Muijsers, Guido J. J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manger, Arentje P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gianotten, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>de Koning, Cornelia H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koning, Aafke M. H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bayram, Neriman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Ham, David P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalafusova, Michaela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van de Laar, Bob I. G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaijser, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Oostwaard, Miriam F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Meijer, Wouter J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Broekmans, Frank J. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Valkenburg, Olivier</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Voet, Lucy F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Disseldorp, Jeroen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambers, Marieke J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peters, Henrike E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lier, Marit C. I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambalk, Cornelis B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Wely, Madelon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bossuyt, Patrick M. M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoker, Jaap</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Veen, Fulco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mol, Ben W. J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mijatovic, Velja</creatorcontrib><jtitle>BMC women's health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Rijswijk, Joukje</au><au>van Welie, Nienke</au><au>Dreyer, Kim</au><au>van Hooff, Machiel H. A</au><au>de Bruin, Jan Peter</au><au>Verhoeve, Harold R</au><au>Mol, Femke</au><au>Kleiman-Broeze, Kimiko A</au><au>Traas, Maaike A. F</au><au>Muijsers, Guido J. J. M</au><au>Manger, Arentje P</au><au>Gianotten, Judith</au><au>de Koning, Cornelia H</au><au>Koning, Aafke M. H</au><au>Bayram, Neriman</au><au>van der Ham, David P</au><au>Vrouenraets, Francisca P. J. M</au><au>Kalafusova, Michaela</au><au>van de Laar, Bob I. G</au><au>Kaijser, Jeroen</au><au>van Oostwaard, Miriam F</au><au>Meijer, Wouter J</au><au>Broekmans, Frank J. M</au><au>Valkenburg, Olivier</au><au>van der Voet, Lucy F</au><au>van Disseldorp, Jeroen</au><au>Lambers, Marieke J</au><au>Peters, Henrike E</au><au>Lier, Marit C. I</au><au>Lambalk, Cornelis B</au><au>van Wely, Madelon</au><au>Bossuyt, Patrick M. M</au><au>Stoker, Jaap</au><au>van der Veen, Fulco</au><au>Mol, Ben W. J</au><au>Mijatovic, Velja</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial</atitle><jtitle>BMC women's health</jtitle><date>2018-05-09</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1472-6874</issn><eissn>1472-6874</eissn><abstract>Background Tubal pathology is a causative factor in 20% of subfertile couples. Traditionally, tubal testing during fertility work-up is performed by hysterosalpingography (HSG). Hysterosalpingo-foam sonography (HyFoSy) is a new technique that is thought to have comparable accuracy as HSG, while it is less expensive and more patient friendly. HyFoSy would be an acceptable alternative for HSG, provided it has similar effectiveness in terms of patient outcomes. Methods/design We aim to compare the effectiveness and costs of management guided by HyFoSy or by HSG. Consenting women will undergo tubal testing by both HyFoSy and HSG in a randomized order during fertility work-up. The study group will consist of 1163 subfertile women between 18 and 41 years old who are scheduled for tubal patency testing during their fertility work-up. Women with anovulatory cycles not responding to ovulation induction, endometriosis, severe male subfertility or a known contrast (iodine) allergy will be excluded. We anticipate that 7 % (N = 82) of the participants will have discordant test results for HyFoSy and HSG. These participants will be randomly allocated to either a management strategy based on HyFoSy or a management strategy based on HSG, resulting in either a diagnostic laparoscopy with chromopertubation or a strategy that assumes tubal patency (intrauterine insemination or expectant management). The primary outcome is ongoing pregnancy leading to live birth within 12 months after randomization. Secondary outcomes are patient pain scores, time to pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage rate, multiple pregnancy rate, preterm birth rate and number of additional treatments. Costs will be estimated by counting resource use and calculating unit prices. Discussion This trial will compare the effectiveness and costs of HyFoSy versus HSG in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women. Trial registration Dutch Trial Register (NTR 4746, Keywords: Hysterosalpingo foam sonography (HyFoSy), Hysterosalpingography (HSG), Fertility work-up, Tubal patency testing, Ongoing pregnancy, Cost-effectiveness, Subfertility, Randomized controlled trial, Budget impact</abstract><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1472-6874 |
ispartof | BMC women's health, 2018-05, Vol.18 (1) |
issn | 1472-6874 1472-6874 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A546418881 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ); PubMed Central; Directory of Open Access Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals |
subjects | Anovulation Diagnosis Health aspects Hysterosalpingography Patient outcomes Tubal sterilization Women |
title | The FOAM study: is Hysterosalpingo foam sonography in assessing tubal patency in subfertile women? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A59%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20FOAM%20study:%20is%20Hysterosalpingo%20foam%20sonography%20in%20assessing%20tubal%20patency%20in%20subfertile%20women?%20Study%20protocol%20for%20a%20randomized%20controlled%20trial&rft.jtitle=BMC%20women's%20health&rft.au=van%20Rijswijk,%20Joukje&rft.date=2018-05-09&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1472-6874&rft.eissn=1472-6874&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/s12905-018-0556-6&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA546418881%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A546418881&rfr_iscdi=true |