Evaluation of the Septifast M.sup.Grade Test on Standard Care Wards-A Cohort Study
The immediate need for appropriate antimicrobial therapy in septic patients requires the detection of the causative pathogen in a timely and reliable manner. In this study, the real-time PCR Septifast M.sup.Grade test was evaluated in adult patients meeting the systemic inflammatory response syndrom...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | PloS one 2016-03, Vol.11 (3) |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | PloS one |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Ratzinger, Franz Tsirkinidou, Irene Haslacher, Helmuth Perkmann, Thomas Schmetterer, Klaus G Mitteregger, Dieter Makristathis, Athanasios Burgmann, Heinz |
description | The immediate need for appropriate antimicrobial therapy in septic patients requires the detection of the causative pathogen in a timely and reliable manner. In this study, the real-time PCR Septifast M.sup.Grade test was evaluated in adult patients meeting the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria that were treated at standard care wards. In total, 220 patients with SIRS were prospectively enrolled, including 56 patients with detection of bacteria in the blood (incidence: 25.5%). BC analysis resulted in 75.0% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, CI: 61.6%- 85.6%) with 97.6% specificity (CI: 93.9%- 99.3%) for detecting bacteria in the blood. In comparison to BC, SF presented with 80.4% sensitivity (CI: 67.6%- 89.8%) and with 97.6% specificity (CI: 93.9%- 99.3%). BC and SF analysis yielded comparable ROC-AUCs (0.86, 0.89), which did not differ significantly (p = 0.558). A trend of a shorter time-to-positivity of BC analysis was not seen in bacteremic patients with a positive SF test than those with a negative test result. Sepsis biomarkers, including PCT, IL-6 or CRP, did not help to explain discordant test results for BC and SF. Since negative results do not exclude bacteremia, the Septifast M.sup.Grade test is not suited to replacing BC, but it is a valuable tool with which to complement BC for faster detection of pathogens. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1371/journal.pone.0151108 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A453470992</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A453470992</galeid><sourcerecordid>A453470992</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g1662-897c3e0166070da5f63edb4e22a68463a4e96fbdf775b5032ab5e9a1fda93d163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQhRdRsFb_gYcFQfCQuJtNNsmxFK2FSqGteiyT7GyTkmZLdiP6713RQwseZA7zePO9OTxCrjkLuUj5_db0XQtNuDcthownnLPshAx4LqJARkycHuhzcmHtlrFEZFIOyOLhHZoeXG1aajR1FdIl7l2twTr6HNp-H046UEhX6A0PLR20CjpFx9AhffPKBiM6NpXpnD_26vOSnGloLF797iF5eXxYjZ-C2XwyHY9mwYZLGQVZnpYCmdcsZQoSLQWqIsYoApnFUkCMudSF0mmaFAkTERQJ5sC1glwoLsWQ3Pz83UCD67rVxnVQ7mpbrkdxIuKU5XnkqfAPyo_CXV36wnTt_aPA3VHAMw4_3AZ6a9fT5eL_7Pz1mL09YCuExlXWNP139fYQ_AJldota</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of the Septifast M.sup.Grade Test on Standard Care Wards-A Cohort Study</title><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>PubMed Central</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Ratzinger, Franz ; Tsirkinidou, Irene ; Haslacher, Helmuth ; Perkmann, Thomas ; Schmetterer, Klaus G ; Mitteregger, Dieter ; Makristathis, Athanasios ; Burgmann, Heinz</creator><creatorcontrib>Ratzinger, Franz ; Tsirkinidou, Irene ; Haslacher, Helmuth ; Perkmann, Thomas ; Schmetterer, Klaus G ; Mitteregger, Dieter ; Makristathis, Athanasios ; Burgmann, Heinz</creatorcontrib><description>The immediate need for appropriate antimicrobial therapy in septic patients requires the detection of the causative pathogen in a timely and reliable manner. In this study, the real-time PCR Septifast M.sup.Grade test was evaluated in adult patients meeting the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria that were treated at standard care wards. In total, 220 patients with SIRS were prospectively enrolled, including 56 patients with detection of bacteria in the blood (incidence: 25.5%). BC analysis resulted in 75.0% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, CI: 61.6%- 85.6%) with 97.6% specificity (CI: 93.9%- 99.3%) for detecting bacteria in the blood. In comparison to BC, SF presented with 80.4% sensitivity (CI: 67.6%- 89.8%) and with 97.6% specificity (CI: 93.9%- 99.3%). BC and SF analysis yielded comparable ROC-AUCs (0.86, 0.89), which did not differ significantly (p = 0.558). A trend of a shorter time-to-positivity of BC analysis was not seen in bacteremic patients with a positive SF test than those with a negative test result. Sepsis biomarkers, including PCT, IL-6 or CRP, did not help to explain discordant test results for BC and SF. Since negative results do not exclude bacteremia, the Septifast M.sup.Grade test is not suited to replacing BC, but it is a valuable tool with which to complement BC for faster detection of pathogens.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-6203</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151108</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Public Library of Science</publisher><subject>Anti-infective agents ; Care and treatment ; Health aspects ; Prevalence studies (Epidemiology) ; Sepsis</subject><ispartof>PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3)</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2016 Public Library of Science</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,864,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ratzinger, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsirkinidou, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslacher, Helmuth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmetterer, Klaus G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitteregger, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makristathis, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgmann, Heinz</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of the Septifast M.sup.Grade Test on Standard Care Wards-A Cohort Study</title><title>PloS one</title><description>The immediate need for appropriate antimicrobial therapy in septic patients requires the detection of the causative pathogen in a timely and reliable manner. In this study, the real-time PCR Septifast M.sup.Grade test was evaluated in adult patients meeting the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria that were treated at standard care wards. In total, 220 patients with SIRS were prospectively enrolled, including 56 patients with detection of bacteria in the blood (incidence: 25.5%). BC analysis resulted in 75.0% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, CI: 61.6%- 85.6%) with 97.6% specificity (CI: 93.9%- 99.3%) for detecting bacteria in the blood. In comparison to BC, SF presented with 80.4% sensitivity (CI: 67.6%- 89.8%) and with 97.6% specificity (CI: 93.9%- 99.3%). BC and SF analysis yielded comparable ROC-AUCs (0.86, 0.89), which did not differ significantly (p = 0.558). A trend of a shorter time-to-positivity of BC analysis was not seen in bacteremic patients with a positive SF test than those with a negative test result. Sepsis biomarkers, including PCT, IL-6 or CRP, did not help to explain discordant test results for BC and SF. Since negative results do not exclude bacteremia, the Septifast M.sup.Grade test is not suited to replacing BC, but it is a valuable tool with which to complement BC for faster detection of pathogens.</description><subject>Anti-infective agents</subject><subject>Care and treatment</subject><subject>Health aspects</subject><subject>Prevalence studies (Epidemiology)</subject><subject>Sepsis</subject><issn>1932-6203</issn><issn>1932-6203</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkEFLw0AQhRdRsFb_gYcFQfCQuJtNNsmxFK2FSqGteiyT7GyTkmZLdiP6713RQwseZA7zePO9OTxCrjkLuUj5_db0XQtNuDcthownnLPshAx4LqJARkycHuhzcmHtlrFEZFIOyOLhHZoeXG1aajR1FdIl7l2twTr6HNp-H046UEhX6A0PLR20CjpFx9AhffPKBiM6NpXpnD_26vOSnGloLF797iF5eXxYjZ-C2XwyHY9mwYZLGQVZnpYCmdcsZQoSLQWqIsYoApnFUkCMudSF0mmaFAkTERQJ5sC1glwoLsWQ3Pz83UCD67rVxnVQ7mpbrkdxIuKU5XnkqfAPyo_CXV36wnTt_aPA3VHAMw4_3AZ6a9fT5eL_7Pz1mL09YCuExlXWNP139fYQ_AJldota</recordid><startdate>20160317</startdate><enddate>20160317</enddate><creator>Ratzinger, Franz</creator><creator>Tsirkinidou, Irene</creator><creator>Haslacher, Helmuth</creator><creator>Perkmann, Thomas</creator><creator>Schmetterer, Klaus G</creator><creator>Mitteregger, Dieter</creator><creator>Makristathis, Athanasios</creator><creator>Burgmann, Heinz</creator><general>Public Library of Science</general><scope>IOV</scope><scope>ISR</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160317</creationdate><title>Evaluation of the Septifast M.sup.Grade Test on Standard Care Wards-A Cohort Study</title><author>Ratzinger, Franz ; Tsirkinidou, Irene ; Haslacher, Helmuth ; Perkmann, Thomas ; Schmetterer, Klaus G ; Mitteregger, Dieter ; Makristathis, Athanasios ; Burgmann, Heinz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g1662-897c3e0166070da5f63edb4e22a68463a4e96fbdf775b5032ab5e9a1fda93d163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Anti-infective agents</topic><topic>Care and treatment</topic><topic>Health aspects</topic><topic>Prevalence studies (Epidemiology)</topic><topic>Sepsis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ratzinger, Franz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tsirkinidou, Irene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haslacher, Helmuth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perkmann, Thomas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schmetterer, Klaus G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mitteregger, Dieter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Makristathis, Athanasios</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burgmann, Heinz</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale In Context: Opposing Viewpoints</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ratzinger, Franz</au><au>Tsirkinidou, Irene</au><au>Haslacher, Helmuth</au><au>Perkmann, Thomas</au><au>Schmetterer, Klaus G</au><au>Mitteregger, Dieter</au><au>Makristathis, Athanasios</au><au>Burgmann, Heinz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of the Septifast M.sup.Grade Test on Standard Care Wards-A Cohort Study</atitle><jtitle>PloS one</jtitle><date>2016-03-17</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>1932-6203</issn><eissn>1932-6203</eissn><abstract>The immediate need for appropriate antimicrobial therapy in septic patients requires the detection of the causative pathogen in a timely and reliable manner. In this study, the real-time PCR Septifast M.sup.Grade test was evaluated in adult patients meeting the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria that were treated at standard care wards. In total, 220 patients with SIRS were prospectively enrolled, including 56 patients with detection of bacteria in the blood (incidence: 25.5%). BC analysis resulted in 75.0% sensitivity (95% confidence interval, CI: 61.6%- 85.6%) with 97.6% specificity (CI: 93.9%- 99.3%) for detecting bacteria in the blood. In comparison to BC, SF presented with 80.4% sensitivity (CI: 67.6%- 89.8%) and with 97.6% specificity (CI: 93.9%- 99.3%). BC and SF analysis yielded comparable ROC-AUCs (0.86, 0.89), which did not differ significantly (p = 0.558). A trend of a shorter time-to-positivity of BC analysis was not seen in bacteremic patients with a positive SF test than those with a negative test result. Sepsis biomarkers, including PCT, IL-6 or CRP, did not help to explain discordant test results for BC and SF. Since negative results do not exclude bacteremia, the Septifast M.sup.Grade test is not suited to replacing BC, but it is a valuable tool with which to complement BC for faster detection of pathogens.</abstract><pub>Public Library of Science</pub><doi>10.1371/journal.pone.0151108</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1932-6203 |
ispartof | PloS one, 2016-03, Vol.11 (3) |
issn | 1932-6203 1932-6203 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A453470992 |
source | DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Public Library of Science (PLoS) Journals Open Access; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; PubMed Central; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Anti-infective agents Care and treatment Health aspects Prevalence studies (Epidemiology) Sepsis |
title | Evaluation of the Septifast M.sup.Grade Test on Standard Care Wards-A Cohort Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T06%3A56%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20the%20Septifast%20M.sup.Grade%20Test%20on%20Standard%20Care%20Wards-A%20Cohort%20Study&rft.jtitle=PloS%20one&rft.au=Ratzinger,%20Franz&rft.date=2016-03-17&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=1932-6203&rft.eissn=1932-6203&rft_id=info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0151108&rft_dat=%3Cgale%3EA453470992%3C/gale%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A453470992&rfr_iscdi=true |