U.S. Consideration of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention

UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, voted overwhelmingly at the biennial meeting of its General Conference in Paris on October 17, 2003 to adopt a new international Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. That Convention became inte...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Ethnologies (Québec) 2014-03, Vol.36 (1-2), p.325-358
1. Verfasser: Kurin, Richard
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 358
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 325
container_title Ethnologies (Québec)
container_volume 36
creator Kurin, Richard
description UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, voted overwhelmingly at the biennial meeting of its General Conference in Paris on October 17, 2003 to adopt a new international Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. That Convention became international law on April 30, 2006. By the end of 2006 it had been ratified or accepted by 68 countries; today, that number is approaching universal acceptance with more than 160 nations having acceded to the convention. At the 2003 session, some 120 nation-members voted for the convention; more registered their support subsequently. No one voted against it; only a handful of nations abstained – Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States among them. Within some of those nations, debate over whether to ratify the treaty continues. In this paper, the author considers the convention and unofficially examines the U.S. government position with regard to why support for it was withheld in 2003, how deliberations have proceeded since then, and whether or not the U.S. might ultimately accept the treaty.
doi_str_mv 10.7202/1037612ar
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>erudit_gale_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A500198045</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><eruid>1037612ar</eruid><galeid>A500198045</galeid><sourcerecordid>1037612ar</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-2ca60d1be3b9942ae71b2b733776a99239f60b1d9b81fb2cc7d15fddc185f26d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0s9LwzAUB_AiCs7pwb_AoicPnUn6I81xFJ2DoQf1HNLkpUa6VpNM9L83YyobFJEcEsLnfeE9XhSdYjShBJErjFJaYCLsXjTCFJUJyhDeD--sxEnOaHYYHTn3ghAuM8RG0fRp8jCJq75zRoEV3vRd3OvYP0M877zoGlO3EFer1q-saONbsMaLBtYV79Ct-XF0oEXr4OT7HkdPN9eP1W2yuJ_Nq-kikVle-IRIUSCFa0hrxjIigOKa1DRNKS0EYyRlukA1Vqwusa6JlFThXCslcZlrUqh0HF1schvRAjed7r0Vcmmc5NM89MNKlOVBJQOqgS401_YdaBO-d_z5gJev5o1vo8kACkfB0sjB1MudgmA8fPhGrJzj84e7f9tytviru28r-7aFBniYd3U_mC1t75wFzV-tWQr7yTHi633hv_sS7NnGgl0p47fkj_gCn2e2Ng</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>U.S. Consideration of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention</title><source>Érudit</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Kurin, Richard</creator><creatorcontrib>Kurin, Richard</creatorcontrib><description>UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, voted overwhelmingly at the biennial meeting of its General Conference in Paris on October 17, 2003 to adopt a new international Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. That Convention became international law on April 30, 2006. By the end of 2006 it had been ratified or accepted by 68 countries; today, that number is approaching universal acceptance with more than 160 nations having acceded to the convention. At the 2003 session, some 120 nation-members voted for the convention; more registered their support subsequently. No one voted against it; only a handful of nations abstained – Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States among them. Within some of those nations, debate over whether to ratify the treaty continues. In this paper, the author considers the convention and unofficially examines the U.S. government position with regard to why support for it was withheld in 2003, how deliberations have proceeded since then, and whether or not the U.S. might ultimately accept the treaty.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1481-5974</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1708-0401</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.7202/1037612ar</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Association Canadienne d’Ethnologie et de Folklore</publisher><subject>Conferences, meetings and seminars ; Cultural resources management</subject><ispartof>Ethnologies (Québec), 2014-03, Vol.36 (1-2), p.325-358</ispartof><rights>Tous droits réservés © Ethnologies, Université Laval, 2014</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2014 Ethnologies</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-2ca60d1be3b9942ae71b2b733776a99239f60b1d9b81fb2cc7d15fddc185f26d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-2ca60d1be3b9942ae71b2b733776a99239f60b1d9b81fb2cc7d15fddc185f26d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.erudit.org/en/journals/ethno/2014-ethno02680/1037612ar.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gerudit$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttp://id.erudit.org/iderudit/1037612ar$$EHTML$$P50$$Gerudit$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,694,780,784,27923,27924,79332,79333</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kurin, Richard</creatorcontrib><title>U.S. Consideration of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention</title><title>Ethnologies (Québec)</title><addtitle>Ethnologies</addtitle><description>UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, voted overwhelmingly at the biennial meeting of its General Conference in Paris on October 17, 2003 to adopt a new international Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. That Convention became international law on April 30, 2006. By the end of 2006 it had been ratified or accepted by 68 countries; today, that number is approaching universal acceptance with more than 160 nations having acceded to the convention. At the 2003 session, some 120 nation-members voted for the convention; more registered their support subsequently. No one voted against it; only a handful of nations abstained – Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States among them. Within some of those nations, debate over whether to ratify the treaty continues. In this paper, the author considers the convention and unofficially examines the U.S. government position with regard to why support for it was withheld in 2003, how deliberations have proceeded since then, and whether or not the U.S. might ultimately accept the treaty.</description><subject>Conferences, meetings and seminars</subject><subject>Cultural resources management</subject><issn>1481-5974</issn><issn>1708-0401</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0s9LwzAUB_AiCs7pwb_AoicPnUn6I81xFJ2DoQf1HNLkpUa6VpNM9L83YyobFJEcEsLnfeE9XhSdYjShBJErjFJaYCLsXjTCFJUJyhDeD--sxEnOaHYYHTn3ghAuM8RG0fRp8jCJq75zRoEV3vRd3OvYP0M877zoGlO3EFer1q-saONbsMaLBtYV79Ct-XF0oEXr4OT7HkdPN9eP1W2yuJ_Nq-kikVle-IRIUSCFa0hrxjIigOKa1DRNKS0EYyRlukA1Vqwusa6JlFThXCslcZlrUqh0HF1schvRAjed7r0Vcmmc5NM89MNKlOVBJQOqgS401_YdaBO-d_z5gJev5o1vo8kACkfB0sjB1MudgmA8fPhGrJzj84e7f9tytviru28r-7aFBniYd3U_mC1t75wFzV-tWQr7yTHi633hv_sS7NnGgl0p47fkj_gCn2e2Ng</recordid><startdate>20140322</startdate><enddate>20140322</enddate><creator>Kurin, Richard</creator><general>Association Canadienne d’Ethnologie et de Folklore</general><general>Ethnologies</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140322</creationdate><title>U.S. Consideration of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention</title><author>Kurin, Richard</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c456t-2ca60d1be3b9942ae71b2b733776a99239f60b1d9b81fb2cc7d15fddc185f26d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Conferences, meetings and seminars</topic><topic>Cultural resources management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kurin, Richard</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><jtitle>Ethnologies (Québec)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kurin, Richard</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>U.S. Consideration of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention</atitle><jtitle>Ethnologies (Québec)</jtitle><addtitle>Ethnologies</addtitle><date>2014-03-22</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>36</volume><issue>1-2</issue><spage>325</spage><epage>358</epage><pages>325-358</pages><issn>1481-5974</issn><eissn>1708-0401</eissn><abstract>UNESCO, the United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization, voted overwhelmingly at the biennial meeting of its General Conference in Paris on October 17, 2003 to adopt a new international Convention for the Safeguarding of Intangible Cultural Heritage. That Convention became international law on April 30, 2006. By the end of 2006 it had been ratified or accepted by 68 countries; today, that number is approaching universal acceptance with more than 160 nations having acceded to the convention. At the 2003 session, some 120 nation-members voted for the convention; more registered their support subsequently. No one voted against it; only a handful of nations abstained – Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, and the United States among them. Within some of those nations, debate over whether to ratify the treaty continues. In this paper, the author considers the convention and unofficially examines the U.S. government position with regard to why support for it was withheld in 2003, how deliberations have proceeded since then, and whether or not the U.S. might ultimately accept the treaty.</abstract><pub>Association Canadienne d’Ethnologie et de Folklore</pub><doi>10.7202/1037612ar</doi><tpages>34</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1481-5974
ispartof Ethnologies (Québec), 2014-03, Vol.36 (1-2), p.325-358
issn 1481-5974
1708-0401
language eng
recordid cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A500198045
source Érudit; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Conferences, meetings and seminars
Cultural resources management
title U.S. Consideration of the Intangible Cultural Heritage Convention
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T23%3A21%3A02IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-erudit_gale_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=U.S.%20Consideration%20of%20the%20Intangible%20Cultural%20Heritage%20Convention&rft.jtitle=Ethnologies%20(Qu%C3%A9bec)&rft.au=Kurin,%20Richard&rft.date=2014-03-22&rft.volume=36&rft.issue=1-2&rft.spage=325&rft.epage=358&rft.pages=325-358&rft.issn=1481-5974&rft.eissn=1708-0401&rft_id=info:doi/10.7202/1037612ar&rft_dat=%3Cerudit_gale_%3E1037612ar%3C/erudit_gale_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A500198045&rft_eruid=1037612ar&rfr_iscdi=true