A categorical modeling approach to analyzing the impacts of the Lacey Act 2008 amendment on Chinese companies’ export cost and the implications on their sourcing behaviors
The United States (US) Lacey Act 2008 amendment (LAA) is a timber legality regulation that requires US importers to monitor and minimize the risk of illegally harvested wood products within their supply chains. This paper empirically examines the effect of the LAA on Chinese companies’ export costs...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Canadian journal of forest research 2015-12, Vol.45 (12), p.1806-1815 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 1815 |
---|---|
container_issue | 12 |
container_start_page | 1806 |
container_title | Canadian journal of forest research |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Lu, Ziyi Ganguly, Indroneil Eastin, Ivan |
description | The United States (US) Lacey Act 2008 amendment (LAA) is a timber legality regulation that requires US importers to monitor and minimize the risk of illegally harvested wood products within their supply chains. This paper empirically examines the effect of the LAA on Chinese companies’ export costs to the US. The study uses 138 responses from two surveys in Shanghai, China, in 2013, i.e., 5 years after the LAA was implemented. Given the high proportion of zero export increase indicated by the Chinese companies, a zero-inflated ordered probit model was used to model Chinese companies’ export cost increases to the US. The research results demonstrate that pre-LAA raw material sourcing patterns are primary indicators of the respondents’ export cost increase to the US as a result of the LAA. From the results, it can be inferred that log and lumber importers from suspect regions are taking additional measures, by changing their procurement practices, to ensure the legality of their raw material, which is adding to their cost structure. The results also indicate that smaller companies, given their flexibility with raw material procurement, were less likely to experience a post-LAA cost increase relative to their larger counterparts. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0163 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_nrcre</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A435454305</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A435454305</galeid><sourcerecordid>A435454305</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-ac1c1a4de076272b0835ad12d0471b54d758e058c41545f08c89ebd5d04903723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVkt-K1DAUxosoOK7eeh30youuJ23Tdi6HQd2FQcE_1yFzetpmaJNukll2vPI19iF8KZ_E1F3RgQGREEJOft93wuFLkucczjnPl69x17o0Ay5S4GX-IFnwDOq0hLx6mCwACpEKKKvHyRPvdwCQlzksku8rhipQZ51GNbDRNjRo0zE1Tc4q7FmwTBk1HL7O1dAT0-OkMHhm21_XjUI6sBUGlgHUTI1kmrgDs4ate23IE0MbNUaT__HtltHNZF2INR-ic_Pbc4j9g7bGz8JY0455u3c4t91Sr661df5p8qhVg6dn9-dZ8uXtm8_ri3Tz4d3lerVJURTLkCrkyFXREFRlVmVbqHOhGp41UFR8K4qmEjWBqLHgohAt1FgvaduI-L6M48rys-TlnW8cwtWefJC7-Jc4Bi95lZfLLIqLP1SnBpLatDY4haP2KFdFHp2LHESk0hNUR4acGqyhVsfyEf_iBI-TvpJ_Q-cnoLgaGjWedH11JIhMoJvQqb338vLTx_9g3x-z9x9BZ7131MrJ6VG5g-Qg51jKOZZyjqWcYxkF_E5gHLoYDuWw_5fmJ44547c</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1736920584</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A categorical modeling approach to analyzing the impacts of the Lacey Act 2008 amendment on Chinese companies’ export cost and the implications on their sourcing behaviors</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Lu, Ziyi ; Ganguly, Indroneil ; Eastin, Ivan</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, Ziyi ; Ganguly, Indroneil ; Eastin, Ivan</creatorcontrib><description>The United States (US) Lacey Act 2008 amendment (LAA) is a timber legality regulation that requires US importers to monitor and minimize the risk of illegally harvested wood products within their supply chains. This paper empirically examines the effect of the LAA on Chinese companies’ export costs to the US. The study uses 138 responses from two surveys in Shanghai, China, in 2013, i.e., 5 years after the LAA was implemented. Given the high proportion of zero export increase indicated by the Chinese companies, a zero-inflated ordered probit model was used to model Chinese companies’ export cost increases to the US. The research results demonstrate that pre-LAA raw material sourcing patterns are primary indicators of the respondents’ export cost increase to the US as a result of the LAA. From the results, it can be inferred that log and lumber importers from suspect regions are taking additional measures, by changing their procurement practices, to ensure the legality of their raw material, which is adding to their cost structure. The results also indicate that smaller companies, given their flexibility with raw material procurement, were less likely to experience a post-LAA cost increase relative to their larger counterparts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0045-5067</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1208-6037</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1139/cjfr-2015-0163</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CJFRAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ottawa: NRC Research Press</publisher><subject>commerce entre les États-Unis et la Chine ; commerce international des produits du bois ; environmental legislation ; Exports ; Finance ; Forest products industry ; Impact analysis ; Importers ; Lacey Act ; Law ; Laws, regulations and rules ; Loi Lacey ; Lumber ; législation environnementale ; législation sur le commerce international ; modèle où la variable aléatoire égale zéro ; Risk reduction ; Timber ; trade legislation ; US–China trade ; Wood products ; wood products’ trade ; zero-inflated model</subject><ispartof>Canadian journal of forest research, 2015-12, Vol.45 (12), p.1806-1815</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 NRC Research Press</rights><rights>Copyright Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press Dec 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-ac1c1a4de076272b0835ad12d0471b54d758e058c41545f08c89ebd5d04903723</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-ac1c1a4de076272b0835ad12d0471b54d758e058c41545f08c89ebd5d04903723</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, Ziyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganguly, Indroneil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastin, Ivan</creatorcontrib><title>A categorical modeling approach to analyzing the impacts of the Lacey Act 2008 amendment on Chinese companies’ export cost and the implications on their sourcing behaviors</title><title>Canadian journal of forest research</title><description>The United States (US) Lacey Act 2008 amendment (LAA) is a timber legality regulation that requires US importers to monitor and minimize the risk of illegally harvested wood products within their supply chains. This paper empirically examines the effect of the LAA on Chinese companies’ export costs to the US. The study uses 138 responses from two surveys in Shanghai, China, in 2013, i.e., 5 years after the LAA was implemented. Given the high proportion of zero export increase indicated by the Chinese companies, a zero-inflated ordered probit model was used to model Chinese companies’ export cost increases to the US. The research results demonstrate that pre-LAA raw material sourcing patterns are primary indicators of the respondents’ export cost increase to the US as a result of the LAA. From the results, it can be inferred that log and lumber importers from suspect regions are taking additional measures, by changing their procurement practices, to ensure the legality of their raw material, which is adding to their cost structure. The results also indicate that smaller companies, given their flexibility with raw material procurement, were less likely to experience a post-LAA cost increase relative to their larger counterparts.</description><subject>commerce entre les États-Unis et la Chine</subject><subject>commerce international des produits du bois</subject><subject>environmental legislation</subject><subject>Exports</subject><subject>Finance</subject><subject>Forest products industry</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Importers</subject><subject>Lacey Act</subject><subject>Law</subject><subject>Laws, regulations and rules</subject><subject>Loi Lacey</subject><subject>Lumber</subject><subject>législation environnementale</subject><subject>législation sur le commerce international</subject><subject>modèle où la variable aléatoire égale zéro</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>trade legislation</subject><subject>US–China trade</subject><subject>Wood products</subject><subject>wood products’ trade</subject><subject>zero-inflated model</subject><issn>0045-5067</issn><issn>1208-6037</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqVkt-K1DAUxosoOK7eeh30youuJ23Tdi6HQd2FQcE_1yFzetpmaJNukll2vPI19iF8KZ_E1F3RgQGREEJOft93wuFLkucczjnPl69x17o0Ay5S4GX-IFnwDOq0hLx6mCwACpEKKKvHyRPvdwCQlzksku8rhipQZ51GNbDRNjRo0zE1Tc4q7FmwTBk1HL7O1dAT0-OkMHhm21_XjUI6sBUGlgHUTI1kmrgDs4ate23IE0MbNUaT__HtltHNZF2INR-ic_Pbc4j9g7bGz8JY0455u3c4t91Sr661df5p8qhVg6dn9-dZ8uXtm8_ri3Tz4d3lerVJURTLkCrkyFXREFRlVmVbqHOhGp41UFR8K4qmEjWBqLHgohAt1FgvaduI-L6M48rys-TlnW8cwtWefJC7-Jc4Bi95lZfLLIqLP1SnBpLatDY4haP2KFdFHp2LHESk0hNUR4acGqyhVsfyEf_iBI-TvpJ_Q-cnoLgaGjWedH11JIhMoJvQqb338vLTx_9g3x-z9x9BZ7131MrJ6VG5g-Qg51jKOZZyjqWcYxkF_E5gHLoYDuWw_5fmJ44547c</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Lu, Ziyi</creator><creator>Ganguly, Indroneil</creator><creator>Eastin, Ivan</creator><general>NRC Research Press</general><general>Canadian Science Publishing NRC Research Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>ISR</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>U9A</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>A categorical modeling approach to analyzing the impacts of the Lacey Act 2008 amendment on Chinese companies’ export cost and the implications on their sourcing behaviors</title><author>Lu, Ziyi ; Ganguly, Indroneil ; Eastin, Ivan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c549t-ac1c1a4de076272b0835ad12d0471b54d758e058c41545f08c89ebd5d04903723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>commerce entre les États-Unis et la Chine</topic><topic>commerce international des produits du bois</topic><topic>environmental legislation</topic><topic>Exports</topic><topic>Finance</topic><topic>Forest products industry</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Importers</topic><topic>Lacey Act</topic><topic>Law</topic><topic>Laws, regulations and rules</topic><topic>Loi Lacey</topic><topic>Lumber</topic><topic>législation environnementale</topic><topic>législation sur le commerce international</topic><topic>modèle où la variable aléatoire égale zéro</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>trade legislation</topic><topic>US–China trade</topic><topic>Wood products</topic><topic>wood products’ trade</topic><topic>zero-inflated model</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Ziyi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganguly, Indroneil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eastin, Ivan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Science</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Ziyi</au><au>Ganguly, Indroneil</au><au>Eastin, Ivan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A categorical modeling approach to analyzing the impacts of the Lacey Act 2008 amendment on Chinese companies’ export cost and the implications on their sourcing behaviors</atitle><jtitle>Canadian journal of forest research</jtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>1806</spage><epage>1815</epage><pages>1806-1815</pages><issn>0045-5067</issn><eissn>1208-6037</eissn><coden>CJFRAR</coden><abstract>The United States (US) Lacey Act 2008 amendment (LAA) is a timber legality regulation that requires US importers to monitor and minimize the risk of illegally harvested wood products within their supply chains. This paper empirically examines the effect of the LAA on Chinese companies’ export costs to the US. The study uses 138 responses from two surveys in Shanghai, China, in 2013, i.e., 5 years after the LAA was implemented. Given the high proportion of zero export increase indicated by the Chinese companies, a zero-inflated ordered probit model was used to model Chinese companies’ export cost increases to the US. The research results demonstrate that pre-LAA raw material sourcing patterns are primary indicators of the respondents’ export cost increase to the US as a result of the LAA. From the results, it can be inferred that log and lumber importers from suspect regions are taking additional measures, by changing their procurement practices, to ensure the legality of their raw material, which is adding to their cost structure. The results also indicate that smaller companies, given their flexibility with raw material procurement, were less likely to experience a post-LAA cost increase relative to their larger counterparts.</abstract><cop>Ottawa</cop><pub>NRC Research Press</pub><doi>10.1139/cjfr-2015-0163</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0045-5067 |
ispartof | Canadian journal of forest research, 2015-12, Vol.45 (12), p.1806-1815 |
issn | 0045-5067 1208-6037 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_gale_infotracmisc_A435454305 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | commerce entre les États-Unis et la Chine commerce international des produits du bois environmental legislation Exports Finance Forest products industry Impact analysis Importers Lacey Act Law Laws, regulations and rules Loi Lacey Lumber législation environnementale législation sur le commerce international modèle où la variable aléatoire égale zéro Risk reduction Timber trade legislation US–China trade Wood products wood products’ trade zero-inflated model |
title | A categorical modeling approach to analyzing the impacts of the Lacey Act 2008 amendment on Chinese companies’ export cost and the implications on their sourcing behaviors |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T07%3A54%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_nrcre&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20categorical%20modeling%20approach%20to%20analyzing%20the%20impacts%20of%20the%20Lacey%20Act%202008%20amendment%20on%20Chinese%20companies%E2%80%99%20export%20cost%20and%20the%20implications%20on%20their%20sourcing%20behaviors&rft.jtitle=Canadian%20journal%20of%20forest%20research&rft.au=Lu,%20Ziyi&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=1806&rft.epage=1815&rft.pages=1806-1815&rft.issn=0045-5067&rft.eissn=1208-6037&rft.coden=CJFRAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1139/cjfr-2015-0163&rft_dat=%3Cgale_nrcre%3EA435454305%3C/gale_nrcre%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1736920584&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A435454305&rfr_iscdi=true |