Comparison of three different sedative-anaesthetic protocols
Background Handling of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) usually requires chemical restraint. Ketamine has been associated with muscle damage in primates, while common marmosets, compared to other primates, additionally display an exceptional high sensitivity to ketamine-associated side-effects....
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | BMC veterinary research 2013-06, Vol.9 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | BMC veterinary research |
| container_volume | 9 |
| creator | Bakker, Jaco Uilenreef, Joost J Pelt, Eva RJ Brok, Herbert PM Remarque, Edmond J Langermans, Jan AM |
| description | Background Handling of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) usually requires chemical restraint. Ketamine has been associated with muscle damage in primates, while common marmosets, compared to other primates, additionally display an exceptional high sensitivity to ketamine-associated side-effects. Notably, muscle twitching movements of limbs and hands, and a marked increase in salivation are observed. We investigated two alternative intramuscular (i.m.) immobilisation protocols against ketamine (50 mg/kg; protocol 1) in a double-blind randomised crossover study in ten healthy adult common marmosets for use as a safe reliable, short-term immobilisation and sedation. These protocols comprised: alphaxalone (12 mg/kg; protocol 2) and 25 mg/kg ketamine combined with 0.50 mg/kg medetomidine (reversal with 2.5 mg/kg atipamezole; protocol 3A). Following completion and unblinding, the project was extended with an additional protocol (3B), comprising 25 mg/kg ketamine combined with 0.05 mg/kg medetomidine (reversal with 0.25 mg/kg atipamezole, twice with 35 min interval). Results All protocols in this study provided rapid onset (induction times |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1186/1746-6148-9-113 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A534644004</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A534644004</galeid><sourcerecordid>A534644004</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g674-6c4aab3de02e8b254bdb3121accff0a3f1f2cbc3e8a3e9c4bf643148e41e0c243</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptj81rwzAMxc3YYF23866Bnd3ZseoksEsJ-4LCLr0XWZFbjyQusdnfv8DG6GG8gx6Pn4SeEPdarbSu7aOuwEqroZaN1NpciMVfcnnmr8VNSp9KATSVXYinNg4nnEKKYxF9kY8Tc9EF73niMReJO8zhiyWOyCkfOQcqTlPMkWKfbsWVxz7x3e9cit3L8659k9uP1_d2s5UHW4G0BIjOdKxKrl25Btc5o0uNRN4rNF77khwZrtFwQ-C8BTN_yqBZUQlmKR5-zh6w530YfcwT0hAS7TdrAxZgrjNTq3-oWR0PgeLIPsz52cI3jqxaUA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of three different sedative-anaesthetic protocols</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>PubMed Central Open Access</source><source>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><creator>Bakker, Jaco ; Uilenreef, Joost J ; Pelt, Eva RJ ; Brok, Herbert PM ; Remarque, Edmond J ; Langermans, Jan AM</creator><creatorcontrib>Bakker, Jaco ; Uilenreef, Joost J ; Pelt, Eva RJ ; Brok, Herbert PM ; Remarque, Edmond J ; Langermans, Jan AM</creatorcontrib><description>Background Handling of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) usually requires chemical restraint. Ketamine has been associated with muscle damage in primates, while common marmosets, compared to other primates, additionally display an exceptional high sensitivity to ketamine-associated side-effects. Notably, muscle twitching movements of limbs and hands, and a marked increase in salivation are observed. We investigated two alternative intramuscular (i.m.) immobilisation protocols against ketamine (50 mg/kg; protocol 1) in a double-blind randomised crossover study in ten healthy adult common marmosets for use as a safe reliable, short-term immobilisation and sedation. These protocols comprised: alphaxalone (12 mg/kg; protocol 2) and 25 mg/kg ketamine combined with 0.50 mg/kg medetomidine (reversal with 2.5 mg/kg atipamezole; protocol 3A). Following completion and unblinding, the project was extended with an additional protocol (3B), comprising 25 mg/kg ketamine combined with 0.05 mg/kg medetomidine (reversal with 0.25 mg/kg atipamezole, twice with 35 min interval). Results All protocols in this study provided rapid onset (induction times <5 min) of immobilisation and sedation. Duration of immobilisation was 31.23 [+ or -] 22.39 min, 53.72 [+ or -] 13.08 min, 19.73 [+ or -] 5.74 min, and 22.78 [+ or -] 22.37 min for protocol 1, 2, 3A, and 3B, respectively. Recovery times were 135.84 [+ or -] 39.19 min, 55.79 [+ or -] 11.02 min, 405.46 [+ or -] 29.81 min, and 291.91 [+ or -] 80.34 min, respectively. Regarding the quality, and reliability (judged by pedal withdrawal reflex, palpebral reflex and muscle tension) of all protocols, protocol 2 was the most optimal. Monitored vital parameters were within clinically acceptable limits during all protocols and there were no fatalities. Indication of muscle damage as assessed by AST, LDH and CK values was most prominent elevated in protocol 1, 3A, and 3B. Conclusions We conclude that intramuscular administration of 12 mg/kg alphaxalone to common marmosets is preferred over other protocols studied. Protocol 2 resulted in at least comparable immobilisation quality with acceptable and less frequent side effects and superior recovery quality. In all protocols, supportive therapy, such as external heat support, remains mandatory. Notably, an unacceptable long recovery period in both ketamine/medetomidine protocols (subsequently reversed with atipamezole) was observed, showing that [alpha]-2 adrenoreceptor agonists in the used dose and dosing regime is not the first choice for sedation in common marmosets in a standard research setting. Keywords: Alphaxalone, Atipamezole, Common marmoset, Immobilisation, Induction, Ketamine, Medetomidine, Recovery, Sedation</description><identifier>ISSN: 1746-6148</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1746-6148</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-113</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>BioMed Central Ltd</publisher><subject>Anesthetics ; Complications and side effects ; Dosage and administration ; Hypnotics ; Marmosets ; Physiological aspects ; Primates ; Sedatives</subject><ispartof>BMC veterinary research, 2013-06, Vol.9</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 BioMed Central Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,861,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bakker, Jaco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uilenreef, Joost J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelt, Eva RJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brok, Herbert PM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remarque, Edmond J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langermans, Jan AM</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of three different sedative-anaesthetic protocols</title><title>BMC veterinary research</title><description>Background Handling of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) usually requires chemical restraint. Ketamine has been associated with muscle damage in primates, while common marmosets, compared to other primates, additionally display an exceptional high sensitivity to ketamine-associated side-effects. Notably, muscle twitching movements of limbs and hands, and a marked increase in salivation are observed. We investigated two alternative intramuscular (i.m.) immobilisation protocols against ketamine (50 mg/kg; protocol 1) in a double-blind randomised crossover study in ten healthy adult common marmosets for use as a safe reliable, short-term immobilisation and sedation. These protocols comprised: alphaxalone (12 mg/kg; protocol 2) and 25 mg/kg ketamine combined with 0.50 mg/kg medetomidine (reversal with 2.5 mg/kg atipamezole; protocol 3A). Following completion and unblinding, the project was extended with an additional protocol (3B), comprising 25 mg/kg ketamine combined with 0.05 mg/kg medetomidine (reversal with 0.25 mg/kg atipamezole, twice with 35 min interval). Results All protocols in this study provided rapid onset (induction times <5 min) of immobilisation and sedation. Duration of immobilisation was 31.23 [+ or -] 22.39 min, 53.72 [+ or -] 13.08 min, 19.73 [+ or -] 5.74 min, and 22.78 [+ or -] 22.37 min for protocol 1, 2, 3A, and 3B, respectively. Recovery times were 135.84 [+ or -] 39.19 min, 55.79 [+ or -] 11.02 min, 405.46 [+ or -] 29.81 min, and 291.91 [+ or -] 80.34 min, respectively. Regarding the quality, and reliability (judged by pedal withdrawal reflex, palpebral reflex and muscle tension) of all protocols, protocol 2 was the most optimal. Monitored vital parameters were within clinically acceptable limits during all protocols and there were no fatalities. Indication of muscle damage as assessed by AST, LDH and CK values was most prominent elevated in protocol 1, 3A, and 3B. Conclusions We conclude that intramuscular administration of 12 mg/kg alphaxalone to common marmosets is preferred over other protocols studied. Protocol 2 resulted in at least comparable immobilisation quality with acceptable and less frequent side effects and superior recovery quality. In all protocols, supportive therapy, such as external heat support, remains mandatory. Notably, an unacceptable long recovery period in both ketamine/medetomidine protocols (subsequently reversed with atipamezole) was observed, showing that [alpha]-2 adrenoreceptor agonists in the used dose and dosing regime is not the first choice for sedation in common marmosets in a standard research setting. Keywords: Alphaxalone, Atipamezole, Common marmoset, Immobilisation, Induction, Ketamine, Medetomidine, Recovery, Sedation</description><subject>Anesthetics</subject><subject>Complications and side effects</subject><subject>Dosage and administration</subject><subject>Hypnotics</subject><subject>Marmosets</subject><subject>Physiological aspects</subject><subject>Primates</subject><subject>Sedatives</subject><issn>1746-6148</issn><issn>1746-6148</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNptj81rwzAMxc3YYF23866Bnd3ZseoksEsJ-4LCLr0XWZFbjyQusdnfv8DG6GG8gx6Pn4SeEPdarbSu7aOuwEqroZaN1NpciMVfcnnmr8VNSp9KATSVXYinNg4nnEKKYxF9kY8Tc9EF73niMReJO8zhiyWOyCkfOQcqTlPMkWKfbsWVxz7x3e9cit3L8659k9uP1_d2s5UHW4G0BIjOdKxKrl25Btc5o0uNRN4rNF77khwZrtFwQ-C8BTN_yqBZUQlmKR5-zh6w530YfcwT0hAS7TdrAxZgrjNTq3-oWR0PgeLIPsz52cI3jqxaUA</recordid><startdate>20130611</startdate><enddate>20130611</enddate><creator>Bakker, Jaco</creator><creator>Uilenreef, Joost J</creator><creator>Pelt, Eva RJ</creator><creator>Brok, Herbert PM</creator><creator>Remarque, Edmond J</creator><creator>Langermans, Jan AM</creator><general>BioMed Central Ltd</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20130611</creationdate><title>Comparison of three different sedative-anaesthetic protocols</title><author>Bakker, Jaco ; Uilenreef, Joost J ; Pelt, Eva RJ ; Brok, Herbert PM ; Remarque, Edmond J ; Langermans, Jan AM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g674-6c4aab3de02e8b254bdb3121accff0a3f1f2cbc3e8a3e9c4bf643148e41e0c243</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Anesthetics</topic><topic>Complications and side effects</topic><topic>Dosage and administration</topic><topic>Hypnotics</topic><topic>Marmosets</topic><topic>Physiological aspects</topic><topic>Primates</topic><topic>Sedatives</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bakker, Jaco</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Uilenreef, Joost J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pelt, Eva RJ</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brok, Herbert PM</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Remarque, Edmond J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langermans, Jan AM</creatorcontrib><jtitle>BMC veterinary research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bakker, Jaco</au><au>Uilenreef, Joost J</au><au>Pelt, Eva RJ</au><au>Brok, Herbert PM</au><au>Remarque, Edmond J</au><au>Langermans, Jan AM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of three different sedative-anaesthetic protocols</atitle><jtitle>BMC veterinary research</jtitle><date>2013-06-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>9</volume><issn>1746-6148</issn><eissn>1746-6148</eissn><abstract>Background Handling of common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus) usually requires chemical restraint. Ketamine has been associated with muscle damage in primates, while common marmosets, compared to other primates, additionally display an exceptional high sensitivity to ketamine-associated side-effects. Notably, muscle twitching movements of limbs and hands, and a marked increase in salivation are observed. We investigated two alternative intramuscular (i.m.) immobilisation protocols against ketamine (50 mg/kg; protocol 1) in a double-blind randomised crossover study in ten healthy adult common marmosets for use as a safe reliable, short-term immobilisation and sedation. These protocols comprised: alphaxalone (12 mg/kg; protocol 2) and 25 mg/kg ketamine combined with 0.50 mg/kg medetomidine (reversal with 2.5 mg/kg atipamezole; protocol 3A). Following completion and unblinding, the project was extended with an additional protocol (3B), comprising 25 mg/kg ketamine combined with 0.05 mg/kg medetomidine (reversal with 0.25 mg/kg atipamezole, twice with 35 min interval). Results All protocols in this study provided rapid onset (induction times <5 min) of immobilisation and sedation. Duration of immobilisation was 31.23 [+ or -] 22.39 min, 53.72 [+ or -] 13.08 min, 19.73 [+ or -] 5.74 min, and 22.78 [+ or -] 22.37 min for protocol 1, 2, 3A, and 3B, respectively. Recovery times were 135.84 [+ or -] 39.19 min, 55.79 [+ or -] 11.02 min, 405.46 [+ or -] 29.81 min, and 291.91 [+ or -] 80.34 min, respectively. Regarding the quality, and reliability (judged by pedal withdrawal reflex, palpebral reflex and muscle tension) of all protocols, protocol 2 was the most optimal. Monitored vital parameters were within clinically acceptable limits during all protocols and there were no fatalities. Indication of muscle damage as assessed by AST, LDH and CK values was most prominent elevated in protocol 1, 3A, and 3B. Conclusions We conclude that intramuscular administration of 12 mg/kg alphaxalone to common marmosets is preferred over other protocols studied. Protocol 2 resulted in at least comparable immobilisation quality with acceptable and less frequent side effects and superior recovery quality. In all protocols, supportive therapy, such as external heat support, remains mandatory. Notably, an unacceptable long recovery period in both ketamine/medetomidine protocols (subsequently reversed with atipamezole) was observed, showing that [alpha]-2 adrenoreceptor agonists in the used dose and dosing regime is not the first choice for sedation in common marmosets in a standard research setting. Keywords: Alphaxalone, Atipamezole, Common marmoset, Immobilisation, Induction, Ketamine, Medetomidine, Recovery, Sedation</abstract><pub>BioMed Central Ltd</pub><doi>10.1186/1746-6148-9-113</doi></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1746-6148 |
| ispartof | BMC veterinary research, 2013-06, Vol.9 |
| issn | 1746-6148 1746-6148 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A534644004 |
| source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; PubMed Central Open Access; Springer Nature OA Free Journals; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals; PubMed Central |
| subjects | Anesthetics Complications and side effects Dosage and administration Hypnotics Marmosets Physiological aspects Primates Sedatives |
| title | Comparison of three different sedative-anaesthetic protocols |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T20%3A33%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20three%20different%20sedative-anaesthetic%20protocols&rft.jtitle=BMC%20veterinary%20research&rft.au=Bakker,%20Jaco&rft.date=2013-06-11&rft.volume=9&rft.issn=1746-6148&rft.eissn=1746-6148&rft_id=info:doi/10.1186/1746-6148-9-113&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA534644004%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A534644004&rfr_iscdi=true |